>SHYLOCK is probably the most famous Jew in all of English literature.
He was The moneylender of Venice.
Nothing to do with Englishmen.
> But, remarkably enough, Shakespeare, his creator, never even met a Jew -
ever.
How do you know?
>(Of course, if it's true that Shakespeare was really Sir Francis Bacon writing
>under a pseudonym, as some scholars suggest, Jews would assuredly have had
>nothing to do with him for obvious reasons!)
They're bigoted against pigs.
>England, as we've already noted,
>expelled all of its Jews in 1290.
And if they repeated the process England
would be the better for it.
> It would take almost 400 years, until 1656, that the Jews would finally be
allowed to return, during the time of Oliver
>Cromwell. The people who were portrayed in the most unflattering manner on the
Elizabethan stage would have to
>struggle to gain acceptance and fight mightily- sometimes even with their
fists, as well will discover - in order to gain
>equal rights.
>English Jewry lagged behind French and German Jews as well as others
>who had an early "continental breakfast" of equality. But as a result of
>their great contributions to English society and the role they played in
British
>culture, the Shylocks of
>Shakespeare eventually became the Rothschilds, the
>Disrealis, the Montefiores, and the Lords.
From despised usurers to obscene wealth in one easy lesson.
>YOU CAN GO HOME AGAIN
> England proved that Thomas Wolfe was wrong: Sometimes you can go home again.
>In the thirteenth century, Jews were expelled from English shores and
>condemed
>as blood-sucking moneylenders.
And of course we all know that they were no such thing:)
>and blood-drinking ritual murderers.
Little St. Hugh is remembered fondly by
the good people of Lincoln.
> But England changed its mind in the seventeenth century for the most
incredible of reasons.
>The Jews had to come back to that Messiah would come! The reasoning was the
>remarkable brainchild of a prominent rabbi in Amsterdam, Menasseh Ben Israel.
These jews certainly come up with some strange ideas don't they? From
some Amsterdam Rabbi to the Red Rabbi of Montreal whose raision d'etre
was to inform the world that "black and whites must intermarry in order to
destroy racism". Natch he married one of his own.
> The rabbi was such an impressive figure that Rembrandt's famous
>portrait of him makes him the only rabbi I know with a multimillion-dollar
>face.
It would be worth a lot more if he had had a nose job before his portrait was
painted.
>Obviously, his gift for persuasion was equally great because he convinced
>Oliver Cromwell that England, with its exclusionary policy towards Jews, was
>delaying the "final coming of Messiah," based on a verse in the Book of
>Daniel. The Biblical prophesy was that the
>Jews had to be scattered "from one end of the earth to the other before the
redemption could be realized." As long as
>there were placed where Jews were not allowed to live, the prophecy could not
>be fulfilled."
Somebody forget to tell the Germans
and Austrians.
>But Being allowed to live in England wasn't the same as being granted equal
>rights. With extraordinary skill, some Jews acquired great wealth.
You mean "extradordinary cunning".
>There were
>financiers like ISAAC GOLDSMID, NATHAN ROTHSCHILD, DAVID SALOMONS, and MOSES
>MONTEFIORE, WHOSE FORTUNES HELPED ENGLAND BECOME AN EMPIRE,
Translated - they financed wars and revolutions in order to obtain even more
wealth than they already had. Not one of them had the guts to fight in said
wars
and they couldn't have cared less how many British soldiers died so that Nathan
Rothschild could become the richest man in the world.
but whose faith
>prevented them from being given
>he power of a voice in Parliament.
>When the bill "For the Repeal of the Civil Disabilities of the Jew" came up
for a
>vote, Lord Macaulay fought for the bill's passage. He put it bluntly, saying,
"How
>is it possible to deny a ROTHSCHILD a seat, on the grounds of his race, when
hi
>signature on the bacl of a piece of paper is worth more than the royal word
>of three kings!"
Quiet. Apparently being "persecuted"
has never managed to interfere with their
money grubbing and aquisition of wealth.
>But the House of Lords threw the bill out. As late as the
>mid-ninteenth century, Jews knew that even if they were ever elected to any
>office they would not be able to serve because of the Oath of Allegiance they
>would be required to take "on the
>truth faith of Christian."
>Lionel Rothschild
>continued to run for office, be elected, and yet was unable to take his seat
>in the House of Commons for more
>than ten years because he refused to take the oath and deny his heritage. It
wasn't until 1858 that a ROTHSCHILD could finally serve in Parliament "on the
true faith of a believing Jew."
>Religious bigotry, however, wasn't based on race - as it would be a century
>later in Nazi Germany. Jews could escape the restrictions placed on them if
>they were ready to sacrifice allegiance to their heritage. No better example
>of
>this was BENJAMIN DISRAELI
And Nostradamus and Edith Stein etc. etc. etc.
