Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Still Waiting for Outraged Repugs To Propose IRS Reforms That Could Be Enforced On All Administrations In A Uniform Bipartisan Manner.
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Bret Cahill
May 16, 2013, 1:47:02 AM5/16/13
to
<crickets>
Bret Cahill
May 16, 2013, 2:16:12 AM5/16/13
to
Repugs may support reforms simply because they aren't running anyone
for president anymore.
Bret Cahill
for president anymore.
Bret Cahill
Dare
May 16, 2013, 9:03:19 AM5/16/13
to
"Bret Cahill" <BretC...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message news:3725f48d-d317-437b...@d6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> <crickets>
Why bother when the Dems ideas are working so well. ;-)
> <crickets>
Why bother when the Dems ideas are working so well. ;-)
Bret Cahill
May 16, 2013, 9:36:45 AM5/16/13
to
> ..... After they stopped licking their electoral wounds they very likely will renew thwir efforts to maximize votes for themselves by digging up and inventing maximum alleged dirt by the competition.
That's as likely to lose votes as produce votes and many Republicans
tacitly or openly admit it. What Republicans won't admit is their
scandal mongering just a smoke screen for a fig leaf exit.
The legacy media can no longer prop up the GOP now that the Clintons
are, once again, sucking all the air out of the room. They cannot
stop Hillary so the media as well as the Republicans -- both git their
cornpone from the very same 0.01% -- are going after Obama.
Some of this is due to Obama losing focus his second term. That was
obvious when he made the dumb if true comment about the California
AG. But that might also be attributed to the Clintons' upstaging the
lame duck. Obama needed to stay on the economy especially disparity
of wealth 24/7/52. He didn't and the vacuum allowed noise to take
over the political debate.
On the plus side the scandal mongering is good for the economy. The
noise is now the official signal that everything is getting better.
Bret Cahill
That's as likely to lose votes as produce votes and many Republicans
tacitly or openly admit it. What Republicans won't admit is their
scandal mongering just a smoke screen for a fig leaf exit.
The legacy media can no longer prop up the GOP now that the Clintons
are, once again, sucking all the air out of the room. They cannot
stop Hillary so the media as well as the Republicans -- both git their
cornpone from the very same 0.01% -- are going after Obama.
Some of this is due to Obama losing focus his second term. That was
obvious when he made the dumb if true comment about the California
AG. But that might also be attributed to the Clintons' upstaging the
lame duck. Obama needed to stay on the economy especially disparity
of wealth 24/7/52. He didn't and the vacuum allowed noise to take
over the political debate.
On the plus side the scandal mongering is good for the economy. The
noise is now the official signal that everything is getting better.
Bret Cahill
BeamMeUpScotty
May 16, 2013, 3:04:41 PM5/16/13
to
Obama's even going to take my guns because there is no possible way for
government tyranny to show up while Democrats run things.
Message has been deleted
Harold Burton
May 16, 2013, 10:12:32 PM5/16/13
to
In article
<3725f48d-d317-437b...@d6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>,
Bret Cahill <BretC...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
> <crickets>
You've been living in a cave?
snicker
<3725f48d-d317-437b...@d6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>,
Bret Cahill <BretC...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
> <crickets>
You've been living in a cave?
snicker
Harold Burton
May 16, 2013, 10:13:37 PM5/16/13
to
In article
<140ba77c-2e33-4a90...@g5g2000pbp.googlegroups.com>,
<140ba77c-2e33-4a90...@g5g2000pbp.googlegroups.com>,
Bret Cahill <BretC...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
> > ..... After they stopped licking their electoral wounds they very likely
> > will renew thwir efforts to maximize votes for themselves by digging up and
> > inventing maximum alleged dirt by the competition.
>
> That's as likely to lose votes as produce votes and many Republicans
> tacitly or openly admit it. What Republicans won't admit is their
> scandal mongering just a smoke screen for a fig leaf exit.
which makes them different from Democrats, how?
