GOP Scandal Mongering Is Much Like the Vindictive Clearwater Woman Who Had Her Husband Arrested for Being A Child Molester

[Bret Cahill]

It felt so good to see him hauled away she couldn't resist coming up
with some more accusations: He was also a drug kingpin and a mafia
don. Later she accused him of being a top nazi war criminal.

Eventually the police let the guy go.

Advice to the GOP:

Stick to one false allegation or Obama will walk.

Everyone knows you are sore losers and cannot win at the ballot box.


Bret Cahill

[duke]

On Sat, 18 May 2013 06:24:39 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill <BretC...@peoplepc.com>
wrote:

>It felt so good to see him hauled away she couldn't resist coming up
>with some more accusations: He was also a drug kingpin and a mafia
>don. Later she accused him of being a top nazi war criminal.
>
>Eventually the police let the guy go.
>
>Advice to the GOP:
>
>Stick to one false allegation or Obama will walk.

He's going to walk anyway. It's too late to stop that. But we can destroy the
'rat machine for the next 2 elections.


The dukester, American - American

********************************************
Repeal Obama
You simply can't fix stupid.
********************************************

[Bret Cahill]

> >It felt so good to see him hauled away she couldn't resist coming up
> >with some more accusations:  He was also a drug kingpin and a mafia
> >don.  Later she accused him of being a top nazi war criminal.
>
> >Eventually the police let the guy go.
>
> >Advice to the GOP:
>
> >Stick to one false allegation or Obama will walk.
>
> He's going to walk anyway.  It's too late to stop that.  But we can destroy the
> 'rat machine for the next 2 elections.

Keep that up and you'll lose the house in 2014.

Then there won't even be any scandal mongering.


Bret Cahill

[BeamMeUpScotty]

She left out "Liberal" so he wasn't all that bad.

[Bret Cahill]

> > > >It felt so good to see him hauled away she couldn't resist coming up

> > > >with some more accusations: =A0He was also a drug kingpin and a mafia
> > > >don. =A0Later she accused him of being a top nazi war criminal.

>
> > > >Eventually the police let the guy go.
>
> > > >Advice to the GOP:
>
> > > >Stick to one false allegation or Obama will walk.
>

> > > He's going to walk anyway. =A0It's too late to stop that. =A0But we can
> > > d=

> > estroy the
> > > 'rat machine for the next 2 elections.
>
> > Keep that up and you'll lose the house in 2014.
>
> > Then there won't even be any scandal mongering.
>
> > Bret Cahill
>

> Right Wing claptrap is always swirling about, but it always amazes me to
> run across someone who really belives it.

What's interesting is the wingers here will not defend BushCo. No
more support the troops, no more patriotic support of the commander in
chief . . .

If you point out BushCo killed 4,000 American troops to get reelected
by saying "cannot change horses mid quagmire" they tacitly agree by
not responding.

The GOP is totally screwed.


Bret Cahill

[Bret Cahill]

> It felt so good to see him hauled away she couldn't resist coming up
> with some more accusations:  He was also a drug kingpin and a mafia
> don.  Later she accused him of being a top nazi war criminal.

Even if he _was_ a child molester they would have had to let him go
because the witness was so . . . well . . . teabag crazy.

[BeamMeUpScotty]

On 5/18/2013 11:34 AM, Bret Cahill wrote:

> What's interesting is the wingers here will not defend BushCo. No
> more support the troops, no more patriotic support of the commander in
> chief . . .

Support Obama's retreat, sure I'll support Obama's retreat and Obama's
resignation?



Given *ALL* that's happening and Obama is clueless about it, it's hard
to imaging Obama is even aware they his troops are retreating from
Afghanistan.


Benghazi and the IRS and Associated Press and on and on and Obama is
clueless about it all.


--


*Rumination*
#12 - It's what you learn, after you know it all, that counts.

[BeamMeUpScotty]

On 5/18/2013 11:34 AM, Bret Cahill wrote:

> What's interesting is the wingers here will not defend BushCo. No
> more support the troops, no more patriotic support of the commander in
> chief . . .

Support Obama's retreat, sure I'll support Obama's retreat and Obama's
resignation?



Given *ALL* that's happening and Obama is clueless about it, it's hard

to imagine Obama is even aware that his troops are retreating from

Afghanistan.


Benghazi and the IRS and Associated Press and on and on and Obama is
clueless about it all.


--



*Rumination*

#47 - ObamaCare is like a box of Cracker Jacks, you had to buy it to
find out what the surprise inside was? It was Slavery "surprise".

[Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E]

We can,and will win as long as the progressives don't use the
IRS,the State Department and the EPA to suppress the Republican
voters.

> Bret Cahill

[Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E]

Keep inhaling those unicorn farts Brett. You'll need to be stoned
after the next election. We'll come after you 'Rats with a vengeance
that will make the bilblical ass kicking of 2010 look like a bake
sale.



