GOD, RELATIVITY & THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
George Hammond
WASHINGTON D.C.
I braked at the stoplight and a sedan skidded to a halt
on my right. It was 3 am in a honky tonk section of Laural
Maryland a block from where George Wallace was shot. The
three punks in the car started blowing their horn. I knew
it was run or pull the K-Bar over my visor and probably kill
one of them in a fight. I jambed it into reverse flooring
the accelerator and spinning the steering wheel. The car
spun into a 180 facing the wrong way on a divided highway. I
gunned it into the oncoming traffic. The three punks in the
sedan followed suit and came after me! That was the day I
discovered the world's first scientific proof of God. I
discovered it while studying in the library of Congress on
Capitol Hill and was on my way home. Needless to say I got
away or I wouldn't be here telling you about it.
The way I discovered it is an interesting story. I'm a
physicist who got interested in psychology research. The
first thing I found out is that modern psychology research
consists mainly of an activity called Factor Analysis. They
use the world's largest computers to extract the
eigenvectors from 100x100 correlation matrices. The
correlations are obtained from psychology tests given to
hundreds of thousands of people world wide.
The upshot of all this is that they have known for
decades that every analysis results in exactly 4
eigenvectors, but being psychologists and not physicists
they have never been able to figure out why or what they
mean or where they come from. Being a physicist I
immediately recognized that the 4x4 matrix is what
physicists call, "curved". I went looking for the cause of
this curvature and soon discovered that it comes from the
3-axis orthogonal structure of the body, in particular the
3-axis cleavage of the brain. That accounted for 3 of the
eigenvectors, they were "space" related. The 4th one was IQ
which is mental speed and is time related. The curvature of
this matrix was actually caused by brain growth, in
particular the well known Secular Trend in human growth.
What I had discovered is that all of psychology is explained
by a curvature of subjective spacetime.... a CURVATURE OF
REALITY! . I was amazed at how simple this discovery was...
apparently I must have been the first physicist in history
to ever take psychology seriously. Little did I know how
momentous this discovery actually was!
Once the stunning fact is discovered that psychology is a
CURVATURE it is not long before one realizes that this
curvature is actually the explaination of "God"... yes, the
God of the Bible. Sure enough, the Secular Trend growth
deficit in the brain causes the "unconscious mind" which is
in fact the God of the Bible. Analysis soon showed that
this discovery explained the following 13 major historical
facts about the phenomenon of God:
1. There physically exists an "invisible world" known as
"Heaven" which is similar to Earth but is a paradise.
2. God is an "invisible man" who lives there and is all
powerful and rules the actual (visible) world from
there.
3. This God can effect miracles which transcend
the (known) laws of Physics.
4. Jesus said "God is a spirit" Jn 4:24
5. Historically Religion has evolved from Polytheism
(many demigods) to Monotheism (one supreme God).
6. Christianity predicts the world is transforming itself
into Heaven and will actually complete this at a
date known as "Kingdom Come"... or the "end of the
world".
7. There is such a thing as "Eternal Life".
8. Jesus was the physical "incarnation of God"
9. The Cross for some reason is the central symbol of
(Western) Religion.
10. For some reason our main canonical text is written
in 4 identical versions known as the "4-Gospel Canon".
11. God "created the world" only a matter of "thousands"
of years ago (Genesis) not "billions" of years ago
(Big Bang) as Science believes.
12. God created man "in his own image".
13. There is a "Trinity of God", functionally or
operationally speaking.
the complete detailed explanation of all 13 of these
leading items PROVES without any doubt that a curvature of
subjective reality (the reality we see) is caused by the
brain growth deficit and explains the entire phenomenon of
God:
GOD IS A CURVATURE OF
REALITY
Naturally I have published all of this in the peer
reviewed literature in order to protect my priorities, and I
am currently writing a book. My peer published papers are
prominantly posted on my website for your reading
convenience (url in signature file below).
Meanwhile, the discovery of the world's first scientific
proof of God is my calling card to history.
========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
Primary site
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
Mirror sites
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=======================================
Inertial
news:gs48f5l3kartad4tq...@4ax.com...
> Copyright 2009 George Hammond M.S. Physics
Gawd no .. Hammond again. Are you still doing your comedy act that you call
science?
George Hammond
You're not laughing, dork.
Inertial
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 20:43:33 +1100, "Inertial"
> <relat...@rest.com> wrote:
>
>>"George Hammond" <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote in message
>>news:gs48f5l3kartad4tq...@4ax.com...
>>> Copyright 2009 George Hammond M.S. Physics
>>
>>Gawd no .. Hammond again. Are you still doing your comedy act that you
>>call
>>science?
>>
> You're not laughing, dork.
Oh .. but I AMMMMM !! You're hilarious
Juan R.
Your usual nonsense.
--
http://www.canonicalscience.org/
BLOG:
http://www.canonicalscience.org/en/publicationzone/canonicalsciencetoday/canonicalsciencetoday.html
ZerkonXXXX
> 5. Historically Religion has evolved from Polytheism
> (many demigods) to Monotheism (one supreme God).
.. and after this?
Religion has not been confined by a "supreme God" event. It has moved
either passed this or has moved differently and away from it depending
how you want to view it.
From the Hindu (non)concept of Brahman, to the Buddhists, to the Tao, all
defying this idea of 'one supreme god'.
Let's get 'scientifically' exact here. Historically, religion has not
evolved. It is humans that have evolved, modified or changed beliefs for
one understandable reason or another which then is called religion.
Religion as actor is metaphorical as is "Christianity predicts .." as is
"Science believes..." an important point to keep in mind, as you may know.
One can be 'set adrift' in metaphorical form.
"Supreme" is a rather weak idea for god or anything else for that matter.
Certainly any science is at it's worst whenever this type of thinking
kicks in. It usually indicates being blinded by some fatal arrogance...
> Meanwhile, the discovery of the world's first scientific
> proof of God is my calling card to history.
.. present poster, George Of the House Of Hammonds, excluded of course
and as usual. Do you have a booking agent?
Anyway, "God is a (only 'a'?) curvature to reality" is an excellent
poetic image.
doug
George Hammond wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 20:43:33 +1100, "Inertial"
> <relat...@rest.com> wrote:
>
>
>>"George Hammond" <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote in message
>>news:gs48f5l3kartad4tq...@4ax.com...
>>
>>>Copyright 2009 George Hammond M.S. Physics
>>
>>Gawd no .. Hammond again. Are you still doing your comedy act that you call
>>science?
>>
>
> You're not laughing, dork.
If he reads the nonsense below, he will laugh his
head off:
raven1
>Copyright 2009 George Hammond
Look who the nurses are letting use their computer again...
John Stafford
George Hammond <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote:
> [...] t modern psychology research
> consists mainly of an activity called Factor Analysis. They
> use the world's largest computers to extract the
> eigenvectors from 100x100 correlation matrices. The
> correlations are obtained from psychology tests given to
> hundreds of thousands of people world wide.
It that is true, then show the data - cite.
> The upshot of all this is that they have known for
> decades that every analysis results in exactly 4
> eigenvectors,
Please show your work.
> Being a physicist I
> immediately recognized that the 4x4 matrix is what
> physicists call, "curved".
Eigenvectors do not curve, so you must be referring to some relationship
between matrices. Show us.
Free Lunch
wrote in alt.atheism:
Didn't you know that George lives in a different universe than we do. He
has been blessed with the opportunity to pass his wisdom along to us at
times and does so without regard to our needs.
xxein
> Mirror sites
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
> HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
> http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
> =======================================
xxein: You didn't remember falling out of your bed did you?
Inertial
>> Meanwhile, the discovery of the world's first scientific
>> proof of God is my calling card to history.
You mean calling card to the lunatic asylum. Oh, that's right, you've
already been there.
George Hammond
<Z...@erkonx.net> wrote:
>On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:22:30 -0800, George Hammond wrote:
>
>> 5. Historically Religion has evolved from Polytheism
>> (many demigods) to Monotheism (one supreme God).
>
>.. and after this?
>
>Religion has not been confined by a "supreme God" event. It has moved
>either passed this or has moved differently and away from it depending
>how you want to view it.
>
>
[Hammond]
I'm using Dragon-10 voice dictation at 150 words a minute
so don't even think about trying to out talk me. You'll
kill yourself pounding away on that stone age keyboard
trying.
When they launch a rocket that count down from 10 and
when they get to zero they push the button.same with
religion, science has now shown that there is a hierarchy of
eigenvectors,30 at the first order, 13 of the second order,
for the third order, and ONLY ONE at the fourth order.
The fourth-order factor is the supreme monotheistic God
of world religion. Scientifically speaking, all of religion
ends in a single fourth order eigenvector known as God.
End of story.
>
>
>From the Hindu (non)concept of Brahman, to the Buddhists, to the Tao, all
>defying this idea of 'one supreme god'.
>
>
>
[Hammond]
the Hindus combine all orders of factors together.
