Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
A coward's inept reply to challenges he's afraid of:
5 views
Skip to first unread message
dh
Aug 30, 2012, 5:31:38 PM8/30/12
to
"You do not pose any "challenge"" - Goo
George Plimpton
Aug 30, 2012, 5:40:44 PM8/30/12
to
On 8/30/2012 2:31 PM, dh@. wrote:
>
> "You do not pose any "challenge""
Correct.
>
> "You do not pose any "challenge""
Wet Paper Bag
Aug 30, 2012, 6:05:16 PM8/30/12
to
there is nothing to it.
jump.
Mr.Smartypants
Aug 31, 2012, 12:49:13 AM8/31/12
to
On Aug 30, 3:31 pm, dh@. wrote:
> "You do not pose any "challenge"" - Goo
We challenged Gooberdoodle to prove EXTRA livestock were being raised
> "You do not pose any "challenge"" - Goo
for the pet food industry and he wussed.
He can't even tell us how many Ruperts he thinks he talks to.
dh
Sep 3, 2012, 6:26:46 PM9/3/12
to
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT), Wet Paper Bag
<ultimate.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Aug 30, 3:40�pm, Goo wrote:
>> On 8/30/2012 2:31 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>
>> Correct.
>
>agreed.
>
>there is nothing to it.
>
>jump.
One of the challenges defeating Goob is the challenge to explain what he
thinks prevents life from being a benefit to us. Notice the Goober has been
afraid to attempt providing any sort of explanation at all to recent challenges.
That's because every time he's tried to maunder a lame explanation in the past
it has been entirely dependant upon something to do with pre-existence. Goo has
learned that he's unable to attempt any sort of explanation without referring to
pre-existence, and I again challenge him to try. He again will fail. He will
fail every time anyone ever challenges him to do so, so if you ever want to
defeat Goo just present this challenge and it will defeat him, every time.
<ultimate.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Aug 30, 3:40�pm, Goo wrote:
>> On 8/30/2012 2:31 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>
>> Correct.
>
>agreed.
>
>there is nothing to it.
>
>jump.
thinks prevents life from being a benefit to us. Notice the Goober has been
afraid to attempt providing any sort of explanation at all to recent challenges.
That's because every time he's tried to maunder a lame explanation in the past
it has been entirely dependant upon something to do with pre-existence. Goo has
learned that he's unable to attempt any sort of explanation without referring to
pre-existence, and I again challenge him to try. He again will fail. He will
fail every time anyone ever challenges him to do so, so if you ever want to
defeat Goo just present this challenge and it will defeat him, every time.
George Plimpton
Sep 4, 2012, 12:38:32 AM9/4/12
to
On 9/3/2012 3:26 PM, dh@. wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT), Wet Paper Bag
> <ultimate.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 30, 3:40 pm, Goo wrote:
>>> On 8/30/2012 2:31 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>>
>>> Correct.
>>
>> agreed.
>>
>> there is nothing to it.
>>
>> jump.
>
> One of the challenges
No.
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT), Wet Paper Bag
> <ultimate.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 30, 3:40 pm, Goo wrote:
>>> On 8/30/2012 2:31 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>>
>>> Correct.
>>
>> agreed.
>>
>> there is nothing to it.
>>
>> jump.
>
> One of the challenges
Mr.Smartypants
Sep 4, 2012, 12:08:16 PM9/4/12
to
better off than you were before, Goo.
Dutch
Sep 4, 2012, 1:59:23 PM9/4/12
to
Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> Tell us what it is about the pre-existent state that makes you no
> better off than you were before, Goo.
Read Salt's essay again, dummy.
> Tell us what it is about the pre-existent state that makes you no
> better off than you were before, Goo.
Mr.Smartypants
Sep 4, 2012, 2:09:53 PM9/4/12
to
George Plimpton
Sep 4, 2012, 2:15:03 PM9/4/12
to
understand it in any previous attempt.
dh
Sep 4, 2012, 3:04:03 PM9/4/12
to
to even attempt to explain what he thinks prevents life from being a benefit,
imo. He has claimed it's not countless times, and amusingly claimed that has
been proven, yet he can't attempt any sort of explanation of what prevents it.
The Goober himself appears to benefit from his existence even with all his
discongoobulated self out-stupidifications, and can't give any decent
explanation as to what prevents him from benefiting as he appears to. It seems
that we've caught Goo in yet another blatant lie since he can't attempt to back
it up.
dh
Sep 4, 2012, 3:05:48 PM9/4/12
to
On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:38:32 -0700, Goo lied blatantly:
>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:26:46 -0400, dh@. challenged:
Yes it will Goob. Every time, just as it did this particular time which
you're lying so blatantly about, here comes another defeat for you Goober:
I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents life
from being a benefit Goo. Go:
(correct prediction: Goo can't do it.)
>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:26:46 -0400, dh@. challenged:
>> One of the challenges defeating Goob is the challenge to explain what he
>>thinks prevents life from being a benefit to us. Notice the Goober has been
>>afraid to attempt providing any sort of explanation at all to recent challenges.
>>That's because every time he's tried to maunder a lame explanation in the past
>>it has been entirely dependant upon something to do with pre-existence. Goo has
>>learned that he's unable to attempt any sort of explanation without referring to
>>pre-existence, and I again challenge him to try. He again will fail. He will
>>fail every time anyone ever challenges him to do so, so if you ever want to
>>defeat Goo just present this challenge and it will defeat him, every time.
>
>No.
>>thinks prevents life from being a benefit to us. Notice the Goober has been
>>afraid to attempt providing any sort of explanation at all to recent challenges.
>>That's because every time he's tried to maunder a lame explanation in the past
>>it has been entirely dependant upon something to do with pre-existence. Goo has
>>learned that he's unable to attempt any sort of explanation without referring to
>>pre-existence, and I again challenge him to try. He again will fail. He will
>>fail every time anyone ever challenges him to do so, so if you ever want to
>>defeat Goo just present this challenge and it will defeat him, every time.
>
Yes it will Goob. Every time, just as it did this particular time which
you're lying so blatantly about, here comes another defeat for you Goober:
I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents life
from being a benefit Goo. Go:
(correct prediction: Goo can't do it.)
George Plimpton
Sep 4, 2012, 3:52:32 PM9/4/12
to
Fuckwit David Harrison, a convicted felon, lied:
> On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:38:32 -0700, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>> Fuckwit David Harrison, a convicted felon, lied:
>>>>> Fuckwit David Harrison, a convicted felon, lied:
>
> Yes it
There is no "challenge", Fuckwit. There never has been. I have won
every encounter precisely *because* you cannot challenge me - ever. I
have won before you even click "Send".
> On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:38:32 -0700, George Plimpton wrote:
>
>> Fuckwit David Harrison, a convicted felon, lied:
>>
>>> On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT), Wet Paper Bag
>>> <ultimate.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Aug 30, 3:40 pm, George Plimpton wrote:
>>> On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT), Wet Paper Bag
>>> <ultimate.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Fuckwit David Harrison, a convicted felon, lied:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>>>>
>>>>> Correct.
>>>>
>>>> agreed.
>>>>
>>>> there is nothing to it.
>>>>
>>>> jump.
>>>
>>> One of the challenges defeating
>>
>> No. No challenge.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>>>>
>>>>> Correct.
>>>>
>>>> agreed.
>>>>
>>>> there is nothing to it.
>>>>
>>>> jump.
>>>
>>> One of the challenges defeating
>>
>
> Yes it
There is no "challenge", Fuckwit. There never has been. I have won
every encounter precisely *because* you cannot challenge me - ever. I
have won before you even click "Send".
Dutch
Sep 4, 2012, 4:16:04 PM9/4/12
to
possum
Sep 4, 2012, 4:24:36 PM9/4/12
to
<dh@.> wrote in message
news:t4kc48tv14441f431...@4ax.com...
Mr.Smartypants
Sep 6, 2012, 2:01:49 PM9/6/12
to
On Sep 4, 2:20 pm, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> > On Sep 4, 12:03 pm, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
> >> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> >>> Tell us what it is about the pre-existent state that makes you no
> >>> better off than you were before, Goo.
>
> >> Read Salt's essay again, dummy.
> > I'm asking Goo, not Salt or you.
>
> If you understood Salt then you wouldn't have to ask the question.
LOL!!
> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> > On Sep 4, 12:03 pm, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
> >> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> >>> Tell us what it is about the pre-existent state that makes you no
> >>> better off than you were before, Goo.
>
> >> Read Salt's essay again, dummy.
> > I'm asking Goo, not Salt or you.
>
> If you understood Salt then you wouldn't have to ask the question.