> Bret Cahill

[Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E]

On May 18, 9:42 am, dzweib...@REMOVEyahoo.com (Denny) wrote:

> Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
> > > >It felt so good to see him hauled away she couldn't resist coming up

> > > >with some more accusations: =A0He was also a drug kingpin and a mafia
> > > >don. =A0Later she accused him of being a top nazi war criminal.

>
> > > >Eventually the police let the guy go.
>
> > > >Advice to the GOP:
>
> > > >Stick to one false allegation or Obama will walk.
>

> > > He's going to walk anyway. =A0It's too late to stop that. =A0But we can
> > > d=

> > estroy the
> > > 'rat machine for the next 2 elections.
>
> > Keep that up and you'll lose the house in 2014.
>
> > Then there won't even be any scandal mongering.
>
> > Bret Cahill
>

> Right Wing claptrap is always swirling about, but it always amazes me to

> run across someone who really belives it.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

And what exactly do YOU believe Sybil??

[Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E]

> Bret Cahill- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Last time I checked Bush was a civilian. Good luck defending Obama and
keeping a straight face while doing it.

[BeamMeUpScotty]

On 5/18/2013 1:11 PM, Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
wrote:

There's the justice department that ignores TEA PARTY plea for justice
and equal under the law and the justice Department has ignores Black
Panther violations of the voter laws so that they can scare off TEA
PARTY VOTERS....



The whole thing including Obama's treatment of Military Absentee votes
were all designed to suppress the TEA PARTY and Republican voters.


*The Shadow Government* is a system of back channels used to communicate
without it being subject to the light of day that the normal e-mails and
communications are subjected to.



As I have said before, the Democrat-Socialists are 5th column traitors
embedded in the Federal system(like the ones we see in the IRS), they
intend to control the Nation and to force "We The People" and the
"States" to live under their version of Socialism-2.0


--


*Rumination*
#73 - Austerity is what happens when Socialists run out of other
people's money.

[Kickin' Ass and Taking Names]

On 18 May 2013 19:06:04 GMT, dzwe...@REMOVEyahoo.com (Denny) wrote:

>BeamMeUpScotty <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>> On 5/18/2013 11:34 AM, Bret Cahill wrote:
>>
>> > What's interesting is the wingers here will not defend BushCo. No
>> > more support the troops, no more patriotic support of the commander in
>> > chief . . .
>>
>> Support Obama's retreat, sure I'll support Obama's retreat and Obama's
>> resignation?
>>
>> Given *ALL* that's happening and Obama is clueless about it, it's hard
>> to imagine Obama is even aware that his troops are retreating from
>> Afghanistan.
>>
>> Benghazi and the IRS and Associated Press and on and on and Obama is
>> clueless about it all.
>

>You people. Obama could heal the sick, raise the dead, and walk on water
>and you'd still hate him.


And don't tell them they hate him because he's a black man.

[BeamMeUpScotty]

On 5/18/2013 3:06 PM, Denny wrote:

> BeamMeUpScotty <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>> On 5/18/2013 11:34 AM, Bret Cahill wrote:
>>
>>> What's interesting is the wingers here will not defend BushCo. No
>>> more support the troops, no more patriotic support of the commander in
>>> chief . . .
>>
>> Support Obama's retreat, sure I'll support Obama's retreat and Obama's
>> resignation?
>>
>> Given *ALL* that's happening and Obama is clueless about it, it's hard
>> to imagine Obama is even aware that his troops are retreating from
>> Afghanistan.
>>
>> Benghazi and the IRS and Associated Press and on and on and Obama is
>> clueless about it all.
>

> You people. Obama could heal the sick, raise the dead, and walk on water
> and you'd still hate him.
>

Obama is trying to perform a miracle and heal the sick with ObamaCare
and he's failed miserably so there's no big worry about Obama being
anything more than just another faker.

Obama can't feed the MULTITUDES with a fish and he can't HEAL the
multitudes with a law or trillions of dollars.

[Bret Cahill]

So you openly admit you only support the troops and the war president
when he's Republican.

Your honesty is refreshing . . . or decadent.


Bret Cahill

[Bret Cahill]

On May 18, 10:11 am, "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey

rd.,Wilmington,D.E" <burtonu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 18, 8:24 am, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
>
> > It felt so good to see him hauled away she couldn't resist coming up
> > with some more accusations:  He was also a drug kingpin and a mafia
> > don.  Later she accused him of being a top nazi war criminal.
>
> > Eventually the police let the guy go.
>
> > Advice to the GOP:
>
> > Stick to one false allegation or Obama will walk.
>
> > Everyone knows you are sore losers and cannot win at the ballot box.
>
>    We can,and will win

On tax cuts for the rich?

