On Another Spook : Political Correctness

[Sir Frederick]

Talk about anti multi culturism! This spook is the great
homogenizer and primitivizer! The primitive liberals hate
civilizing stories, then they hate cultural, behavior, and biological
considerations, too sophisticated for the simple primitive.
This is part of that spook mentioned earlier : the personal virtual
reality, supported by the human brain.
See :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_correctness
"Political correctness (adjectivally, politically correct; both forms commonly abbreviated to PC) is
a term denoting language, ideas, policies, and behavior seen as seeking to minimize social offense
in gender, racial, cultural, sexual orientation, handicap, and age-related contexts. In current
usage, the terms are almost exclusively pejorative, connoting �intolerant� and �intolerance� [1][2]
whilst the usage politically incorrect, denotes an implicitly positive self-description. Examples
include the conservative Politically Incorrect Guides published by the Regnery editorial house, [3]
and the television talk show Politically Incorrect. Thus, �politically incorrect� denotes language,
ideas, and behavior, unconstrained by orthodoxy and the fear of giving offense."

Much more ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_correctness
---------------------------------------------

Reality is more complicated than PC considers. 'Tolerance'
is often 'chosen stupidity'. (Consider Mr. Hasan.)
--

F M McNeill
858 206-3517
California, USA

mmcn...@fuzzysys.com

***********************************************
"When most Americans read the novel 1984 they were scared.
When Obama read 1984, he started taking notes."
- Rush Limbaugh
"The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run
out of other people's money."
- Margaret Thatcher
**************************************

[ZerkonXXXX]

On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:50:04 -0800, Sir Frederick wrote:

> Talk about anti multi culturism!

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/12/business/main2558620.shtml

[TruthSlave]

Sir Frederick wrote:
> Talk about anti multi culturism! This spook is the great
> homogenizer and primitivizer! The primitive liberals hate
> civilizing stories, then they hate cultural, behavior, and biological
> considerations, too sophisticated for the simple primitive.
> This is part of that spook mentioned earlier : the personal virtual
> reality, supported by the human brain.
> See :
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_correctness
> "Political correctness (adjectivally, politically correct; both forms commonly abbreviated to PC) is
> a term denoting language, ideas, policies, and behavior seen as seeking to minimize social offense
> in gender, racial, cultural, sexual orientation, handicap, and age-related contexts. In current

> usage, the terms are almost exclusively pejorative, connoting �intolerant� and �intolerance� [1][2]

> whilst the usage politically incorrect, denotes an implicitly positive self-description. Examples
> include the conservative Politically Incorrect Guides published by the Regnery editorial house, [3]

> and the television talk show Politically Incorrect. Thus, �politically incorrect� denotes language,

> ideas, and behavior, unconstrained by orthodoxy and the fear of giving offense."
>
> Much more ...
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_correctness
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Reality is more complicated than PC considers. 'Tolerance'
> is often 'chosen stupidity'. (Consider Mr. Hasan.)

Welcome to my world.

For what its worth this ghost you speak of, has no particular
preference. Regardless of its incarnation, it exist only to haunt
the unread. From one moment to the next it has no memory. It has
no label that would be understood, instead try to see it for its
function, its blind egotistical pursuit of function. Like the
program it demands its use. It can't know why it does what it
does. In laying blame for this specter on any particular 'ology,
you rob yourself of the real point.

In time you may see how this ghostly example spurs you to another
state, so that you wake to reality, so that you see the past and
the present, all history, with an uncommon sight. There again, you
may not, and only react in rage, like the latest headline, without
understanding. You know, it is even possible to see their example,
another depth to the stories you look to construct.

Beyond function and control, there lies Understanding.

[ck]

Sir Frederick wrote:
> Talk about anti multi culturism! This spook is the great
> homogenizer and primitivizer! The primitive liberals hate
> civilizing stories, then they hate cultural, behavior, and biological
> considerations, too sophisticated for the simple primitive.
> This is part of that spook mentioned earlier : the personal virtual
> reality, supported by the human brain.
> See :
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_correctness
> "Political correctness (adjectivally, politically correct; both forms commonly abbreviated to PC) is
> a term denoting language, ideas, policies, and behavior seen as seeking to minimize social offense
> in gender, racial, cultural, sexual orientation, handicap, and age-related contexts. In current

> usage, the terms are almost exclusively pejorative, connoting �intolerant� and �intolerance� [1][2]

> whilst the usage politically incorrect, denotes an implicitly positive self-description. Examples
> include the conservative Politically Incorrect Guides published by the Regnery editorial house, [3]

> and the television talk show Politically Incorrect. Thus, �politically incorrect� denotes language,

> ideas, and behavior, unconstrained by orthodoxy and the fear of giving offense."
>
> Much more ...
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_correctness
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Reality is more complicated than PC considers. 'Tolerance'
> is often 'chosen stupidity'. (Consider Mr. Hasan.)

[corrections]

Welcome to my world.

For what its worth this ghost you speak of, has no particular
preference. Regardless of its incarnation, it exist only to haunt

the undead. From one moment to the next it has no memory. It can't
know why it does, what it does. This creature has no label that

would be understood, instead try to see it for its function, its

blind egotistical pursuit of function. Like the program, it demands
its use. In laying blame for this specter on a particular 'ology,

you rob yourself of the real point.

In time you may see how this ghostly example spurs you to another
state, so that you wake to reality, so that you see the past and
the present, all history, with an uncommon sight. There again, you
may not, and only react in rage, like the latest headline, without

understanding. You know, it is even possible to see, in their
example, another depth to the stories you look to construct. A
reason why. Now dust down all your old philosophy books and look
again for what you'll find.