Online photo hosting w/ sales
Richard H.
sites - not like pbase, but sites catering to professionals who want to
sell photos online. I.e., they host & handle fulfillment, you get paid.
(No luck narrowing the Google search.)
I'd like to find a reliable site that charges a reasonable printing &
processing fee. I'm not looking for a premium service (these are sports
photos, not portraits), just a site that will do a good job of hosting
and order fulfillment.
Have you got any favorites? What makes them great?
Thanks,
Richard
John McWilliams
unbeatable, at least since I last shopped around before choosing them 19
months ago.
Incidentally, I am also on offer from them to get some kinds of
remuneration for introducing others, and to offer something for anyone
signing up using my account introduction. So, if you or anyone else here
for that matter, decide on using them, and wouldn't mind, please contact
me by email at
jpmcw[at]mac.com
just prior to signing up and I'll send you the details of what their
bonus to you would be. It feels odd to be writing this, but there it is.
--
John McWilliams
Richard H.
> I prefer Printroom.com. Good products, good service, generally
> unbeatable, at least since I last shopped around before choosing them 19
> months ago.
>
> Incidentally, I am also on offer from them to get some kinds of
> remuneration for introducing others, and to offer something for anyone
> signing up using my account introduction. So, if you or anyone else here
> for that matter, decide on using them, and wouldn't mind, please contact
> me by email at
> jpmcw[at]mac.com
>
> just prior to signing up and I'll send you the details of what their
> bonus to you would be. It feels odd to be writing this, but there it is.
Hi, John.
Thanks a bunch for the reference. I've seen the customer side of
printroom, and I'm glad to hear the experience has been positive.
Yes, it makes sense for you to benefit from the referral. I've sent you
a note offline for details.
Thanks,
Richard
Unspam
I see they take a hefty 16% of your hard earned too.
Richard H.
>>I prefer Printroom.com. Good products, good service, generally
>>unbeatable, at least since I last shopped around before choosing them 19
>>months ago.
>
Given the turnkey service, I can swallow the transaction fees (plus
per-print cost and annual membership). Their per-print fees are high,
but seem on-par with services like mpix.
What I'm choking on is printroom's one-time storage fee of $100/GB -
that works out to ~$0.50 per image, which adds up fast. For the other
fees they charge, I'd expect storage to cost more like $1-2/GB.
It seems a bit unreasonable to charge fairly high prices per print, and
an annual fee, and a transaction fee, and a premium storage fee. But,
perhaps current supply & demand allows for it.
Who's out there besides Printroom? (What search words will narrow the
results to just these guys?) There's a flood of photo hosting and/or
printing shops, but without pro sales & fulfillment.
Alan Browne
collection. Not sure if the service is still offered.
--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
Frank ess
I haven't tried it, but FotoTime has a sell-for-you service. You set
the price, they collect it, subtract the usual printing and postage
costs, and send you the remainder in $25.00 increments, I think I
remember.
FotoTime is like $2.00 per month for each 10GB, payable yearly in
advance, 30-day free trial.
I have seven thousand images there, have experience essentially no
downtime, and the technical service is rapid and competent.
http://www.fototime.com/inv/7FB3CB20960048D
--
Frank ess
Frank ess
Sorry, it's 1 (one) Gig per $2.00 monthly.
Here's the answer page for "Can I sell my photos through FotoTime?":
http://www.fototime.com/pages/ftsellerhowto
--
Frank ess
John McWilliams
There's Shutterfly which has a Pro section.
But as to storage fees, I have about 13 Gigs of photos in my folder on
my desktop, which are linked to the thumbnails stored at Printroom; it's
the thumbnails' size which are counted against their storage, and so I
haven't incurred any storage fees, and some of my thumbnails are
customized, and at max. size.
--
John McWilliams
JC Dill
>I'm looking for suggestions / experiences with online photo hosting
>sites - not like pbase, but sites catering to professionals who want to
>sell photos online. I.e., they host & handle fulfillment, you get paid.
I have experience with 3 sites: Smugmug, ExposureManager, and
Printroom.