> > ..... After they stopped licking their electoral wounds they very likely
> > will renew thwir efforts to maximize votes for themselves by digging up and
> > inventing maximum alleged dirt by the competition.
>
> That's as likely to lose votes as produce votes and many Republicans
> tacitly or openly admit it. What Republicans won't admit is their
> scandal mongering just a smoke screen for a fig leaf exit.
Bret Cahill
May 17, 2013, 11:00:51 AM5/17/13
to
> > > ..... After they stopped licking their electoral wounds they very likely
> > > will renew thwir efforts to maximize votes for themselves by digging up and
> > > inventing maximum alleged dirt by the competition.
>
> > That's as likely to lose votes as produce votes and many Republicans
> > tacitly or openly admit it. What Republicans won't admit is their
> > scandal mongering just a smoke screen for a fig leaf exit.
>
> which makes them different from Democrats, how?
Republicans need to be answering that question if they want some sort
> > > will renew thwir efforts to maximize votes for themselves by digging up and
> > > inventing maximum alleged dirt by the competition.
>
> > That's as likely to lose votes as produce votes and many Republicans
> > tacitly or openly admit it. What Republicans won't admit is their
> > scandal mongering just a smoke screen for a fig leaf exit.
>
> which makes them different from Democrats, how?
of moral high groound.
Bret Cahill
Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
May 17, 2013, 11:14:48 AM5/17/13
to
On May 16, 2:00 pm, dzweib...@REMOVEyahoo.com (Denny) wrote:
> I'm just glad everyone is talking about something other than the Boston
> bombing or the three kidnapped women.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Oh, don't worry Sybil. Look for some poor 3rd century, cave dwelling
ragheads to get vaporised in a day or two. Probably a few women and
children just to make the story "spicy" enough. Anything to take the
LIV's attention off the Obama regime's corruption for a few days so
they can get back to the business of destroying the country from
behind the curtain..
> bombing or the three kidnapped women.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Oh, don't worry Sybil. Look for some poor 3rd century, cave dwelling
ragheads to get vaporised in a day or two. Probably a few women and
children just to make the story "spicy" enough. Anything to take the
LIV's attention off the Obama regime's corruption for a few days so
they can get back to the business of destroying the country from
behind the curtain..
Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
May 17, 2013, 11:17:55 AM5/17/13
to
gutter and play dirty like the Gimmeerats. Every time a Republican
uses progressive tactics against a progressive the progressive goes
into granmal siezures, because there's not a page in the Alinsky
handbook that instructs them on how to cope with it.
Bret Cahill
May 17, 2013, 11:23:16 AM5/17/13
to
GOP thing, not Democrat.
That's how Obama won the Democratic Party base to beat the most
popular public servant in America today: Hillary Clinton
The neocons, always liberal as far as tax hikes on the rich and open
borders are concerned, quit the Dems and joined the GOP because they
knew the Democrats would never go around bombing Muslims for political
gain.
Bret Cahill
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
BeamMeUpScotty
May 17, 2013, 5:58:20 PM5/17/13
to
On 5/17/2013 5:25 PM, Denny wrote:
> policy should be automatically ignored. Zero objectivity.
>
The republicans/TEA-PARTY are the targets of Obama's retribution and
Obama wants to PUNISH his enemies.
Maybe Democrats shouldn't abuse the power entrusted to them, and then
they wouldn't need to complain yet again about Republican/TEA PARTY
people and their over zealous opinions, you know those rascally
Republican/TEA PARTY types that have opinions......
--
*Rumination*
#30 - Socialism will eventually run out of other people's money and
collapse.
> Bret Cahill <BretC...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
>>>>> ..... After they stopped licking their electoral wounds they very
>>>>> lik=
>>>>> ..... After they stopped licking their electoral wounds they very
>> ely
>>>>> will renew thwir efforts to maximize votes for themselves by
>>>>> digging =
>>>>> will renew thwir efforts to maximize votes for themselves by
>> up and
>>>>> inventing maximum alleged dirt by the competition.