30+13+4+1 equals 46 gods and Hinduism. Of course they don't
know what they are, I'm the one that has discovered that and
published it.
Christianity on the other hand retains only the fourth
order factor which is the supreme God and the 4-3rd order
factors which are known as the four Gospes canon of Matthew
Mark Luke and John.
Judaism of course retains ONLY the single forth order
eigenvector. Same for Islam.
>
>
>
>Let's get 'scientifically' exact here.
>
>
[Hammond]
It's about time, I'm an MS in physics you know.
>
>
> Historically, religion has not
>evolved. It is humans that have evolved, modified or changed beliefs for
>one understandable reason or another which then is called religion.
>Religion as actor is metaphorical as is "Christianity predicts .." as is
>"Science believes..." an important point to keep in mind, as you may know.
>One can be 'set adrift' in metaphorical form.
>
>
[Hammond]
what you have just said is a load of suburban mythology,
knowledge of crap. It is well-known that religion has
progressed from policy is to monotheism in the last 5000
years. And now Hammond has explained WHY. It's because
millions of people analyzing everyday psychology over
thousands of years slowly discovered the full hierarchy of
high factors in Psychometry, one step at a time. naturally
they discovered the lower orders first in progress slowly
through the second order factors which are the 12 Olympic
gods of the Egyptian-Greco-Roman pantheon. Finally the Jews
identified the single final fourth-quarter eigenvector which
they called "God".
>
>
>"Supreme" is a rather weak idea for god or anything else for that matter.
>
>
[Hammond]
you know what talking about. Take a look at the size of
world monotheism.... each of the five major face of the
world is monotheistic. That right there tells you how big
an influential the fourth order final eigenvector is!
>
>
>Certainly any science is at it's worst whenever this type of thinking
>kicks in. It usually indicates being blinded by some fatal arrogance...
>
>
[Hammond]
I'm not talking about "thinking" for Christ's sake. I'm
talking about experimental discovery in their weight
confirmed to two decimal point accuracy! if you don't
believe it I suggest you read my papers which have been
published in the peer-reviewed academic literature:
Peer reviewed publications:
Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in
New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167
Pergamon Press. Online copy of peer/published
paper is posted at:
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/cart.html
Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Proof of God
Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July 2003, pp 231-244(Noetic
Press)
Online copy of peer/published paper is posted at:
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/Hammond5s1.html
Otherwise you're just passing into the wind!
>
>
>
>> Meanwhile, the discovery of the world's first scientific
>> proof of God is my calling card to history.
>
>.. present poster, George Of the House Of Hammonds, excluded of course
>and as usual. Do you have a booking agent?
>
>
>
[Hammond]
Quit sliding that greased coke bottle in and out of your
ass, It kills brain cells.
>
>
>Anyway, "God is a (only 'a'?) curvature to reality" is an excellent
>poetic image.
>
>
[Hammond]
you don't even know what the word "curvature" in
theoretical physics means for Christ sake.
you like to talk and you seem reasonably civil, that's
commendable. But if you want to talk to me you love to base
your arguments on factual material and not personal
prejudice.
Over and out, Hammond.
PS: Excuse any grammatical errors, I'm using voice
recognition technology and once in awhile it misinterprets a
word. I don't even bother to proofread it on the Internet,
I'm too busy dictating a 300 page book entitled:
THE
SCIENTIFIC
PROOF OF GOD
Into this computer using it.
George Hammond
>In article <gs48f5l3kartad4tq...@4ax.com>,
> George Hammond <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote:
>
>> [...] t modern psychology research
>> consists mainly of an activity called Factor Analysis. They
>> use the world's largest computers to extract the
>> eigenvectors from 100x100 correlation matrices. The
>> correlations are obtained from psychology tests given to
>> hundreds of thousands of people world wide.
>
>It that is true, then show the data - cite.
>
>
[Hammond]
Cite it? Ffor Christ sakes I've already published it in
two papers in the peer-reviewed academic literature!
Peer reviewed publications:
Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in
New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167
Pergamon Press. Online copy of peer/published
paper is posted at:
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/cart.html
Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Proof of God
Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July 2003, pp 231-244(Noetic
Press)
Online copy of peer/published paper is posted at:
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/Hammond5s1.html
Why don't you read them before shooting your mouth off.
>
>
>> The upshot of all this is that they have known for
>> decades that every analysis results in exactly 4
>> eigenvectors,
>
>Please show your work.
>
[Hammond]
Cited above and posted online for your reading
convenience.
>
>
>> Being a physicist I
>> immediately recognized that the 4x4 matrix is what
>> physicists call, "curved".
>
>Eigenvectors do not curve, so you must be referring to some relationship
>between matrices. Show us.
>
>
[Hammond]
Obviously you don't even know what the word "curvature"
means in theoretical physics. All it means is that the
matrix of the eigenvectors is OBLIQUE and not ORTHOGONALl.
In physical terms this means that the world appears
LARGER and FASTER than it actually is; to EVERYONE including
you and me.
George Hammond
<lits...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Nov 6, 8:02�am, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>> My peer published papers are
>> prominantly posted on my website for your reading
>> convenience
>
>Wow. You can even make spelling errors using speech
>recognition software. Very impressive, George!
>
>
[Hammond]
Let's try that one again. "prominently", hmmm Dragon spells
it correctly. Must've been an editing typo.
raven1
<Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote:
> I'm not talking about "thinking" for Christ's sake.
Truer words were never spoken...
John Stafford
George Hammond <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote:
> Cite it? Ffor Christ sakes I've already published it in
> two papers in the peer-reviewed academic literature!
>
> Peer reviewed publications:
>
> Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in
> New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167
> Pergamon Press. Online copy of peer/published
> paper is posted at:
> http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/cart.html
Pergamon Press was not credible. Elsevier bought Pergamon and chose to
discard your papers.
George Hammond
[Hammmond]
LIAR. ElsEvier lists the paper on their Elsevier official
website and is selling copies for $31.50 shithead:
Cartesian Theory At ELSVIER LTD Web site:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VD4-460RN9N-6&_user
=10&_coverDate=07%2F31%2F1994&_rdoc=6&_fmt=high&_orig=browse&_srch=doc-info(
%23toc%235972%231994%23999879997%23320836%23FLP%23display%23Volume)&_cdi=
5972&_sort=d&_docanchor=&_ct=25&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_
userid=10&md5=49e5f19e70300e8f061e953d6817508c
the URL is too long for Usenet so you'll have to cut and
paste the URL in your web browser to see it.
I've done it, it works, the paperr is there and other more
competent readers can verify it.
YOUR A LIAR SCUMBAG
panam...@hotmail.com
snip
> the URL is too long for Usenet so you'll have to cut and
> paste the URL in your web browser to see it.
Okay, so he's brilliant enough to "prove" <chuckle> the existence of a
god through physics, but can't figure out how to use tinyurl.com.
> YOUR A LIAR SCUMBAG
I quess he was spending so much time on his physics homework that he
just skipped the English classes..
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/Member, Knights of BAAWA!
Tim
> [Hammond]
> I'm using Dragon-10 voice dictation at 150 words a minute
> so don't even think about trying to out talk me. You'll
> kill yourself pounding away on that stone age keyboard
> trying.
> When they launch a rocket that count down from 10 and
> when they get to zero they push the button.same with
> religion, science has now shown that there is a hierarchy of
> eigenvectors,30 at the first order, 13 of the second order,
> for the third order, and ONLY ONE at the fourth order.
> The fourth-order factor is the supreme monotheistic God
> of world religion. Scientifically speaking, all of religion
> ends in a single fourth order eigenvector known as God.
> End of story.
Yes, end of the fantasy story
[Hammond]
> you know what talking about. Take a look at the size of
> world monotheism.... each of the five major face of the
> world is monotheistic. That right there tells you how big
> an influential the fourth order final eigenvector is!
Hey Ham that's some software you got there. Is there a version that
works in English?
> [Hammond]
> I'm not talking about "thinking" for Christ's sake.
Ham, no one, I mean absolutely no one would ever accuse you of
thinking. Giving up your medication and continuing to try and polish
that steaming turd you call spog is a sure sign that you're not a
thinker.
George Hammond
panam...@hotmail.com wrote:
>On Nov 7, 4:33�pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>
>snip
>
>> the URL is too long for Usenet so you'll have to cut and
>> paste the URL in your web browser to see it.
>
>
>-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
>aa#2015/Member, Knights of BAAWA!
>
>
[Hammond]
thanks for the tip Panama..... here's the new URL fo my
paper at ELSEVIER...... let Stafford stuff that up his ass!
Hammond Paper at Elsevier Science Ltd.
George Hammond
[Hammond]
LIAR......... the ELSEVIER PAPER IS RIGFHT HERE:
Notice they are selling it for $20 a copy!
eric gisse
> On Nov 7, 4:33 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>
> snip
>
>> the URL is too long for Usenet so you'll have to cut and
>> paste the URL in your web browser to see it.