Goo is the one who is constantly making statements that show he
believes in the pre-existent state while making other statements
denying the pre-existent state. The question is accurately aimed at
Goo who as usual is wussing.
dh
Sep 6, 2012, 5:52:10 PM9/6/12
to
"and what shall be the reply of the Pig to the Philosopher? "Revered
moralist," he might plead, "it were unseemly for me, who am to-day a
pig, and to-morrow but ham and sausages, to dispute with a master of
ethics, yet to my porcine intellect it appeareth" - Salt
dh
Sep 6, 2012, 5:52:19 PM9/6/12
to
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:52:32 -0700, Goo wrote:
>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:05:48 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:38:32 -0700, Goo lied blatantly:
>>
>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:26:46 -0400, dh@. challenged:
>>>
There is and it defeats you every time it's presented Goober. You PROVE that
it defeats you every time, by your inability to explain what you want people to
think prevents life from being the benefit it so clearly appears to be. You have
no idea at all Goo, and can't even pretend that you do.
>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:05:48 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:38:32 -0700, Goo lied blatantly:
>>
>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:26:46 -0400, dh@. challenged:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT), Wet Paper Bag
>>>><ultimate.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>><ultimate.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Aug 30, 3:40�pm, Goo wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/30/2012 2:31 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/30/2012 2:31 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>
>>>>>agreed.
>>>>>
>>>>>there is nothing to it.
>>>>>
>>>>>jump.
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>
>>>>>agreed.
>>>>>
>>>>>there is nothing to it.
>>>>>
>>>>>jump.
>>>>
>>>> One of the challenges defeating Goob is the challenge to explain what he
>>>>thinks prevents life from being a benefit to us. Notice the Goober has been
>>>>afraid to attempt providing any sort of explanation at all to recent challenges.
>>>>That's because every time he's tried to maunder a lame explanation in the past
>>>>it has been entirely dependant upon something to do with pre-existence. Goo has
>>>>learned that he's unable to attempt any sort of explanation without referring to
>>>>pre-existence, and I again challenge him to try. He again will fail. He will
>>>>fail every time anyone ever challenges him to do so, so if you ever want to
>>>>defeat Goo just present this challenge and it will defeat him, every time.
>>>
>>>No.
>>
>> Yes it will Goob. Every time, just as it did this particular time which
>>you're lying so blatantly about, here comes another defeat for you Goober:
>>
>>I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents life
>>from being a benefit Goo. Go:
>>
>>(correct prediction: Goo can't do it.)
>
>There is no "challenge"
>>>>thinks prevents life from being a benefit to us. Notice the Goober has been
>>>>afraid to attempt providing any sort of explanation at all to recent challenges.
>>>>That's because every time he's tried to maunder a lame explanation in the past
>>>>it has been entirely dependant upon something to do with pre-existence. Goo has
>>>>learned that he's unable to attempt any sort of explanation without referring to
>>>>pre-existence, and I again challenge him to try. He again will fail. He will
>>>>fail every time anyone ever challenges him to do so, so if you ever want to
>>>>defeat Goo just present this challenge and it will defeat him, every time.
>>>
>>>No.
>>
>> Yes it will Goob. Every time, just as it did this particular time which
>>you're lying so blatantly about, here comes another defeat for you Goober:
>>
>>I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents life
>>from being a benefit Goo. Go:
>>
>>(correct prediction: Goo can't do it.)
>
There is and it defeats you every time it's presented Goober. You PROVE that
it defeats you every time, by your inability to explain what you want people to
think prevents life from being the benefit it so clearly appears to be. You have
no idea at all Goo, and can't even pretend that you do.
dh
Sep 6, 2012, 5:56:55 PM9/6/12
to
to meet the challenge, but as we can see he's afraid to try. He has tried in the
past though, and his supposed explanation has always involved something to do
with pre-existence. But Goo has never been able to say how he thinks anything
about our pre-existence can and does prevent us from benefitting from our
existence now.
Everything to do with Goo is pretty much directed at discouraging people
from appreciating lives of positive value for livestock animals from my pov, and
that is because appreciating them works against the objective to eliminate
domestic animals.
George Plimpton
Sep 6, 2012, 7:17:29 PM9/6/12
to
Fuckwit David Harrison, convicted felon, lied
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> agreed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> jump.
>>>>>
>>>>> One of the challenges defeating
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>
>>> Yes it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> agreed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> jump.
>>>>>
>>>>> One of the challenges defeating
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes it
>>
>> There is no "challenge"
>
> There is and
No. Fuckwit David Harrison, you *cannot* challenge me, and you know it.
>> There is no "challenge"
>
> There is and
George Plimpton
Sep 6, 2012, 11:52:43 PM9/6/12
to
Mr.Smartypants
Sep 7, 2012, 11:05:35 AM9/7/12
to
On Sep 6, 9:52 pm, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> On 9/6/2012 2:56 PM, dh@. wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 21:24:36 +0100, "possum" <zen102...@zen.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >> <dh@.> wrote in message
> >>news:t4kc48tv14441f431...@4ax.com...
> >>> On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 21:49:13 -0700 (PDT),
> >>> "Mr.Smartypants"
> On 9/6/2012 2:56 PM, dh@. wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 21:24:36 +0100, "possum" <zen102...@zen.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >> <dh@.> wrote in message
> >>news:t4kc48tv14441f431...@4ax.com...
> >>> On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 21:49:13 -0700 (PDT),
> >>> "Mr.Smartypants"
Rupert has you backed into a corner and you're wussing there too.
dh
Sep 10, 2012, 9:57:08 AM9/10/12
to
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 08:05:35 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
That Goober is wussing all over the place. LOL...and his boy "Derek" sure
hasn't been able to do anything to help Goo either.
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
hasn't been able to do anything to help Goo either.
dh
Sep 10, 2012, 10:04:56 AM9/10/12
to
On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:17:29 -0700, Goo wrote:
>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:52:19 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:52:32 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:05:48 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:38:32 -0700, Goo lied blatantly:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:26:46 -0400, dh@. challenged:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT), Wet Paper Bag
>>>>>><ultimate.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Aug 30, 3:40 pm, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/30/2012 2:31 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>
I know you don't Goob, as you can tell by the fact that I just pointed out
you don't.
>Fuckwit David Harrison, you *cannot* challenge me, and you know it.
That's a blatant lie Goober since this challenge I present to you defeats
you every time I present it. You sure do suck at this Goo. You suck at it so
badly that you can't even attempt to back up your own stupid claims Goob, as I
make you confirm time after time like you confirmed again this time.
>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:52:19 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:52:32 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:05:48 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:38:32 -0700, Goo lied blatantly:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:26:46 -0400, dh@. challenged:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT), Wet Paper Bag
>>>>>><ultimate.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Aug 30, 3:40 pm, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/30/2012 2:31 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>agreed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>jump.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>agreed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>jump.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One of the challenges defeating Goob is the challenge to explain what he
>>>>>>thinks prevents life from being a benefit to us. Notice the Goober has been
>>>>>>afraid to attempt providing any sort of explanation at all to recent challenges.
>>>>>>That's because every time he's tried to maunder a lame explanation in the past
>>>>>>it has been entirely dependant upon something to do with pre-existence. Goo has
>>>>>>learned that he's unable to attempt any sort of explanation without referring to
>>>>>>pre-existence, and I again challenge him to try. He again will fail. He will
>>>>>>fail every time anyone ever challenges him to do so, so if you ever want to
>>>>>>defeat Goo just present this challenge and it will defeat him, every time.
>>>>>
>>>>>No.
>>>>
>>>> Yes it will Goob. Every time, just as it did this particular time which
>>>>you're lying so blatantly about, here comes another defeat for you Goober:
>>>>
>>>>I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents life
>>>>from being a benefit Goo. Go:
>>>>
>>>>(correct prediction: Goo can't do it.)
>>>
>>>There is no "challenge"
>>>>>>thinks prevents life from being a benefit to us. Notice the Goober has been
>>>>>>afraid to attempt providing any sort of explanation at all to recent challenges.
>>>>>>That's because every time he's tried to maunder a lame explanation in the past
>>>>>>it has been entirely dependant upon something to do with pre-existence. Goo has
>>>>>>learned that he's unable to attempt any sort of explanation without referring to
>>>>>>pre-existence, and I again challenge him to try. He again will fail. He will
>>>>>>fail every time anyone ever challenges him to do so, so if you ever want to
>>>>>>defeat Goo just present this challenge and it will defeat him, every time.
>>>>>
>>>>>No.
>>>>
>>>> Yes it will Goob. Every time, just as it did this particular time which
>>>>you're lying so blatantly about, here comes another defeat for you Goober:
>>>>
>>>>I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents life
>>>>from being a benefit Goo. Go:
>>>>
>>>>(correct prediction: Goo can't do it.)
>>>
>>
>> There is and it defeats you every time it's presented Goober. You PROVE that
>>it defeats you every time, by your inability to explain what you want people to
>>think prevents life from being the benefit it so clearly appears to be. You have
>>no idea at all Goo, and can't even pretend that you do.
>
>No.
>>it defeats you every time, by your inability to explain what you want people to
>>think prevents life from being the benefit it so clearly appears to be. You have
>>no idea at all Goo, and can't even pretend that you do.