>>>
>>>> That's as likely to lose votes as produce votes and many Republicans
>>>> tacitly or openly admit it. =A0What Republicans won't admit is their
>>>>> inventing maximum alleged dirt by the competition.
>>>
>>>> That's as likely to lose votes as produce votes and many Republicans
>>>> scandal mongering just a smoke screen for a fig leaf exit.
>>>
>>> which makes them different from Democrats, how?
>>
>> Republicans need to be answering that question if they want some sort
>> of moral high groound.
>>
>> Bret Cahill
>
> Republicans hate the IRS so much that any opinion they say about future
>>>
>>> which makes them different from Democrats, how?
>>
>> Republicans need to be answering that question if they want some sort
>> of moral high groound.
>>
>> Bret Cahill
>
> policy should be automatically ignored. Zero objectivity.
>
The republicans/TEA-PARTY are the targets of Obama's retribution and
Obama wants to PUNISH his enemies.
Maybe Democrats shouldn't abuse the power entrusted to them, and then
they wouldn't need to complain yet again about Republican/TEA PARTY
people and their over zealous opinions, you know those rascally
Republican/TEA PARTY types that have opinions......
--
*Rumination*
#30 - Socialism will eventually run out of other people's money and
collapse.
Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
May 17, 2013, 7:57:47 PM5/17/13
to
On May 17, 4:25 pm, dzweib...@REMOVEyahoo.com (Denny) wrote:
> Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
> Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
> > > > > ..... After they stopped licking their electoral wounds they very
> > > > > lik=
> > ely
> > > > > will renew thwir efforts to maximize votes for themselves by
> > > > > digging =
> > > > > will renew thwir efforts to maximize votes for themselves by
> > up and
> > > > > inventing maximum alleged dirt by the competition.
>
> > > > That's as likely to lose votes as produce votes and many Republicans
> > > > tacitly or openly admit it. =A0What Republicans won't admit is their
> > > > > inventing maximum alleged dirt by the competition.
>
> > > > That's as likely to lose votes as produce votes and many Republicans
> > > > scandal mongering just a smoke screen for a fig leaf exit.
>
> > > which makes them different from Democrats, how?
>
> > Republicans need to be answering that question if they want some sort
> > of moral high groound.
>
> > Bret Cahill
>
>
> > > which makes them different from Democrats, how?
>
> > Republicans need to be answering that question if they want some sort
> > of moral high groound.
>
> > Bret Cahill
>
> Republicans hate the IRS so much that any opinion they say about future
> policy should be automatically ignored. Zero objectivity.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Ohhh, but you leftists just LOVE the IRS. That why most progressives
> - Show quoted text -
don't pay their taxes.
Immortalist
May 17, 2013, 7:59:55 PM5/17/13
to
On May 15, 10:47 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
> <crickets>
Sounds like a waste of time setting around waiting for that shit.
> <crickets>
Sounds like a waste of time setting around waiting for that shit.
Harold Burton
May 17, 2013, 9:11:54 PM5/17/13
to
In article <20130517172506.063$i...@newsreader.com>,
cite? And I know you don't have one.
snicker
> > > > > ..... After they stopped licking their electoral wounds they very
> > > > > lik=
> > ely
> > > > > will renew thwir efforts to maximize votes for themselves by
> > > > > digging =
> > > > > will renew thwir efforts to maximize votes for themselves by
> > up and
> > > > > inventing maximum alleged dirt by the competition.
> > >
> > > > That's as likely to lose votes as produce votes and many Republicans
> > > > tacitly or openly admit it. =A0What Republicans won't admit is their
> > > > > inventing maximum alleged dirt by the competition.
> > >
> > > > That's as likely to lose votes as produce votes and many Republicans
> > > > scandal mongering just a smoke screen for a fig leaf exit.
> > >
> > > which makes them different from Democrats, how?
