Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
The Eating of the Lamb -- food for thought
3 views
Skip to first unread message
TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher
Nov 18, 2012, 11:40:01 AM11/18/12
to
It was delicious, no doubt about it. But it may have to do more with
the touch of the cook than the lamb himself. Was he a happy lamb or
unhappy lamb? And why would a lamb be unhappy anyway? Do they know
their fate?
Then it was the wine --like Jesus would have it-- bread and olive oil.
All mentioned in the Bible. I don't know if it was the wine or the
realization that simplicity is best, but I was totally carried away
eating. I just landed in bed and took a nap. I think a good dinner
calls for a nap.
And does anyone what was in the menu at the Last Supper? We may have
to follow our best wild guess, but I assume that he had similar food
to me. That means that Jesus would disapprove of junk food and thus
the Christian diet would be considered junk. And what if Jesus was a
vegetarian? Then nobody would enjoy the delicious lamb and turkey. I
had turkey one night before but it doesn't compare. But it may have
been the cook.
And do the Indians celebrate Thanksgiving? I bet you they don't.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
the touch of the cook than the lamb himself. Was he a happy lamb or
unhappy lamb? And why would a lamb be unhappy anyway? Do they know
their fate?
Then it was the wine --like Jesus would have it-- bread and olive oil.
All mentioned in the Bible. I don't know if it was the wine or the
realization that simplicity is best, but I was totally carried away
eating. I just landed in bed and took a nap. I think a good dinner
calls for a nap.
And does anyone what was in the menu at the Last Supper? We may have
to follow our best wild guess, but I assume that he had similar food
to me. That means that Jesus would disapprove of junk food and thus
the Christian diet would be considered junk. And what if Jesus was a
vegetarian? Then nobody would enjoy the delicious lamb and turkey. I
had turkey one night before but it doesn't compare. But it may have
been the cook.
And do the Indians celebrate Thanksgiving? I bet you they don't.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
i2i
Nov 18, 2012, 11:46:17 AM11/18/12
to
>"TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher" wrote in message
>news:410cc81d-23fe-41c6...@c17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
>And does anyone what was in the menu at the Last Supper?
the drive-thru in golgotha is
open until 3am.
TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher
Nov 18, 2012, 9:46:24 PM11/18/12
to
On Nov 18, 9:11 pm, pilgrim <being@.... --- -- .> wrote:
>
> Well, cud be.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passover_Seder
> It's more like a flat cracker.
> the lamb was brought into the house to live
> so everyone could fall in love with it. Very cute.
> Very happy. Perfect. For about 5 days.
>
> On the night when the angel was to pass
> over and kill all the first-born, the lamb, the one
> everybody had fallen in love with, was slain, kosher.
> A quick slice cutting its throat. No pain. No problem.
> If the lamb was abused it might not be happy.
> Possibly it could have sensed a dread.
> Feel free to make up your own story.
> Or you could actually read the Book.
> Try Exodus, Chapter 12.
> Maybe you left out know.
> You know, or perhaps you don't know,
> according to the Bible, what is known
> deals with the bread and wine.
> Do you partake of many bitter herbs?
> A regular party animal. He prolly didn't eat ham.
> Pork was a no-no back then. He ate fish.
>
> http://www.nazarethvillage.com/food.php
>
> Roasted lamb and\or goat perhaps.
> He dined with tax-collectors, lawyers and
> hookers. He ate with the rich and the poor.
You seem to be as bad about geography as you are about evolution. The
turkey was an American species.
And the sheepherders that wrote the Bible had no hint of the
Americas.
> TibetanMonkey wrote:
> >It was delicious, no doubt about it.
>
> A Passover meal? Really?
> >It was delicious, no doubt about it.
>
>
> Well, cud be.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passover_Seder
>
> > But it may have to do more with
> >the touch of the cook than the lamb himself.
>
> Unleavened bread isn't cooked much.
> > But it may have to do more with
> >the touch of the cook than the lamb himself.
>
> It's more like a flat cracker.
>
> > Was he a happy lamb or unhappy lamb?
>
> After Moses told how things were to go,
> > Was he a happy lamb or unhappy lamb?
