Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: The tea party "CONSERVATIVE" anti-abortion, pro-family Tennessee congressman who pushed his patient and mistress to get an abortion also agreed that his wife should have two, according to court transcripts released Thursday

69 views
Skip to first unread message

Bret Cahill

unread,
Nov 16, 2012, 11:33:32 PM11/16/12
to
> The tea party "CONSERVATIVE" anti-abortion, pro-family Tennessee
> congressman who pushed his patient and mistress to get an abortion
> also agreed that his wife should have two, according to court
> transcripts released Thursday
>
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/15/scott-desjarlais-approved_n_...
>
> Michael McAuliff Become a fan
> mike.mcaul...@huffingtonpost.com
>
> Scott DesJarlais Approved Wife's Abortion, Slept With Coworkers,
> Patients, Court Records Say
> Posted: 11/15/2012 6:51 pm EST Updated: 11/16/2012 12:29 am EST
>
> WASHINGTON -- The anti-abortion, pro-family Tennessee congressman who
> pushed his patient and mistress to get an abortion also agreed that
> his wife should have two, according to court transcripts released
> Thursday.
> Those documents, from GOP Rep. Scott DesJarlais' 2000 divorce
> proceedings, paint a lurid picture of a doctor who had multiple
> affairs with coworkers and patients --

The Party of Reagan ain't what it used to be.

Remember the Gipper? That Gipper could really salute the troops!

And the Reagan stein handle economy had the tire biters believing
_they_ were gonna git rich quick with the Gipster.


Tunderbar

unread,
Nov 16, 2012, 11:41:52 PM11/16/12
to
a little off topic......?

Nickname unavailable

unread,
Nov 16, 2012, 11:42:28 PM11/16/12
to
On Nov 16, 10:33 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
have you ever in your life seen so many unbelievable stupid nut
cases? its scary to know they have held power for over three decades,
its amazing we have anything left.

Bret Cahill

unread,
Nov 17, 2012, 12:05:35 AM11/17/12
to
> > > The tea party "CONSERVATIVE" anti-abortion, pro-family Tennessee
> > > congressman who pushed his patient and mistress to get an abortion
> > > also agreed that his wife should have two, according to court
> > > transcripts released Thursday
>
> > >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/15/scott-desjarlais-approved_n_...
>
> > > Michael McAuliff Become a fan
> > > mike.mcaul...@huffingtonpost.com
>
> > > Scott DesJarlais Approved Wife's Abortion, Slept With Coworkers,
> > > Patients, Court Records Say
> > > Posted: 11/15/2012 6:51 pm EST Updated: 11/16/2012 12:29 am EST
>
> > > WASHINGTON -- The anti-abortion, pro-family Tennessee congressman who
> > > pushed his patient and mistress to get an abortion also agreed that
> > > his wife should have two, according to court transcripts released
> > > Thursday.
> > > Those documents, from GOP Rep. Scott DesJarlais' 2000 divorce
> > > proceedings, paint a lurid picture of a doctor who had multiple
> > > affairs with coworkers and patients --
>
> > The Party of Reagan ain't what it used to be.
>
> > Remember the Gipper?  That Gipper could really salute the troops!
>
> > And the Reagan stein handle economy had  the tire biters believing
> > _they_ were gonna git rich quick with the Gipster.
>
>  have you ever in your life seen so many unbelievable stupid nut
> cases?

Tire biters are so frightened they cannot even plan a post.

It's definitely mass insanity based on fear aka, fascism, despotism.

> its scary to know they have held power for over three decades,
> its amazing we have anything left.

The Achilles heel of the despotim is the legacy media. They are
critical for the oligarchy to survive and they are very easy to
discredit.

They are hyper sensitive to being exposed as Jerry Springer shills
which is, of course, what they are.

The legacy media can intimidate politicians into supporting tax cuts
for the rich, censorship of economic information and other nonsense
but they cannot intimidate 250 million individuals.

"Occupy National News Room" while not necessary, would do the trick.