>
> Okay, so he's brilliant enough to "prove" <chuckle> the existence of a
> god through physics, but can't figure out how to use tinyurl.com.
Real men use HUGEURL.
Paul Hovnanian P.E.
literature section?
--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:Pa...@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Experience is the worst teacher. It always gives the test
first and the instruction afterward.
George Hammond
<pa...@hovnanian.com> wrote:
>Library of Congress? Have you stopped hanging around the children's
>literature section?
>
>
Huh...unlike you, I'm not a pedofile.
========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
Primary site
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
Mirror site
panam...@hotmail.com
> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:47:20 -0600, John Stafford
>
>
>
>
>
> >In article <ngfaf552fd8elb4u92ujosr9u8b6ecn...@4ax.com>,
> > George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>
> >> Cite it? Ffor Christ sakes I've already published it in
> >> two papers in the peer-reviewed academic literature!
>
> >> Peer reviewed publications:
>
> >> Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in
> >> New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167
> >> Pergamon Press. Online copy of peer/published
> >> paper is posted at:
> >>http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/cart.html
>
> >Pergamon Press was not credible. Elsevier bought Pergamon and chose to
> >discard your papers.
>
> [Hammond]
> LIAR......... the ELSEVIER PAPER IS RIGFHT HERE:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
>
> Notice they are selling it for $20 a copy!
A price discount is usually a sign of a need to discard unwanted
inventory...
Yap
> Copyright 2009 George Hammond M.S. Physics
>
> WASHINGTON D.C.
> I braked at the stoplight and a sedan skidded to a halt
> on my right. It was 3 am in a honky tonk section of Laural
> Maryland a block from where George Wallace was shot. The
> three punks in the car started blowing their horn. I knew
> it was run or pull the K-Bar over my visor and probably kill
> one of them in a fight. I jambed it into reverse flooring
> the accelerator and spinning the steering wheel. The car
> spun into a 180 facing the wrong way on a divided highway. I
> gunned it into the oncoming traffic. The three punks in the
> sedan followed suit and came after me! That was the day I
> discovered the world's first scientific proof of God. I
> discovered it while studying in the library of Congress on
> Capitol Hill and was on my way home. Needless to say I got
> away or I wouldn't be here telling you about it.
> The way I discovered it is an interesting story. I'm a
> physicist who got interested in psychology research. The
> consists mainly of an activity called Factor Analysis. They
> use the world's largest computers to extract the
> eigenvectors from 100x100 correlation matrices. The
> correlations are obtained from psychology tests given to
> hundreds of thousands of people world wide.
> decades that every analysis results in exactly 4
> they have never been able to figure out why or what they
> immediately recognized that the 4x4 matrix is what
> (many demigods) to Monotheism (one supreme God).
> prominantly posted on my website for your reading
> proof of God is my calling card to history.
> GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
> Mirror sites
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
> HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
> http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
> =======================================
Are you sure that you got his permission to find him?
Or you are working against his will, otherwise how could million find
in vain for thousands of years?
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Interview - Confessions of an Economic Hit Man - Part I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTbdnNgqfs8&feature=related
Interview - Confessions of an Economic Hit Man - Part II
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29GhXsx7-Rs&feature=related
Confessions of an Economic Hit Man - Part 3/3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l22O33KyWa4&feature=related
--
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Best Regards!
"Yap" <hhya...@gmail.com> kirjoitti
viestiss�:98fc333a-4aed-4bef...@x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
George Hammond
[Hammond]
Stafford said my paper wasn't in print by Elsevier. So
he's been proven a LIAR.
That's the main point of this exercise!
http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
I'll leave you people to haggle over the price!
========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
Primary site
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
Mirror site
George Hammond
[Hammond]
Bear in mind that I don't have to pound a Stone Age
keyboard to respond to useless crap, I have automated voice
recognition and blow you off the Internet without lifting a
finger at 150 words a minute.
Sure it been sent by God to deliver the world's first
scientific proof of God, that goes without saying. And I've
done it, signed sealed and delivered in the peer-reviewed
academic literature.
Millions have been seeking it for thousands of years?
That tells you something about who I am right there, and why
thousands of academic irate wannabee pseudo-intellectuals
are following me around on the Internet heckling me.
You better get voice recognition if you want to try to
our talk me smart ass because you'll wear your fingers to
the bone typing without it.
========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
Primary site
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
Mirror site
George Hammond
wrote:
>"Bob Casanova" <nos...@buzz.off> wrote
>
>>>> WASHINGTON D.C.
>>>> I braked at the stoplight and a sedan skidded to a halt
>>>> on my right.
>>
>>><You never told us that you had telekinetic powers. That is just,
>>><like, sooo cool!
>>
>> I think he's going for a Bulwer-Lytton award:
>>
>> http://www.bulwer-lytton.com/
>
>It was a dark and stormy night. The dark part is redundant; had
>the lonesome moon even been out, it would have been obscured by
>the ephemeral clouds. Suddenly, three men entered a cave. One
>said, "Otto, tell us a story." The story began...It was a stormy
>night, and three men entered a cave. One said, "Cut it out, Otto!"
>And he did.
>
>--oTTo--
>
>
[Hammond]
The wind was a torrent of darkness among the gusty trees
The moon was a ghostly galleon tossed upon cloudy seas
The road was a ribbon of moonlight across the purple moor
When Hammond saw the castle wall grey as a piece of slate
He nailed his thesis in peer review form upon the city gate
And a 1000 years to the proof of God marked his final fate
George Hammond
<don.sto...@gmail.com> wrote:
<SNIP CRAP>
>> GEORGE �HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
>
>But you missed the REAL proof of God:
>
>"God and the Universe are identical memes."
>
>
[Hammond]
You have stated the classic atheist position. Atheists
of course are the world's last and only ABSOLUTE FOOLS.
Answering you is a waste of time except that I am using
voice dictation and don't have to lift a finger to do so.
It is sad and pathetic but somehow reassuring to be
absolutely confident and have proof positive that you are an
ABSOLUTE FOOL.
It is doubtful that you will ever live long enough to
find out what God actually is. Ironic that the world's most
common mystery has absolutely passed you by unnoticed.
A self-satisfied and busy fool like you spends his life
tinkering with motorcycles and is quizzically perplexed by
all this commotion about "God".
It just goes to show how selfish and ignorant deceipt
comes full circle like an errant torpedo to sink its
practitioner. What a laugh.
An entire world of meek and responsible people has
noticed long ago that a substantial fraction of every human
being is INVISIBLE (ungrown) and that this invisible man is
commonly called "God". But you in your haughty ignorance
think that is only a matter of biology, money, or
genetics..... of course you know it's the source of all the
trouble and the basis of every human contest, but your
towering ignorance is so great that it never occurred to you
that THE WHOLE WORLD KNOWS ABOUT IT and has been talking
about it for 10,000 years..... and they call the phenomenon
"God".
"Poetic justice"is to be your fate Stockbauer, and oh so
subtle and sublime is the vengeance of the Lord on the smug,
the hypocritical, and the self-satisfied. but not to worry
Stockbauer, you'll have plenty of company where you're
going.... you can spend the rest of eternity passing the day
with Kurt Waldheim and other materialistic fools of your
ilk.
George Hammond
<but...@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
>Otto Bahn <e...@eio.com> wrote:
>> It was a dark and stormy night. The dark part is redundant; had
>> the lonesome moon even been out, it would have been obscured by
>> the ephemeral clouds. Suddenly, three men entered a cave. One
>> said, "Otto, tell us a story." The story began...It was a stormy
>> night, and three men entered a cave. One said, "Cut it out, Matt!"
>> And he did.
>
>IFYPFY.
>
>
>butting
>
>
[Hammond]
The wind was a torrent of darkness among the gusty trees
The moon was a ghostly galleon tossed upon cloudy seas
The road was a ribbon of moonlight across the purple moor
When Hammond saw the castle walls grey as a piece of slate
He nailed his thesis in peer review form upon the city gate
And a 1000 years to the proof of God became his final fate
Bryce Utting
>>> The story began...It was a stormy
>>> night, and three men entered a cave. One said, "Cut it out, Matt!"
>>> And he did.
>>
>>IFYPFY.
>>
>
> The wind was a torrent of darkness among the gusty trees
> The moon was a ghostly galleon tossed upon cloudy seas
> The road was a ribbon of moonlight across the purple moor
> When Hammond saw the castle walls grey as a piece of slate
> He nailed his thesis in peer review form upon the city gate
> And a 1000 years to the proof of God became his final fate
cut it *out*, Matt!
butting
--
http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~butting
'Tis the fell work of the international floating-head-missile-zombie-
erupting-tentacle cartel.
-- John D Salt
Jimbo
> Copyright 2009 George Hammond M.S. Physics
>
What a load of crap. Just another "I can't adequately explain
something, so it must be Gawd!!" load of idiocy.
It does not constitute proof.
