On 7/1/2012 9:46 PM, dizzy wrote:
> tholen tholed:
>
>>"Lieutenant Scott" <
n...@spam.com> writes:
>>
>>51> Newsgroups: alt.talk.bollocks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>>
>>51> The question was wrong,
>>
>>What does your classic substantiated and erroneous claim have to
>>do with OS/2, Scott?
>>
>>51> so I corrected you.
>>
>>What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
>>OS/2, Scott?
>>
>>51> I never claimed anything was to do with OS/2.
>>
>>Irrelevant, given that I never said that you did make such a
>>claim, Scott. Nevertheless, you have posted something to an
>>OS/2 newsgroup, thus the question what your threat has to do
>>with OS/2, a newsgroup to which you posted it, is valid.
>>
>>51> And you still haven't answered why you put numbers before
>>51> your greater than signs.
>>
>>And you still haven't explained what you query has to do with
>>OS/2, Scott.
>>
>>51> You are clearly suffering from logic problems.
>>
>>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic,
>>coming from someone who can't even understand that the newsgroup
>>comp.os.os2.advocacy in the newsgroups line of your post means
>>that you posted to an OS/2 newsgroup.
>>
>>51> I'll help you a little - go to the start of the thread
>>51> (my post) and see what groups it was posted to.
>>
>>Unecessary. The Newsgroups line on your latest posting has
>>all the evidence I need to demonstrate that you posted to
>>an OS/2 newsgroup, Scott.
>>
>>51> You are the only one I see posting from there.
>>
>>Kill filed everybody else, Scott?
>>
>>51> I will be more precise in my claim. "even though nobody
>>51> with any sense uses that shite anymore".
>>
>>Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> Shouldn't you warn people that you're a world-class kook, before
> kooking-out on them, tholen?
Does the wind advise a tree?
--
a "
http://www.pointerpointer.com/" h