Bret Cahill


BeamMeUpScotty

unread,
Nov 17, 2012, 8:51:45 AM11/17/12
to
Hows that economy doing today, and how many abortions did Liberals
allow, did you get your quota of black baby abortions this year?
There's still time to get there all you need to do is have a Christmas
Special on abortions make it a two for one sale in the inner cities.

--
*Welcome to Socialism*


-Kum bay ya-

Nickname unavailable

unread,
Nov 17, 2012, 11:35:24 AM11/17/12
to
and arizona is turning blue:)))))))


> It's definitely mass insanity based on fear aka, fascism, despotism.
>




did you see the one about "THE CONSERVATIVE" nutcase that blamed the
federal government because he lost his topless car wash? the idiot
does not even know many years ago, the supreme court ruled obscenity
was a local matter. they are even to stupid to know a states right
when they see one. the stupid f**ker belongs to the party of family
values and they closed down his boob company, what a moron.


> > its scary to know they have held power for over three decades,
> > its amazing we have anything left.
>
> The Achilles heel of the despotim is the legacy media.  They are
> critical for the oligarchy to survive and they are very easy to
> discredit.
>



you are so correct. tens of millions are reading real news. there are
so many web sites exposing "THE CONSERVATIVE" cranks right now, and
almost none of it is on the legacy media.


> They are hyper sensitive to being exposed as Jerry Springer shills
> which is, of course, what they are.
>


yep. a democratic senator just introduced a bill into the senate that
will lift the cap on earnings for social security. the article on the
h.p. clearly spells out why, and clearly spells out the s.s. is not
going bankrupt, it is self funded, has nothing to do with the deficit,
and clearly spells out that just lifting the cap will do the trick. i
wonder how many outlets of the legacy media had a story about it, if
they did at all, there will either be no mention how easy it is to
fix, or saying he is plain wrong.


> The legacy media can intimidate politicians into supporting tax cuts
> for the rich, censorship of economic information and other nonsense
> but they cannot intimidate 250 million individuals.
>


yet, all thru out history, "THE CONSERVATIVES" try and fail.


> "Occupy National News Room" while not necessary, would do the trick.
>


yea, good idea.


> Bret Cahill

Bret Cahill

unread,
Nov 17, 2012, 12:44:46 PM11/17/12
to
But, hey, we're getting 24/7 saturation gush hyped coverage about a
general having sex!

That's where www.gushhype.com could play a useful role. Every media
shill who gush hypes private matters of any political person gets
exposed.

> > The legacy media can intimidate politicians into supporting tax cuts
> > for the rich, censorship of economic information and other nonsense
> > but they cannot intimidate 250 million individuals.

>  yet, all thru out history, "THE CONSERVATIVES" try and fail.

Right now some in the legacy media who have spent decades cultivating
an image of being "liberal" or a "pro Democrat" are wondering how long
they can keep up their "deals" with the 0.01% confidential.

The stats guys at Princeton made a complete mockery of their "it's a
horse race" nonsense. It won't be too long before _all_ their other
scams are exposed.

When they are finally exposed that's it. There will not be any
comeback.

_Ever_.

Some are openly wondering how long it will be before the info age
uncovers all their hypocritical sordid "deals" with the 0.01%.

> > "Occupy National News Room" while not necessary, would do the trick.
>
>  yea, good idea.

The best idea is to first read _Democracy In America_. Then you can
really see the historical - political revisionism going on at the _New
York Times_.

Political activism is much easier, much more mechanical than what many
have been led to believe.

Tocqueville gives out all these "secrets" once common knowledge in
America and the only thing saving the oligarchy is the hope no one
reads T.


Bret Cahill


Nickname unavailable

unread,
Nov 18, 2012, 12:39:13 PM11/18/12
to
a real headline grabber, to bad people are to preoccupied with just
trying to survive.


> That's wherewww.gushhype.comcould play a useful role.  Every media
> shill who gush hypes private matters of any political person gets
> exposed.
>



good idea.