George Hammond
[Hammond]
Yeah it DOES constitute scientific proof, or it wouldn't
be published in a highly respected academic journal
published by Elsevier Scientific Ltd. the world's largest
and most premier academic scientific publisher.
You're an asswipe with a high school education. You
wouldn't know God from a pair of contact lenses. Go open
another Sam Adams beer and turn on the football game.
Jimbo
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:22:08 -0800 (PST), Jimbo
>
> >On Nov 6, 7:22 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
> >> Copyright 2009 George Hammond M.S. Physics
>
> >What a load of crap. Just another "I can't adequately explain
> >something, so it must be Gawd!!" load of idiocy.
>
> >It does not constitute proof.
>
> [Hammond]
> Yeah it DOES constitute scientific proof,
No, it simply doesn't.
Otto Bahn
.
> Answering you is a waste of time except that I am using
> voice dictation and don't have to lift a finger to do so.
> It is sad and pathetic but somehow reassuring to be
> absolutely confident and have proof positive that you are an
> ABSOLUTE FOOL.
Voice dictation has an all-caps mode?
ELEVENTY!
--oTTo--
George Hammond
wrote:
>"George Hammond" <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote
>--oTTo--
>
[Hammond]
Of course it does storm trooper.... every word processing
function known to man has a verbal command which the voice
recognition program immediately recognizes.
Dragon-10 is a 2-GIG program! That's almost the size of
Windows for chrissakes!
George Hammond
[Hammond]
Yeah it simply does... if you don't think so you're free
to rebut me in the peer-reviewed literature... meanwhile
handwaving claims by pseudoanonymous jerkwater posters with
no credentials like you mean NOTHING to anybody. Screw.
John Stafford
George Hammond <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:32:18 -0800 (PST), Jimbo
> <ckdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> [Hammond]
> >> � �Yeah it DOES constitute scientific proof,
> >
> >No, it simply doesn't.
> >
> >
> [Hammond]
> Yeah it simply does... if you don't think so you're free
> to rebut me in the peer-reviewed literature...
There are peers and there are peers.
Yours: http://magicanimation.com/misc/SidneyHarris_MiracleWeb.jpg
John Stafford
George Hammond <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote:
> Dragon-10 is a 2-GIG program! That's almost the size of
> Windows for chrissakes!
OMG! You can't count, either!
WindoZe is over 14 'GIG' !
Otto Bahn
>>> Answering you is a waste of time except that I am using
>>> voice dictation and don't have to lift a finger to do so.
>>> It is sad and pathetic but somehow reassuring to be
>>> absolutely confident and have proof positive that you are an
>>> ABSOLUTE FOOL.
>>
>>Voice dictation has an all-caps mode?
>>--oTTo--
>>
> [Hammond]
> Of course it does storm trooper.... every word processing
> function known to man has a verbal command which the voice
> recognition program immediately recognizes.
That's only available in the professional version, which
I doubt you can afford.
> Dragon-10 is a 2-GIG program! That's almost the size of
> Windows for chrissakes!
Windows are measured in inches or feet, not bytes.
--oTTo--
BURT
> In article <g7hjf511pcgo1oqp9j5jiir2vi1j0jc...@4ax.com>,
> George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>
> > Dragon-10 is a 2-GIG program! That's almost the size of
> > Windows for chrissakes!
>
> OMG! You can't count, either!
> WindoZe is over 14 'GIG' !
Relaivity is the theory of the appearance of things moving around you.
Mitch Raemsch
George Hammond
[Hammond]
Thanks for the information gopher. I had no idea what
the size of Windows is, so to find out all I do is take a
guess and some mindless pedantic drone like you will
immediately give us the right answer. Its easier than
Google, schmuck.
George Hammond
[Hammond]
WRONG. General Relativity includes the theory of
gravitational fields causing time dilations and space
contractions WITHOUT ANYTHING MOVING AT ALL!
In fact, it is the theory of General Relativity that is
the cause of God.... NOT the theory of Special Relativity
which is the theory of relativistic MOTION.
George Hammond
wrote:
>"George Hammond" <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote
>
>>>> Answering you is a waste of time except that I am using
>>>> voice dictation and don't have to lift a finger to do so.
>>>> It is sad and pathetic but somehow reassuring to be
>>>> absolutely confident and have proof positive that you are an
>>>> ABSOLUTE FOOL.
>>>
>>>Voice dictation has an all-caps mode?
>>>--oTTo--
>>>
>> [Hammond]
>> Of course it does storm trooper.... every word processing
>> function known to man has a verbal command which the voice
>> recognition program immediately recognizes.
>
>That's only available in the professional version, which
>I doubt you can afford.
>
>
[Hammond]
Wrong on both counts shithead.
>
>
>> Dragon-10 is a 2-GIG program! That's almost the size of
>> Windows for chrissakes!
>
>Windows are measured in inches or feet, not bytes.
>--oTTo--
>
[Hammond]
That's YOUR measurement of Windows bicycle mechanic.
My measurement of Windows is in subjective space time not
objective space time and includes the time dilation and
space magnification. You look through windows to see the
street, I looked through windows of heaven to see God.
George Hammond
<nh...@droffats.net> wrote:
>In article <lhhjf5lc5p2vf7i0h...@4ax.com>,
> George Hammond <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:32:18 -0800 (PST), Jimbo
>> <ckdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >> [Hammond]
>> >> � �Yeah it DOES constitute scientific proof,
>> >
>> >No, it simply doesn't.
>> >
>> >
>> [Hammond]
>> Yeah it simply does... if you don't think so you're free
>> to rebut me in the peer-reviewed literature...
>
>There are peers and there are peers.
>
>
[Hammond]
Here's my paper:]
http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
Published in the prestigious journal by the world's largest
scientific publisher. Obviously all five of the reviewers
were PhD's and faculty members at prominent universities.
You're just another no account shithead Heckler. Screw.
John Stafford
George Hammond <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:15:03 -0600, John Stafford
> <nh...@droffats.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <g7hjf511pcgo1oqp9...@4ax.com>,
> > George Hammond <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Dragon-10 is a 2-GIG program! That's almost the size of
> >> Windows for chrissakes!
> >
> >OMG! You can't count, either!
> >WindoZe is over 14 'GIG' !
> >
> [Hammond]
> Thanks for the information gopher. I had no idea what
> the size of Windows is, so to find out all I do is take a
> guess and some mindless pedantic drone like you will
> immediately give us the right answer. Its easier than
> Google, schmuck.
Yup, and guessing and presuming is your version of the scientific method.
Jimbo
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:32:18 -0800 (PST), Jimbo
>
>
>
>
>
> <ckdbig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Nov 10, 5:19 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:22:08 -0800 (PST), Jimbo
>
> >> <ckdbig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Nov 6, 7:22 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
> >> >> Copyright 2009 George Hammond M.S. Physics
>
> >> >What a load of crap. Just another "I can't adequately explain
> >> >something, so it must be Gawd!!" load of idiocy.
>
> >> >It does not constitute proof.
>
> >> [Hammond]
> >> Yeah it DOES constitute scientific proof,
>
> >No, it simply doesn't.
>
> [Hammond]
> Yeah it simply does...
Nope, sorry, it's not even strong evidence, much less proof. There is
no need to rebut obvious bullshit.
George Hammond
<nh...@droffats.net> wrote:
>In article <mvpjf5dkae1ik964k...@4ax.com>,
> George Hammond <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:15:03 -0600, John Stafford
>> <nh...@droffats.net> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <g7hjf511pcgo1oqp9...@4ax.com>,
>> > George Hammond <Nowh...@notspam.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Dragon-10 is a 2-GIG program! That's almost the size of
>> >> Windows for chrissakes!
>> >
>> >OMG! You can't count, either!
>> >WindoZe is over 14 'GIG' !
>> >
>> [Hammond]
>> Thanks for the information gopher. I had no idea what
>> the size of Windows is, so to find out all I do is take a
>> guess and some mindless pedantic drone like you will
>> immediately give us the right answer. Its easier than
>> Google, schmuck.
>
>Yup, and guessing and presuming is your version of the scientific method.
>
>
[Hammond]
WRONG know nothing heckling dipshit. The scientific
method means publishing your research in a peer-reviewed
academic journal, which I have done:
http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
INTERNET communication is 90% about kicking kook ass,
kooks like you. That's not science, that's informal
criminologyand pro bono public service. Screw!
George Hammond
[Hammond]
You CAN'T REBUT the fact that my work has been published
in a prestigious peer-reviewed academic journal by the
world's largest scientific publisher.
http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
You're just an anonymous dipshit no account Internet wag
with no credentials, and no credibility. Screw!
Not only that asshole, I'm using voice dictation of 150
words a minute so was 10 times easier for me to kick your
ass than it is for you to heckle me pounding furiously on a
stone age keyboard. Crawl back under your rock flake!
huge
It's a joke site, right? -- like the Journal of Irreproducable Results?
http://www.jir.com/
...e-except that theirs is funny, yours is just sad.
