In the last weekend I took this photo:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4415394067/
Thanks for your technical comments about photography.
--
MMYV
http://www.mmyv.com
It looks like a monster asshole.
--
Charles E Hardwidge
>Hello:
>
>In the last weekend I took this photo:
>
>http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4415394067/
>
>Thanks for your technical comments about photography.
One of your better efforts, but next time move around to shoot the
people up close. The building has no interest or distinguishing
features. The girl dancing in the water has interest and the water
fountains make a good background.
You really need to start thinking "Is my subject matter going to be
interesting to other people?" if you continue to link here.
--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
You seem to relate all photographs to normally-concealed body parts.
Your own perverted hangups are really more than we want to know.
They're so crap the mind hungrily looks for *anything* to hang on to. This
guy could make an arboretum look like a pubic hair sandwich. I bet he could
shoot a flower in a lightbox and make it look like a dog poo.
--
Charles E Hardwidge
>"tony cooper" <tony_co...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:q34tp51g43khef2st...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:39:25 GMT, "Charles E Hardwidge"
>> <bo...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>"mmyvusenet" <mmyvu...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
>>>news:807g5...@mid.individual.net...
>>>> Hello:
>>>>
>>>> In the last weekend I took this photo:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mmyv/4415394067/
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your technical comments about photography.
>>>
>>>It looks like a monster asshole.
>>
>> You seem to relate all photographs to normally-concealed body parts.
>> Your own perverted hangups are really more than we want to know.
>
>They're so crap the mind hungrily looks for *anything* to hang on to. This
>guy could make an arboretum look like a pubic hair sandwich. I bet he could
>shoot a flower in a lightbox and make it look like a dog poo.
So says a guy who links to his photograph of a hedge beside a street
and thinks the photo was - what did you proudly call it? - "dynamic"
or something.
It is actually not bad <g>. People for interest, afternoon light, kind
of a nice interplay between things where the red ties them together, not
completely centered.