> > > The legacy media can intimidate politicians into supporting tax cuts
> > > for the rich, censorship of economic information and other nonsense
> > > but they cannot intimidate 250 million individuals.
> >  yet, all thru out history, "THE CONSERVATIVES" try and fail.
>
> Right now some in the legacy media who have spent decades cultivating
> an image of being "liberal" or a "pro Democrat" are wondering how long
> they can keep up their "deals" with the 0.01% confidential.
>


yea, there are web sites popping up exposing the shills. i have used
them a couple of times now.


> The stats guys at Princeton made a complete mockery of their "it's a
> horse race" nonsense.  It won't be too long before _all_ their other
> scams are exposed.
>
> When they are finally exposed that's it.  There will not be any
> comeback.
>
> _Ever_.
>


we shall see. we are destined to repeat the mistakes of the past.
some sociopath out their is cunning enough, so you never know.


> Some are openly wondering how long it will be before the info age
> uncovers all their hypocritical sordid "deals" with the 0.01%.
>



oh goody, i hope i am still here:))))


> > > "Occupy National News Room" while not necessary, would do the trick.
>
> >  yea, good idea.
>
> The best idea is to first read _Democracy In America_.  Then you can
> really see the historical - political revisionism going on at the _New
> York Times_.
>
> Political activism is much easier, much more mechanical than what many
> have been led to believe.
>
> Tocqueville gives out all these "secrets" once common knowledge in
> America and the only thing saving the oligarchy is the hope no one
> reads T.
>



lets hope the workers at walmart are reading this.


> Bret Cahill

Transition Zone

unread,
Nov 18, 2012, 1:49:10 PM11/18/12
to
"[Re[] Scott DesJarlais, R-Jasper [TN], whose district includes the
Kingston plant, voted to undermine EPA's regulatory authority. The
vote coincided with the end of testimony in a civil trial in federal
court over the Kingston ash spill."
-- http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2011/oct/20/house-vote-to-strip-the-epa-of-authority-over/


On Nov 16, 11:33 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
>> The tea party "CONSERVATIVE" anti-abortion, pro-family Tennessee
> > congressman who pushed his patient and mistress to get an abortion
> > also agreed that his wife should have two, according to court
> >transcripts released Thursday
>
>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/15/scott-desjarlais-approved_n_...
>
> > Michael McAuliff Become a fan
> > mike.mcaul...@huffingtonpost.com
>
> >Scott DesJarlais Approved Wife's Abortion, Slept With Coworkers,
> > Patients, Court Records Say
> > Posted: 11/15/2012 6:51 pm EST Updated: 11/16/2012 12:29 am EST
>
> > WASHINGTON -- The anti-abortion, pro-family Tennessee congressman who
> > pushed his patient and mistress to get an abortion also agreed that
> > his wife should have two, according to court transcripts released
> > Thursday.
> > Those documents, from GOP Rep. Scott DesJarlais' 2000 divorce
> > proceedings, paint a lurid picture of a doctor who had multiple
> > affairs with coworkers and patients --
>
> The Party of Reagan ain't what it used to be.

Reagan and Dole had affairs on previous wives with their later wives.
So, yes. This is still the Good Old Party.
(as the Republican National Committee says it is on their website)

Bret Cahill

unread,
Nov 18, 2012, 1:51:12 PM11/18/12
to
> > That's wherewww.gushhype.comcouldplay a useful role.  Every media
> > shill who gush hypes private matters of any political person gets
> > exposed.
>
>  good idea.
>
> > > > The legacy media can intimidate politicians into supporting tax cuts
> > > > for the rich, censorship of economic information and other nonsense
> > > > but they cannot intimidate 250 million individuals.

