On 8-Nov-2009, Sir Frederick <mmcne...@fuzzysys.com> wrote:
> Evolution 'found' religion useful.
Religion functions as a division of power... when power is an absolute monarchy... so religion makes a distinction between tyranny and monarchy. Question for Islam: If the head of government and the head of the church are the same person, how come there is more than one Islamic country in the world.
-- Denial of Free Will makes the Knowledge of Order Absolute.
So in a democracy, there is either religion and no government or government and no religion... religion is treason from government's perspective... Government exists to mock religion.
-- Denial of Free Will makes the Knowledge of Order Absolute.
Kevin B. Murphy wrote: > We have religion because citizenship is meaningless.
We have religion the same way we have laws or rules. We have religion to temper our excess, our lust, our selfish short-sighted beastly natures.
We have religion as answer, where there were only questions. We have religion as a bond between the past and the future. We have religion because we are born blank slates, primitives, saved only by this enduring knowledge.
We have religion because human nature remains constant. And so religion persist as testament to who we are, were and will be.
Getting back to your implied point, religion now serves as an enclave, a community within a community of individuals. As such it sees, and in its own way, notes, what would otherwise pass unnoticed by any single soul.
For religion, one might also see the passage of time, and the progress of mankind.
> Kevin B. Murphy wrote: > > We have religion because citizenship is meaningless.
> We have religion the same way we have laws or rules. > We have religion to temper our excess, our lust, our > selfish short-sighted beastly natures.
> We have religion as answer, where there were only > questions. We have religion as a bond between the past > and the future. We have religion because we are born > blank slates, primitives, saved only by this enduring > knowledge.
> We have religion because human nature remains constant. > And so religion persist as testament to who we are, were > and will be.
> Getting back to your implied point, religion now serves > as an enclave, a community within a community of > individuals. As such it sees, and in its own way, notes, > what would otherwise pass unnoticed by any single soul.
> For religion, one might also see the passage of time, > and the progress of mankind.
What part did religion play in the renaissance? Well, the renaissance wouldn't exist if religion didn't have an imperative to preserve the integrity of the historical account of it. But now we are only talking about Catholicism. What is funny about the renaissance is that... nobody knew how to fight except for the barbarians... and of course that kind of flys in the face of our previous understanding with Imperial Rome where barbarians always got the short end of the deal.
-- Denial of Free Will makes the Knowledge of Order Absolute.
On Nov 8, 8:47 am, "Kevin B. Murphy" <kmurphy...@comcast.net> wrote:
> We have religion because citizenship is meaningless.
> -- > Denial of Free Will makes the Knowledge of Order Absolute.
Gibberish question, gibberish answer.
1) You answer begs the question. Is religion any more meaningless. 2) Why question, to avoid unjustifiable teleologies need to be tested as how questions first, because 'why' implies purpose.
So how do we have religions? How do we have citizenship? Might be a better place to start.
You also might do better to ask how is it that we STILL have religion? Your answer implies that citizenship might be some kind or substitute for religion. Now we are getting to a point where you are assuming that people could not live without either one. I can tell you that this is a false assumption.
On Nov 8, 9:26 am, Sir Frederick <mmcne...@fuzzysys.com> wrote:
> Evolution 'found' religion useful.
Evolution cannot 'find' anything. Evolution cannot cause anything. Evolution is the consequence of change. It is an effect. You might say that humans have continued to select religion as it has some utility for them.
On Nov 8, 4:39 pm, "Kevin B. Murphy" <kmurphy...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 8-Nov-2009, Sir Frederick <mmcne...@fuzzysys.com> wrote:
> > Evolution 'found' religion useful.
> Religion functions as a division of power... when power is an absolute > monarchy... so religion makes a distinction between tyranny and monarchy. > Question for Islam: If the head of government and the head of the church are > the same person, how come there is more than one Islamic country in the > world.
SOme religions are used in this way. But what you describe is not a necessary fact of religion.
> -- > Denial of Free Will makes the Knowledge of Order Absolute.
What is that? And why do you think denial of free-will makes anything?
On 11-Nov-2009, Chazwin <chazwy...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> SOme religions are used in this way. But what you describe is not a > necessary fact of religion.
I'm answering the other guy who says that religion is a part of evolution so the basis for religion is to divide power... because of evolution but now Islam sticks in my craw for some reason... I'm thinking it is because Islam says a prophet is someone who founds a new religion and I'm inclined to believe that is a myopic view.
-- Denial of Free Will makes the Knowledge of Order Absolute.
On Nov 11, 8:01 pm, "Kevin B. Murphy" <kmurphy...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On 11-Nov-2009, Chazwin <chazwy...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > SOme religions are used in this way. But what you describe is not a > > necessary fact of religion.
> I'm answering the other guy who says that religion is a part of evolution so > the basis for religion is to divide power...
Even if you could describe the emergence of religion in evolutionary terms you would have to conclude that it has no purpose, as that is the consequence and conclusion of evolution - purposeless with the consequence of survival.
because of evolution but now
> Islam sticks in my craw for some reason... I'm thinking it is because Islam > says a prophet is someone who founds a new religion and I'm inclined to > believe that is a myopic view.
Islam is no worse than Christianity. You can put as much blame on Islam for terrorism as you can put it to Christianity for the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan.
> -- > Denial of Free Will makes the Knowledge of Order Absolute.
> On Nov 11, 8:01 pm, "Kevin B. Murphy" <kmurphy...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > On 11-Nov-2009, Chazwin <chazwy...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > SOme religions are used in this way. But what you describe is not a > > > necessary fact of religion.
> > I'm answering the other guy who says that religion is a part of evolution so > > the basis for religion is to divide power...
> Even if you could describe the emergence of religion in evolutionary > terms you would have to conclude that it has no purpose, as that is > the consequence and conclusion of evolution - purposeless with the > consequence of survival.
> because of evolution but now
> > Islam sticks in my craw for some reason... I'm thinking it is because Islam > > says a prophet is someone who founds a new religion and I'm inclined to > > believe that is a myopic view.
> Islam is no worse than Christianity. You can put as much blame on > Islam for terrorism as you can put it to Christianity for the invasion > of Iraq and Afghanistan.
> > -- > > Denial of Free Will makes the Knowledge of Order Absolute.
> This seems meaningless can you explain it?
Why are we Religious?
Why do we refer to HIM as our heavenly father?
As children “we” grow up knowing our father is there to look after us, protect us and solve our problems. Also, it is known that the religious feelings of our parents, who we believe would not lie to us, play a strong part in our development. When we grow up we are faced with the horror of making our way through life ON OUR OWN. We come face to face with reality, of the need for “success” and the fear of failure and death.
“We have a strong unbearable feeling of helplessness, so that our thoughts become related to a power outside ourselves, there is nothing we do, think or feel which is not known to this power. We expect protection by Him, wish to be taken care of by Him, make Him responsible…..” (Erich Fromm “Escape to freedom”).
Religion is also part of our culture, it influences our lives, and so we accept it as “fact” and strongly resent anyone who tries to say differently.
BORT wrote: > Why do we refer to HIM as our heavenly father?
Who's 'we'? It wasnt always so among my Native European ancestors. "Celtic Queen Maeve" by Briton is but one source unraveling pre-Christian myth to reveal the prime deity was female.
That had a powerful effect on the way things worked, easy to see considering the problem a demagogue would have trying to rile up a mob or an army by claiming that HE speaks in HER name.