On Apr 22, 4:53 pm, Fred M. McNeill <
mmcne...@fuzzysys.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 10:04:19 -0400, "Dare" <
clydad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >"Fred M. McNeill" <
mmcne...@fuzzysys.com> wrote in messagenews:pq17p79vset1mhecn...@4ax.com...
> >>>"Fred M. McNeill" <
mmcne...@fuzzysys.com> wrote in messagenews:4g26p7d5i293s6ofi...@4ax.com...
> >>>> Suicide is not entertaining.
>
> >>>No it is not.
> >>>Seems often it is seen as the only solution for
> >>>a life filled with suffering and hopelessness...
> >>>is it "just" depression...or is there "rational" suicide?
>
> >> 'Humans' are finite physical and information structures.
> >> In that context, "rational" is perhaps a cultural story.
> >> It may not actually exist, except in a 'virtual' sense.
>
> >That's true...some cultures have even expected suicide
> >if one has "dishonored" one's self or position.
>
> >> What do you mean by "rational"?
>
> >I was thinking of situations where the pain and hopelessness
> >had become so unbearable to the individual that "self-release"
> >seemed a "reasonable" and perhaps the only effective solution.
> >It seems to me the most significant aspect is the feeling of
> >absolute hopelessness...and/or an acknowledgement of
> >meaninglessness. Brain chemistry probably plays a role in it.
> >Seems it can affect anyone...even those with vibrant, successful lives:
>
> >Mike Wallace's Battle With Depression and Suicide
> >
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/2012/04/09/mike-wallaces-battle-wi...
>
> >At his lowest and most desperate, a bottle of pills and a suicide note
> >seemed like the only answer for the legendary journalist Mike Wallace.
>
> >The CBS 60 Minutes correspondent could make some of the most
> >powerful leaders in the world sweat with nervousness, but Wallace
> >will also be remembered as a voice and face for those who have suffered
> >in silence with depression and other mental illnesses.....
>
> As it is, 'we' all seem to die from 'death by ignorance',
> even so called natural death, even suicides,
> Ignorance must be removed. 'Human' condition constraints
> are becoming detrimental.
You know, intelligence must be only 'another' experiment in
biogenesis....right? If the ultimate endpoint is to only discover
hopelessness, then it may be an 'experiment' bound for failure.
Imagine, on some universal level, where perhaps there are
millions of planets out there where DNA is evolving in various ways,
all trying to 'fit' enironments, while perhaps on a universal level,
also trying to 'come together' in some measurable fashion, what
'experiment' would be the ultimate winner [if intelligence can't
be, for the dead end point of hopelessness]? Perhaps a 'less
intelligence' maybe; one where certain minimal aspects of science and
matth
must be found for travel through the stars, but not so much that it
can decipher this morbid wall of materialism.
Or maybe, it all just goes to be a machine...dead, cold, lifeless like
a computer...but whirrring away calculations by the boatload.
To something so cold and calculating, I meaning would perhaps be
'meaningless' in itself. Hmmm...what would justify it's 'existence
then I wonder?