> > >  yet, all thru out history, "THE CONSERVATIVES" try and fail.
>
> > Right now some in the legacy media who have spent decades cultivating
> > an image of being "liberal" or a "pro Democrat" are wondering how long
> > they can keep up their "deals" with the 0.01% confidential.
>
>  yea, there are web sites popping up exposing the shills. i have used
> them a couple of times now.
>
> > The stats guys at Princeton made a complete mockery of their "it's a
> > horse race" nonsense.  It won't be too long before _all_ their other
> > scams are exposed.
>
> > When they are finally exposed that's it.  There will not be any
> > comeback.
>
> > _Ever_.
>
>  we shall see.

If my life and liberty depends on it, I'm not going to wait and see.
I'm going to _make_ it happen.

Why let the stats guy at Princeton or the disparity of wealth study
people at Harvard have all the fun making a mockery of the legacy
media?

> we are destined to repeat the mistakes of the past.
> some sociopath out their is cunning enough, so you never know.

Cunning isn't necessary. Sloth, ignorance, fear and buying people off
are or were enough, at least in the past.

> > Some are openly wondering how long it will be before the info age
> > uncovers all their hypocritical sordid "deals" with the 0.01%.
>
>  oh goody, i hope i am still here:))))
>
> > > > "Occupy National News Room" while not necessary, would do the trick.
>
> > >  yea, good idea.
>
> > The best idea is to first read _Democracy In America_.  Then you can
> > really see the historical - political revisionism going on at the _New
> > York Times_.
>
> > Political activism is much easier, much more mechanical than what many
> > have been led to believe.
>
> > Tocqueville gives out all these "secrets" once common knowledge in
> > America and the only thing saving the oligarchy is the hope no one
> > reads T.
>
>  lets hope the workers at walmart are reading this.

Everyone isn't a political scientist.


Bret Cahill


Transition Zone

unread,
Nov 18, 2012, 1:53:45 PM11/18/12
to
Tunderbar wrote:

> >And the Reagan stein handle economy had the tire biters believing
> > _they_ were gonna git rich quick with the Gipster.
> a little off topic....?

This better for ya ??

"[Re[] Scott DesJarlais, R-Jasper [TN], whose district includes the
Kingston plant, voted to undermine EPA's regulatory authority. The
vote coincided with the end of testimony in a civil trial in federal
court over the Kingston ash spill."
-- http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2011/oct/20/house-vote-to-strip-the-epa-...

erschro...@gmail.com

unread,
Nov 19, 2012, 9:31:42 AM11/19/12
to
On Nov 17, 8:51 am, BeamMeUpScotty
Tell us again how Romney is beating Obama in the polls. How he's
beating Obama among women. How blacks are deserting Obama.

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,
Nov 19, 2012, 10:44:58 AM11/19/12
to
You tell us how Obama didn't stuff the ballot boxes....

Nickname unavailable

unread,
Nov 19, 2012, 11:47:03 AM11/19/12
to
> > > That's wherewww.gushhype.comcouldplaya useful role.  Every media
true. but history repeats. what i am amazed at, is how many wal mart
workers in the south are striking. could be the youth of the red
states have had enough angry white male stupidity?

Immortalist

unread,
Nov 19, 2012, 12:54:26 PM11/19/12
to
There was a lot to the adjusting post New Deal policies. Conservatives
tuned and pruned and at one point things were just right. But they
didn't know when to say "when" and continued until the economy had no
more protections against the common problems of capitalism. The New
Deal institutions have been their pinata. Luckily their War Economies
finally booted em out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4qmzArq25MOn Nov 16, 8:42 pm, Nickname

Nickname unavailable

unread,
Nov 19, 2012, 1:43:52 PM11/19/12
to
On Nov 19, 11:54 am, Immortalist <reanimater_2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> There was a lot to the adjusting post New Deal policies. Conservatives
> tuned and pruned and at one point things were just right. But they
> didn't know when to say "when" and continued until the economy had no
> more protections against the common problems of capitalism. The New
> Deal institutions have been their pinata. Luckily their War Economies
> finally booted em out.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4qmzArq25MOnNov 16, 8:42 pm, Nickname
>
>