>
I know you don't Goob, as you can tell by the fact that I just pointed out
you don't.
>Fuckwit David Harrison, you *cannot* challenge me, and you know it.
you every time I present it. You sure do suck at this Goo. You suck at it so
badly that you can't even attempt to back up your own stupid claims Goob, as I
make you confirm time after time like you confirmed again this time.
dh
Sep 10, 2012, 10:05:33 AM9/10/12
to
neither of them are able to back up, very similar to their pet food cattle
idiotics.
George Plimpton
Sep 10, 2012, 10:31:26 AM9/10/12
to
Fuckwit David Harrison, convicted felon, lied:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> agreed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> jump.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One of the challenges
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No. There is no "challenge". There never has been any "challenge".
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes it
>>>>
>>
>> No. Fuckwit David Harrison, you *cannot* challenge me, and you know it.
me. You don't have what it takes - you are too far below me. You
*KNOW* you are, Goober Fuckwit.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> agreed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> jump.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One of the challenges
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes it
>>>>
>>>> There is no "challenge", Fuckwit. There never has been. I have won every
>>>> encounter precisely *because* you cannot challenge me - ever. I have won
>>>> before you even click "Send".
>>>
>>> There is and
>>>> encounter precisely *because* you cannot challenge me - ever. I have won
>>>> before you even click "Send".
>>>
>>
>> No. Fuckwit David Harrison, you *cannot* challenge me, and you know it.
>
> That's a blatant lie
It's not a lie, Goober Fuckwit. You do not - you *CANNOT* - challenge
> That's a blatant lie
me. You don't have what it takes - you are too far below me. You
*KNOW* you are, Goober Fuckwit.
dh
Sep 11, 2012, 11:41:42 AM9/11/12
to
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:31:26 -0700, Goo wussed horribly:
>On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:04:56 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:17:29 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:52:19 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:52:32 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:05:48 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:38:32 -0700, Goo lied blatantly:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:26:46 -0400, dh@. challenged:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT), Wet Paper Bag
>>>>>>>><ultimate.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Aug 30, 3:40�pm, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/2012 2:31 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
I'll defeat you again right now:
Goober, I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents
life from being a benefit.
You lose, Goo.
>On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:04:56 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:17:29 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:52:19 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:52:32 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:05:48 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:38:32 -0700, Goo lied blatantly:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:26:46 -0400, dh@. challenged:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT), Wet Paper Bag
>>>>>>>><ultimate.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Aug 30, 3:40�pm, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/2012 2:31 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> > "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>agreed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>jump.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>agreed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>jump.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One of the challenges defeating Goob is the challenge to explain what he
>>>>>>>>thinks prevents life from being a benefit to us. Notice the Goober has been
>>>>>>>>afraid to attempt providing any sort of explanation at all to recent challenges.
>>>>>>>>That's because every time he's tried to maunder a lame explanation in the past
>>>>>>>>it has been entirely dependant upon something to do with pre-existence. Goo has
>>>>>>>>learned that he's unable to attempt any sort of explanation without referring to
>>>>>>>>pre-existence, and I again challenge him to try. He again will fail. He will
>>>>>>>>fail every time anyone ever challenges him to do so, so if you ever want to
>>>>>>>>defeat Goo just present this challenge and it will defeat him, every time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes it will Goob. Every time, just as it did this particular time which
>>>>>>you're lying so blatantly about, here comes another defeat for you Goober:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents life
>>>>>>from being a benefit Goo. Go:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>(correct prediction: Goo can't do it.)
>>>>>
>>>>>There is no "challenge"
>>>>
>>>> There is and it defeats you every time it's presented Goober. You PROVE that
>>>>it defeats you every time, by your inability to explain what you want people to
>>>>think prevents life from being the benefit it so clearly appears to be. You have
>>>>no idea at all Goo, and can't even pretend that you do.
>>>
>>>No.
>>
>> I know you don't Goob, as you can tell by the fact that I just pointed out
>>you don't.
>>
>>>>>>>>thinks prevents life from being a benefit to us. Notice the Goober has been
>>>>>>>>afraid to attempt providing any sort of explanation at all to recent challenges.
>>>>>>>>That's because every time he's tried to maunder a lame explanation in the past
>>>>>>>>it has been entirely dependant upon something to do with pre-existence. Goo has
>>>>>>>>learned that he's unable to attempt any sort of explanation without referring to
>>>>>>>>pre-existence, and I again challenge him to try. He again will fail. He will
>>>>>>>>fail every time anyone ever challenges him to do so, so if you ever want to
>>>>>>>>defeat Goo just present this challenge and it will defeat him, every time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes it will Goob. Every time, just as it did this particular time which
>>>>>>you're lying so blatantly about, here comes another defeat for you Goober:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents life
>>>>>>from being a benefit Goo. Go:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>(correct prediction: Goo can't do it.)
>>>>>
>>>>>There is no "challenge"
>>>>
>>>> There is and it defeats you every time it's presented Goober. You PROVE that
>>>>it defeats you every time, by your inability to explain what you want people to
>>>>think prevents life from being the benefit it so clearly appears to be. You have
>>>>no idea at all Goo, and can't even pretend that you do.
>>>
>>>No.
>>
>> I know you don't Goob, as you can tell by the fact that I just pointed out
>>you don't.
>>
>>>Fuckwit David Harrison, you *cannot* challenge me, and you know it.
>>
>>
>> That's a blatant lie Goober since this challenge I present to you defeats
>>you every time I present it. You sure do suck at this Goo. You suck at it so
>>badly that you can't even attempt to back up your own stupid claims Goob, as I
>>make you confirm time after time like you confirmed again this time.
>
>It's n
>>you every time I present it. You sure do suck at this Goo. You suck at it so
>>badly that you can't even attempt to back up your own stupid claims Goob, as I
>>make you confirm time after time like you confirmed again this time.
>
I'll defeat you again right now:
Goober, I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents
life from being a benefit.
You lose, Goo.
George Plimpton
Sep 11, 2012, 1:28:55 PM9/11/12
to
Fuckwit David Harrison, convicted felon, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> agreed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> jump.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> One of the challenges defeating
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> agreed.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> jump.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> One of the challenges defeating
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No. There is no "challenge". There never has been any "challenge".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I challenge you
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no "challenge", Fuckwit. There never has been. I have won every
>>>>>> encounter precisely *because* you cannot challenge me - ever. I have won
>>>>>> before you even click "Send".
>>>>>
>>>>> There is and
>>>>
>>>> No. Fuckwit David Harrison, you *cannot* challenge me, and you know it.
>>>>>> There is no "challenge", Fuckwit. There never has been. I have won every
>>>>>> encounter precisely *because* you cannot challenge me - ever. I have won
>>>>>> before you even click "Send".
>>>>>
>>>>> There is and
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> That's a blatant lie
>>
>>>
>>> That's a blatant lie
>>
>> It's not a lie, Goober Fuckwit. You do not - you *CANNOT* - challenge me.
>> You don't have what it takes - you are too far below me. You *KNOW* you
>> are, Goober Fuckwit.
>
> I'll defeat
>> You don't have what it takes - you are too far below me. You *KNOW* you
>> are, Goober Fuckwit.
>
No.
Mr.Smartypants
Sep 11, 2012, 2:59:14 PM9/11/12
to
you think you talk to.
LOL!
dh
Sep 12, 2012, 2:53:42 PM9/12/12
to
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:28:55 -0700, Goo lost, again:
>On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:41:42 -0400, dh@. correctly predicted:
Then you lose, Goo.
>> You lose, Goo.
>On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:41:42 -0400, dh@. correctly predicted:
>
>>On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:31:26 -0700, Goo wussed horribly:
>>
>>>On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:04:56 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:17:29 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:52:19 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:52:32 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:05:48 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:38:32 -0700, Goo lied blatantly:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:26:46 -0400, dh@. challenged:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT), Wet Paper Bag
>>>>>>>>>><ultimate.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Aug 30, 3:40�pm, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/2012 2:31 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:31:26 -0700, Goo wussed horribly:
>>
>>>On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:04:56 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:17:29 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:52:19 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:52:32 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:05:48 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:38:32 -0700, Goo lied blatantly:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:26:46 -0400, dh@. challenged:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT), Wet Paper Bag
>>>>>>>>>><ultimate.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Aug 30, 3:40�pm, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/2012 2:31 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> > "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>agreed.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>jump.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>agreed.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>jump.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> One of the challenges defeating Goob is the challenge to explain what he
>>>>>>>>>>thinks prevents life from being a benefit to us. Notice the Goober has been
>>>>>>>>>>afraid to attempt providing any sort of explanation at all to recent challenges.
