--
Denial of Free Will makes the Knowledge of Order Absolute.
"Kevin B. Murphy" <kmurp...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:8badnbwumr9bs2vX...@giganews.com...
My immediate neighbor is a woman named 'Hasan'. She is also
Muslim, and also, in my observation, genuinely nuts.
What about Jerry Lewis, Steve Martin, Groucho Marx?
They are such nuts they make a living at it.
Her nuttiness is not humorous, it is frightening.
It's probably a self perpetuating fright of hers, too.
The more she scares people, the more she feels rejected
and therefore feels the need to do it again.
Sounds like a Hasan or a Hassan. So far she hasn't shot up
the neighborhood, or as BOfL would say "gone on a spree".
The Muslim "Hassan", has done so, in Texas.
> If I talked to women the way we talk in this newsgroup, they would run
> for their lives because... they not only don't want to date a guy who
> wants to change the world... they also don't want to date a guy who
> pretends he wants to change the world, which is why WOMEN ARE IDIOTS!!!
It would follow then if any of 'us' talk to any woman "the way we talk in
this newsgroup" each one 'we' talk to would then "run for their lives"
and so doing would be idiots, or IDIOTS!!!
What can be concluded if this is not the case?
> If it wasn't for a woman you wouldn't even exist.
It was disconcerting to my mother that I had ambition... She wanted me to
become a garbage collector... when I was six months from graduating with a
BS in Aerospace Engineering.
How do you eliminate the possibility that they are geniuses only
acting like idiots.
- When asked to spell a word, men use the left hemisphere. Women use
both sides of the brain.
- Women recover language function better after left-hemisphere damage
than men do.
WOMEN'S SOCIAL SKILLS
Grammar's study of modern courtship showed that women are socially
more astute than men. They orchestrate social interactions so
skillfully that they can control their date, even when the man
believes he is running the show. The view that women arc more verbal
than men is more than a stereotype. Women score higher on verbal
tests, speak more words in a day, are quicker to verbal aggression,
are more articulate, get verbal responses out rapidly, have more
friends, and spend longer amounts of time speaking to them on the
telephone. Moreover, when women talk, they reveal more intimate and
meaningful information about themselves. Women are better listeners.
They tend not to let their attention wander in the middle of a long
story. They are more willing to offer comfort to another person a sex
difference in empathy that is present even in young children.
Women are more skilled in reading and using body language. countless
laboratory experiments have showed that they are more skilled at
reading facial expressions and detecting nonverbal signs of lying, for
example. This research backs up the findings of field studie on
courtship interactions.
Psychologists often point to different childhood influences in order
to explain why women have better interpersonal skills. They argue that
giving a doll to a little girl and giving a tool set to a little boy
conveys important messages about the kind of skills each needs to
develop. While this may be true, it is also true that boys and girls
differ in their inclinations regardless of how they are treated, a
point already made for the development of aggression in boys. Parents
who strive to inculcate nonviolence in their sons by keeping them away
from violent toys and violent TV are often alarmed to discover that
the boys imaginatively turn common objects into weapons of
destruction. Sticks are guns or spears. Pine cones are hand grenades.
Sex differences in aggression are largely due to biology, as already
pointed out, but upbringing does accen- tuate them, as happens in
warlike societies. Sex differences in social skills may also reflect
evolved differences.
Thus, women's abilities to entice and manipulate men in a dating
context would have helped to ensure male support for their children.
In the past, they may not have had much personal interest in striving
for political power and social status, but they were attracted to men
who had these qualities and therefore acquired them by association. In
other words, a woman who succeeded in marrying a high-ranking man
acquired high social status for herself. Even today, when women's
earning power immediately after college is almost equivalent to that
of men, they still express the same emotional needs that helped them
to obtain paternal in vestment in the evolutionary past.
The Science of Romance - by Nigel Barber
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1573929700/
ain't that a bitch?
They might have been trying to do something else but it only seemed
like they were running from us?
> How do you eliminate the possibility that they are geniuses only
> acting like idiots.
Some women say that they don't like to be condescended too... I *definitely*
don't want to be condescended too!!! So where is the genius in the
condescending attitudes that women have towards men? Especially with the
stupid BORG... BORG must be completely psycho because BORG wants to turn
condescending into a high art form... I have no control over a women's self
esteem so what does it take for me to be sensitive? The answer is... very
simply... I *should* get right in the face of every women I meet and rant
about how stupid and idiotic all women obviously are. If a woman's self
esteem is something I should care about then please... women... place your
self esteem into my hands and I will nurture it. The other thing is... what
is psychic... since I (tongue in cheek) say that I am psychic? Well, is it
not the same thing that your so-called genius woman is big on... which is
empathy? Psychic means that my opinion of what I think your true belief
is... is your true belief... well, that is genius, ok?... so since empathy
is the same thing, why is psychic a provacative word while empathy is
something which, as a rule, we are more or less obliged to apply ourselves
too?... just because women say so... stupid!!!
I do take your question seriously... The French are brilliant at diplomacy
because of geniuses who act like idiots... Sartre is tough for me to tap for
that reason... but I don't see any parallel between women and either the
Sartre or the French. You should be careful... christians excuse all mannor
of stupidity for the very reason you have just stated.
> My immediate neighbor is a woman named 'Hasan'. She is also
> Muslim, and also, in my observation, genuinely nuts.
I live in an Islamic apartment complex... I don't know, they tend to act as
if all authority has the authority of Allah... I once told one of them that
the apartment manager was a whore and whatever she has to say about it is
between you and her and it doesn't involve me...
> It would follow then if any of 'us' talk to any woman "the way we talk in
> this newsgroup" each one 'we' talk to would then "run for their lives"
> and so doing would be idiots, or IDIOTS!!!
Hmm... well... mainly, I'm just trying to provoke the BORG... she is too
filled up with her own haughtiness, if you ask me... she needs a boot up her
ass.
umm.....may be you generalize bit too far.
:P
Suzana
If you give a reason for your preference to remain single, as you did,
it is logical and probably applies to some men or women who decided to
be single. Relationships are like job, not blow jobs, but work; where
it is a 9 to 5 like false environment designed for struggling and
competing to gain something.
Weird... Given the fact that "Hasan" is a boys name...