I started with Smugmug. I love many things about Smugmug. The look
and feel is great, it's easy to use (for the features they offer, more
on that later), they do some neat things like automatically determine
if the visitor would probably prefer a larger page of thumbnails
(large browser size, fast network connection) and give them a page
with more thumbnails per page, etc. Smugmug is a family operation
with a real commitment to customer service but they aren't "family" in
a way that is unprofessional. Quite the contrary, they have extensive
internet business experience (Chris MacAskill was a founder and the
CEO of Fatbrain.com) and they are putting that experience together
with their experience and passion for photography. See:
<http://www.smugmug.com/aboutus/aboutus.mg>
Smugmug offers unlimited space for uploading your photos. No, really,
it IS unlimited.
<http://www.digitalmediathoughts.com/index.php?action=expand,9710>
Smugmug uses EZPrints for print order fulfillment. During the time I
was using Smugmug I was happy with EZPrints (more on this later).
Smugmug is really really good at what they do, but ultimately they
didn't offer some specific features and services I need due to my
specific type of photography (event photography). I need to be able
to upload proofs and then later upload print ready images only when an
item has been ordered. When I used Smugmug for my event photo sales I
spent days and days making every image "print ready" before I uploaded
my galleries, which wasted a lot of time since no one buys all the
photos offered. I still have a Smugmug account:
<http://equinephotoart.smugmug.com/>
but I downgraded my account from the "pro sales" level to the "power
user" level, and I no longer do professional sales from that site. If
you find that Smugmug meets your needs and wanted to give me referral
credit when you sign-up, you can email me for my referral code. Also,
the folks at Smugmug were very nice when one of my friends signed up
and then told me about it, Smugmug gave me the referral credit after
the fact. I had enough referrals from talking about Smugmug to my
friends and associates in the first year that the referral credits
paid for my second year's hosting.
When I realized that the Smugmug workflow wasn't working for my event
sales, I went looking for a site that better met my needs. This is
when I discovered Printroom. My experience with pre-sales questions
and answers (or more correctly snippy incomplete answers and then
email that was not replied to at all) resulted in my deciding to never
do business with Printroom. Others have had better luck, but for me
their lack of customer service was enough for me to decide to take my
money and business elsewhere.
That led me to ExposureManager. I *really* like EM for event
photography. See my horse show gallery page for examples:
<http://equinephotoart.exposuremanager.com/g/shows>
EM is perfect for my event photo sales because I can upload proofs and
then process and upload print-ready images after I get print orders
for specific images. I have been 150% happy with their excellent
customer service as well. I find the fees I pay are quite low
considering how much of the "work" of my business is now automated by
using their services. I don't have to manually create photo
galleries, I don't have to take/process payments, I don't have to
print and mail photos. After I have finished taking the photos all I
have to do are 3 things that I can't (easily) outsource: Upload
proofs, prepare and upload print-ready files when an order has been
received, and deposit the check they send me each month. The only
thing they could do to make my life easier would be to offer
autodeposit on the payment. :-)
EM was using EZPrints when I first signed-up. Over time I became
unhappy with EZPrints - they lost some orders, they wouldn't stamp
"Photos, do not bend" on shipments (leading customers to blame me
rather than the post office if the order arrived folded). etc.
Recently EM changed to a new lab:
<http://blog.exposuremanager.com/2006/06/switching_labs.html>
So far I've been delighted with the prints and the shipping from the
new lab.
EM offers 2 levels of accounts, one for Art sales (with 1GB of image
storage and 5 GB of bandwidth per month) and one for Event sales (with
unlimited storage and 20 GB of bandwidth per month). If you find that
EM meets your needs and wanted to give me referral credit when you
sign-up, please hit my referral URL to let it set a cookie (if you
don't mind) at some point before signing up:
<http://www.exposuremanager.com/aff/equinephotoart>
I hope you find this info useful as you figure out which of the many
photo hosting sites will best meet your particular needs!
jc
--
"The nice thing about a mare is you get to ride a lot
of different horses without having to own that many."
