Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Increasing Fuckwit David Harrisons' - *Goo's* - frustration
1 view
Skip to first unread message
George Plimpton
Mar 10, 2013, 12:21:01 PM3/10/13
to
I've begun using a new technique for replying to *Goo's* cracker
bullshit that I *know* is causing him a lot of grief and additional lost
time.
Look at *Goo's* post this morning at 9:06am - which was the *wrong*
time, as *Goo* doesn't know how to adjust his system clock for daylight
saving time (British summer time) - with a subject of "Goo desperately
tries to support the eliminationist position." Now, click on the
message ID link in the headers that identifies the post to which *Goo*
was responding. It's <5krhj810efokhgvc5...@4ax.com>.
That is a link to *Goo's* post! Ha ha ha ha ha! He is so thoroughly
frustrated at the way I chop his cracker bullshit up in my reply that in
order to restore it, he has to respond to his own post, *then* insert
parts of what I wrote into it.
Several weeks ago, I discovered a technique that allows me to restore
what I wrote that *Goo* has mangled with a click of a couple of buttons.
It takes me almost no time at all, but within a couple of iterations,
*Goo* is having to go to an inordinate amount of trouble to try to
restore what he wrote. It's hilarious!
What a stupid knuckle-dragging cracker he is!
bullshit that I *know* is causing him a lot of grief and additional lost
time.
Look at *Goo's* post this morning at 9:06am - which was the *wrong*
time, as *Goo* doesn't know how to adjust his system clock for daylight
saving time (British summer time) - with a subject of "Goo desperately
tries to support the eliminationist position." Now, click on the
message ID link in the headers that identifies the post to which *Goo*
was responding. It's <5krhj810efokhgvc5...@4ax.com>.
That is a link to *Goo's* post! Ha ha ha ha ha! He is so thoroughly
frustrated at the way I chop his cracker bullshit up in my reply that in
order to restore it, he has to respond to his own post, *then* insert
parts of what I wrote into it.
Several weeks ago, I discovered a technique that allows me to restore
what I wrote that *Goo* has mangled with a click of a couple of buttons.
It takes me almost no time at all, but within a couple of iterations,
*Goo* is having to go to an inordinate amount of trouble to try to
restore what he wrote. It's hilarious!
What a stupid knuckle-dragging cracker he is!
Mr.Smartypants
Mar 11, 2013, 2:07:22 AM3/11/13
to
On Mar 10, 10:21 am, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> I've begun using a new technique for replying to *Goo's* cracker
> bullshit that I *know* is causing him a lot of grief and additional lost
> time.
>
> Look at *Goo's* post this morning at 9:06am - which was the *wrong*
> time, as *Goo* doesn't know how to adjust his system clock for daylight
> saving time (British summer time) - with a subject of "Goo desperately
> tries to support the eliminationist position." Now, click on the
> message ID link in the headers that identifies the post to which *Goo*
> was responding. It's <5krhj810efokhgvc5m0u8njp2c26mla...@4ax.com>.
> I've begun using a new technique for replying to *Goo's* cracker
> bullshit that I *know* is causing him a lot of grief and additional lost
> time.
>
> Look at *Goo's* post this morning at 9:06am - which was the *wrong*
> time, as *Goo* doesn't know how to adjust his system clock for daylight
> saving time (British summer time) - with a subject of "Goo desperately
> tries to support the eliminationist position." Now, click on the
> message ID link in the headers that identifies the post to which *Goo*
> That is a link to *Goo's* post! Ha ha ha ha ha! He is so thoroughly
> frustrated at the way I chop his cracker bullshit up in my reply that in
> order to restore it, he has to respond to his own post, *then* insert
> parts of what I wrote into it.
>
> Several weeks ago, I discovered a technique that allows me to restore
> what I wrote that *Goo* has mangled with a click of a couple of buttons.
> It takes me almost no time at all, but within a couple of iterations,
> *Goo* is having to go to an inordinate amount of trouble to try to
> restore what he wrote. It's hilarious!
>
> What a stupid knuckle-dragging cracker he is!
did you smoke too much crack again, Goobs?
> frustrated at the way I chop his cracker bullshit up in my reply that in
> order to restore it, he has to respond to his own post, *then* insert
> parts of what I wrote into it.
>
> Several weeks ago, I discovered a technique that allows me to restore
> what I wrote that *Goo* has mangled with a click of a couple of buttons.
> It takes me almost no time at all, but within a couple of iterations,
> *Goo* is having to go to an inordinate amount of trouble to try to
> restore what he wrote. It's hilarious!