> >
> > Republicans need to be answering that question if they want some sort
> > of moral high groound.
> >
> > Bret Cahill
>
> Republicans hate the IRS so much . . .
> > >
> > > which makes them different from Democrats, how?
> >
> > Republicans need to be answering that question if they want some sort
> > of moral high groound.
> >
> > Bret Cahill
>
cite? And I know you don't have one.
snicker
Harold Burton
May 17, 2013, 9:13:28 PM5/17/13
to
In article
<18a9ab70-6640-4804...@g9g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
"Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E"
Democrats came up with a plan to encourage more tax compliance, but it
turned out there weren't enough Cabinet posts to make it practical. :-)
<18a9ab70-6640-4804...@g9g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
"Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E"
turned out there weren't enough Cabinet posts to make it practical. :-)
BeamMeUpScotty
May 17, 2013, 11:29:26 PM5/17/13
to
>>>>> ..... After they stopped licking their electoral wounds they very
>>>>> lik=
>> ely
>>>>> will renew thwir efforts to maximize votes for themselves by
>>>>> digging =
>>>>> will renew thwir efforts to maximize votes for themselves by
>> up and
>>>>> inventing maximum alleged dirt by the competition.
>>>
>>>> That's as likely to lose votes as produce votes and many Republicans
>>>> tacitly or openly admit it. =A0What Republicans won't admit is their
>>>>> inventing maximum alleged dirt by the competition.
>>>
>>>> That's as likely to lose votes as produce votes and many Republicans
>>>> scandal mongering just a smoke screen for a fig leaf exit.
>>>
>>> which makes them different from Democrats, how?
>>
>> Republicans need to be answering that question if they want some sort
>> of moral high groound.
>>
>> Bret Cahill
>
> Republicans hate the IRS
>>>
>>> which makes them different from Democrats, how?
>>
>> Republicans need to be answering that question if they want some sort
>> of moral high groound.
>>
>> Bret Cahill
>
You GOT THAT backwards didn't you?
It's the IRS that was targeting the TEA PARTY people.
Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
May 17, 2013, 11:46:22 PM5/17/13
to
>
> - Show quoted text -
Oh? Tell that to the dozens of innocent men,women and children
> - Show quoted text -
vaporised by Obama's remote controlled drones.
Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
May 17, 2013, 11:46:55 PM5/17/13
to
On May 17, 4:25 pm, dzweib...@REMOVEyahoo.com (Denny) wrote:
> Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
> Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
> > > > > ..... After they stopped licking their electoral wounds they very
> > > > > lik=
> > ely
> > > > > will renew thwir efforts to maximize votes for themselves by
> > > > > digging =
> > > > > will renew thwir efforts to maximize votes for themselves by
> > up and
> > > > > inventing maximum alleged dirt by the competition.
>
> > > > That's as likely to lose votes as produce votes and many Republicans
> > > > tacitly or openly admit it. =A0What Republicans won't admit is their
> > > > > inventing maximum alleged dirt by the competition.
>
> > > > That's as likely to lose votes as produce votes and many Republicans
> > > > scandal mongering just a smoke screen for a fig leaf exit.
>
> > > which makes them different from Democrats, how?
>
> > Republicans need to be answering that question if they want some sort
> > of moral high groound.
>
> > Bret Cahill
>
>
> > > which makes them different from Democrats, how?
>
> > Republicans need to be answering that question if they want some sort
> > of moral high groound.
>
> > Bret Cahill
>
> Republicans hate the IRS so much that any opinion they say about future
> policy should be automatically ignored. Zero objectivity.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I have an idea. Abolish the IRS and go to a flat tax. Problem solved.
> - Show quoted text -
Bret Cahill
May 17, 2013, 11:55:32 PM5/17/13
to
distraction that killed 4 orders of magnitude more innocent men,women
and children.
Once Republicans opened to door to patriotic quagmires of mass
distraction, there could not be any end game. It was supposed to
"lock" the GOP in power forever.