--
huge: Not on my time you don't.
Don Stockbauer
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 20:40:14 -0800 (PST), DonStockbauer
>
> subtle and sublime is the vengeance of the Lord on the smug,
> going.... you can spend the rest of eternity passing the day
> with Kurt Waldheim and other materialistic fools of your
> ilk.
> ========================================
> GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
> Mirror site
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
> HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
> http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
> =======================================
God and the Universe being the same thing is a great model of reality,
much better than your "SPOG" delusion. So rant and rave on. Who
cares?
George Hammond
[Hammond]
You care or you wouldn't be here. I correspond with
professionals by private e-mail and professional (moderated)
Internet lists, and in the peer-reviewed journals, and by
private correspondence and now am even dictating a 300 page
book. Several million people have hit my websites, an
Australian rock group even recorded a song about me (see URL
below).
The announcement and publication of a major scientific
discovery was the strong scent of blood in the water which
just won't go away.
I'm just here on USENET to tweak up my Dragon-10 voice
dictation system which I'm using to dictate my book. And
boy, is it working spiffy!
George Hammond
[Hammond]
Wrong, so very wrong, unsuspecting innocent bystander!
You're not the only one that doesn't know what to make of
it... neither does the whole of academia. Try to remember,
I'm probably the only qualified graduate physicist working
in the field of psychology and theology. I'm probably the
only physicist who's ever taken the subject of psychology
seriously. Sure enough, the first day out I discovered the
structural model of personality that they been looking for
for 2500 years. published in a peer-reviewed academic
journal.
http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
That led directly to my discovery of the world's first
scientific proof of God and I published that in another
peer-reviewed journal.
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/Hammond5s1.html
You know very well just as everyone else in the society
knows that our academic authorities in fields like
philosophy, psychology, theology and so forth are nothing
but quasi intellectual windbags who can barely get out of
their own way. And furthermore, our brilliant physicists
are nothing but high grade auto mechanics who know
absolutely nothing about people. Einstein didn't even
believe in the Godof the Bible for Christ's sake.
Just who in hell do you think you would appeal to if you
accidentally discovered the world's first scientific proof
of God? There is no one to call! There is no authority!
So what you're watching is the SPECTACLE of the advent of
the world's first scientific proof of God, and it isn't
going to look like an academic production. in this day and
age is still appear first ON THE INTERNET because that is
the most modern means of communication in the world.
WAKE UP for Christ's sake, you've got a front row seat at
Ground Zero in a historic socioscientific spectacle.
And by the way I happen to be a New England
Congregationalist Yankee physicist, but I'm crossposting
this to soc.culture.jewish, so you can be sure there'll be a
few Jews here sniffing around sooner or later. Not that any
of them are going to help me either, as you know history
repeats itself, and we can fully expect them to hand over
the messenger of the new scientific discovery of God to the
authorities just like they did last time!
George Hammond
<nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:54:39 -0800, the following appeared
>in sci.skeptic, posted by George Hammond
><Nowh...@notspam.net>:
>
>>On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:57:53 -0700, Bob Casanova
>><nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:49:49 -0500, the following appeared in
>>>sci.skeptic, posted by "Otto Bahn" <e...@eio.com>:
>>>
>>>>"Nicko" <nervou...@gmail.com> wrote
>>>
>>>>> WASHINGTON D.C.
>>>>> I braked at the stoplight and a sedan skidded to a halt
>>>>> on my right.
>>>
>>>><You never told us that you had telekinetic powers. That is just,
>>>><like, sooo cool!
>>>
>>>I think he's going for a Bulwer-Lytton award:
>>>
>>>http://www.bulwer-lytton.com/
>>>
>>>It would have been easier if he'd managed to combine his
>>>screed into one sentence, like this one:
>>>
>>>"It came to him in a cocaine rush as he took the Langley
>>>exit that if Aldrich had told Filipov about Hancock only
>>>Tulfengian could have known that the photograph which Wagner
>>>had shown to Maximov on the jolting S-bahn was not the
(snip answer bot>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>[Hammond]
>>There are more interesting answer-bot programs littering the
>>Internet. That one apparently uses a German dictionary.
>
>What a shame, then, that it wasn't the product of a 'bot at
>all, but exactly what it claimed to be. Perhaps you're in
>transference mode...?
>
>
[Hammond]
Great scholars and true intellectuals like myself do not
speak any yuppie language such as "transference mode". We
speak in simple universal poor man's English.
Unlike you, I'm not a phony smart ass! I got the courage
to talk to people, any people, about real and newly
discovered facts. If you want to talk to me you'll have to
get real.
>
>> Simple minded dimwit!
>
>Yes, you are. Which is what I believe I showed.
>
[Hammond]
you didn't show anything, this one shows something:
http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
And this:
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/Hammond5s1.html
Unless you can address that in specific terms, in plain
English, you're just a worthless stumblebum with nothing to
say.
Jimbo
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:17:10 -0800 (PST), Jimbo
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Nov 10, 3:02 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:32:18 -0800 (PST), Jimbo
>
> >> <ckdbig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Nov 10, 5:19 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:22:08 -0800 (PST), Jimbo
>
> >> >> <ckdbig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >On Nov 6, 7:22 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> Copyright 2009 George Hammond M.S. Physics
>
> >> >> >What a load of crap. Just another "I can't adequately explain
> >> >> >something, so it must be Gawd!!" load of idiocy.
>
> >> >> >It does not constitute proof.
>
> >> >> [Hammond]
> >> >> Yeah it DOES constitute scientific proof,
>
> >> >No, it simply doesn't.
>
> >> [Hammond]
> >> Yeah it simply does...
>
> >Nope, sorry, it's not even strong evidence, much less proof. There is
> >no need to rebut obvious bullshit.
>
> [Hammond]
> You CAN'T REBUT the fact that my work has been published
> in a prestigious peer-reviewed
That doesn't make it any less bullshit. It's a common fallacy to
assume your conclusion, then try to prop it up. Primitive man
couldn't explain why water would periodically fall from the sky, so
lacking an answer they attributed it to proof of the existence of a
Rain God, then they set about validating this belief in story, dance
and song. Your so-called "evidence" does much the same thing. Your
thesis is the same thing, on a slightly less primitive level, but it
boils down to the same old song and dance.
Jimbo
And through all of that, it still boils down to bullshit.
Don Ocean
I would be very curious as to where you earned your bones as a
physicist. Are you an MIT upper grad or what? We already have captured
the God Element at the bottom of the Homestake Goldmine in Lead, South
Dakota. As for being a Congregationalist... They sold out years ago to
the United Church of Christ. There are no real Puritans left. However
a reunion Witch burning has been discussed. Dragon speech is not a very
good app for writing a book. A word processor is actually preferred by
the professionals.
Don Ocean
Could it be that you are Hal Lindsey in disguise?
> =======================================
George Hammond
[Hammond]
You wish.
George Hammond
<oc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>I would be very curious as to where you earned your bones as a
>physicist. Are you an MIT upper grad or what? We already have captured
>the God Element at the bottom of the Homestake Goldmine in Lead, South
>Dakota. As for being a Congregationalist... They sold out years ago to
>the United Church of Christ. There are no real Puritans left. However
>a reunion Witch burning has been discussed. Dragon speech is not a very
>good app for writing a book. A word processor is actually preferred by
>the professionals.
>
>
[Hammond]
Newton Left a million words written with with a goose
feather. Freud wrote 50 volumes with a fountain pen. Voice
recognition is simply the latest development. I find it to
be the greatest invention since sliced bread. Probably more
important to civilization than the invention of the six
shooter.
My CV is prominently posted on my website which you
obviously haven't bothered to read:
CURRICULUM VITAE
GEORGE HAMMOND
B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Worcester MA, USA (Deans List)
M.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern University,
Boston MA, USA
Ph.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in Physics, 1967-68
Northeastern Univ. Boston MA
Note: Studied Relativity under Prof. Richard Arnowitt
at N.U. and who is presently Distinguished
Professor of Physics at TAMU
Peer reviewed publications:
Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in
New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167
Pergamon Press. Online copy of peer/published
paper is posted at:
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/cart.html
and
http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Proof of God
Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July 2003, pp 231-244(Noetic
Press)
Online copy of peer/published paper is posted at:
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/Hammond5s1.html
George Hammond
<oc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Could it be that you are Hal Lindsey in disguise?
>
>
[Hammond]
Who?
George Hammond
<ckdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> � �You CAN'T REBUT the fact that my work has been published
>> in a prestigious peer-reviewed academic journal:
>> http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
>
>That doesn't make it any less bullshit.
>
[Hammond]
Majority opinion says it does!
You're the minority
>
>
> It's a common fallacy to
>assume your conclusion, then try to prop it up.
>
>
[Hammond]
Never did that. I derived a proven result.