>
> What a stupid knuckle-dragging cracker he is!
there's no recent post with the subject "Goo desperately
SpamƁuster
Mar 11, 2013, 5:36:16 PM3/11/13
to
On 3/10/2013 11:07 PM, Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> On Mar 10, 10:21 am, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
>> I've begun using a new technique for replying to *Goo's* cracker
--
> On Mar 10, 10:21 am, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
>> I've begun using a new technique for replying to *Goo's* cracker
=====================================================================
SPAMMED INTO NON-RELEVANT GROUPS / COUNTRIES
=====================================================================
dh
Mar 12, 2013, 2:09:21 PM3/12/13
to
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:07:22 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>did you smoke too much crack again, Goobs?
>
>there's no recent post with the subject "Goo desperately
>tries to support the eliminationist position."
It's not always clear wtf Goo thinks he's trying to gain by the particular
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>did you smoke too much crack again, Goobs?
>
>there's no recent post with the subject "Goo desperately
>tries to support the eliminationist position."
idiocy he's spending his time fooling with. How does Goo think that by comparing
existence to never existing, he's showing that the comparison can't be made for
example? What could the Googoots think he gains by doing stupid things like
that?
George Plimpton
Mar 12, 2013, 5:11:37 PM3/12/13
to
On 3/12/2013 11:09 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
> On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:07:22 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
> <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>
>> did you
>>
insert what I said in a followup to that post, in order to try to
restore all of your cracker fuckwittery. We can *all* tell by the chain
of message IDs, *Goo*.
I'm fucking with your head, *Goo*. You're crying about it. Too funny.
illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
> On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:07:22 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
> <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>
>> did you
>>
>> there's no recent post with the subject "Goo desperately
>> tries to support the eliminationist position."
>
> It's not always clear wtf
*Goo*: You are having to go back and reply to your own post, *then*
>> tries to support the eliminationist position."
>
> It's not always clear wtf
insert what I said in a followup to that post, in order to try to
restore all of your cracker fuckwittery. We can *all* tell by the chain
of message IDs, *Goo*.
I'm fucking with your head, *Goo*. You're crying about it. Too funny.
dh
Mar 14, 2013, 3:58:01 PM3/14/13
to
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:11:37 -0700, Goo wussed again:
>On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:09:21 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:07:22 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>><bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>
What do you want people to think you could gain by what appears to be
extremely stupidly trying to show that you can't make a comparison, by making
the comparison, Goo?
(correct prediction: the lame Googoots has no idea what he thinks he could gain
by it)
>On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:09:21 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:07:22 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>><bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>
>>>did you smoke too much crack again, Goobs?
>>>
>>>
>>>there's no recent post with the subject "Goo desperately
>>>tries to support the eliminationist position."
>>
>>>tries to support the eliminationist position."
>>
>> It's not always clear wtf Goo thinks he's trying to gain by the particular
>>idiocy he's spending his time fooling with. How does Goo think that by comparing
>>existence to never existing, he's showing that the comparison can't be made for
>>example? What could the Googoots think he gains by doing stupid things like
>>that?
>
>*Goo*: Y
>>idiocy he's spending his time fooling with. How does Goo think that by comparing
>>existence to never existing, he's showing that the comparison can't be made for
>>example? What could the Googoots think he gains by doing stupid things like
>>that?
>
What do you want people to think you could gain by what appears to be
extremely stupidly trying to show that you can't make a comparison, by making
the comparison, Goo?
(correct prediction: the lame Googoots has no idea what he thinks he could gain
by it)
George Plimpton
Mar 14, 2013, 8:42:07 PM3/14/13
to
On 3/14/2013 12:58 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
*Goo*, in half your posts, you're now having to reply to *your* earlier
post, then paste in what I said in reply to it. I proved it.
Gotcha.
illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
> On 3/12/2013 2:11 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>> On 3/12/2013 11:09 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>
>> On 3/12/2013 11:09 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>
>>> On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:07:22 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>> <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> did you
>>>>
>>> <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> did you
>>>>
>>>> there's no recent post with the subject "Goo desperately
>>>> tries to support the eliminationist position."
>>>
>>> It's not always clear wtf
>>
>>>> tries to support the eliminationist position."
>>>
>>> It's not always clear wtf
>>
>> *Goo*: You are having to go back and reply to your own post, *then*
>> insert what I said in a followup to that post, in order to try to
>> restore all of your cracker fuckwittery. We can *all* tell by the chain
>> of message IDs, *Goo*.