i read a interesting article recently and i should have saved it. by
the time harding came into office, it was to late, the world had
changed, but not "THE CONSERVATIVE". harding tried for four years to
reverse the world, but america was no longer rural, poor, and stupid.
it was becoming like europe, heavily populated, and urban. once that
happens, lots of problems arise with capitalism, as adam smith wrote,
it will not work when there are so many poor, exploited, with huge
wealth inequality, and a economic aristocracy.
harding died in office exhausted trying to resurrect "THE
CONSERVATIVE" world of small government that let robber barons run
free, the exact opposite of what a majority of the founders
envisioned. he failed, because in a modern world, one after another
problem arise, and if those problems are not addressed fairly and
quickly, things spiral out of hand.
the election was more to do with revulsion against "CONSERVATIVE"
polices, than with demographics. in many cases the angry white stupid
males already have their own personal socialism and safety net
cinched(although they are to stupid to know it, and to stupid to know
that the ones they voted for, would snatch it away as soon as they
can), its the youth that is poor and exploited, and it matters not
what color or ethnic back round, they know they are getting screwed.
obama i think is to stupid to know that also, and he will try the neo-
liberal way one more time. his presidency may be know for 8 long years
of trying to resurrect a failed system.

Transition Zone

unread,
Nov 19, 2012, 4:13:21 PM11/19/12
to
On Nov 19, 10:44 am, BeamMeUpScotty
<ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
HA ! ! ! That's simple. Fux Noise didn't claim it, so why should you?

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,
Nov 19, 2012, 6:45:47 PM11/19/12
to
ą90% at many voting precincts, and 104% of the vote in another one?


Was it because things went as planned?

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,
Nov 19, 2012, 6:54:09 PM11/19/12
to
On 11/19/2012 4:13 PM, Transition Zone wrote:
> On Nov 19, 10:44 am, BeamMeUpScotty
> <ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>> On 11/19/2012 9:31 AM, erschroedin...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 17, 8:51 am, BeamMeUpScotty
>>> <ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>>>> On 11/16/2012 11:33 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:
>>
>>>>>> The tea party "CONSERVATIVE" anti-abortion, pro-family Tennessee
>>>>>> congressman who pushed his patient and mistress to get an abortion
>>>>>> also agreed that his wife should have two, according to court
>>>>>> transcripts released Thursday
>>>>>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/15/scott-desjarlais-approved_n_....
You know, if the Republicans aren't going to stand up to the Democrats
stealing elections why would I ever vote for another Republican?

I might as well vote for the Libertarians every time rather than trying
to help Republicans, if they lay down I'd rather waste a vote on a
Libertarian that might actually call for a recount.





BeamMeUpScotty

unread,
Nov 19, 2012, 7:08:37 PM11/19/12
to
On 11/19/2012 4:13 PM, Transition Zone wrote:
> On Nov 19, 10:44 am, BeamMeUpScotty
> <ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>> On 11/19/2012 9:31 AM, erschroedin...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 17, 8:51 am, BeamMeUpScotty
>>> <ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>>>> On 11/16/2012 11:33 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:
>>
>>>>>> The tea party "CONSERVATIVE" anti-abortion, pro-family Tennessee
>>>>>> congressman who pushed his patient and mistress to get an abortion
>>>>>> also agreed that his wife should have two, according to court
>>>>>> transcripts released Thursday
>>>>>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/15/scott-desjarlais-approved_n_....
You know, if the Republicans aren't going to stand up to the Democrats
stealing elections why would I ever vote for another Republican?

I might as well vote for the Libertarians every time rather than trying
to help Republicans, if they lay down I'd rather waste a vote on a
Libertarian that might actually call for a recount.


The Libertarians won the elections by the simple fact that the winners
were for a Liberal Social agenda and a Conservative economic agenda.

The House of representatives where *ALL* revenue must begin was NOT only
kept in Republican hands but it gained Republican seats.


The President that has NO power over Revenue was elected for his Liberal
social agenda.... Women getting free birth control and free abortions
and pot smoking and and Gays getting married.





0 new messages