>
>Primitive man
>couldn't explain why water would periodically fall from the sky, so
>lacking an answer they attributed it to proof of the existence of a
>Rain God
>
>
[Hammond]
Who told you that, your grandmother? The elite members of
primitive society knew full well what God actually is just
like the elite members of today's society know what God
actually is. That's what you don't know simply because
you're not one of them. So you believe suburban legends
like the one your grandmother told you.
Your problem is that now modern science has actually
found an AIRTIGHT SCIENTIFIC PROOF of God, thus finally
proving that your problem is simply that you are too stupid
to comprehend what God is! Naturally this pisses you off,
but hey, that's your problem.
Jimbo
Sorry, but it's simply bullshit.
Jimbo
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:52:11 -0800 (PST), Jimbo
>
>
> >> [Hammond]
> >> You CAN'T REBUT the fact that my work has been published
> >> in a prestigious peer-reviewed academic journal:
> >>http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
>
> >That doesn't make it any less bullshit.
>
> [Hammond]
> Majority opinion says it does!
> You're the minority
>
> > It's a common fallacy to
> >assume your conclusion, then try to prop it up.
>
> [Hammond]
> Never did that. I derived a proven result.
Yes, you most certainly did.
>
> >Primitive man
> >couldn't explain why water would periodically fall from the sky, so
> >lacking an answer they attributed it to proof of the existence of a
> >Rain God
>
> [Hammond]
> Who told you that, your grandmother?
Ph.D. in History, and plain old common sense.
M Otis Beard
giving in to my primal, animalistic panic by driving out of control
against the flow of traffic, I suddenly realized that the steering
wheel I was gripping with my sweaty white knuckles was CURVED!
Obviously, this curvature means that every single arbitrary, dogmatic
detail of the pantheism of the ancient Greeks is literally and
absolutely true. There is a mountain in the 8th dimension, and this
mountain is called 'Olympus.' The gods and goddesses live there and
wear togas and eat ambrosia (1 large tub Cool Whip, 20 cherries, 1
large can mixed fruit, any other fruit you would like, have fun with
it and add your favorite nut! Refrigerate for about 3-4 hours and
ENJOY). Sometimes they commit adultery with humans, and their divine
spouses get all cheesed off and go around turning people into
crocoducks. If you argue with me about any of this then you're a FOOL
who doesn't understand mathematics or science and you probably have
herpes, also Zeus is totally going to fuck you up with some badass
lightning bolts and shit.
Madge
wrote:
Well I think you're talking a whole load of Horsesh BZZZZT GAAAH
--
http://www.madge.tk Madges Links
http://twitter.com/MadgeTwits Yes IKNOW.
George Hammond
[Hammond]
You wish.
Otto Bahn
> One day some loud teenagers in their car frightened me, and as I was
I blame Pandora. (That stuff about Eve and the apple
is just too damn original to be true.)
--oTTo--
George Hammond
<atomd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> the steering wheel .. was CURVED!
>Obviously, this curvature means that every single arbitrary, dogmatic
>detail of the pantheism of the ancient Greeks is literally and
>absolutely true.
>
>
[Hammond]
I can tell you this Sarge. The ancient Greeks believed
that the were 12 different personality types and call them
the Olympian gods. Modern science (Psychometry) has
discovered that the structural model of personality is CUBIC
(Hammond, 1994). A cube has 13 symmetry axes and this is
why Factor Analysis in Psychometry always locates 13
personality eigenvectors.
So the ancient Greeks were 2500 years ahead of modern
science, they guessed 12 and the actual answer is 13. That's
92% mathematical accuracy, pretty good for 500 BC in my
opinion.
>
>
> this
>mountain is called 'Olympus.' The gods and goddesses live there
>
>
[Hammond]
Like I say sarge, modern science has now proven that they
were scientifically correct.
>
>
> If you argue with me about any of this then you're a FOOL
>who doesn't understand mathematics or science
>
>
[Hammond]
Not only do I have an advanced degree in science and
mathematics, I'm the one that has discovered and published
in the peer-reviewed literature that the ancient Greeks were
scientifically correct to 92% accuracy.
http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
George Hammond
[Hammond]
You tell em Madge.
George Hammond
<ckdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > �It's a common fallacy to
>> >assume your conclusion, then try to prop it up.
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> Never did that. �I derived a proven result.
>
>Yes, you most certainly did.
>
[Hammond]
Your apology is magnanimously accepted.
>>
>> >Primitive man
>> >couldn't explain why water would periodically fall from the sky, so
>> >lacking an answer they attributed it to proof of the existence of a
>> >Rain God
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> � �Who told you that, your grandmother?
>
>Ph.D. in History, and plain old common sense.
>
>
[Hammond]
PhD in history? Tell me something doc, do you think
Arthur Koestler is correct that the entire Khazar empire in
740 A.D. and 5 million strong without a drop of Semitic
blood flowing in their veins, converted overnight en masse
from primitive atheism to Judaism, as he claims in his
celebrated book _The 13th Tribe_? Is that a historical
fact?
If that is true, doesn't that mean that the "Jews" are
actually a religion and not a race, same as "Christians" are
a religion and not a race?
Otto Bahn
>>> >And through all of that, it still boils down to bullshit.
>>>
>>> [Hammond]
>>> You wish.
>>
>>
>>Sorry, but it's simply bullshit.
>>
>>
> [Hammond]
> You wish.
Why would he wish for bullshit? Even if doesn't believe
in SPOG, you'd still think he'd *want* it to be true.
--oTTo--
M Otis Beard
>
> [Hammond]
> Not only do I have an advanced degree in science
"I have a Master's degree... in SCIENCE!"
M Otis Beard
> science, they guessed 12 and the actual answer is 13. That's
> 92% mathematical accuracy, pretty good for 500 BC in my
> opinion.
>
> were scientifically correct.
>
> mathematics, I'm the one that has discovered and published
> in the peer-reviewed literature that the ancient Greeks were
> scientifically correct to 92% accuracy.
SCIENCE WORLD STUNNED AS HAMMOND PROVES THAT 12 is 92% of 13
LARGE HADRON COLLIDER SCIENTICIANS ABANDON THEIR POSTS, SAYING "WHAT'S
THE POINT NOW?"
"NO COMMENT" SAYS OMNISCIENT OMNIPOTENT ANTHROPOMORPHIC CREATOR AND
RULER OF UNIVERSE
NIETZSCHE DUG UP AND TARRED, FEATHERED BY ANGRY MOB
Jimbo
LOL! That makes more sense than the what the op was spouting.
Jimbo
wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:50:20 -0000, M Otis Beard <atomdeb...@gmail.com>
>
> - Show quoted text -
True, but it did have the added feature of being humerous. :D
Jimbo
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:00:27 -0800 (PST), Jimbo
>
>
> >> > It's a common fallacy to
> >> >assume your conclusion, then try to prop it up.
>
> >> [Hammond]
> >> Never did that. I derived a proven result.
>
> >Yes, you most certainly did.
>
> [Hammond]
> Your apology is magnanimously accepted.
>
Your idiocy is duly noted.
John Stafford
<169ef0b0-4936-4eb9...@h14g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
M Otis Beard <atomd...@gmail.com> wrote:
Soil Science.
Doctroid
<6e2d9092-7bad-4c94...@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>,
M Otis Beard <atomd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> SCIENCE WORLD STUNNED AS HAMMOND PROVES THAT 12 is 92% of 13
>
> LARGE HADRON COLLIDER SCIENTICIANS ABANDON THEIR POSTS, SAYING "WHAT'S
> THE POINT NOW?"
Your fatuous sarcasm is wholly inappropriate, Beard. As you would know
if you were even casually acquainted with recent results of string
theory, the predicted value (in a third order perturbative calculation)
of 92% of 13 is 11.93 +- 0.04, or nearly two standard deviations below
12, a discrepancy that has the potential to rock physics to its very
foundations if confirmed. The LHC should be able to provide a
measurement of 92% of 12 within its first three years with an error bar
of +- 0.06% if the damn birds stop dropping bread on it.
--
Sig available on request.
- Doctroid
Jimbo
> In article
> <6e2d9092-7bad-4c94-b470-2e9b3eda6...@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>,
> M Otis Beard <atomdeb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > SCIENCE WORLD STUNNED AS HAMMOND PROVES THAT 12 is 92% of 13
>
> > LARGE HADRON COLLIDER SCIENTICIANS ABANDON THEIR POSTS, SAYING "WHAT'S
> > THE POINT NOW?"
>
> Your fatuous sarcasm is wholly inappropriate, Beard.
Actually, it was quite funny, and wholly appropriate.
M Otis Beard
GUILD OF CALAMITOUS INTENT INUNDATED WITH APPLICATIONS FROM
SUPERVILLIANS WANTING TO ARCH GEORGE HAMMOND
INTERROBANG CARTEL STORMS POP CHARTS WITH #1 HIT BASED ON SCIENTIFIC
PROOF OF GOD (http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3)
Bryce Utting
IFYPFY.
butting
--
http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~butting
Its full name would then be Kublai Kahn Paw Paw Chow Chow Chow
Mohammed Mohammed Mohammed Mohammed Mohammed Bjork Bjork Bjork Bjork
Bjork Bjork Bjork Bjork Galumph Galumph Galumph Galumph Galumph
Galumph Galumph Galumph Galumph Galumph Galump Galumph Galumph.