>>
>> I'm fucking with your head, *Goo*. You're crying about it. Too funny.
>
>> insert what I said in a followup to that post, in order to try to
>> restore all of your cracker fuckwittery. We can *all* tell by the chain
>> of message IDs, *Goo*.
>>
>> I'm fucking with your head, *Goo*. You're crying about it. Too funny.
>
> What do you want people to think you could gain by what appears to be
Write in English, *Goo*.
*Goo*, in half your posts, you're now having to reply to *your* earlier
post, then paste in what I said in reply to it. I proved it.
Gotcha.
dh
Mar 18, 2013, 5:15:32 PM3/18/13
to
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:42:07 -0700, Goo proved dh correct:
>On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:58:01 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:11:37 -0700, Goo wussed again:
>>
>>>On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:09:21 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
You proved my prediction correct, Goo.
>On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:58:01 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:11:37 -0700, Goo wussed again:
>>
>>>On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:09:21 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:07:22 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>><bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>><bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>did you smoke too much crack again, Goobs?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>there's no recent post with the subject "Goo desperately
>>>>>tries to support the eliminationist position."
>>>>
>>>>>tries to support the eliminationist position."
>>>>
>>>> It's not always clear wtf Goo thinks he's trying to gain by the particular
>>>>idiocy he's spending his time fooling with. How does Goo think that by comparing
>>>>existence to never existing, he's showing that the comparison can't be made for
>>>>example? What could the Googoots think he gains by doing stupid things like
>>>>that?
>>>
>>>*Goo*: Y
>>
>>>>idiocy he's spending his time fooling with. How does Goo think that by comparing
>>>>existence to never existing, he's showing that the comparison can't be made for
>>>>example? What could the Googoots think he gains by doing stupid things like
>>>>that?
>>>
>>>*Goo*: Y
>>
>> What do you want people to think you could gain by what appears to be
>>extremely stupidly trying to show that you can't make a comparison, by making
>>the comparison, Goo?
>>
>>(correct prediction: the lame Googoots has no idea what he thinks he could gain
>>by it)
>
>Wr
>>the comparison, Goo?
>>
>>(correct prediction: the lame Googoots has no idea what he thinks he could gain
>>by it)
>
You proved my prediction correct, Goo.
George Plimpton
Mar 18, 2013, 5:41:13 PM3/18/13
to
On 3/18/2013 2:15 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
I proved that you are having to reply to your *own* posts, *then*
inserting what I wrote, *Goo*.
I also proved that your locutions - "what do you want people to
think..." - are cracker bullshit.
illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
> On 3/14/2013 5:42 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>> On 3/14/2013 12:58 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>
>>> On 3/12/2013 2:11 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>> On 3/12/2013 11:09 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>>>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>>>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>>>
>> On 3/14/2013 12:58 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>
>>> On 3/12/2013 2:11 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>> On 3/12/2013 11:09 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>>>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>>>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 23:07:22 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>> <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> did you
>>>>>>
>>>>> <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> did you
>>>>>>
>>>>>> there's no recent post with the subject "Goo desperately
>>>>>> tries to support the eliminationist position."
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not always clear wtf
>>>>
>>>>>> tries to support the eliminationist position."
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not always clear wtf
>>>>
>>>> *Goo*: You are having to go back and reply to your own post, *then*
>>>> insert what I said in a followup to that post, in order to try to
>>>> restore all of your cracker fuckwittery. We can *all* tell by the chain
>>>> of message IDs, *Goo*.
>>>>
>>>> I'm fucking with your head, *Goo*. You're crying about it. Too funny.
>>>
>>>> insert what I said in a followup to that post, in order to try to
>>>> restore all of your cracker fuckwittery. We can *all* tell by the chain
>>>> of message IDs, *Goo*.
>>>>
>>>> I'm fucking with your head, *Goo*. You're crying about it. Too funny.
>>>
>>> What do you want people to think you could gain by what appears
>>> to be
>>
>>> to be
>>
>> Write in English, *Goo*.
>>
>> *Goo*, in half your posts, you're now having to reply to *your* earlier
>> post, then paste in what I said in reply to it. I proved it.
>>
>> Gotcha.
>
> You proved
>>
>> *Goo*, in half your posts, you're now having to reply to *your* earlier
>> post, then paste in what I said in reply to it. I proved it.
>>
>> Gotcha.
>
I proved that you are having to reply to your *own* posts, *then*
inserting what I wrote, *Goo*.
I also proved that your locutions - "what do you want people to
think..." - are cracker bullshit.
0 new messages