>
> the lamb was brought into the house to live
> so everyone could fall in love with it. Very cute.
> Very happy. Perfect. For about 5 days.
>
> On the night when the angel was to pass
> over and kill all the first-born, the lamb, the one
> everybody had fallen in love with, was slain, kosher.
> A quick slice cutting its throat. No pain. No problem.
>
> >And why would a lamb be unhappy anyway? Do they know
> >their fate?
>
> If the kill isn't kosher it might taint the meat.
> >And why would a lamb be unhappy anyway? Do they know
> >their fate?
>
> If the lamb was abused it might not be happy.
> Possibly it could have sensed a dread.
> Feel free to make up your own story.
> Or you could actually read the Book.
> Try Exodus, Chapter 12.
>
> >And does anyone what was in the menu at the Last Supper?
>
> Do you mean, know?
> >And does anyone what was in the menu at the Last Supper?
>
> Maybe you left out know.
> You know, or perhaps you don't know,
> according to the Bible, what is known
> deals with the bread and wine.
>
> > We may have
> >to follow our best wild guess, but I assume that he had similar food
> >to me.
>
> You are free to assume all you wish was.
> > We may have
> >to follow our best wild guess, but I assume that he had similar food
> >to me.
>
> Do you partake of many bitter herbs?
>
> > That means that Jesus would disapprove of junk food and thus
> >the Christian diet would be considered junk.
>
> I am unaware of any Christian diet.
> > That means that Jesus would disapprove of junk food and thus
> >the Christian diet would be considered junk.
>
>
> > And what if Jesus was a vegetarian?
>
> He was known as a glutton and a drunkard.
> > And what if Jesus was a vegetarian?
>
> A regular party animal. He prolly didn't eat ham.
> Pork was a no-no back then. He ate fish.
>
> http://www.nazarethvillage.com/food.php
>
> Roasted lamb and\or goat perhaps.
> He dined with tax-collectors, lawyers and
> hookers. He ate with the rich and the poor.
>
> > Then nobody would enjoy the delicious lamb and turkey.
>
> I don't recall turkeys mentioned in the Book.
> > Then nobody would enjoy the delicious lamb and turkey.
>
You seem to be as bad about geography as you are about evolution. The
turkey was an American species.
And the sheepherders that wrote the Bible had no hint of the
Americas.
pilgrim
Nov 19, 2012, 6:50:29 AM11/19/12
to
TibetanMonkey wrote:
>> > That means that Jesus would disapprove of junk food and thus
>> >the Christian diet would be considered junk.
I am not aware of any Christian diet.
>> > Then nobody would enjoy the delicious lamb and turkey.
>>
>> I don't recall turkeys mentioned in the Book.
>
>You seem to be as bad about geography as you are about evolution.
Cud be a reading comprehension difficulty.
> The turkey was an American species.
Jesus was at the first T-Day?
>And the sheepherders that wrote the Bible had no hint of the
>Americas.
Then why would Jesus have eaten turkey?
Are you a Morman?
> pilgrim wrote:
>> TibetanMonkey wrote:
>
>> >It was delicious, no doubt about it.
>> TibetanMonkey wrote:
>
>> >It was delicious, no doubt about it.
>> > But it may have to do more with
>> >the touch of the cook than the lamb himself.
>>
>> >the touch of the cook than the lamb himself.
>>
>> > Was he a happy lamb or unhappy lamb?
>> >And why would a lamb be unhappy anyway? Do they know
>> >their fate?
>>
>> >their fate?
>>
>> >And does anyone what was in the menu at the Last Supper?
>>
>>
>> > We may have
>> >to follow our best wild guess, but I assume that he had similar food
>> >to me.
Such as, turkey?
>> >to follow our best wild guess, but I assume that he had similar food
>> >to me.
>> > That means that Jesus would disapprove of junk food and thus
>> >the Christian diet would be considered junk.
>> > Then nobody would enjoy the delicious lamb and turkey.
>>
>> I don't recall turkeys mentioned in the Book.
>
>You seem to be as bad about geography as you are about evolution.
> The turkey was an American species.
>And the sheepherders that wrote the Bible had no hint of the
>Americas.
Are you a Morman?
0 new messages