>(1804-1881) who was baptized at age twelve into the
>Church of England by his novelist father in order to improve his chances for
>success.
His father had a row with the local Rabbi.
*That* was the reason the while family converted.
snip Queen Victoria'a puzzlement with the yid Disraeli.
>As improbable as it sounds, MOSES
>MONTEFIORE (1784-1885) was not only Sheriff of London, but also became the
>personal financial advisor to Queen Victoria.
Why is it all these bloody jews are "financial advisors" to some Head of State
or another? The court jew always seems to be at the ready where money is
concerned.
He had led the way for the
>industrial development of Great Britain and was responsible for illuminating
>London's streets by his Imperial Continental Gas Association,
I didn't think he worked in a coal mine.
>bringing a new
>twist to the ideal of Isaiah that the Jews become "a light unto the nations."
Did Isaiah ever meet Marx, Engels, Trotsky, Kurovsky, Rosa Luxemburg and Ethel
and Jules Rosenberg? The only nation that benefited from their "enlightenment
was Russia" and that, at the expense of millions of innocent dead.
>He founded the PROVINICIAL BANK OF IRELAND and a number of other leading
>banking institutions.
Well, he would, wouldn't he.
> His greatest talent, however, was not in knowing how to
>make money, but how to spend it wisely. His philanthropy reached every corner
>of the world, and it's hard to find placed that weren't bestowed with his
>charitable gifts.
Naturally:) I am sure every left-wing
organisation on the planet benefited. Had he been around in 1917 he could have
done what another billionaire jew did,
finance Trotsky's (Bronstein) Red Army.
>For his contributions, he was the first Jew even to be knighted by the Queen.
Now they are getting honours on a daily basis. Even the porn king Saatchi
sits in The House of Lords, laughable as it may seem.
>BOXING WITH BRAINS: THE JEWISH CONTRIBUTION
>Not every Jew had the talent of MONTEFIORE, the brilliance of DISRAELI, or the
riches of ROTHSCHILD. In an England where Jew-hatred had a long history,
survival in the streets often meant having to prove yourself with your fists
>when attacked by anti-Semites. And if you still think that nice Jewish boys
>don't know how to fight,
They don't.
you'll be amazed to learn that the father of modern
>scientific boxing is DANIEL MENDOZA (1764-1836), an East End Jew who fought
>under the professional name of
>"Star of Israel."
He also happens to be the great great grandfather of the actor Peter Sellers.
> Mendoza was able to beat
>opponents who were much bigger and stronger because he invented a new style
>of defense, a technique called "side-stepping."
They're good at *that*.
> Jews had been trying to avoid
>punches for centuries.
Along with serving in the millitary of any country unfortunate enough to be
infested with them.
>. Mendoza adapted this cultural trait and turned it into a
>boxing technique. Some purists who thought boxing was all punches and no
>tactics criticized Mendoza for this "cowardly" kind of fighting.
And they were right.
> In 1965, Daniel Mendoza was one of the inaugural
>groups chosen for the Boxing Hall of Fame in the United Staes as a "father of
>modern boxing." Of all the Jewish contributions to modern culture, that one
>must have been the most unlikely!
You can say that again ! When it comes to personal danger of any kind, they
run like rats.
"I became a boxer because I wanted to show people that jews aren't cowards".
Maxie Rosenbloom
He failed.
>>England, as we've already noted,
>>expelled all of its Jews in 1290.
>
>And if they repeated the process England
>would be the better for it.
>> The rabbi was such an impressive figure that Rembrandt's famous
>>portrait of him makes him the only rabbi I know with a multimillion-dollar
>>face.
>
>It would be worth a lot more if he had had a nose job before his portrait was
>painted.
>
>How
>>is it possible to deny a ROTHSCHILD a seat, on the grounds of his race, when
>hi
>>signature on the bacl of a piece of paper is worth more than the royal word
>>of three kings!"
>
>Quiet. Apparently being "persecuted"
>has never managed to interfere with their
>money grubbing and aquisition of wealth.
>
>>As improbable as it sounds, MOSES
>>MONTEFIORE (1784-1885) was not only Sheriff of London, but also became the
>>personal financial advisor to Queen Victoria.
>
>Why is it all these bloody jews are "financial advisors" to some Head of
>State
>or another? The court jew always seems to be at the ready where money is
>concerned.
>> Jews had been trying to avoid
>>punches for centuries.
>
>Along with serving in the millitary of any country unfortunate enough to be
>infested with them.
"HELL, PARTY OF ONE." eheh Are you vying for a seat next to HITLER in HELL!?
Keep up the splendid work, because that's precisely where you are heading!!
You're not too much of a jealous anti-Semitic goy, eh!?