Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
No consideration for animals' lives
3 views
Skip to first unread message
George Plimpton
Nov 20, 2012, 2:30:21 PM11/20/12
to
The lying cracker, Goo Fuckwit David Harrison, continually blabbers
about having "consideration" for the lives of animals. What he means
is, he thinks it's good for the animals themselves if they exist. That's
*all* it means.
He sure as hell doesn't have one bit of consideration for their lives as
animals experience them, i.e., for their welfare. He has made that
abundantly clear over 11 years:
It's not out of consideration for porcupines
that we don't raise them for food. It's because
they would be a pain in the ass to raise. We
don't raise cattle out of consideration for them
either, but because they're fairly easy to
raise.
Goo/Fuckwit David Harrison - Sep 26, 2005
I am not an extremist about it, and if I thought
that all of the animals I eat had terrible
lives, I would still eat meat. That is not
because I don't care about them at all, but I
would just ignore their suffering.
Goo/Fuckwit David Harrison - Nov 29, 1999
I would eat animals even if I thought that it was
cruel to them, and even if they gained nothing from
the deal. Is that what you want me to say? It is true.
But that doesn't mean that I can't still like the animals
also....
Goo/Fuckwit David Harrison - Sept 23, 1999
I don't try to eat ethically, because I don't really care enough
to make the effort.
Goo/Fuckwit David Harrison - July 31, 2003
Goo only cares about the products and services they provide - mainly
meat, but also disgusting animal combats that Goo enjoys watching.
--
Any more lip out of you and I'll haul off and let you have it...if you
know what's good for you, you won't monkey around with Fred C. Dobbs
about having "consideration" for the lives of animals. What he means
is, he thinks it's good for the animals themselves if they exist. That's
*all* it means.
He sure as hell doesn't have one bit of consideration for their lives as
animals experience them, i.e., for their welfare. He has made that
abundantly clear over 11 years:
It's not out of consideration for porcupines
that we don't raise them for food. It's because
they would be a pain in the ass to raise. We
don't raise cattle out of consideration for them
either, but because they're fairly easy to
raise.
Goo/Fuckwit David Harrison - Sep 26, 2005
I am not an extremist about it, and if I thought
that all of the animals I eat had terrible
lives, I would still eat meat. That is not
because I don't care about them at all, but I
would just ignore their suffering.
Goo/Fuckwit David Harrison - Nov 29, 1999
I would eat animals even if I thought that it was
cruel to them, and even if they gained nothing from
the deal. Is that what you want me to say? It is true.
But that doesn't mean that I can't still like the animals
also....
Goo/Fuckwit David Harrison - Sept 23, 1999
I don't try to eat ethically, because I don't really care enough
to make the effort.
Goo/Fuckwit David Harrison - July 31, 2003
Goo only cares about the products and services they provide - mainly
meat, but also disgusting animal combats that Goo enjoys watching.
--
Any more lip out of you and I'll haul off and let you have it...if you
know what's good for you, you won't monkey around with Fred C. Dobbs
dh
Nov 22, 2012, 1:45:34 PM11/22/12
to
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:30:21 -0800, Goo wrote:
>Goo only cares about the products and services they provide - mainly
>meat
"I consume meat. I consume it daily - I can't even remember a day in my life
>Goo only cares about the products and services they provide - mainly
>meat
when I didn't." - Goo
"the moral harm caused by killing them is greater in magnitude
than ANY benefit they might derive from "decent lives" - Goo
"no matter how "decent" the conditions are, the deliberate killing
of the animals erases all of it." - Goo
""giving them life" does NOT mitigate the wrongness of
their deaths" - Goo
George Plimpton
Nov 22, 2012, 2:00:56 PM11/22/12
to
Fuckwit David Harrison, who has no consideration for animals' lives *or*
welfare, wussed out:
You do not give any consideration to animals' lives nor to their
welfare, Fuckwit, you cheap fuck.
welfare, wussed out:
>
>> Goo only cares about the products and services they provide - mainly
>> meat
>
> [snip Fuckwit's craven gutless wuss-out]
>> Goo only cares about the products and services they provide - mainly
>> meat
>
You do not give any consideration to animals' lives nor to their
welfare, Fuckwit, you cheap fuck.