~ Eileen Morgan of The Mare's Nest, PA
RAH
"Richard H." <rh...@no.spam> wrote in message
news:MA%Mg.10806$c07.1903@fed1read04...
DawnA...@gmail.com
getting better. Started as a basic user, now I subscribe to the pro
service. I also have a huge love for photoworks.com, of all the places
I have ever had prints made, no one has done a better job.
NOTv...@queensbridge.us
JC Dill wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:37:48 -0700, "Richard H." <rh...@no.spam> wrote:
>
> >I'm looking for suggestions / experiences with online photo hosting
> >sites - not like pbase, but sites catering to professionals who want to
> >sell photos online. I.e., they host & handle fulfillment, you get paid.
>
> I have experience with 3 sites: Smugmug, ExposureManager, and
> Printroom.
>
Thank you for a very good comparison of the three.
However re proofs, I don't understand the problem with uploading proofs
to SmugMug and later the edited pic.
I use SmugMug but don't like the fact that this year they started to
strip my domain masking. I have several actors portfolios on SmugMug,
each has its own domain name which I had masked. Now the actors domain
no longer shows when the SmugMug pix load up. Of course the text I
posted on SmugMug which each portfolio still shows.
NOTv...@queensbridge.us
JC Dill wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:37:48 -0700, "Richard H." <rh...@no.spam> wrote:
>
> >I'm looking for suggestions / experiences with online photo hosting
> >sites - not like pbase, but sites catering to professionals who want to
> >sell photos online. I.e., they host & handle fulfillment, you get paid.
>
> I have experience with 3 sites: Smugmug, ExposureManager, and
> Printroom.
>
Thank you for a very good comparison of the three.
JC Dill
>
>JC Dill wrote:
>> On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:37:48 -0700, "Richard H." <rh...@no.spam> wrote:
>>
>> >I'm looking for suggestions / experiences with online photo hosting
>> >sites - not like pbase, but sites catering to professionals who want to
>> >sell photos online. I.e., they host & handle fulfillment, you get paid.
>>
>> I have experience with 3 sites: Smugmug, ExposureManager, and
>> Printroom.
>>
>Thank you for a very good comparison of the three.
>
>However re proofs, I don't understand the problem with uploading proofs
>to SmugMug and later the edited pic.
Unless they have made recent changes that I don't know about, Smugmug
uses the photo you upload to process the print order automagically.
You don't have any chance to upload an edited pic after the print is
ordered. The only way to "later upload an edited pic" would be to
mark the originals as not available for purchase, then edit and upload
replacements, and then mark the replaced images as available for
purchase. I don't know about your photo volume and workflow, but that
wouldn't work for me at all.
>I use SmugMug but don't like the fact that this year they started to
>strip my domain masking.
Have you asked them about this? You might want to post on dgrin and
see if there's a workaround.
Richard H.
> However re proofs, I don't understand the problem with uploading proofs
> to SmugMug and later the edited pic.
The issue is uploading proofs for preview (reduced images of the
unedited photos), but fetching the high-res version from the owner when
a print is ordered. This is honestly an issue I hadn't considered at
the outset, but it would hugely reduce the effort to prep pics that
nobody wants, and it reduces the online storage requirement to a small
fraction.
> I use SmugMug but don't like the fact that this year they started to
> strip my domain masking.
This concerned me, but on another posting here the masking is clearly
working: http://photo.higginsoft.com/
Do you subscribe at a basic level, that they would have disabled this on
you and not his?
Thanks,
Richard
Richard H.
> I haven't tried it, but FotoTime has a sell-for-you service.
>
> downtime, and the technical service is rapid and competent.
Hi, Frank.
Thanks for the info. I've finally got the time to compare these
recommendations side-by-side. It's just an impression, but fototime
doesn't seem to have a strong emphasis on pro sales (more photo sharing,
it seems). Do you agree?