>>>>>>>>>>That's because every time he's tried to maunder a lame explanation in the past
>>>>>>>>>>it has been entirely dependant upon something to do with pre-existence. Goo has
>>>>>>>>>>learned that he's unable to attempt any sort of explanation without referring to
>>>>>>>>>>pre-existence, and I again challenge him to try. He again will fail. He will
>>>>>>>>>>fail every time anyone ever challenges him to do so, so if you ever want to
>>>>>>>>>>defeat Goo just present this challenge and it will defeat him, every time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>No.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes it will Goob. Every time, just as it did this particular time which
>>>>>>>>you're lying so blatantly about, here comes another defeat for you Goober:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents life
>>>>>>>>from being a benefit Goo. Go:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>(correct prediction: Goo can't do it.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>There is no "challenge"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is and it defeats you every time it's presented Goober. You PROVE that
>>>>>>it defeats you every time, by your inability to explain what you want people to
>>>>>>think prevents life from being the benefit it so clearly appears to be. You have
>>>>>>no idea at all Goo, and can't even pretend that you do.
>>>>>
>>>>>No.
>>>>
>>>> I know you don't Goob, as you can tell by the fact that I just pointed out
>>>>you don't.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>thinks prevents life from being a benefit to us. Notice the Goober has been
>>>>>>>>>>afraid to attempt providing any sort of explanation at all to recent challenges.
>>>>>>>>>>That's because every time he's tried to maunder a lame explanation in the past
>>>>>>>>>>it has been entirely dependant upon something to do with pre-existence. Goo has
>>>>>>>>>>learned that he's unable to attempt any sort of explanation without referring to
>>>>>>>>>>pre-existence, and I again challenge him to try. He again will fail. He will
>>>>>>>>>>fail every time anyone ever challenges him to do so, so if you ever want to
>>>>>>>>>>defeat Goo just present this challenge and it will defeat him, every time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>No.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes it will Goob. Every time, just as it did this particular time which
>>>>>>>>you're lying so blatantly about, here comes another defeat for you Goober:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents life
>>>>>>>>from being a benefit Goo. Go:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>(correct prediction: Goo can't do it.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>There is no "challenge"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is and it defeats you every time it's presented Goober. You PROVE that
>>>>>>it defeats you every time, by your inability to explain what you want people to
>>>>>>think prevents life from being the benefit it so clearly appears to be. You have
>>>>>>no idea at all Goo, and can't even pretend that you do.
>>>>>
>>>>>No.
>>>>
>>>> I know you don't Goob, as you can tell by the fact that I just pointed out
>>>>you don't.
>>>>
>>>>>Fuckwit David Harrison, you *cannot* challenge me, and you know it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's a blatant lie Goober since this challenge I present to you defeats
>>>>you every time I present it. You sure do suck at this Goo. You suck at it so
>>>>badly that you can't even attempt to back up your own stupid claims Goob, as I
>>>>make you confirm time after time like you confirmed again this time.
>>>
>>>It's n
>>
>> I'll defeat you again right now:
>>
>>Goober, I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents
>>life from being a benefit.
>
>No.
>>>>you every time I present it. You sure do suck at this Goo. You suck at it so
>>>>badly that you can't even attempt to back up your own stupid claims Goob, as I
>>>>make you confirm time after time like you confirmed again this time.
>>>
>>>It's n
>>
>> I'll defeat you again right now:
>>
>>Goober, I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents
>>life from being a benefit.
>
Then you lose, Goo.
>> You lose, Goo.
George Plimpton
Sep 12, 2012, 3:23:51 PM9/12/12
to
Fuckwit David Harrison, convicted felon, lied (except when he *admitted*
to posing no challenge):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> agreed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> jump.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> One of the challenges
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's a blatant lie since this challenge
No. You will not "defeat" anything, Fuckwit David Harrison. You can't
even "defeat" your dead father Warren or your dead father-in-law Delma.
No "challenge", Fuckwit. You're simply too stupid and too too far below
me mentally to pose any challenge. I win every time, Fuckwit - usually
by default.
to posing no challenge):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> agreed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> jump.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> One of the challenges
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No. There is no "challenge". There never has been any "challenge".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes it will
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is no "challenge"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is and
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No. Fuckwit David Harrison, you *cannot* challenge me, and you know it.
>>>>>>>> There is no "challenge"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is and
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's a blatant lie since this challenge
>>>>
>>>> It's not a lie, Goober Fuckwit. You do not - you *CANNOT* - challenge me.
>>>> You don't have what it takes - you are too far below me. You *KNOW* you
>>>> are, Goober Fuckwit.
>>>
>>> I'll defeat
>>
>> No.
>
> Then
>>>> It's not a lie, Goober Fuckwit. You do not - you *CANNOT* - challenge me.
>>>> You don't have what it takes - you are too far below me. You *KNOW* you
>>>> are, Goober Fuckwit.
>>>
>>> I'll defeat
>>
>> No.
>
No. You will not "defeat" anything, Fuckwit David Harrison. You can't
even "defeat" your dead father Warren or your dead father-in-law Delma.
No "challenge", Fuckwit. You're simply too stupid and too too far below
me mentally to pose any challenge. I win every time, Fuckwit - usually
by default.
Mr.Smartypants
Sep 12, 2012, 3:32:23 PM9/12/12
to
talk to?
dh
Sep 16, 2012, 3:35:49 PM9/16/12
to
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012,, Goo desperately lied about his frequent defeats:
>On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:53:42 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:28:55 -0700, Goo lost, again:
>>
>>>On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:41:42 -0400, dh@. correctly predicted:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:31:26 -0700, Goo wussed horribly:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:04:56 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:17:29 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:52:19 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:52:32 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:05:48 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:38:32 -0700, Goo lied blatantly:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:26:46 -0400, dh@. challenged:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT), Wet Paper Bag
>>>>>>>>>>>><ultimate.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Aug 30, 3:40�pm, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/2012 2:31 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
try giving an explanation, Goo.
>>>> You lose, Goo.
>On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:53:42 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:28:55 -0700, Goo lost, again:
>>
>>>On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:41:42 -0400, dh@. correctly predicted:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:31:26 -0700, Goo wussed horribly:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:04:56 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:17:29 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:52:19 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:52:32 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:05:48 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:38:32 -0700, Goo lied blatantly:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:26:46 -0400, dh@. challenged:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT), Wet Paper Bag
>>>>>>>>>>>><ultimate.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Aug 30, 3:40�pm, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/2012 2:31 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>agreed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>jump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>agreed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>jump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the challenges defeating Goob is the challenge to explain what he
>>>>>>>>>>>>thinks prevents life from being a benefit to us. Notice the Goober has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>afraid to attempt providing any sort of explanation at all to recent challenges.
>>>>>>>>>>>>That's because every time he's tried to maunder a lame explanation in the past
>>>>>>>>>>>>it has been entirely dependant upon something to do with pre-existence. Goo has
>>>>>>>>>>>>learned that he's unable to attempt any sort of explanation without referring to
>>>>>>>>>>>>pre-existence, and I again challenge him to try. He again will fail. He will
>>>>>>>>>>>>fail every time anyone ever challenges him to do so, so if you ever want to
>>>>>>>>>>>>defeat Goo just present this challenge and it will defeat him, every time.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>No.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes it will Goob. Every time, just as it did this particular time which
>>>>>>>>>>you're lying so blatantly about, here comes another defeat for you Goober:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents life
>>>>>>>>>>from being a benefit Goo. Go:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>(correct prediction: Goo can't do it.)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>There is no "challenge"
>>>>>>>>>>>>thinks prevents life from being a benefit to us. Notice the Goober has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>afraid to attempt providing any sort of explanation at all to recent challenges.
>>>>>>>>>>>>That's because every time he's tried to maunder a lame explanation in the past
>>>>>>>>>>>>it has been entirely dependant upon something to do with pre-existence. Goo has
>>>>>>>>>>>>learned that he's unable to attempt any sort of explanation without referring to
>>>>>>>>>>>>pre-existence, and I again challenge him to try. He again will fail. He will
>>>>>>>>>>>>fail every time anyone ever challenges him to do so, so if you ever want to
>>>>>>>>>>>>defeat Goo just present this challenge and it will defeat him, every time.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>No.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes it will Goob. Every time, just as it did this particular time which
>>>>>>>>>>you're lying so blatantly about, here comes another defeat for you Goober:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents life
>>>>>>>>>>from being a benefit Goo. Go:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>(correct prediction: Goo can't do it.)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is and it defeats you every time it's presented Goober. You PROVE that
>>>>>>>>it defeats you every time, by your inability to explain what you want people to
>>>>>>>>think prevents life from being the benefit it so clearly appears to be. You have
>>>>>>>>no idea at all Goo, and can't even pretend that you do.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know you don't Goob, as you can tell by the fact that I just pointed out
>>>>>>you don't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>it defeats you every time, by your inability to explain what you want people to
>>>>>>>>think prevents life from being the benefit it so clearly appears to be. You have
>>>>>>>>no idea at all Goo, and can't even pretend that you do.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know you don't Goob, as you can tell by the fact that I just pointed out
>>>>>>you don't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Fuckwit David Harrison, you *cannot* challenge me, and you know it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's a blatant lie Goober since this challenge I present to you defeats
>>>>>>you every time I present it. You sure do suck at this Goo. You suck at it so
>>>>>>badly that you can't even attempt to back up your own stupid claims Goob, as I
>>>>>>make you confirm time after time like you confirmed again this time.