Repugs wouldn't want Obama to cut 'n run would they?
Bret Cahill
Bret Cahill
May 18, 2013, 12:05:48 AM5/18/13
to
> > <crickets>
>
> Sounds like a waste of time setting around waiting for that shit.
Maybe so but it got a thread going!
>
> Sounds like a waste of time setting around waiting for that shit.
Bret Cahill
BeamMeUpScotty
May 18, 2013, 12:16:18 AM5/18/13
to
On 5/17/2013 11:46 PM, Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
wrote:
But Obama just hired 16,000 NEW partisan hacks that with a wink and a
nod they know their job is they are supposed to target anyone Democrats
flag as the opposition of the moment.
All it takes is the code phrase that "we must punish our enemies"
And with that the trigger is pulled.
wrote:
nod they know their job is they are supposed to target anyone Democrats
flag as the opposition of the moment.
All it takes is the code phrase that "we must punish our enemies"
And with that the trigger is pulled.
Zinnic
May 18, 2013, 7:25:15 AM5/18/13
to
Why has no one noted that the statute states that tax free status be granted only to organizations that cater "EXCLUSIVELY" to social benefit. For some reason (powerful Unions?) the IRS took it on itself to redefine EXCLUSIVELY as meaning "PRIMARILY".
With this redefinition, the IRS justifies granting tax-free status to any social/polical organization that limits it's polical activities/expenditures to less than 50%.
This was not the intent of the statute. The fault, as usual, is the do-nothing Congress!
Zinnic
With this redefinition, the IRS justifies granting tax-free status to any social/polical organization that limits it's polical activities/expenditures to less than 50%.
This was not the intent of the statute. The fault, as usual, is the do-nothing Congress!
Zinnic
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Bret Cahill
May 18, 2013, 9:17:29 AM5/18/13
to
> > > > > > > ..... After they stopped licking their electoral wounds they
> > > > > > > very lik=3D
> > > > ely
> > > > > > > will renew thwir efforts to maximize votes for themselves by
> > > > > > > digging =3D
> > > > > > > will renew thwir efforts to maximize votes for themselves by
> > > > up and
> > > > > > > inventing maximum alleged dirt by the competition.
>
> > > > > > That's as likely to lose votes as produce votes and many
> > > > > > Republican=
> > > > > > > inventing maximum alleged dirt by the competition.
>
> > > > > > That's as likely to lose votes as produce votes and many
> > s
> > > > > > tacitly or openly admit it. =3DA0What Republicans won't admit is
> > > > > > th=
> > eir
> > > > > > scandal mongering just a smoke screen for a fig leaf exit.
>
> > > > > which makes them different from Democrats, how?
>
> > > > Republicans need to be answering that question if they want some sort
> > > > of moral high groound.
>
> > > > Bret Cahill
>
> > > Republicans hate the IRS so much that any opinion they say about future
> > > policy should be automatically ignored. Zero objectivity.- Hide quoted
> > > te=
> > > > > > scandal mongering just a smoke screen for a fig leaf exit.
>
> > > > > which makes them different from Democrats, how?
>
> > > > Republicans need to be answering that question if they want some sort
> > > > of moral high groound.
>
> > > > Bret Cahill
>
> > > Republicans hate the IRS so much that any opinion they say about future
> > > policy should be automatically ignored. Zero objectivity.- Hide quoted
> > xt -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > I have an idea. Abolish the IRS and go to a flat tax. Problem solved.
>
> While we're at it, put the AirCav back on horses and swithch the navy back
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > I have an idea. Abolish the IRS and go to a flat tax. Problem solved.
>
> to sailing ships.
What most on both sides fail to understand is that teabaggerism isn't
a throw back to something that seems backwards to Democrats today.
It's a form of despotism that is new to America. The "celebrated
Montesquieu" was clear that taxes and taxation were correlative.