What does it cost you to host those 7,000 images annually, and what
resolution are you storing? Unless they offer the option to upload
proofs like the others, $24/yr per 1GB is going to cost a fortune for
hosting event photos. Do you know if they support uploding high-res
after an order is placed?
Thanks,
Richard
Paul Rubin
> What does it cost you to host those 7,000 images annually, and what
> resolution are you storing? Unless they offer the option to upload
> proofs like the others, $24/yr per 1GB is going to cost a fortune for
> hosting event photos. Do you know if they support uploding high-res
> after an order is placed?
I think he said $2/month per 10GB, not per 1GB.
A "fine"-quality 5MP jpeg takes about 1.5MB so 7000 of them would be
10.5GB. For 16MP shots (EOS-1DS mk II) maybe that goes up to 40 GB,
around $100 a year, still not bad if print sales are generating any
serious amount of revenue.
Frank ess
> "Richard H." <rh...@no.spam> writes:
>> What does it cost you to host those 7,000 images annually, and what
>> resolution are you storing? Unless they offer the option to upload
>> proofs like the others, $24/yr per 1GB is going to cost a fortune
>> for
>> hosting event photos. Do you know if they support uploding
>> high-res
>> after an order is placed?
>
> I think he said $2/month per 10GB, not per 1GB.
>
I corrected my mis-type; it's 1 (one) GB.
I store for-web-link images, mostly. They tell me the average file
size is 79.14 KB, but that includes a few large-for-print files and
some video. If the projections Paul made (below) are in the ballpark,
It might not be an appropriate venue.
My (very low-volume) way of doing it has been to load un-processed but
re-sized images for proofs purposes, with instructions to contact me
with selections. When I know which are the desired ones I process and
upload print-ready versions to a separate 'album', where prints can be
ordered or the image downloaded, depending on prior arrangements.
Not really conducive to the kind of work flow you describe.
> A "fine"-quality 5MP jpeg takes about 1.5MB so 7000 of them would be
> 10.5GB. For 16MP shots (EOS-1DS mk II) maybe that goes up to 40 GB,
> around $100 a year, still not bad if print sales are generating any
> serious amount of revenue.
Paul:
The few contacts I've had with the folks that run FotoTime have been
pleasant and productive; I wouldn't be surprised if they'd be willing
to make a better offer for the kind of volume Richard is
contemplating, and even adjust their capabilities to his needs.
--
Frank ess
NOTv...@queensbridge.us
Richard H. wrote:
> > I use SmugMug but don't like the fact that this year they started to
> > strip my domain masking.
>
> This concerned me, but on another posting here the masking is clearly
> working: http://photo.higginsoft.com/
>
> Do you subscribe at a basic level, that they would have disabled this on
> you and not his?
>
Yes I pay the basic level.
When I mentioned it to them, they told me that masking was for Pro
Level.
It was OK for at least one year, before they downgraded basic level.
Richard H.
> My (very low-volume) way of doing it has been to load un-processed but
> re-sized images for proofs purposes, with instructions to contact me
> with selections. When I know which are the desired ones I process and
> upload print-ready versions to a separate 'album', where prints can be
> ordered or the image downloaded, depending on prior arrangements.
>
> Not really conducive to the kind of work flow you describe.
Hi, Frank.
:-) Yep. As example, the last event turned out 450 passable pics, for
a total of 2GB in high-res JPEG. (Yes, compression could bring this
down a bit.) Although I culled 80% of these from my personal
collection, they were still good shots that might be interesting to the
subjects / saleable.
Admittedly, I'm adjusting the requirements as I learn more about the
services. The responses here enlightened me to the benefits of
uplaoding just proofs and deferring the edits until an order is placed -
a lot less work up-front, and less storage cost too. And it captures
the sale on impulse, rather than requiring a return visit from them.
So far, it seems like printroom.com and exposuremanager.com are the two
offering this feature, so I'm looking deeper into them. (It seems
really odd that MPIX.com doesn't offer a pro sales service - they've got
90% of it there already.)
Thanks for the info!
Cheers,
Richard
Richard H.
