On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:11:48 -0400, PeterN
<
pete...@nospam.verizon.net> wrote:
>On 4/28/2012 10:41 PM, tony cooper wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 21:42:11 -0400, PeterN
>> <
pete...@nospam.verizon.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/28/2012 6:41 PM, RichA wrote:
>>>> On Apr 28, 12:42 pm, Alan Browne<alan.bro...@FreelunchVideotron.ca>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Last month the Committee asked for suggestions for a new mandate.
>>>>
>>>>> Decay (consider shots of abandoned, or forgotten architecture,
>>>>> engineering, infrastructure, etc.)
>>>>
>>>> No fair! The Americans in the northeast have too much of an advantage
>>>> here. :)
>>>
>>> Posted with your usual actual knowledge.
>>>
>>> Let's see what you contribute
>>
>> Actually, I agree with him. Nine out of ten abandoned architecture
>> subjects down here are foreclosed houses and decaying strip malls.
>>
>>
>
>Do you live in the North East?
Duh.
>Have you seen the re-vitalization? (Some call it "gentrification."
>
>Yes! There are a lot of issues with denigrated inner cities, but that
>issue is not limited to the US North East.
Nor did he say that, Peter. He said they have an advantage. It's
easier for a resident of a "rust belt" state to go out and find a
interesting photographic opportunity that it is for me if the mandate
is architectural decay. An abandoned steel mill is a more interesting
subject than the typical abandoned house in this area.
That doesn't mean that I can't compete in the mandate. I just have to
put more thought, imagination, and searching for sites into it.
I won't complain about whatever mandate is chosen.