Bret Cahill
Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
May 18, 2013, 9:21:12 AM5/18/13
to
On May 18, 7:57 am, dzweib...@REMOVEyahoo.com (Denny) wrote:
> "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E" <burtonu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > s
> > > > > > tacitly or openly admit it. =3DA0What Republicans won't admit is
> > > > > > th=
> to sailing ships.- Hide quoted text -
> "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E" <burtonu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 17, 4:25=A0pm, dzweib...@REMOVEyahoo.com (Denny) wrote:
> > > Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > ..... After they stopped licking their electoral wounds they
> > > > > > > very lik=3D
>
>
>
>
> > On May 17, 4:25=A0pm, dzweib...@REMOVEyahoo.com (Denny) wrote:
> > > Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > ..... After they stopped licking their electoral wounds they
> > > > ely
> > > > > > > will renew thwir efforts to maximize votes for themselves by
> > > > > > > digging =3D
> > > > > > > will renew thwir efforts to maximize votes for themselves by
> > > > up and
> > > > > > > inventing maximum alleged dirt by the competition.
>
> > > > > > That's as likely to lose votes as produce votes and many
> > > > > > Republican=
> > > > > > > inventing maximum alleged dirt by the competition.
>
> > > > > > That's as likely to lose votes as produce votes and many
> > s
> > > > > > tacitly or openly admit it. =3DA0What Republicans won't admit is
> > > > > > th=
> > eir
> > > > > > scandal mongering just a smoke screen for a fig leaf exit.
>
> > > > > which makes them different from Democrats, how?
>
> > > > Republicans need to be answering that question if they want some sort
> > > > of moral high groound.
>
> > > > Bret Cahill
>
> > > Republicans hate the IRS so much that any opinion they say about future
> > > policy should be automatically ignored. Zero objectivity.- Hide quoted
> > > te=
> > > > > > scandal mongering just a smoke screen for a fig leaf exit.
>
> > > > > which makes them different from Democrats, how?
>
> > > > Republicans need to be answering that question if they want some sort
> > > > of moral high groound.
>
> > > > Bret Cahill
>
> > > Republicans hate the IRS so much that any opinion they say about future
> > > policy should be automatically ignored. Zero objectivity.- Hide quoted
> > xt -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > I have an idea. Abolish the IRS and go to a flat tax. Problem solved.
>
> While we're at it, put the AirCav back on horses and swithch the navy back
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > I have an idea. Abolish the IRS and go to a flat tax. Problem solved.
>
> to sailing ships.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
WTF does the military have to do with the IRS Sybil??
> - Show quoted text -
Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
May 18, 2013, 9:22:11 AM5/18/13
to
>
> - Show quoted text -
I guess that explains why most Obama supporters pay no federal taxes.
> - Show quoted text -
Even the ones in his regime.
Bret Cahill
May 18, 2013, 9:32:42 AM5/18/13
to
quit dodgin' 'n dodgin' The Question:
"Does free speech precede each and every free trade?"
Montesquieu was clear: Progressive taxation goes back to ancient
Greece and "is fair if not proportionable."
Bret Cahill
BeamMeUpScotty
May 18, 2013, 9:56:00 AM5/18/13
to
Message has been deleted
jim
May 18, 2013, 10:40:38 AM5/18/13
to
BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> >
> >
> Liberals Waste and Taxes are correlative...
Federal taxes are taking the lowest percent of
GDP since Truman was in office. Taxes haven't been
below 15% of GDP since 1950.
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fredgraph.png?g=ixe
BeamMeUpScotty
May 18, 2013, 11:02:37 AM5/18/13
to
Bush Tax cuts ended January 1 2013
Two of the largest tax hikes in history.
BeamMeUpScotty
May 18, 2013, 11:33:11 AM5/18/13
to
On 5/18/2013 10:40 AM, jim wrote:
>
>
>
>
looking for federal taxes and then refraining from those activities that
are taxed *rather than* going out and Producing more wealth to grow the
GDP. Isn't that funny, your higher ObamaCare taxes and killing the
Bush Tax cuts reduced your GDP and your realized tax receipts into the
treasury and your answer to that is raise the taxes more. That's a hoot.