75% support tax _hikes_ on the rich.

> as long as the progressives don't use the
> IRS,the State Department and the EPA to suppress the Republican
> voters.

Would you like some cheese with that whine?


Bret Cahill'

[Nickname unavailable]

On May 18, 12:11 pm, "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey

Bush Used the IRS, FBI, CIA and Secret Service to Go After Opponents.
Where Was the Fox and GOP Outrage?: in 2005, Bush’s IRS began what
became an extensive two-year investigation into a Pasadena church
after an orator dared to speak out against President Bush’s Iraq War

http://www.alternet.org/bush-used-irs-fbi-cia-and-secret-service-go-a...

/ By David Sirota [2]

Bush Used the IRS, FBI, CIA and Secret Service to Go After Opponents
-- Where Was the Fox and GOP Outrage?
May 14, 2013 |

As your kindergarten teacher probably told you, two wrongs do not make
a right. But the discrepancy in reactions to wrongs does, indeed, show
how Washington so often serves the interests of the political right.
That’s one of the big – if deliberately ignored – takeaways from the
reaction to news that the Internal Revenue Service allegedly targeting
conservative organizations for extra scrutiny in their larger review
of political groups’ tax exempt status. In the last few days, the
allegations have generated a wave of national headlines,
a congressional investigation [3],federal legislation [4] and ever-
louder [5] calls for impeachment [6].
Considering the gravity of the allegations against the Obama IRS from
the Treasury Department’s inspector general, congressional scrutiny is
certainly warranted. However, there’s just one problem: most of the
lawmakers and pundits today decrying the use of public resources
against a White House’s political opponents had little – if anything –
to say about equally troubling revelations about the Bush
administration’s deployment of public resources against its opponents.
In fact, conservatives said so little back then that Fox News
apparently doesn’t even know [7] (or is pretending not to know) the
Bush administration used the IRS in the same way the Obama
adminstration allegedly did.
And here’s the even more incredible thing: the Bush cabal didn’t just
use the IRS for its political hackery – it mounted a full-scale
government-wide assault on its enemies, marshaling disparate agencies
in its smear efforts.
Bush’s use of the IRS was but one part of that larger assault. As my
Salon colleague Alex Seitz-Wald notes today in greater detail [8], in
2005, Bush’s IRS began what became an extensive two-year investigation
[9] into a Pasadena church after an orator dared to speak out against
President Bush’s Iraq War. Not coincidentally, the Los Angeles Times
[10] reports that the church targeted just so happened to be “one of
Southern California’s largest and most liberal congregations.” That
IRS church audit came a year after it launched a near-identical attack
on the NAACP [11] after the civil rights organization criticized
various Bush administration policies.
That is not where the story ends, however. The Bush administration’s
crusade against its enemies moved from the IRS into the Secret
Service.
Under the Republican president, that law enforcement agency
was repeatedly [12] deployed [13] to physically block suspected
antiwar activists from attending public presidential events. As
the San Francisco Chronicle [12] reported, the scheme eventually
targeted some peaceful antiwar activists for arrest for the alleged
crime of “holding up small handwritten protest signs outside the
designated zone” of free speech (yes, the Bush White House cemented
the precedent that the right to dissent is no longer a fundamental
right, but is instead only allowed in certain “free speech
zones” [14]). Ultimately, in a case dealing with a man who was
arrested for simply telling Vice President Dick Cheney that his
“policies on Iraq are disgusting,” the Republican-dominated Supreme
Court upheld the Bush administration’s use of “retaliatory
arrests” [15] against the administration’s ideological critics.
Then, in 2010, we learned that Bush’s targeting operation was also
operating inside the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Recounting
findings from the Justice Department’s Inspector General,
the Washington Post [16] reported that “the FBI improperly
investigated some left-leaning U.S. advocacy groups after the Sept.
11, 2001, attacks…citing cases in which agents put activists on
terrorist watch lists even though they were planning nonviolent civil
disobedience.”
A year later, we learned that along with the IRS, Secret Service and
FBI, the Bush administration may have also been using the Central
Intelligence Agency against its political enemies. As the New York
Times [17] reported, “A former Central Intelligence Agency officer who
was a top counterterrorism official during the administration of
President George W. Bush, said the White House at least twice asked
intelligence officials to gather sensitive information” on prominent
Iraq War critic Juan Cole. That story had an eerie similarity to the
Bush administration’s effort to out CIA operative Valerie Plame as
retribution for her husband’s criticism of that same war.
Unlike the noisy outrage that met today’s allegations of IRS
misconduct under President Obama, these earlier – and well-documented
– revelations of systemic IRS, Secret Service, FBI and CIA misconduct
were met with a collective shrug of the shoulders in Washington. Sure,
a few newspapers wrote about them, and a few Democratic lawmakers
[18] tried to raise questions about the Bush administration’s actions,
but compared to today’s sound and fury over the IRS allegations, there
was veritable silence. Indeed, as alluded to before, so little outrage
was voiced about this kind of thing during the Bush years that a Fox
News’ headline this week summarizing a Karl Rove interview
blared: “What if IRS Under President Bush targeted liberal
groups?” [7] – as if that never actually happened…even though it most
certainly did.
What explains this obvious double standard in the reactions to Bush
era and Obama era misconduct? Partisanship, expectations and
ideological bias.
In terms of partisanship, Republicans now screaming bloody murder over
the IRS allegations clearly don’t care about the principles of equal
protection, nonpartisan public services or impartial governance. We
know this because most of them had nothing to say about the Bush
administration’s actions against the GOP’s ideological opponents. In
the context of that record, the GOP is really saying it is outraged
when government resources are aimed at its friends, but more than
happy to have those resources aimed at its enemies.
That context, though, hasn’t been publicly referenced by most
Democrats. Indeed, other than Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) [19], most
Democratic lawmakers have not dared to mention that the problem of
politicized government goes back many years.
That gets to expectations and ideological bias – simply put, the
expectation in a Washington where both parties and most media outlets
tilt to the right is that conservative groups should never be treated
the same way liberal groups so often are. Why? Because conservative
causes (say, the anti-tax movement) tend to be aligned with the
interests of the transpartisan moneyed establishment while liberal
causes (say, the anti-war movement) tend to be at odds with those
interests.
Thus, when conservative groups happen to be treated like liberal
groups, the Washington Outrage Machine turns the noise up to 11 – even
though when liberal groups were targeted, that Outrage Machine
remained dormant. And with today’s national press corps reoriented
around amplifying – rather than challenging – power, this double
standard is then predictably reflected in a corresponding discrepancy
in coverage.
Taken together, the lesson should be straightforward: according to
Washington, politicized government is perfectly fine when it is
punishing liberal forces that challenge the status quo, but totally
outrageous when it is targeting conservative groups that preserve the
status quo.
Neither should be acceptable, of course. But that truism is ignored by
a hypocritical political culture whose unquestioned assumptions so
obviously favor the right.




