Mayor blames "guns" when a liberal goes on a spree
AZDuffman
So, a liberal commits a terrorist act and instead of blaming radical
islam and the individual the fault is "guns" as if the guns pulled the
trigger.
They say he called al-queida. I guess it was a good thing Obama
stopped listening in on calls as the Patriot Act allowed.
Anlatt the Builder
> http://biggovernment.com/2009/11/10/chicago-mayor-daley-blames-fort-h...
>
> So, a liberal commits a terrorist act and instead of blaming radical
> islam and the individual the fault is "guns" as if the guns pulled the
> trigger.
>
> They say he called al-queida. I guess it was a good thing Obama
> stopped listening in on calls as the Patriot Act allowed.
Islamic extremists are not "liberals" by any definition, not in any
way, shape, or form. This man (and I make NO excuses for him) didn't
want to be photographed with women (if I heard correctly). Not exactly
a liberal point of view - any more than any of his other points of
view.
AZDuffman
his anti-war position would fit right in at a liberal group.
John Jones
Yes, the shootout wasn't fair. Only one side had the gun. Only Texas,
and some bleached mountain communities, support fair shootouts with
everyone having a gun - that's freedom, the Texan/mountain men way.
Bret Cahill
> > > So, a liberal commits a terrorist act and instead of blaming radical
> > > islam and the individual the fault is "guns" as if the guns pulled the
> > > trigger.
>
> > > They say he called al-queida. I guess it was a good thing Obama
> > > stopped listening in on calls as the Patriot Act allowed.
>
> > Islamic extremists are not "liberals" by any definition, not in any
> > way, shape, or form. This man (and I make NO excuses for him) didn't
> > want to be photographed with women (if I heard correctly). Not exactly
> > a liberal point of view - any more than any of his other points of
> > view.
>
> his anti-war position would fit right in at a liberal group.
He wasn't anti-war against Western "decadents" [liberals] just against
Muslims.
Bret Cahill
AZDuffman
> AZDuffman wrote:
> >http://biggovernment.com/2009/11/10/chicago-mayor-daley-blames-fort-h...
>
> > So, a liberal commits a terrorist act and instead of blaming radical
> > islam and the individual the fault is "guns" as if the guns pulled the
> > trigger.
>
> > They say he called al-queida. I guess it was a good thing Obama
> > stopped listening in on calls as the Patriot Act allowed.
>
> Yes, the shootout wasn't fair. Only one side had the gun. Only Texas,
> and some bleached mountain communities, support fair shootouts with
> everyone having a gun - that's freedom, the Texan/mountain men way.
sounds good to me.
Places with the most restrictive gun laws always seem to have the most
shootings.
Rod Speed
>>> http://biggovernment.com/2009/11/10/chicago-mayor-daley-blames-fort-h...
> sounds good to me.
Because they have the most shootings, fool.
tg
And then there's the fact that wingers were against the war in Kosovo.
I think mostly they don't 'support the troops' if there's a Dem
Commander In Chief, especially if he is trying to create a high-tax
booming economy.
-tg
AZDuffman
then why wouldn't shootings go down.
Are you capable of posting a reply without name-calling?
AZDuffman
Why would anyone want a high-tax economy? Do you like paying more for
government for no reason?
Rod Speed
>>> sounds good to me.
Because the restrictions dont stop those doing the shootings, fool.
Rod Speed
Because they dont like massive deficits, fool.
Patriot Games
<tir...@aol.com> wrote:
>On Nov 10, 12:32�pm, AZDuffman <srduffy1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> http://biggovernment.com/2009/11/10/chicago-mayor-daley-blames-fort-h...
>> So, a liberal commits a terrorist act and instead of blaming radical
>> islam and the individual the fault is "guns" as if the guns pulled the
>> trigger.
>> They say he called al-queida. �I guess it was a good thing Obama
>> stopped listening in on calls as the Patriot Act allowed.
>Islamic extremists are not "liberals" by any definition, not in any
>way, shape, or form.
He is anti-American, THAT is a Liberal Socialist DemocRAT
characteristic.
He is anti-Christian, THAT is a Liberal Socialist DemocRAT
characteristic.
He is anti-Freedom, THAT is a Liberal Socialist DemocRAT
characteristic.
>This man (and I make NO excuses for him) didn't
>want to be photographed with women (if I heard correctly).
But he went to titty bars and bought lap dances....