Like producing income.... I purposefully quit doing that 4 years ago.
Now I'm starting to produce income in ways that don't get taxed or defer
their tax until I choose to realize that as income. If you look into
GOOD'OL Warren Buffet that was how he became a Billionaire, he defers
taxes and grows his companies and his own wealth without chasing it in
so raising taxes on him is useless because he will wait until he can get
a break or exemption or lower rates and then he will realize the profit
and pat less tax.
I don't buy any Liquor or Gas. I don't pay for a cell phone.
--
*Rumination*
#5 - You can't have Social Justice and Equal Justice at the same time,
they are 'mutually exclusive'.
BeamMeUpScotty
May 18, 2013, 12:51:10 PM5/18/13
to
On 5/18/2013 10:40 AM, jim wrote:
>
>
>
>
Thanks to people like me that spend an unusually large amount of time
looking for federal taxes and then refraining from those activities that
are taxed *rather than* going out and Producing more wealth to grow the
GDP. Isn't that funny, your higher ObamaCare taxes and killing the
Bush Tax cuts reduced your GDP and your realized tax receipts into the
treasury and your answer to that is raise the taxes more. That's a hoot.
Like producing income.... I purposefully quit doing that 4 years ago.
Now I'm starting to produce income in ways that don't get taxed or defer
their tax until I choose to realize that as income. If you look into
GOOD'OL Warren Buffet that was how he became a Billionaire, he defers
taxes and grows his companies and his own wealth without cashing it in
looking for federal taxes and then refraining from those activities that
are taxed *rather than* going out and Producing more wealth to grow the
GDP. Isn't that funny, your higher ObamaCare taxes and killing the
Bush Tax cuts reduced your GDP and your realized tax receipts into the
treasury and your answer to that is raise the taxes more. That's a hoot.
Like producing income.... I purposefully quit doing that 4 years ago.
Now I'm starting to produce income in ways that don't get taxed or defer
their tax until I choose to realize that as income. If you look into
GOOD'OL Warren Buffet that was how he became a Billionaire, he defers
so raising taxes on him is useless because he will wait until he can get
a break or exemption or lower rates and then he will realize the profit
and pay less tax.
a break or exemption or lower rates and then he will realize the profit
I don't buy any Liquor or Gas. I don't pay for a cell phone tax.
Raise taxes more I'll quit buying and doing more.....
--
*Rumination*
#73 - Austerity is what happens when Socialists run out of other
people's money.
Transition Zone
May 18, 2013, 2:07:37 PM5/18/13
to
On May 16, 9:03 am, "Dare" <clydad...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Bret Cahill" <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote in messagenews:3725f48d-d317-437b...@d6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> > <crickets>
>
> Why bother when the Dems ideas are working so well. ;-)
How would repubs respond?
> "Bret Cahill" <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote in messagenews:3725f48d-d317-437b...@d6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> > <crickets>
>
> Why bother when the Dems ideas are working so well. ;-)
How would repubs respond?
jim
May 18, 2013, 2:07:36 PM5/18/13
to
BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>
> On 5/18/2013 10:40 AM, jim wrote:
> >
> >
> > BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Liberals Waste and Taxes are correlative...
> >
> > Taxes are very low in the last 4 years.
> > Federal taxes are taking the lowest percent of
> > GDP since Truman was in office. Taxes haven't been
> > below 15% of GDP since 1950.
> >
> > http://research.stlouisfed.org/fredgraph.png?g=ixe
>
> Thanks to people like me that spend an unusually large amount of time
> looking for federal taxes and then refraining from those activities that
> are taxed *rather than* going out and Producing more wealth to grow the
> GDP.
Lower GDP would make taxes seem relatively higher.
> Like producing income.... I purposefully quit doing that 4 years ago.
Remember to keep the wheels on your
shopping cart well oiled.