-- Gokmop introduces Fibonacci to Martha Stewart
George Hammond
[Hammond]
CURRICULUM VITAE
GEORGE HAMMOND
B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Worcester MA, USA
M.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern University,
Boston MA, USA
Ph.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in Physics, 1967-68
Northeastern Univ. Boston MA
Note: Studied Relativity under Prof. Richard Arnowitt
at N.U. and who is presently Distinguished
Professor of Physics at TAMU
Peer reviewed publications:
Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in
New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167
Pergamon Press. Online copy of peer/published
paper is posted at:
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/cart.html
Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Proof of God
Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July 2003, pp 231-244(Noetic
Press)
Online copy of peer/published paper is posted at:
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/Hammond5s1.html
========================================
George Hammond
[Hammond]
CURRICULUM VITAE
GEORGE HAMMOND
B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Worcester MA, USA
M.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern University,
Boston MA, USA
Ph.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in Physics, 1967-68
Northeastern Univ. Boston MA
Note: Studied Relativity under Prof. Richard Arnowitt
at N.U. and who is presently Distinguished
Professor of Physics at TAMU
Peer reviewed publications:
Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in
New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167
Pergamon Press. Online copy of peer/published
paper is posted at:
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/cart.html
Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Proof of God
Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July 2003, pp 231-244(Noetic
Press)
Online copy of peer/published paper is posted at:
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/Hammond5s1.html
huge
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:47:32 -0600, huge <hu...@nomailaddress.com> wrote:
>
>>George Hammond :
>>
>>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:17:10 -0800 (PST), Jimbo <ckdb...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Nov 10, 3:02 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:32:18 -0800 (PST), Jimbo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <ckdbig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >On Nov 10, 5:19 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>>>>> >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:22:08 -0800 (PST), Jimbo
>>>>>
>>>>> >> <ckdbig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >> >On Nov 6, 7:22 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>>>>> >> >> Copyright 2009 George Hammond M.S. Physics
>>>>>
>>>>> >> >What a load of crap. Just another "I can't adequately explain
>>>>> >> >something, so it must be Gawd!!" load of idiocy.
>>>>>
>>>>> >> >It does not constitute proof.
>>>>>
>>>>> >> [Hammond]
>>>>> >> Yeah it DOES constitute scientific proof,
>>>>>
>>>>> >No, it simply doesn't.
>>>>>
>>>>> [Hammond]
>>>>> Yeah it simply does...
>>>>
>>>>Nope, sorry, it's not even strong evidence, much less proof. There is
>>>>no need to rebut obvious bullshit.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> [Hammond]
>>> You CAN'T REBUT the fact that my work has been published
>>> in a prestigious peer-reviewed academic journal by the world's largest
>>> scientific publisher. http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
>>> You're just an anonymous dipshit no account Internet wag
>>> with no credentials, and no credibility. Screw!
>>> Not only that asshole, I'm using voice dictation of 150
>>> words a minute so was 10 times easier for me to kick your ass than it
>>> is for you to heckle me pounding furiously on a stone age keyboard.
>>> Crawl back under your rock flake!
>>> ======================================== GEORGE HAMMOND'S
PROOF OF
>>> GOD WEBSITE
>>> Primary site
>>> http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
>>> Mirror site
>>> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
>>> HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
>>> http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
>>> =======================================
>>
>>It's a joke site, right? -- like the Journal of Irreproducable Results?
>>http://www.jir.com/
>>
>>...e-except that theirs is funny, yours is just sad.
>>
>>
> [Hammond]
> Wrong, so very wrong, unsuspecting innocent bystander!
> You're not the only one that doesn't know what to make of
> it... neither does the whole of academia. Try to remember, I'm probably
> the only qualified graduate physicist working in the field of psychology
> and theology.
Oh, I get it -- pretending it is not a joke is part of the joke?
You can do better!
(Not.)
> I'm probably the only physicist who's ever taken the
> subject of psychology seriously. Sure enough, the first day out I
> discovered the structural model of personality that they been looking
> ======================================== GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF
OF GOD
> WEBSITE
> Primary site
> http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
> Mirror site
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
> HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
> http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
> =======================================
--
huge: Not on my time you don't.
M Otis Beard
>
> CURRICULUM VITAE
>
> GEORGE HAMMOND
Yes, I know who you are, Curious George.
I wonder how Richard Arnowitt feels about you discrediting him by
association like that.
All you prove by waving your Ph.D. around like a manic pirate with a
torn and faded jolly roger is that your religiosity is more likely to
be a product of mental illness than incompetence... or is it? Your
publishing credentials aren't very impressive, are they? I mean, ONE
paper in a soft-sciences journal almost sixteen years ago, and one in
a quasi-religious philosophy rag? I guess you weren't really much of
a physicist even before you started sucking the cosmic god-cock and
went insane.
George Hammond
[Hammond]
You missed a few of the upcoming headlines:
VATICAN RECOGNIZES DISCOVERY OF SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
(Pontifical Academy of Sciences)
CHIEF RABBI OF JERASULEM AV BETH DIN PROCALIMS MIRACLE
ARCHBISHO OF CANTERBURY DECLARES SECOND COMING
DALI LAMA CALLS FOR WORLD ECUMENICAL UNIFICATION
TALIBAN DECLARES SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF ALLAH
REV WRIGHT DECLARES GOD LIVES IN AMERICA
HINDUS RENAME CASTE THE BICAMERAL/2-PARTY SYSTEM
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE CHURCH SAYS I TOLD YOU SO
UNITED NATIONS ANNOUNCES OFFICAL END OF ANTISEMITISM
SUPREME COURT DECLARES SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD MUST
BE TAUGHT IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS
U.S. CONGRESS OUTLAWS ATHEISM
RUSSIAN PALIAMENT ANNOUNCES FREEDOM OF RELIGION, CHINA TO
FOLLOW SUIT
M Otis Beard
>
> You missed a few of the upcoming headlines:
>
> VATICAN RECOGNIZES DISCOVERY OF SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
> (Pontifical Academy of Sciences)
>
> CHIEF RABBI OF JERASULEM AV BETH DIN PROCALIMS MIRACLE
>
> ARCHBISHO OF CANTERBURY DECLARES SECOND COMING
>
> DALI LAMA CALLS FOR WORLD ECUMENICAL UNIFICATION
>
> TALIBAN DECLARES SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF ALLAH
>
> REV WRIGHT DECLARES GOD LIVES IN AMERICA
>
> HINDUS RENAME CASTE THE BICAMERAL/2-PARTY SYSTEM
>
> CHRISTIAN SCIENCE CHURCH SAYS I TOLD YOU SO
Substitute 'LIBERTY UNIVERSITY' for the Vatican, the Chief Rabbi, the
Archbisho [sic], the Dali Lama [sic], the Taliban, Rev Wright [sic],
and the Hindus, and it just might happen. Creationist turd-polishers
have a nasty habit of using almost any half-baked nonsense to claim
that science validates their irrational beliefs... it's only when
science contradicts them that they hide behind the argument that
science and religion occupy separate, non-overlapping domains.
On the other hand, you're probably too whacko-nutzoid even for them.
Maybe you could come up with some kind of mathematical proof that
medieval knights used dinosaurs as their steeds? I'm just sayin'.
> UNITED NATIONS ANNOUNCES OFFICAL END OF ANTISEMITISM
>
> SUPREME COURT DECLARES SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD MUST
> BE TAUGHT IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS
>
> U.S. CONGRESS OUTLAWS ATHEISM
>
> RUSSIAN PALIAMENT ANNOUNCES FREEDOM OF RELIGION, CHINA TO
> FOLLOW SUIT
OK, now even if we pretend to believe you about your SPOG (and ignore
the bad spelling), this part is just so naïve that it couldn't
possibly have come from a sane mind over twelve years old. It's like
a tiny glimpse through your eyes, George... and what we see through
your eyes is a rollercoaster ride through Crazytown on a train made of
ego and powered by pure adrenaline.
The voices, do they torment you? Do they goad you on, insisting that
you spread your squidgy gospel far and wide in hopes of some reward?
Do they promise you a throne from which you can sit in judgment of
those who doubted you? You can tell me, George... I'm not like the
others. I'm your FRIEND.
George Hammond
> Doctroid
>
>
[Hammond]
The emergence of the Dodecahedron in western religion is
a very interesting because to any forensically minded
logical person its explanation is almost in and of itself a
confirmation of Hammons scientific proof of God.
