Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Nietzsche v. Sartre v. Locke.
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Kevin B. Murphy
Nov 16, 2009, 7:24:21 PM11/16/09
to
I suppose it is understood (wink) that Sartre is more highly regarded than
Nietzsche... whatever... but what really is Sartre about... besides mock
pity? Well, it is altogether clear to me as it probably would be to Sartre
as well that... we must be a society of complete retards if Locke is as well
known and well regarded as he happens to be... greed is good?... yeah, so
what? If greed is good then work is bad and then why don't we just all
become a society of lowlifes with no incentive and no ambition... the only
people who care a whit about John Locke are the lowest caste in our society.
It's a rule, DUH!!! It's my rule this time... If you think Locke is
important then you are nobody to me. Locke is only there to bait you into
exposing yourselves as being posers. Previously, I thought Sartre's will
was that all memory of him should be damned upon his death... but really...
Sartre hates Locke like I do.
Nietzsche... whatever... but what really is Sartre about... besides mock
pity? Well, it is altogether clear to me as it probably would be to Sartre
as well that... we must be a society of complete retards if Locke is as well
known and well regarded as he happens to be... greed is good?... yeah, so
what? If greed is good then work is bad and then why don't we just all
become a society of lowlifes with no incentive and no ambition... the only
people who care a whit about John Locke are the lowest caste in our society.
It's a rule, DUH!!! It's my rule this time... If you think Locke is
important then you are nobody to me. Locke is only there to bait you into
exposing yourselves as being posers. Previously, I thought Sartre's will
was that all memory of him should be damned upon his death... but really...
Sartre hates Locke like I do.
--
Denial of Free Will makes the Knowledge of Order Absolute.
Immortalist
Nov 16, 2009, 9:44:27 PM11/16/09
to
Are you talking about Locke's political philosophy or his theories
about empiricism?
Kevin B. Murphy
Nov 18, 2009, 12:28:45 PM11/18/09
to
On 16-Nov-2009, Immortalist <reanima...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Are you talking about Locke's political philosophy or his theories
> about empiricism?
Locke is a philosopher for idiots which is why he is so well known... What's
important to me is to tap the mindset of modern philosopher's like Sartre...
Well, we need a philosopher for idiots, apparently, and so we have one in
Locke (shrug)... whatever.
Kevin B. Murphy
Nov 18, 2009, 12:29:51 PM11/18/09
to
On 16-Nov-2009, Immortalist <reanima...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Are you talking about Locke's political philosophy or his theories
> about empiricism?
It is not out of contempt for Locke that Locke is a philosopher for
idiots... it is to his credit instead.
0 new messages