Transition Zone
May 18, 2013, 2:08:45 PM5/18/13
to
On May 17, 11:17 am, "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey
rd.,Wilmington,D.E" <burtonu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 17, 10:00 am, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > ..... After they stopped licking their electoral wounds they very likely
> > > > > will renew thwir efforts to maximize votes for themselves by digging up and
> > > > tacitly or openly admit it. What Republicans won't admit is their
> gutter and play dirty like the Gimmeerats.
Nope, can't do that. There's no time to. They spend too much time
going to anti-abortion churches.
rd.,Wilmington,D.E" <burtonu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 17, 10:00 am, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > ..... After they stopped licking their electoral wounds they very likely
> > > > > will renew thwir efforts to maximize votes for themselves by digging up and
> > > > > inventing maximum alleged dirt by the competition.
>
> > > > That's as likely to lose votes as produce votes and many Republicans
>
> > > > tacitly or openly admit it. What Republicans won't admit is their
> > > > scandal mongering just a smoke screen for a fig leaf exit.
>
> > > which makes them different from Democrats, how?
>
> > Republicans need to be answering that question if they want some sort
> > of moral high groound.
>
> > Bret Cahill
>
>Fuck the "moral high ground". Republicans need to get down in the
>
> > > which makes them different from Democrats, how?
>
> > Republicans need to be answering that question if they want some sort
> > of moral high groound.
>
> > Bret Cahill
>
> gutter and play dirty like the Gimmeerats.
Nope, can't do that. There's no time to. They spend too much time
going to anti-abortion churches.
BeamMeUpScotty
May 18, 2013, 2:21:24 PM5/18/13
to
shopping cart I've had my eye on. The bag lady is wanting to move
Washington D.C. where the streets are paved with green backs.
I think I can get a government backed loan to get it if I show the
pervert at the post office "my package".
jim
May 18, 2013, 4:47:42 PM5/18/13
to
compared to yours.
Immortalist
May 18, 2013, 5:56:59 PM5/18/13
to
On May 17, 9:05 pm, Bret Cahill <Bret_E_Cah...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > <crickets>
>
> > Sounds like a waste of time setting around waiting for that shit.
>
> Maybe so but it got a thread going!
>
Threads in usenet are a thing of the past. Facebook is getting more
> > > <crickets>
>
> > Sounds like a waste of time setting around waiting for that shit.
>
> Maybe so but it got a thread going!
>
debates going now. I remember the goal was to break Googles limit of a
1000 entries, my last one;
In 2011 I started this debate in usenet, the last of the good
arguments before FakeBook killed the original social media...
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.environment/browse_frm/thread/5c14c0b46bd2171a/28d9524854e6812d?#28d9524854e6812d
> Bret Cahill
Bret Cahill
May 18, 2013, 6:39:36 PM5/18/13
to
> > > > <crickets>
>
> > > Sounds like a waste of time setting around waiting for that shit.
>
> > Maybe so but it got a thread going!
>
> Threads in usenet are a thing of the past. Facebook is getting more
> debates going now. I remember the goal was to break Googles limit of a
> 1000 entries, my last one;
>
> In 2011 I started this debate in usenet, the last of the good
> arguments before FakeBook killed the original social media...http://groups.google.com/group/sci.environment/browse_frm/thread/5c14...
>
> > > Sounds like a waste of time setting around waiting for that shit.
>
> > Maybe so but it got a thread going!
>
> Threads in usenet are a thing of the past. Facebook is getting more
> debates going now. I remember the goal was to break Googles limit of a
> 1000 entries, my last one;
>
> In 2011 I started this debate in usenet, the last of the good
A nice girl asked if I did anything on social media. I answered, "no,
I'm just on anti-social media."
Bret Cahill
Immortalist
May 18, 2013, 6:51:34 PM5/18/13
to
in some sense. You, bro, are one of the pioneers of social media,
don't let them take that from us.
0 new messages