The mixed Electron from Wikipedia .
socratus
Electron.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron
a)
The electron is a subatomic particle that . . . . . .
is believed to be a point particle . . (!!! ??? )
and belong to the first-generation of fundamental particles
b)
The classical electron radius is 2.8179 × 10 - 15 m . (!!!)
c)
The electron has no known substructure. (!!! )
d)
electrons can act as waves.
This is called the wave–particle duality (!!!)
e)
An isolated electron that is not undergoing acceleration is unable
to emit or absorb a real photon ( !!! ) ; doing so would violate
conservation of energy and momentum . ( !!!)
==== .
My conclusion:
#
Electron is the point particle with the
classical electron radius 2.8179 × 10 - 15 m,
( the radius shows that electron must have a form .)
which has no known substructure but can emit or absorb a real
photon ( where does electron hide the real photon? In its pocket ?),
and electron can be a corpuscular and can be a wave,
and belong to the first-generation of fundamental particles.
#
And according to SRT the point particle or classical electron radius
cannot all time keep firm form, the electron’s form must be elastic
. . . .variable.
#
When electrons and positrons collide, they annihilate each other . .
(!!! ???)
And when electron interact with vacuum its parameters became
infinity .
(!!! What does it mean ??? )
The experimental lower bound for the electron's mean lifetime
is 4.6 × 10^ 26 years, . . . .
! !!
And trying to understand the birth of an electron
we search for his mother a ‘ Higgs boson ‘.
======= .
We have two possibilities:
To believe that electron looks like the Wikipedia says
or, maybe, to understand and agree that our intellect
looks a little strange.
====== . .
My opinion about
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron
#
Half truth can be falsehood.
Half answer can be not truthful answer.
========== .
S.
John Brockbank
<"socratus" <isr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:463cb9df-f991-46d3...@h11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
If you wished to understand science you should have studied it at school,
university and by reading. You would need to be very clever to get to know
it just by thinking - in fact science is not compatible with just thinking,
one needs also to observe events and experiment and learn how to verify and
falsify.
Anyway I will answer a point in your little flurry of scientific words. An
electron does not absorb a photon by putting it into a pocket. An atom
absorbs a photon and so increases the amount of energy it stores. This
manifests itself by an electron being in an excited state. Almost
immediatedly, the electron reverts to its previous more stable state and the
atom emits a photon. The photon released can be in any direction, and a
tendency exists for this to happen more often to photons in the visible
spectrum range at the longer wavelength end of the spectrum.
That is why the sky is blue. This is a good example of why science is a
very interesting subject. It gives us the best chance to answer questions
about nature. Much better a chance than thinking. However it takes a bit
of work - actually a lot more than just idle perusing.
socratus
============
I think you must be a happy man.
The behavior of electron and photon is clear for you.
socratus
Socratus.
Yes, this response makes sense on me.
Now I can understand more clear, what physicists
don't understand that they say about Physics / Electron.
Andy.
What is it that we don't understand about what we say?
Except, when we say we don't understand something completely?
Do you mean that YOU don't understand what we are saying?
For example, when I say that an electron is an electron –
I guess you think that I don't understand anything about an
electron?
Imagine for a moment, that we find some furry little animal on Mars.
We might try to tell other earthlings what it 'is'.
We might say, well, it is sort of a cat, but also like a fox. But it
isn't a cat,
it isn't a fox, it isn't anything we have on earth. It comes from
Mars,
and is completely different from anything on earth. It is a furry
little
animal from Mars. In all honesty, that is all we can say about it.
To say it has some characteristics of a cat, and some
characteristics of a fox,
might convey some insight to other earthlings, but it is neither a
cat nor a fox.
Would that mean that biologists don't understand anything they say
about biology? I don't think so.
Likewise, we can discuss the properties of an electron - it has a
mass,
a charge, a magnetic moment, an angular momentum. But what it really
IS,
I don't think we understand. We know some things about it, but not
everything.
That doesn't mean we know everything, or even pretend to - I've NEVER
heard
a physicist say he thinks we know everything; have you?
Nor does it mean we know nothing.
I await your answers to my questions.
Andy
Northern Arizona University
Physics-Astronomy Dept
United States
============ === .
Interesting opinion about electron, isn’t it?
Our Electron as an animal from Mars. (!!!)
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.