>>>>>
>>>>>It's n
>>>>
>>>> I'll defeat you again right now:
>>>>
>>>>Goober, I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents
>>>>life from being a benefit.
>>>
>>>No.
>>
>> Then you lose, Goo.
>
>>>>>>you every time I present it. You sure do suck at this Goo. You suck at it so
>>>>>>badly that you can't even attempt to back up your own stupid claims Goob, as I
>>>>>>make you confirm time after time like you confirmed again this time.
>>>>>
>>>>>It's n
>>>>
>>>> I'll defeat you again right now:
>>>>
>>>>Goober, I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents
>>>>life from being a benefit.
>>>
>>>No.
>>
>> Then you lose, Goo.
>
>No. You will not "defeat" anything
LOL!!! I clearly defeated you to the point that you can't even attempt to
try giving an explanation, Goo.
>>>> You lose, Goo.
George Plimpton
Sep 16, 2012, 4:06:56 PM9/16/12
to
Fuckwit David Harrison, convicted felon, lied (except when he *admitted*
to posing no challenge):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
to posing no challenge):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agreed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the challenges defeating
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agreed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the challenges defeating
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No. There is no "challenge". There never has been any "challenge".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes it
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes it
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is no "challenge", Fuckwit. There never has been. I have won every
>>>>>>>>>> encounter precisely *because* you cannot challenge me - ever. I have won
>>>>>>>>>> before you even click "Send".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No. Fuckwit David Harrison, you *cannot* challenge me, and you know it.
>>>>>>>>>> encounter precisely *because* you cannot challenge me - ever. I have won
>>>>>>>>>> before you even click "Send".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's a blatant lie
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's a blatant lie
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not a lie, Goober Fuckwit. You do not - you *CANNOT* - challenge me.
>>>>>> You don't have what it takes - you are too far below me. You *KNOW* you are,
>>>>>> Goober Fuckwit.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll defeat
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>
>>> Then
>>
>> No. You will not "defeat" anything, Fuckwit David Harrison. You can't even
>> "defeat" your dead father Warren or your dead father-in-law Delma.
>>
>> No "challenge", Fuckwit. You're simply too stupid and too too far below me
>> mentally to pose any challenge. I win every time, Fuckwit - usually by default.
>
> LOL!!! I
>>>>>> You don't have what it takes - you are too far below me. You *KNOW* you are,
>>>>>> Goober Fuckwit.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll defeat
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>
>>> Then
>>
>> No. You will not "defeat" anything, Fuckwit David Harrison. You can't even
>> "defeat" your dead father Warren or your dead father-in-law Delma.
>>
>> No "challenge", Fuckwit. You're simply too stupid and too too far below me
>> mentally to pose any challenge. I win every time, Fuckwit - usually by default.
>
You *admit* you are far below me mentally, Goo. You've admitted it many
times.
Mr.Smartypants
Sep 16, 2012, 7:56:23 PM9/16/12
to
Tim
Sep 16, 2012, 10:26:23 PM9/16/12
to
On Sep 16, 2:06 pm, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> > LOL!!! I
that's no laughing matter fuckwit.
> You *admit* you are far below me mentally, Goo. You've admitted it many
> times.
on his royal behalf... to jump up and down, kicking your heels
together and yelling "yippie" suggests a long life of defeat relishing
in a single non-consequential moment of misunderstanding.
many times in deed george, it is embarrassing watching him but for the
thunderous laughter silented away.
i respect you taking the hit to try and bring his misery to an end...
do it one more time... we all want to see it again.
dh
Sep 19, 2012, 3:26:50 PM9/19/12
to
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 13:06:56 -0700, Goo continued to wuss:
>On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 15:35:49 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 12 Sep 2012,, Goo desperately lied about his frequent defeats:
>>
>>>On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:53:42 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:28:55 -0700, Goo lost, again:
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:41:42 -0400, dh@. correctly predicted:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:31:26 -0700, Goo wussed horribly:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:04:56 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:17:29 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:52:19 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:52:32 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:05:48 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:38:32 -0700, Goo lied blatantly:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:26:46 -0400, dh@. challenged:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT), Wet Paper Bag
>>>>>>>>>>>>>><ultimate.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Aug 30, 3:40 pm, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/2012 2:31 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
a time I thought you might be fairly intelligent. But I've been aware that
you're really stupid for years now Goob, and you prove it time after time after
time. You prove it every time you claim life is not a benefit Goo, and again
every time you fail to meet the challenge of trying to explain what you want
people to believe prevents you from benefitting from your life. I'll make you
fail again now:
Goo, try to explain what you think about the definition of benefit is preventing
you from benefitting from your life now. Go:
(correct prediction: the Goober will again fail to the point of being unable to
even make an attempt)
>On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 15:35:49 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 12 Sep 2012,, Goo desperately lied about his frequent defeats:
>>
>>>On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:53:42 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:28:55 -0700, Goo lost, again:
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:41:42 -0400, dh@. correctly predicted:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:31:26 -0700, Goo wussed horribly:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:04:56 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:17:29 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:52:19 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:52:32 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:05:48 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:38:32 -0700, Goo lied blatantly:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:26:46 -0400, dh@. challenged:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT), Wet Paper Bag
>>>>>>>>>>>>>><ultimate.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Aug 30, 3:40 pm, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/2012 2:31 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>agreed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>agreed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the challenges defeating Goob is the challenge to explain what he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>thinks prevents life from being a benefit to us. Notice the Goober has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>afraid to attempt providing any sort of explanation at all to recent challenges.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>That's because every time he's tried to maunder a lame explanation in the past
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>it has been entirely dependant upon something to do with pre-existence. Goo has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>learned that he's unable to attempt any sort of explanation without referring to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pre-existence, and I again challenge him to try. He again will fail. He will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>fail every time anyone ever challenges him to do so, so if you ever want to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>defeat Goo just present this challenge and it will defeat him, every time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>No.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes it will Goob. Every time, just as it did this particular time which
>>>>>>>>>>>>you're lying so blatantly about, here comes another defeat for you Goober:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents life
>>>>>>>>>>>>from being a benefit Goo. Go:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>(correct prediction: Goo can't do it.)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>There is no "challenge"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is and it defeats you every time it's presented Goober. You PROVE that
>>>>>>>>>>it defeats you every time, by your inability to explain what you want people to
>>>>>>>>>>think prevents life from being the benefit it so clearly appears to be. You have
>>>>>>>>>>no idea at all Goo, and can't even pretend that you do.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>No.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I know you don't Goob, as you can tell by the fact that I just pointed out
>>>>>>>>you don't.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>thinks prevents life from being a benefit to us. Notice the Goober has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>afraid to attempt providing any sort of explanation at all to recent challenges.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>That's because every time he's tried to maunder a lame explanation in the past
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>it has been entirely dependant upon something to do with pre-existence. Goo has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>learned that he's unable to attempt any sort of explanation without referring to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pre-existence, and I again challenge him to try. He again will fail. He will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>fail every time anyone ever challenges him to do so, so if you ever want to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>defeat Goo just present this challenge and it will defeat him, every time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>No.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes it will Goob. Every time, just as it did this particular time which
>>>>>>>>>>>>you're lying so blatantly about, here comes another defeat for you Goober:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents life
>>>>>>>>>>>>from being a benefit Goo. Go:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>(correct prediction: Goo can't do it.)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>There is no "challenge"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is and it defeats you every time it's presented Goober. You PROVE that
>>>>>>>>>>it defeats you every time, by your inability to explain what you want people to
>>>>>>>>>>think prevents life from being the benefit it so clearly appears to be. You have
>>>>>>>>>>no idea at all Goo, and can't even pretend that you do.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>No.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I know you don't Goob, as you can tell by the fact that I just pointed out
>>>>>>>>you don't.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Fuckwit David Harrison, you *cannot* challenge me, and you know it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's a blatant lie Goober since this challenge I present to you defeats
>>>>>>>>you every time I present it. You sure do suck at this Goo. You suck at it so
>>>>>>>>badly that you can't even attempt to back up your own stupid claims Goob, as I
>>>>>>>>make you confirm time after time like you confirmed again this time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It's n
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll defeat you again right now:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Goober, I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents
>>>>>>life from being a benefit.
>>>>>
>>>>>No.
>>>>
>>>> Then you lose, Goo.
>>>
>>>No. You will not "defeat" anything
>>
>> LOL!!! I clearly defeated you to the point that you can't even attempt to
>>try giving an explanation, Goo.
>>
>>>>>> You lose, Goo.
>
>>>>>>>>you every time I present it. You sure do suck at this Goo. You suck at it so
>>>>>>>>badly that you can't even attempt to back up your own stupid claims Goob, as I
>>>>>>>>make you confirm time after time like you confirmed again this time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It's n
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll defeat you again right now:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Goober, I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents
>>>>>>life from being a benefit.