>
>
>
>
>
> > Bret Cahill

[Transition Zone]

On May 18, 12:44 pm, BeamMeUpScotty

<ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
> On 5/18/2013 11:34 AM, Bret Cahill wrote:
>
> > What's interesting is the wingers here will not defend BushCo.  No
> > more support the troops, no more patriotic support of the commander in
> > chief . . .
>
> Support Obama's retreat, sure I'll support Obama's retreat and Obama's
> resignation?
>
>   Given *ALL* that's happening and Obama is clueless about it, it's hard
>to imaging Obama is even aware they his troops are retreating from
> Afghanistan.

He told the electorate (a term you've never heard of) that he was
leaving that area. PERIOD !!!

(got it, yet?)

[Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E]

On May 19, 9:58 am, "Kirby Grant" <kgr...@whatzit.org> wrote:

> On 18-May-2013,  wrote:
> > t felt so good to see him hauled away she couldn't resist coming up
> > with some more accusations:  He was also a drug kingpin and a mafia
> > don.  Later she accused him of being a top nazi war criminal.
>
> > Eventually the police let the guy go.
>
> > Advice to the GOP:
>
> > Stick to one false allegation or Obama will walk.
>
> > Everyone knows you are sore losers and cannot win at the ballot box.
>

> > Bret Cahill
>
> You are spot on with this. Probably more than you actually realize.
>
> Conservatives are desperately trying to turn everything that President Obama
> does into a scandal but what they don't realize is that the masses will
> eventually get bored and tune it all out because they recognize that
> conservatives are only acting out of desperation. They have set themselves
> up as the party of whiners and complainers and have generally been pretty
> dispicable. That is why they are losers and will continue to be losers.

Hmmm. Most everything Obama does is scandalous. Your point?

[Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E]

On May 20, 1:27 pm, Nickname unavailable

> > > Bret Cahill- Hide quoted text -
>

> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

"alternet"?? Well hell, I'm convinced.

[Nickname unavailable]

On May 20, 6:44 pm, "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E"

just like when i called you out on the polling from think progress.
you ran and hide like all self responsible "CONSERVATIVES". if you
were responsible, you would not shoot the messenger, but instead prove
them wrong, and of course they had sources for their article, so you
know that its true, otherwise put up, or shut up.

[harry.pe...@gmail.com]

You have everything ass backwards. The problem is you don't mind a
warmonger as long as he supports whatever subsidy you want to keep coming.

https://twitter.com/m_mgrant/status/374891325159907328/photo/1

Heh.

Anyway, thank God, Obama backed out of his plan to start WW3, and
just let Putin the peacelover be the boss.