> That led me to ExposureManager. I *really* like EM for event
> photography. See my horse show gallery page for examples:
>
> <http://equinephotoart.exposuremanager.com/g/shows>
JC,
EM is looking pretty good, especially for events.
I like the domain masking support, the display-only (proofs) capability,
the ability to flag the same photo to fulfill differently by format
(e.g., different file uploads possible per print format; or print using
the uploaded med-res for 4x6, while queuing for the high-res file for
larger formats).
The comparison chart is pretty handy, though subject to verifying:
http://www.exposuremanager.com/scripts/website.pl?rm=compare
Their "self fulfillment" option is also pretty slick, but they do a
confusing job of presenting it. i.e., "we'll take the order, you
print/ship the order".
I see you offer some items with custom treatment - can you define your
own products, or only select from their lists?
Thanks,
Richard
Richard H.
> That led me to ExposureManager. I *really* like EM for event
> photography. See my horse show gallery page for examples:
>
> <http://equinephotoart.exposuremanager.com/g/shows>
JC,
By the way, why aren't you using the domain mapping feature, a la
http://gallery.equinephotoart.com? Do they charge an extra fee for this
? (It doesn't seem like it from their pre-sales materials.)
JC Dill
>The comparison chart is pretty handy, though subject to verifying:
>http://www.exposuremanager.com/scripts/website.pl?rm=compare
I see that there are changes to that chart from what it displayed when
I first joined, so I think they are doing a pretty good job of keeping
it up to date and accurate. You will also note that they encourage
the visitor to report any inaccuracies.
>Their "self fulfillment" option is also pretty slick, but they do a
>confusing job of presenting it. i.e., "we'll take the order, you
>print/ship the order".
I don't understand what part of that is confusing. They take the
order, they inform you of the order, and you take it from there -
printing and shipping.
>I see you offer some items with custom treatment - can you define your
>own products, or only select from their lists?
They now offer 3 ways you can offer customized products. You can make
product packages from the products they supply, you can have a
questionaire with any product (which allows you to then process the
order following the customer's answers to your questions), and you can
make your own self-fulfillment products be absolutely anything you
want. You can also sell digital downloads. It's a pretty
comprehensive set of product options if you ask me.
JC Dill
I just never bothered. It's one of those things in my roundtuit list.
I want to redesign my website, which would involve re-branding my site
on EM (as well as my site on SM).
The other reason is that I'm not sure if both URLs would continue to
work and I have a lot of customers who have the old URLs. So, when I
do make the change it will be during my business lull in the middle of
winter (after xmas sales).
Richard H.
> The other reason is that I'm not sure if both URLs would continue to
> work and I have a lot of customers who have the old URLs. So, when I
> do make the change it will be during my business lull in the middle of
> winter (after xmas sales).
Yes, the normal and domain masking work simultaneously. I can mail you
an example offline if you'd like. FYI, you need to have the CNAME setup
in DNS before submitting the request to EM.
I decided to signup on a monthly Event plan to give it a try. It seems
really flexible, although quirky - it seems very rich technically, but
the user interface seems like a techie developed it. I'll get it all
figured out eventually. Overall, I'm very impressed sor far - thanks
for the referral.
However, the site seems a bit slow, and I'm on high-speed cable. Is it
normally faster?
Richard H.
> However, the site seems a bit slow, and I'm on high-speed cable. Is it
> normally faster?
FYI, this turned out to be a hiccup in their system. The thumbnail
generator wasn't stipping out all it should, and the thumbnails were
~30K each instead of 1-2K. They've already fixed it.
So far, their support has been extremely responsive.
JC Dill
Their support is what sold me on their service before I signed up.
The difference between ExposureManager's fantastic support both before
and after I signed up for my trial, and the way I was blown off by
Printroom was *very* dramatic.
JC Dill
>Yes, the normal and domain masking work simultaneously. I can mail you
>an example offline if you'd like. FYI, you need to have the CNAME setup
>in DNS before submitting the request to EM.
If you don't mind emailing, I'd like that very much. My posting addy
is valid.
Thanks!