>>>>>
>>>>>No.
>>>>
>>>> Then you lose, Goo.
>>>
>>>No. You will not "defeat" anything
>>
>> LOL!!! I clearly defeated you to the point that you can't even attempt to
>>try giving an explanation, Goo.
>>
>>>>>> You lose, Goo.
>
>You *admit* you are far below me mentally
I might have thought I was at some point years ago Goober because there was
a time I thought you might be fairly intelligent. But I've been aware that
you're really stupid for years now Goob, and you prove it time after time after
time. You prove it every time you claim life is not a benefit Goo, and again
every time you fail to meet the challenge of trying to explain what you want
people to believe prevents you from benefitting from your life. I'll make you
fail again now:
Goo, try to explain what you think about the definition of benefit is preventing
you from benefitting from your life now. Go:
(correct prediction: the Goober will again fail to the point of being unable to
even make an attempt)
George Plimpton
Sep 19, 2012, 3:38:32 PM9/19/12
to
Fuckwit David Harrison, convicted felon, lied (except when he *admitted*
to posing no challenge):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
to posing no challenge):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agreed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the challenges defeating
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agreed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the challenges defeating
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No. There is no "challenge". There never has been any "challenge".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes it
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes it
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is no "challenge", Fuckwit. There never has been. I have won every
>>>>>>>>>> encounter precisely *because* you cannot challenge me - ever. I have won
>>>>>>>>>> before you even click "Send".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No. Fuckwit David Harrison, you *cannot* challenge me, and you know it.
>>>>>>>>>> encounter precisely *because* you cannot challenge me - ever. I have won
>>>>>>>>>> before you even click "Send".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's a blatant lie
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's a blatant lie
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not a lie, Goober Fuckwit. You do not - you *CANNOT* - challenge me.
>>>>>> You don't have what it takes - you are too far below me. You *KNOW* you are,
>>>>>> Goober Fuckwit.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll defeat
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>
>>> Then
>>
>> No. You will not "defeat" anything, Fuckwit David Harrison. You can't even
>> "defeat" your dead father Warren or your dead father-in-law Delma.
>>
>> No "challenge", Fuckwit. You're simply too stupid and too too far below me
>> mentally to pose any challenge. I win every time, Fuckwit - usually by default.
>
> LOL!!! I
>>>>>> You don't have what it takes - you are too far below me. You *KNOW* you are,
>>>>>> Goober Fuckwit.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll defeat
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>
>>> Then
>>
>> No. You will not "defeat" anything, Fuckwit David Harrison. You can't even
>> "defeat" your dead father Warren or your dead father-in-law Delma.
>>
>> No "challenge", Fuckwit. You're simply too stupid and too too far below me
>> mentally to pose any challenge. I win every time, Fuckwit - usually by default.
>
Mr.Smartypants
Sep 20, 2012, 3:05:36 AM9/20/12
to
to you.
dh
Sep 20, 2012, 4:02:34 PM9/20/12
to
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:38:32 -0700, Goo wrote:
>On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:26:50 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 13:06:56 -0700, Goo continued to wuss:
>>
>>>On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 15:35:49 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
"there was a time I thought you might be fairly intelligent. But I've been aware
that you're really stupid for years now Goob, and you prove it time after time
after time."
that makes you stupidly believe I admit I'm far below you, Goob? I predict you
have no clue Goo, and can't even pretend that you do.
>On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:26:50 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 13:06:56 -0700, Goo continued to wuss:
>>
>>>On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 15:35:49 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 12 Sep 2012,, Goo desperately lied about his frequent defeats:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:53:42 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:28:55 -0700, Goo lost, again:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:41:42 -0400, dh@. correctly predicted:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:31:26 -0700, Goo wussed horribly:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:04:56 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:17:29 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:52:19 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:52:32 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:05:48 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:38:32 -0700, Goo lied blatantly:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:26:46 -0400, dh@. challenged:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT), Wet Paper Bag
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><ultimate.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Aug 30, 3:40�pm, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/2012 2:31 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:53:42 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:28:55 -0700, Goo lost, again:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:41:42 -0400, dh@. correctly predicted:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:31:26 -0700, Goo wussed horribly:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:04:56 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:17:29 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:52:19 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:52:32 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:05:48 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:38:32 -0700, Goo lied blatantly:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:26:46 -0400, dh@. challenged:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT), Wet Paper Bag
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><ultimate.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Aug 30, 3:40�pm, Goo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/2012 2:31 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>agreed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>agreed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>jump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the challenges defeating Goob is the challenge to explain what he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>thinks prevents life from being a benefit to us. Notice the Goober has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>afraid to attempt providing any sort of explanation at all to recent challenges.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>That's because every time he's tried to maunder a lame explanation in the past
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>it has been entirely dependant upon something to do with pre-existence. Goo has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>learned that he's unable to attempt any sort of explanation without referring to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pre-existence, and I again challenge him to try. He again will fail. He will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>fail every time anyone ever challenges him to do so, so if you ever want to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>defeat Goo just present this challenge and it will defeat him, every time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes it will Goob. Every time, just as it did this particular time which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>you're lying so blatantly about, here comes another defeat for you Goober:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents life
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>from being a benefit Goo. Go:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(correct prediction: Goo can't do it.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>There is no "challenge"
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There is and it defeats you every time it's presented Goober. You PROVE that
>>>>>>>>>>>>it defeats you every time, by your inability to explain what you want people to
>>>>>>>>>>>>think prevents life from being the benefit it so clearly appears to be. You have
>>>>>>>>>>>>no idea at all Goo, and can't even pretend that you do.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>No.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I know you don't Goob, as you can tell by the fact that I just pointed out
>>>>>>>>>>you don't.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>thinks prevents life from being a benefit to us. Notice the Goober has been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>afraid to attempt providing any sort of explanation at all to recent challenges.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>That's because every time he's tried to maunder a lame explanation in the past
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>it has been entirely dependant upon something to do with pre-existence. Goo has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>learned that he's unable to attempt any sort of explanation without referring to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pre-existence, and I again challenge him to try. He again will fail. He will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>fail every time anyone ever challenges him to do so, so if you ever want to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>defeat Goo just present this challenge and it will defeat him, every time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes it will Goob. Every time, just as it did this particular time which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>you're lying so blatantly about, here comes another defeat for you Goober:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents life
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>from being a benefit Goo. Go:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(correct prediction: Goo can't do it.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>There is no "challenge"
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There is and it defeats you every time it's presented Goober. You PROVE that
>>>>>>>>>>>>it defeats you every time, by your inability to explain what you want people to
>>>>>>>>>>>>think prevents life from being the benefit it so clearly appears to be. You have
>>>>>>>>>>>>no idea at all Goo, and can't even pretend that you do.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>No.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I know you don't Goob, as you can tell by the fact that I just pointed out
>>>>>>>>>>you don't.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Fuckwit David Harrison, you *cannot* challenge me, and you know it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's a blatant lie Goober since this challenge I present to you defeats
>>>>>>>>>>you every time I present it. You sure do suck at this Goo. You suck at it so
>>>>>>>>>>badly that you can't even attempt to back up your own stupid claims Goob, as I
>>>>>>>>>>make you confirm time after time like you confirmed again this time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>It's n
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll defeat you again right now:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Goober, I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents
>>>>>>>>life from being a benefit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then you lose, Goo.
>>>>>
>>>>>No. You will not "defeat" anything
>>>>
>>>> LOL!!! I clearly defeated you to the point that you can't even attempt to
>>>>try giving an explanation, Goo.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> You lose, Goo.
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>you every time I present it. You sure do suck at this Goo. You suck at it so
>>>>>>>>>>badly that you can't even attempt to back up your own stupid claims Goob, as I
>>>>>>>>>>make you confirm time after time like you confirmed again this time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>It's n
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll defeat you again right now:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Goober, I challenge you to try explaining what you want people to think prevents
>>>>>>>>life from being a benefit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then you lose, Goo.
>>>>>
>>>>>No. You will not "defeat" anything
>>>>
>>>> LOL!!! I clearly defeated you to the point that you can't even attempt to
>>>>try giving an explanation, Goo.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> You lose, Goo.