The Egyptians were the first to discover the dodecahedron
pantheon of the gods. This of course are the 13 personality
types discovered by modern Psychometry. The high culture of
ancient Egypt discovered the Walt Disney approach 4500 years
ago. They drew pictures of a dozen animal headed men to
characterize these 12 personalities. Jackals, Cats,
alligators, Baboons, snakes, falcons, beetles were the
ancient versions of Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, Porky pig and
Bugs Bunny. There were about a dozen universally known
"gods" in the ancient Egyptian pantheon.
These gods were eventually taken over by the Greeks and
given typical human faces and renamed the Olympian gods.
Next a Roman's renamed the Greek dodecahedron with Latin
names, again about 12 of them, and this became the Roman
dodecahedron.
Of course throughout history no one except the highest
religious authority's in these places ever had any idea why
there were approximately 12 of them.
Then, in 1994 Hammond discovered that the cleavage of the
brain is actually CUBIC and that this causes a CUBIC
EIGENVECTOR STRUCTURE in the factor analysis of personality
tests in Psychometry.
Simply put, a CUBE has 13 symmetry axes,and these become
the eigenvector locations when the principal axis extraction
is rotated to simple structure.
A 4500 year-old mystery is instantly solved. Sure enough
he published empirical data accurate to three significant
figures confirms the discovery. I publish this result in
1994 and you can read about it here;
http://tinyurl.com/ygqopj5
and here:
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/Hammond5s1.html
now that in itself is an amazing scientific discovery to
anyone with a scientific and logical mind. Why, when you
read even an educated person like Cicero during Roman times
wrote a book entitled "On the nature of the gods" and
listened to him agonize over where the gods are, and what
they are, you begin to realize what a historic problem has
been solved by modern science.
Of course there is an even more fabulous discovery. It
turns out when you factor the 13 gods ( the 13x13 matrix)
you get for higher-order factors which are higher order
personality descriptors and that turns out to be the
bicameral/2-party system and is also referred to as Matthew
Mark Luke and John by the theologians.
Finally, when you factor those four "gods" (the 4x4
matrix) you get ONE SINGLE LAST SUPREME EIGENVECTOR, and
that eigenvector turns out to be the God of the Bible, God!
Hence, not only is "God"explained by this discovery, but
the entire history of religion is explained as the slow
progression of discovery from the lower order eigenvectors
up the hierarchy to the final supreme single last
eigenvector.
In the face of this kind of evidence all proven to two
decimal point experimental accuracy and thoroughly
theoretically explain, how any self-respecting intellectual
or scientist could sit there and read it and deny that the
world's first scientific proof of God is discovered is of
course nothing but a ludicrous charade of ignorance.
George Hammond
[Hammond]
Yours is ignored.
George Hammond
<atomd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Nov 11, 7:49�pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.net> wrote:
>>
>> � � � � � CURRICULUM VITAE
>>
>> � � � � � � GEORGE HAMMOND
>
>
>Yes, I know who you are, Curious George.
>
>I wonder how Richard Arnowitt feels about you discrediting him by
>association like that.
>
[Hammond]
Richard Arnowitt is probably dead of old age for Christ's
sake. I'm 67 and he is at least 10 or 15 years older than
me.
I run into that problem all time, by the time the average
academic actually knows anything he's over 75 years old. For
instance the only world class authority in Factor Analysis
in Psychometry is Richard Gorsuch who is a professor in the
psychology department at Fuller theological seminary. I
talked to him once on the phone about 10 years ago before I
discovered the scientific proof of God and then I e-mailed
him about a year ago when I found out he was on the payroll
of Fuller theological seminary. For Christ's sake it took
him seven months to answer my e-mail and then he wanted to
know if my papers were in"e-mailable format". That after I
told him the URL of both papers in my original letter! For
Christ's sake, I don't have time to fool around with old
farts who are in their dotage!
>
>
>
>All you prove by waving your Ph.D. around like a manic pirate with a
>torn and faded jolly roger is that your religiosity is more likely to
>be a product of mental illness than incompetence... or is it? Your
>publishing credentials aren't very impressive, are they? I mean, ONE
>paper in a soft-sciences journal almost sixteen years ago, and one in
>a quasi-religious philosophy rag? I guess you weren't really much of
>a physicist even before you started sucking the cosmic god-cock and
>went insane.
>
>
>
[Hammond]
don't kid yourself Einstein. When you're looking at here
is a maverick scientist who was made a historic scientific
discovery ACCIDENTALLY. Naturally there is no one in
academia competent to talk to him. Moreover, they know that
I think they're a bunch of lazy treacherous and overpaid
windbags. The few who are competent enough to talk to me
already know who I am and I'm holding a royal straight flush
in spades and that if they talk to me it's as good as
writing their obituary notice academically speaking.
Wake up dimwit, I'm not competent, the establishment is.
George Hammond
<atomd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>The voices, do they torment you? Do they goad you on, insisting that
>you spread your squidgy gospel far and wide in hopes of some reward?
>Do they promise you a throne from which you can sit in judgment of
>those who doubted you? You can tell me, George... I'm not like the
>others. I'm your FRIEND.
>
>
[Hammond]
Go fuck yourself you half assed middle class overstuffed
Flat-footed puke... your mouth is three times bigger than
your brain.
George Hammond
<hu...@nomailaddress.com> wrote:
>>>
>> [Hammond]
>> Wrong, so very wrong, unsuspecting innocent bystander!
>> You're not the only one that doesn't know what to make of
>> it... neither does the whole of academia. Try to remember, I'm probably
>> the only qualified graduate physicist working in the field of psychology
>> and theology.
>
>Oh, I get it -- pretending it is not a joke is part of the joke?
>You can do better!
>
>
[Hammond]
I suggest they tie your arms to a tree and your feet to a
Caterpillar tractor and try to pull your head out of your
ass.
M Otis Beard
of:
>
> The emergence of the Dodecahedron in western religion is
> a very interesting because to any forensically minded
> logical person its explanation is almost in and of itself a
> confirmation of Hammons scientific proof of God.
> The Egyptians were the first to discover the dodecahedron
> pantheon of the gods. This of course are the 13 personality
> types discovered by modern Psychometry. The high culture of
> ancient Egypt discovered the Walt Disney approach 4500 years
> ago. They drew pictures of a dozen animal headed men to
> characterize these 12 personalities. Jackals, Cats,
> alligators, Baboons, snakes, falcons, beetles were the
> ancient versions of Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, Porky pig and
> Bugs Bunny. There were about a dozen universally known
> "gods" in the ancient Egyptian pantheon.
> These gods were eventually taken over by the Greeks and
> given typical human faces and renamed the Olympian gods.
> Next a Roman's renamed the Greek dodecahedron with Latin
> names, again about 12 of them, and this became the Roman
> dodecahedron.
Later we named the withered-headed hammond after him.
> Of course throughout history no one except the highest
> religious authority's in these places ever had any idea why
> there were approximately 12 of them.
> Then, in 1994 Hammond discovered that the cleavage of the
> brain is actually CUBIC and that this causes a CUBIC
> EIGENVECTOR STRUCTURE in the factor analysis of personality
> tests in Psychometry.
Also, something something mumble mumble approximately twelve.
> Simply put, a CUBE has 13 symmetry axes,and these become
> the eigenvector locations when the principal axis extraction
> is rotated to simple structure.
> A 4500 year-old mystery is instantly solved. Sure enough
> now that in itself is an amazing scientific discovery to
pretend you made, but of course it means less than nothing to
> anyone with a scientific and logical mind. Why, when you
fap to the Land O'Lakes princess, God gets angry! Once I
> read even an educated person like Cicero during Roman times
would slam the ham occasionally. Between rubbing 'em out, he
> wrote a book entitled "On the nature of the gods" and
didn't include a single fap-worthy illustration, the bastard. We all
> listened to him agonize over where the gods are, and what
the best lube for attending church is. If priests are perverts, and
> they are, you begin to realize what a historic problem has
plagued altar boys from the very beginning, and never ever
> been solved by modern science.
I will never forget the day I discovered my Cubic's Rube.
> Of course there is an even more fabulous discovery. It
is in the blouse of the Land O'Lakes princess. Her blouse
> turns out when you factor the 13 gods ( the 13x13 matrix)
into the "approximately 12 = must be related" theory. What
> you get for higher-order factors which are higher order
are factors which are of an order that is higher. Scientology
> personality descriptors and that turns out to be the
peanut-butter-and-chocolate of crazy. My Rube set up a
> bicameral/2-party system and is also referred to as Matthew
Peepshow by the Indians. My Rube and blue balls are called
> Mark Luke and John by the theologians.
> Finally, when you factor those four "gods" (the 4x4
monster truck rally, Jerry, the Indian princess, and the Fleshlight
> matrix) you get ONE SINGLE LAST SUPREME EIGENVECTOR, and
if you then make a huge crazy leap from math to superstition,
> that eigenvector turns out to be the God of the Bible, God!
(Or as the Indian princess and I like to call Him, 'Pookie')
M Otis Beard
>
> Wake up dimwit, I'm not competent, the establishment is.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA