If a voting RIGHT can't be suppressed by such tactics then surely the RIGHT to buy a personal defense system can't be suppressed.

[BeamMeUpScotty]

> Johnny Football <johnny_...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:3tivr89e6ij8gpvlc...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:45:10 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty
>> <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/17/2013 9:10 PM, Johnny Football wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:03:57 -0400, "Scout"
>>>> <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "RD Sandman" <rdsandman[remove]@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:XnsA1E27477...@216.196.121.131...
>>>>>> GOP: Caged monkeys flinging shit <bus...@asshole.com> wrote in
>>>>>> news:6nHvt.78684$1p2....@newsfe25.iad:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Another anti-American law from AZ struck down !
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What difference do you really see between photo-ID to vote and
>>>>>> universal background check to transfer a firearm?
>>>>>
>>>>> The background check is far more invasive than simply checking a
>>>>> Photo ID.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you've nothing to hide, why are you so concerned about a
>>>> background check? Many jobs require a background check so what's
>>>> the big deal?
>>>>
>>>> Only those guilty of something will care.
>>>>
>>> Why fear a photo ID to vote?
>>>
>>>
>>> What are Democrats hiding, why are they afraid of a photo ID to vote,
>>> are you stealing votes?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> It's really a non-issue from my standpoint. Just another hot button
>> to get people going.


Good to see you think background checks for guns and having an ID to buy
them is just a hot button issue, I was afraid you didn't actually want
to support equal treatment of my RIGHTS under the law.


If a voting RIGHT can't be suppressed by such tactics then surely the
RIGHT to buy a personal defense system can't be suppressed by requiring
a photo ID.


Thanks for supporting 2nd Amendment GUN RIGHTS and 24th amendment voting
rights equally under the law.

[Peter Franks]

Voting isn't even a right, it is a /privilege/, and accordingly,
subordinates to rights.

If you can require ID, taxes, fees, training, etc. for the exercise of a
right then you can do that AND MORE for a privilege.

[BeamMeUpScotty]

On 6/18/2013 8:48 PM, Johnny Football wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:07:22 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty
> <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>
>> On 6/18/2013 10:06 AM, Busch Lite spent 720 days on vacation reading
>> "Billy the Goat" at his dude ranch wrote:
>>> On 6/17/2013 8:09 PM, Johnny Football wrote:
>>>> voting doesn't kill 20 kids at a time.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sure it does.
>>>
>>> Voting for hug huggers guarantee another school
>>> massacre .
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Elect a Liberal and start more gun free zones where children become easy
>> targets for the only person with a gun, the bad guy.
>>
>>
>> Liberals with a handle on logic like that... deserve to be in charge of
>> your child.
>>
>>
>
> Wonder if your spawn had been part of the Columbine or NewTown mess,
> would you still feel that way?
>

I'm sure I would, and if your spawn died defending your constitutional
freedoms would you be ready to give those RIGHTS away so easy?

[Johnny Football]

On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:31:01 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty

You're so full of shit. I'd GLADLY give up the 2nd Amendment. I'm
not as obsessed about it as you are.

[Peter Franks]

Someone that is willing to give up any right is subject to giving up all
rights.

[BeamMeUpScotty]

You'll notice he wants to give up his rights to spite me rather than
improve your life.


Liberals bring a lot of hate to the table and they want to punish the
rest of us all, it looks like a deep deep seated psychological issue
that they all have in common. Maybe their mommy didn't hug them enough.


--



*Rumination*
“After the Soviet collapse, Marxism is a relic, a pathetic anachronism
reduced to its last redoubts: North Korea, Cuba, and the English
departments of the more expensive American universities.”
-Charles Krauthammer-

[Peter Franks]

I've found that liberalism is founded in hatred. Only fitting that it
regularly shows through.

[Johnny Football]

On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:35:08 -0700, Peter Franks <no...@none.com>
wrote:

Better than losing a loved one in a gun massacre. Or is it for you?

[Peter Franks]

On 6/20/2013 7:45 PM, Johnny Football wrote:
> Better than losing a loved one in a gun massacre. Or is it for you?

You'd prefer to have your loved ones killed in a fiery blast?