"The Army psychiatrist authorities say killed 13 people and wounded 29
others at the Fort Hood Army Base Thursday was a recent and frequent
customer at a local strip club, employees of the club told FoxNews.com
exclusively."
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,573052,00.html
>Not exactly
>a liberal point of view - any more than any of his other points of
>view.
Labels don't always fix exactly perfect.
John Jones
Yes. We need more fair shootouts. That's why everyone should have a gun.
It makes shootouts fair and square, and no-one can complain no matter
who gets killed or who complains about it.
John Jones
Here in Britain there are no shootouts. Thats why we need guns.
AZDuffman
So they "have the laws because they have the most shootings" yet
"restrictions don't stop the shootings."
Do you even follow what you post?
AZDuffman
Well, that could be one reason people don't want Obamacare, the
deficits it will cause.
(David P.)
>
> We need more fair shootouts. That's why everyone should have a gun.
> It makes shootouts fair and square, and no-one can complain no matter
> who gets killed or who complains about it.
Now you're talkin'! And we get to watch it all on U-Tube!
.
.
--
Rod Speed
> Rod Speed <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote
>> AZDuffman wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> AZDuffman wrote
>>>>> John Jones <jonescard...@btinternet.com> wrote
>>>>>> AZDuffman wrote
>>>>>>> http://biggovernment.com/2009/11/10/chicago-mayor-daley-blames-fort-h...
>>>>>>> So, a liberal commits a terrorist act and instead of blaming
>>>>>>> radical islam and the individual the fault is "guns" as if the
>>>>>>> guns pulled the trigger. They say he called al-queida.
>>>>>>> I guess it was a good thing Obama stopped listening
>>>>>>> in on calls as the Patriot Act allowed.
>>>>>> Yes, the shootout wasn't fair. Only one side had the gun.
>>>>>> Only Texas, and some bleached mountain communities,
>>>>>> support fair shootouts with everyone having a gun -
>>>>>> that's freedom, the Texan/mountain men way.
>>>>> sounds good to me.
>>>>> Places with the most restrictive gun laws always seem to have the most shootings.
>>>> Because they have the most shootings, fool.
>>> then why wouldn't shootings go down.
>> Because the restrictions dont stop those doing the shootings, fool.
> So they "have the laws because they have the most shootings"
Yes, they dont like all those shootings, so they try the laws.
> yet "restrictions don't stop the shootings."
Yep, they're so stupid that they cant grasp that its ALREADY
illegal to shoot people, so its just a tad unlikely that making it
illegal to have a gun will stop those who ALREADY flout the
existing law that makes it illegal to shoot people, fool.
Rod Speed
>>>> Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote
>>>>>>>> So, a liberal commits a terrorist act and instead of blaming
>>>>>>>> radical islam and the individual the fault is "guns" as if the
>>>>>>>> guns pulled the trigger.
>>>>>>>> They say he called al-queida. I guess it was a good thing Obama
>>>>>>>> stopped listening in on calls as the Patriot Act allowed.
>>>>>>> Islamic extremists are not "liberals" by any definition, not in
>>>>>>> any way, shape, or form. This man (and I make NO excuses for
>>>>>>> him) didn't want to be photographed with women (if I heard
>>>>>>> correctly). Not exactly a liberal point of view - any more than
>>>>>>> any of his other points of view.
>>>>>> his anti-war position would fit right in at a liberal group.
>>>>> He wasn't anti-war against Western "decadents" [liberals] just against Muslims.
>>>> And then there's the fact that wingers were against the war in
>>>> Kosovo. I think mostly they don't 'support the troops' if there's a
>>>> Dem Commander In Chief, especially if he is trying to create a
>>>> high-tax booming economy.
>>> Why would anyone want a high-tax economy?
>> Because they dont like massive deficits, fool.
> Well, that could be one reason people don't want Obamacare, the deficits it will cause.
Nothing like the massive deficits that your clowns have already produced, fool.
AZDuffman
>
> - Show quoted text -
Obama has the record deficits. He may be a clown but he isn't my
clown.
Rod Speed
> Obama has the record deficits.
Because your clowns completely implode the entire world financial system,
AGAIN, and got the bums rush at the ballot box because they did, fool.
John Jones
And if everyone has balanced nuclear weapons we couldn't complain about
a good-old, free and fair, intercontental shootout, Texan-style.