>>>
>>>You *admit* you are far below me mentally
>>
>> I might have thought I was at some point years ago Goober because there was
>>a time I thought you might be fairly intelligent. But I've been aware that
>>you're really stupid for years now Goob, and you prove it time after time after
>>time. You prove it every time you claim life is not a benefit Goo, and again
>>every time you fail to meet the challenge of trying to explain what you want
>>people to believe prevents you from benefitting from your life. I'll make you
>>fail again now:
>>
>>Goo, try to explain what you think about the definition of benefit is preventing
>>you from benefitting from your life now. Go:
>>
>>(correct prediction: the Goober will again fail to the point of being unable to
>>even make an attempt)
>
>>
>> I might have thought I was at some point years ago Goober because there was
>>a time I thought you might be fairly intelligent. But I've been aware that
>>you're really stupid for years now Goob, and you prove it time after time after
>>time. You prove it every time you claim life is not a benefit Goo, and again
>>every time you fail to meet the challenge of trying to explain what you want
>>people to believe prevents you from benefitting from your life. I'll make you
>>fail again now:
>>
>>Goo, try to explain what you think about the definition of benefit is preventing
>>you from benefitting from your life now. Go:
>>
>>(correct prediction: the Goober will again fail to the point of being unable to
>>even make an attempt)
>
>You *admit* you are far below me
LOL!!! What is it about:
"there was a time I thought you might be fairly intelligent. But I've been aware
that you're really stupid for years now Goob, and you prove it time after time
after time."
have no clue Goo, and can't even pretend that you do.
George Plimpton
Sep 20, 2012, 4:29:33 PM9/20/12
to
Fuckwit David Harrison, convicted felon, lied (except when he *admitted*
to posing no challenge):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
to posing no challenge):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agreed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the challenges defeating
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agreed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing to it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the challenges defeating
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No. There is no "challenge". There never has been any "challenge".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes it
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes it
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is no "challenge", Fuckwit. There never has been. I have won every
>>>>>>>>>> encounter precisely *because* you cannot challenge me - ever. I have won
>>>>>>>>>> before you even click "Send".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No. Fuckwit David Harrison, you *cannot* challenge me, and you know it.
>>>>>>>>>> encounter precisely *because* you cannot challenge me - ever. I have won
>>>>>>>>>> before you even click "Send".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's a blatant lie
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's a blatant lie
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not a lie, Goober Fuckwit. You do not - you *CANNOT* - challenge me.
>>>>>> You don't have what it takes - you are too far below me. You *KNOW* you are,
>>>>>> Goober Fuckwit.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll defeat
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>
>>> Then
>>
>> No. You will not "defeat" anything, Fuckwit David Harrison. You can't even
>> "defeat" your dead father Warren or your dead father-in-law Delma.
>>
>> No "challenge", Fuckwit. You're simply too stupid and too too far below me
>> mentally to pose any challenge. I win every time, Fuckwit - usually by default.
>
>>>>>> You don't have what it takes - you are too far below me. You *KNOW* you are,
>>>>>> Goober Fuckwit.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll defeat
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>
>>> Then
>>
>> No. You will not "defeat" anything, Fuckwit David Harrison. You can't even
>> "defeat" your dead father Warren or your dead father-in-law Delma.
>>
>> No "challenge", Fuckwit. You're simply too stupid and too too far below me
>> mentally to pose any challenge. I win every time, Fuckwit - usually by default.
>
Mr.Smartypants
Sep 22, 2012, 3:07:49 AM9/22/12
to
challenges, should you Goo?
dh
Sep 24, 2012, 5:34:24 PM9/24/12
to
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 00:07:49 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>On Sep 20, 2:29 pm, Goo wrote:
>
>> You *admit* you are far below me mentally, Goo. You've admitted it many
>> times.
>
>
>If you believe that then you should have no problem meeting any of his
>challenges, should you Goo?
Good point. And we see that he certainly has a lot of problems trying to
meet them, to the extent that he's afraid to try. Even when he pretends to
maunder something about what he wants us to think he thinks is preventing him
from benefitting from his own life he can't do it without referring to the
pre-existent state. It's like he feels that everybody else should consider there
to be a great significance to it just as he apparently does, so all he has to do
is refer to it and people will feel like they don't benefit from their own
lives. LOL!!! Again just describing the stupid Goober's position is hilarious.
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>On Sep 20, 2:29 pm, Goo wrote:
>
>> You *admit* you are far below me mentally, Goo. You've admitted it many
>> times.
>
>
>If you believe that then you should have no problem meeting any of his
>challenges, should you Goo?
meet them, to the extent that he's afraid to try. Even when he pretends to
maunder something about what he wants us to think he thinks is preventing him
from benefitting from his own life he can't do it without referring to the
pre-existent state. It's like he feels that everybody else should consider there
to be a great significance to it just as he apparently does, so all he has to do
is refer to it and people will feel like they don't benefit from their own
lives. LOL!!! Again just describing the stupid Goober's position is hilarious.
dh
Sep 24, 2012, 5:50:05 PM9/24/12
to
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:31:38 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>"You do not pose any "challenge"" - Goo
"No "challenges", Goo. He can't. You can't." - Goo
>
>"You do not pose any "challenge"" - Goo
"No "challenges", Goo. He can't. You can't." - Goo
George Plimpton
Sep 24, 2012, 6:49:12 PM9/24/12
to
Fuckwit David Harrison, convicted felon, inept liar, and no-challenge
fuckwit, admitted:
>
> "I do not pose any 'challenge'" - me
Right.
fuckwit, admitted:
>
> "I do not pose any 'challenge'" - me
Right.
dh
Oct 2, 2012, 6:43:34 PM10/2/12
to
challenge, Goo." - Goo
George Plimpton
Oct 2, 2012, 7:02:36 PM10/2/12
to
Fuckwit David Harrison, convicted felon who *CANNOT* present *any*
challenge, tried to suck his own asshole and lied:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:50:05 -0400, dh@. sucked:
>
>> On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:31:38 -0400, dh@. sucked:
>>
>> "No "challenges", Goo. He can't. You can't."
True.
> "I've *always* been aware that you do not - *cannot* - pose any
> challenge, Goo."
True.
Goo, you cannot "challenge" anything. You couldn't "challenge" an
earthworm.
challenge, tried to suck his own asshole and lied:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:50:05 -0400, dh@. sucked:
>
>> On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:31:38 -0400, dh@. sucked:
>>
>>>
>>> "You do not pose any "challenge""
True.
>>>
>>> "You do not pose any "challenge""
>>
>> "No "challenges", Goo. He can't. You can't."
> "I've *always* been aware that you do not - *cannot* - pose any
> challenge, Goo."
Goo, you cannot "challenge" anything. You couldn't "challenge" an
earthworm.
Mr.Smartypants
Oct 3, 2012, 2:56:21 AM10/3/12
to
food cows was "fuckwitted and wrong"?
dh
Oct 3, 2012, 3:38:59 PM10/3/12
to
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 23:56:21 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghol...@lycos.com> challenged:
>On Oct 2, 5:02 pm, Goo puled:
LOL!!! That will be yet ANOTHER challenge that defeats the Goober every time
he's presented with it. It will result in total and absolute failure on Goo's
part to the point that he can't even attempt to answer, or pretend that he has
any clue at all.
<bunghol...@lycos.com> challenged:
>On Oct 2, 5:02 pm, Goo puled:
he's presented with it. It will result in total and absolute failure on Goo's
part to the point that he can't even attempt to answer, or pretend that he has
any clue at all.
dh
Oct 3, 2012, 3:39:35 PM10/3/12
to
"You never challenge anyone" - Goo
"No "challenges", Goo. He can't. You can't." - Goo
"I've *always* been aware that you do not - *cannot* - pose any
challenge, Goo." - Goo
"I *always* say that you haven't "challenged" me, Goo - because you
never have. You are *UNABLE* to "challenge" me, Goo." - Goo
"Goo, you cannot "challenge" anything. You couldn't "challenge" an
earthworm." - Goo
"No "challenges", Goo. He can't. You can't." - Goo
"I've *always* been aware that you do not - *cannot* - pose any
"I *always* say that you haven't "challenged" me, Goo - because you
never have. You are *UNABLE* to "challenge" me, Goo." - Goo
"Goo, you cannot "challenge" anything. You couldn't "challenge" an
George Plimpton
Oct 3, 2012, 11:30:48 PM10/3/12
to
On 10/3/2012 12:39 PM, dh@. wrote:
>
> Yes, it is the unborn animals that will be
> born if nothing prevents that from happening,
> that would experience the loss if their lives
> are prevented.
<chortle>
>
> Yes, it is the unborn animals that will be
> born if nothing prevents that from happening,
> that would experience the loss if their lives
> are prevented.
<chortle>
dh
Oct 9, 2012, 2:21:46 PM10/9/12
to
On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 20:30:48 -0700, Goo wrote:
><chortle>
The stupidly high level of the blatancy of your dishonsties is the only
thing funny about these particular lies, Goober.
The stupidly high level of the blatancy of your dishonsties is the only
thing funny about these particular lies, Goober.