George Plimpton
Nov 22, 2012, 2:05:40 PM11/22/12
to
Goo only cares about the products and services they provide - mainly
dh
Nov 26, 2012, 1:23:37 PM11/26/12
to
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:05:40 -0800, Goo wrote:
>On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:45:34 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:30:21 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>
>On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:45:34 -0500, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:30:21 -0800, Goo wrote:
>>
>>>Goo only cares about the products and services they provide - mainly
>>>meat
>>
>>"I consume meat. I consume it daily - I can't even remember a day in my life
>>when I didn't." - Goo
>>
>>"the moral harm caused by killing them is greater in magnitude
>>than ANY benefit they might derive from "decent lives" - Goo
>>
>>"no matter how "decent" the conditions are, the deliberate killing
>>of the animals erases all of it." - Goo
>>
>>""giving them life" does NOT mitigate the wrongness of
>>their deaths" - Goo
>
>>
>>"I consume meat. I consume it daily - I can't even remember a day in my life
>>when I didn't." - Goo
>>
>>"the moral harm caused by killing them is greater in magnitude
>>than ANY benefit they might derive from "decent lives" - Goo
>>
>>"no matter how "decent" the conditions are, the deliberate killing
>>of the animals erases all of it." - Goo
>>
>>""giving them life" does NOT mitigate the wrongness of
>>their deaths" - Goo
>
>Goo only cares about the products and services they provide - mainly
>meat
"I eat meat." - Goo
>meat
George Plimpton
Nov 26, 2012, 1:39:56 PM11/26/12
to
Fuckwit David Harrison, a convicted felon who gives *NO* consideration
to animals' lives or welfare, lied:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:05:40 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>> Fuckwit David Harrison, a convicted felon who gives *NO* consideration to animals' lives or welfare, lied:
>>
>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:30:21 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>
>>>> Goo Fuckwit Harrison (felon) only cares about the products and services
You don't care about animals' lives or welfare, Goo - proved.
to animals' lives or welfare, lied:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:05:40 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>> Fuckwit David Harrison, a convicted felon who gives *NO* consideration to animals' lives or welfare, lied:
>>
>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:30:21 -0800, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>
>>>> Goo Fuckwit Harrison (felon) only cares about the products and services
>>>> they provide - mainly meat
>>>
>>> "I consume meat. I consume it daily - I can't even remember a day in my life
>>> when I didn't." - Prof. Geo. Plimpton
>>>
>>> "I consume meat. I consume it daily - I can't even remember a day in my life
>>>
>>> "the moral harm caused by killing them is greater in magnitude
>>> than ANY benefit they might derive from "decent lives" - Prof. Geo. Plimpton
>>> "the moral harm caused by killing them is greater in magnitude
>>>
>>> "no matter how "decent" the conditions are, the deliberate killing
>>> of the animals erases all of it." - Prof. Geo. Plimpton
>>> "no matter how "decent" the conditions are, the deliberate killing
>>>
>>> ""giving them life" does NOT mitigate the wrongness of
>>> their deaths" - Prof. Geo. Plimpton
>>> ""giving them life" does NOT mitigate the wrongness of
>>
>> Goo only cares about the products and services they provide - mainly
>> meat
>
> "I eat meat." - Prof. Geo. Plimpton
>> Goo only cares about the products and services they provide - mainly
>> meat
>
You don't care about animals' lives or welfare, Goo - proved.
George Plimpton
Nov 27, 2012, 12:22:07 PM11/27/12
to
Fuckwit David Harrison, a convicted felon, lied:
> [lies cut]
You have no consideration for animals' lives or welfare, Fuckwit.
> [lies cut]
You have no consideration for animals' lives or welfare, Fuckwit.
0 new messages