Received: by 10.216.207.38 with SMTP id m38mr1464670weo.13.1350610296062;
        Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
Path: q11ni134356356wiw.1!nntp.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: uncited <being@.... --- -- .>
Newsgroups: alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.philosophy.taoism,alt.zen,alt.religion.buddhism.tibetan,soc.culture.australian
Subject: Re: The Doctrine (was - Re: Everyone knows the rule: Trust no one, never fear and never forgive)
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:31:29 -0700
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <una1889iagddup7gvvcch0321e9d3m66vi@4ax.com>
References: <58fbcf6f-8cd1-43e1-9908-7aa17aa8eaf9@3g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <24690b90-ffe2-46af-be6a-9d2b38373349@m4g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <hbct78hou8q5osa7i5tjuudd1u81o1ud5j@4ax.com> <6d2a32ce-f06c-436e-ba42-c01f05ad8267@g4g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <u0bu78pbu3qcjajl2jcef8bqa2sget6svq@4ax.com> <97d5c7a3-a4fe-40c9-a249-51eb10497696@4g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <011088la8sc5atsl1ijamdp7fcddpdl2t7@4ax.com> <e03f21a1-92f2-4fc4-8c36-6a0c135094f2@c20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: individual.net brJWWXwCZYbwW1DRBUwTnwzbfkISzBiLf6qFCM9H0TwilrnT9UtPy99kcYvdiUV5wf
Cancel-Lock: sha1:tvCqTLYkIX83mvjaZc8HVqq2GkQ=
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 3.3/32.846
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Tim wrote:
> uncited wrote:
>
><snipped for its original content.>
>
>> Ones are able to be ones
>> None may be the One
>
>awareness without object and consciousness is in everything. we are
>all that. and each other.
>
>when you see a red fire truck, do you think of the same thing i do...

In some ways, probably.
In other ways, probably not.

>or only most of the time?

Probably.

>is that one-ness?

If I'm thinking about it, 
it's most likely three-ness at least
and more than likely a many-ness
of greater than three.

>where was the awareness?

In the perceptions and the thoughts.

>last thought.

To be aware
without being aware of being aware
might be how and what consciousness is
prior to reflecting.

When second-nature is congruent 
with whatever is being done, 
then what is being done 
may be done without doing.