George Plimpton
Oct 9, 2012, 3:58:01 PM10/9/12
to
Fuckwit David Harrison, convicted felon who *CANNOT* present *any*
challenge, lied:
>>
>>> "You never challenge anyone" - Prof. Geo. Plimpton
>>>
>>> "No "challenges", Goo. He can't. You can't." - Prof. Geo. Plimpton
>>>
>>> "I've *always* been aware that you do not - *cannot* - pose any
>>> challenge, Goo." - Prof. Geo. Plimpton
>>> "I've *always* been aware that you do not - *cannot* - pose any
>>>
>>> "I *always* say that you haven't "challenged" me, Goo - because you
>>> never have. You are *UNABLE* to "challenge" me, Goo." - Prof. Geo. Plimpton
>>> "I *always* say that you haven't "challenged" me, Goo - because you
>>>
>>> "Goo, you cannot "challenge" anything. You couldn't "challenge" an
>>> earthworm." - Prof. Geo. Plimpton
>>> "Goo, you cannot "challenge" anything. You couldn't "challenge" an
>>
>> <chortle>
>
> The
It's true.
Mr.Smartypants
Oct 10, 2012, 2:43:10 AM10/10/12
to
dh
Oct 10, 2012, 4:23:10 PM10/10/12
to
"You never challenge anyone" - Goo
"No "challenges", Goo. He can't. You can't." - Goo
"I've *always* been aware that you do not - *cannot* - pose any
challenge, Goo." - Goo
"I *always* say that you haven't "challenged" me, Goo - because you
never have. You are *UNABLE* to "challenge" me, Goo." - Goo
"Goo, you cannot "challenge" anything. You couldn't "challenge" an
earthworm." - Goo
"you long ago admitted you were no challenge, and *NEVER COULD BE* a
challenge to me, Goo." - Goo
"No "challenges", Goo. He can't. You can't." - Goo
"I've *always* been aware that you do not - *cannot* - pose any
"I *always* say that you haven't "challenged" me, Goo - because you
"Goo, you cannot "challenge" anything. You couldn't "challenge" an
"you long ago admitted you were no challenge, and *NEVER COULD BE* a
challenge to me, Goo." - Goo
George Plimpton
Oct 10, 2012, 4:51:15 PM10/10/12
to
Fuckwit David Harrison, convicted felon and congenital liar, lied:
> "You never challenge anyone" - Prof. Geo. Plimpton, VC
>
> "No "challenges", Goo. He can't. You can't." - Prof. Geo. Plimpton, VC
All correct, Goo.
Stupid knuckle-dragging plodding Southern Baptist dumbfuck cracker: Goo
Fuckwit David Harrison.
> "You never challenge anyone" - Prof. Geo. Plimpton, VC
>
> "No "challenges", Goo. He can't. You can't." - Prof. Geo. Plimpton, VC
>
> "I've *always* been aware that you do not - *cannot* - pose any
> challenge, Goo." - Prof. Geo. Plimpton, VC
> "I've *always* been aware that you do not - *cannot* - pose any
>
> "I *always* say that you haven't "challenged" me, Goo - because you
> never have. You are *UNABLE* to "challenge" me, Goo." - Prof. Geo. Plimpton, VC
> "I *always* say that you haven't "challenged" me, Goo - because you
>
> "Goo, you cannot "challenge" anything. You couldn't "challenge" an
> earthworm." - Prof. Geo. Plimpton, VC
> "Goo, you cannot "challenge" anything. You couldn't "challenge" an
>
> "you long ago admitted you were no challenge, and *NEVER COULD BE* a
> challenge to me, Goo." - Prof. Geo. Plimpton, VC
> "you long ago admitted you were no challenge, and *NEVER COULD BE* a
All correct, Goo.
Stupid knuckle-dragging plodding Southern Baptist dumbfuck cracker: Goo
Fuckwit David Harrison.
dh
Oct 16, 2012, 1:24:49 PM10/16/12
to
"You never challenge anyone" - Goo
"No "challenges", Goo. He can't. You can't." - Goo
"I've *always* been aware that you do not - *cannot* - pose any
challenge, Goo." - Goo
"I *always* say that you haven't "challenged" me, Goo - because you
never have. You are *UNABLE* to "challenge" me, Goo." - Goo
"Goo, you cannot "challenge" anything. You couldn't "challenge" an
earthworm." - Goo
"you long ago admitted you were no challenge, and *NEVER COULD BE* a
challenge to me, Goo." - Goo
"I *always* say that you haven't "challenged" me, Goo - because you
never have. You are *UNABLE* to "challenge" me, Goo." - Goo
"No challenge - ever." - Goo
"No "challenges", Goo. He can't. You can't." - Goo
"I've *always* been aware that you do not - *cannot* - pose any
"I *always* say that you haven't "challenged" me, Goo - because you
"Goo, you cannot "challenge" anything. You couldn't "challenge" an
"you long ago admitted you were no challenge, and *NEVER COULD BE* a
"I *always* say that you haven't "challenged" me, Goo - because you
"No challenge - ever." - Goo
George Plimpton
Oct 16, 2012, 4:44:39 PM10/16/12
to
Fuckwit David Harrison, convicted felon and profoundly stupid fuckwit,
admitted:
> "You never challenge anyone" - George Plimpton
>
> "No "challenges", Goo. He can't. You can't." - George Plimpton
>
> "No challenge - ever." - George Plimpton
>
admitted:
> "You never challenge anyone" - George Plimpton
>
> "No "challenges", Goo. He can't. You can't." - George Plimpton
>
> "I've *always* been aware that you do not - *cannot* - pose any
> challenge, Goo." - George Plimpton
> "I've *always* been aware that you do not - *cannot* - pose any
>
> "I *always* say that you haven't "challenged" me, Goo - because you
> never have. You are *UNABLE* to "challenge" me, Goo." - George Plimpton
> "I *always* say that you haven't "challenged" me, Goo - because you
>
> "Goo, you cannot "challenge" anything. You couldn't "challenge" an
> earthworm." - George Plimpton
> "Goo, you cannot "challenge" anything. You couldn't "challenge" an
>
> "you long ago admitted you were no challenge, and *NEVER COULD BE* a
> challenge to me, Goo." - George Plimpton
> "you long ago admitted you were no challenge, and *NEVER COULD BE* a
>
> "I *always* say that you haven't "challenged" me, Goo - because you
> never have. You are *UNABLE* to "challenge" me, Goo." - George Plimpton
> "I *always* say that you haven't "challenged" me, Goo - because you
>
> "No challenge - ever." - George Plimpton
>
Mr.Smartypants
Oct 17, 2012, 4:12:54 AM10/17/12
to
On Oct 9, 12:21 pm, dh@. wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 20:30:48 -0700, Goo wrote:
> >On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 15:39:35 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
> >>"You never challenge anyone" - Goo
>
> >>"No "challenges", Goo. He can't. You can't." - Goo
>
> >>"I've *always* been aware that you do not - *cannot* - pose any
> >>challenge, Goo." - Goo
>
> >>"I *always* say that you haven't "challenged" me, Goo - because you
>
> On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 20:30:48 -0700, Goo wrote:
> >On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 15:39:35 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
> >>"You never challenge anyone" - Goo
>
> >>"No "challenges", Goo. He can't. You can't." - Goo
>
> >>"I've *always* been aware that you do not - *cannot* - pose any
> >>challenge, Goo." - Goo
>
> >>"I *always* say that you haven't "challenged" me, Goo - because you
>
> >>"Goo, you cannot "challenge" anything. You couldn't "challenge" an
> >>earthworm." - Goo
>
> ><chortle>
>
> The stupidly high level of the blatancy of your dishonsties is the only
> thing funny about these particular lies, Goober.
Goobs has told Rupert that his (Goobs') time is so valuable that he is
> >>earthworm." - Goo
>
> ><chortle>
>
> The stupidly high level of the blatancy of your dishonsties is the only
> thing funny about these particular lies, Goober.
in the top 5% of earners in America. I wonder if Goo sold Ralston-
Purina on the idea that he is the pet food cow genius and that he will
lead them to herds of pet food cows ..............as soon as Dutch
finds them for him.......he already found ONE. LOL!!!
dh
Oct 18, 2012, 2:11:12 PM10/18/12
to
look for them it appears that he's lying about that. He's being unusually wishy
washy even for him about this one, sometimes trying to pretend he never believed
in pet food cattle to begin with and other times trying to pretend they do and
he found evidence of their existence. It's hard to tell which the goofy goo
actually believes, or if he even knows himself. The same is true of Goo.
Mr.Smartypants
Oct 19, 2012, 1:47:23 AM10/19/12
to
likely has Derek using his fingers and toes to calculate how many
Ruperts they think they talk to. Meanwhile Goo is posting nonsense to
buy time till his boys come up with some answers.
dh
Oct 22, 2012, 1:47:16 PM10/22/12
to
them up. They defeat themselves, and all we really do is keep repeating their
own defeat of themselves by challenging them to try backing up their stupidity.
At least that's what it seems like. It's still fun though, and would be even
more fun if they could try backing it up. LOL...wouldn't it be amusing if at
some point the Goober starts trying to blame other things on Slater, like the
pet food cows or the multi Rupert idiocy.
Mr.Smartypants
Oct 23, 2012, 1:50:04 AM10/23/12
to
dh
Oct 29, 2012, 6:08:15 PM10/29/12
to
away with it. Maybe he even emailed "Dutch" to see what his boy thought about
it.
0 new messages