From: Rob Raffety <raff...@cs.okstate.edu>
Subject: Re: how to define God?
Date: 1998/09/11
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.02.9809110152080.6470-100000@a.cs.okstate.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 390014904
References: <35F8ADEF.794C7A71@student.ecel.uwa.edu.au>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Organization: Oklahoma State University
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.philosophy.taoism

On Fri, 11 Sep 1998, chuqing chen wrote:

> As God is the collective of all virtues, all beauty and all loves, so if
> he is defined in a psychological term, he is the supreego of ourselves.

What's the point then?

> Only a part of yourself can love you foreever, no matter good or bad you
> are, whereever and whenever...

I know some that would disagree

> When you talk to God, are you actually talking to yourself...?

When I talk to myself, am I actually talking to God...?