9 Questions That Stump Every Pro-Vaccine Advocate and Their Claims
Jerry
--- [ quote ] ---
9 Questions That Stump Every
Pro-Vaccine Advocate and Their Claims
Since the flu pandemic was declared, there have been several so-called
"vaccine experts" coming out of the wood work attempting to justify
the effectiveness of vaccines. All of them parrot the same ridiculous
historical and pseudoscientific perspectives of vaccinations which are
easily squelched with the following 9 questions.
Claim: The study of vaccines, their historical record of achievements,
effectiveness, safety and mechanism in humans are well understood and
proven in scientific and medical circles.
Fact: The claim is completely false.
1. What to ask: Could you please provide one double-blind, placebo-
controlled study that can prove the safety and effectiveness of
vaccines?
2. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific evidence on ANY
study which can confirm the long-term safety and effectiveness of
vaccines?
3. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific evidence which can
prove that disease reduction in any part of the world, at any point in
history was attributable to inoculation of populations?
4. What to ask: Could you please explain how the safety and mechanism
of vaccines in the human body are scientifically proven if their
pharmacokinetics (the study of bodily absorption, distribution,
metabolism and excretion of ingredients) are never examined
or analyzed in any vaccine study?
One of the most critical elements which defines the toxicity potential
of any vaccine are its pharmacokinetic properties. Drug companies and
health agencies refuse to consider the study, analysis or evaluation
of the pharmacokinetic properties of any vaccine.
There is not one double-blind, placebo-controlled study in the history
of vaccine development that has ever proven their safety,
effectiveness or achievements (unless those achievements have
underlined their damage to human health).
There are also no controlled studies completed in any country which
have objectively proven that vaccines have had any direct or
consequential effect on the reduction of any type of disease in any
part of the world.
Every single study that has ever attempted to validate the safety and
effectiveness of vaccines has conclusively established carcinogenic,
mutagenic, neurotoxic or fertility impairments, but they won't address
those.
******************************************************************************
Claim: Preservatives and chemical additives used in the manufacture of
vaccines are safe and no studies have been linked or proven them
unsafe for use in humans.
Fact: The claim is completely false.
5. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification as
to how injecting a human being with a confirmed neurotoxin is
beneficial to human health and prevents disease?
6. What to ask: Can you provide a risk/benefit profile on how the
benefits of injecting a known neurotoxin exceeds its risks to human
health for the intended goal of preventing disease?
This issue is no longer even open to debate. It is a scientifically
established fact in literally hundreds of studies that the
preservatives and chemical additives in vaccines damage cells.
Neurotoxicity, immune suppression, immune-mediated chronic
inflammation and carcinogenic proliferation are just a few of several
effects that have been observed on the human body. See a list of
chemicals in vaccines
Fortunately, the drug companies still tell us the damage vaccines have
on the human body. People just don't read them. All you have to do is
look at the insert for any vaccine, and it will detail the exact
ingredients, alerts and potentially lethal effects.
See my latest analysis of the Arepanrix H1N1 vaccine for an example.
Any medical professional who believes that it is justified to inject
any type of neurotoxin into any person to prevent any disease is
completely misguided, misinformed, deluded and ignorant of any logic
regarding human health.
******************************************************************************
Claim: Once an individual is injected with the foreign antigen in the
vaccine, that individual becomes immune to future infections.
Fact: The claim is completely false.
7. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification on
how bypassing the respiratory tract (or mucous membrane) is
advantageous and how directly injecting viruses into the bloodstream
enhances immune functioning and prevents future infections?
8. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification on
how a vaccine would prevent viruses from mutating?
9. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification as
to how a vaccination can target a virus in an infected individual who
does not have the exact viral configuration or strain the vaccine was
developed for?
All promoters of vaccination fail to realize that the respiratory
tract of humans (actually all mammals) contains antibodies which
initiates natural immune responses within the respiratory tract
mucosa. Bypassing this mucosal aspect of the immune system by directly
injecting viruses into the bloodstream leads to a corruption in the
immune system itself. As a result, the pathogenic viruses or bacteria
cannot be eliminated by the immune system and remain in the body,
where they will further grow and/or mutate as the individual is
exposed to ever more antigens and toxins in the environment which
continue to assault the immune system.
Despite the injection of any type of vaccine, viruses continue
circulating through the body, mutating and transforming into other
organisms. The ability of a vaccine manufacturer to target the exact
viral strain without knowing its mutagenic properties is equivalent to
shooting a gun at a fixed target that has already been moved from its
location. You would be shooting at what was, not what is!
Flu viruses, may mutate, change or adapt several times over a period
of one flu season, making the seasonal influenza vaccine 100%
redundant and ineffective every single flu season. Ironically, the
natural immune defenses of the human body can target these changes but
the vaccines cannot.
I have never encountered one pro-vaccine advocate, whether medically
or scientifically qualified, who could answer even 1 let alone all 9
of these questions. One or all of the following will happen when
debating any of the above questions:
- They will concede defeat and admit they are stumped
- They will attempt to discredit unrelated issues that do not pertain
to the question.
- They will formulate their response and rebuttal based on historical
arguments and scientific studies which have been disproved over and
over again.
Not one pro-vaccine advocate will ever directly address these
questions in an open mainstream venue.
--- [ end quote ] ---