Rush's favorite dope, and what it means
Neil
Before I get serious: I put this joke out too late at night (?) on
alt.flame.rush-limbaugh etc. for anyone to notice yet, and Google Groups now
fascistically limits us to five (!) cross-groups, so here goes for the
entertainment and enlightenment of others across the fruited plains:
When Rush talks about his "favorite dope," does he mean:
A. Oxycontin?
or
B. His biggest fan (whoever that might be....you?)
(Actually, it must be "himself!")
Well, to be serious (because this is an opportunity to raise consciousness about
these issues, whatever Limbaugh's opinions are about this and that): Now that
one of their own (otherwise, they never care) is indulging, will conservatives
quit calling for, and jailing, people involved in the analogous case of sampling
medical marijuana? I notice, that's the new slant by Rush's right-dio shills:
Oh, poor guy, we can feel his pain, and mean Liberals quite picking on the poor
guy! Mike Savage blamed doctors for not being willing enough to pass out pain
pills to people who want them! We don't know if Rush really "needs" it anyway,
or maybe it's for those "anal cysts" that let him dodge the Vietnam era draft
and become a chickenhawk. (Well, Rush should know, that opiates cause
constipation anyway.....) Is there hypocrisy here?
For treatment: it would be cool to put Rush on ibogaine. That might not only
cure his pill addiction, it might open his mind to the narrow meanness of his
thinking and attitudes.
Neil
Al Lewis
>With a name like "Rush," I guess we should have known!
>
>Before I get serious: I put this joke out too late at night (?) on
>alt.flame.rush-limbaugh etc. for anyone to notice yet, and Google Groups now
>fascistically limits us to five (!) cross-groups, so here goes for the
>entertainment and enlightenment of others across the fruited plains:
>
Why don't you fuck off and realize that crossposting is a sin?
Steady Eddy
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 22:29:46 -0400, "Neil" <para...@lykose.com>
>
> >With a name like "Rush," I guess we should have known!
> >
> >Before I get serious: I put this joke out too late at night (?) on
> >alt.flame.rush-limbaugh etc. for anyone to notice yet, and Google Groups now
> >fascistically limits us to five (!) cross-groups, so here goes for the
> >entertainment and enlightenment of others across the fruited plains:
> >
>
> Why don't you fuck off and realize that crossposting is a sin?
Why don't you fuck off and realize that shooting dope into your arm is a sin?
Neil
Al Lewis <b...@boss.man> wrote in message
news:tf6vnvkgmatc140ma...@4ax.com...
>
> >With a name like "Rush," I guess we should have known!
> >
> >Before I get serious: I put this joke out too late at night (?) on
> >alt.flame.rush-limbaugh etc. for anyone to notice yet, and Google Groups now
> >fascistically limits us to five (!) cross-groups, so here goes for the
> >entertainment and enlightenment of others across the fruited plains:
> >
>
> Why don't you fuck off and realize that crossposting is a sin?
>
least to subject-relevant groups (Robert Anton Wilson is a major mover and
shaker in the arena of drug policy.) Why the hell should it have to be put out
on just one group?
>
> >When Rush talks about his "favorite dope," does he mean:
> >
> >A. Oxycontin?
> >
> >or
> >
> >B. His biggest fan (whoever that might be....you?)
You! Well, I guess you're just kidding, in a bad mood. Some OxyContin would be
relaxing, but don't try Rush's dosage levels - he's an addict.
> >(Actually, it must be "himself!")
> >.......
J Lee
"Neil" <para...@lykose.com> wrote in message
news:vnv0823...@corp.supernews.com...
: With a name like "Rush," I guess we should have known!
:
: Before I get serious: I put this joke out too late at night (?) on
: alt.flame.rush-limbaugh etc. for anyone to notice yet, and Google Groups
now
: fascistically limits us to five (!) cross-groups, so here goes for the
: entertainment and enlightenment of others across the fruited plains:
:
: When Rush talks about his "favorite dope," does he mean:
:
: A. Oxycontin?
:
: or
:
: B. His biggest fan (whoever that might be....you?)
My basic attitude toward the Great Windbag is that what he does is a
schtick. It's entertainment. It has nothing to do with political commentary.
He's a political version of Howard Stern. No one would call Howard a "sex
therapist." That a lot of folks take him seriously is just a symptom of the
shallow depth of many folks on political matters. George III isn't president
because the average American is blindingly incisive. ;-)
SF
nougat
"J Lee" <puug3c...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:Ob1gb.13$em2.1...@news.abs.net...
>
> "Neil" <para...@lykose.com> wrote in message
> news:vnv0823...@corp.supernews.com...
> : With a name like "Rush," I guess we should have known!
> schtick. It's entertainment. It has nothing to do with political
commentary.
> He's a political version of Howard Stern. No one would call Howard a "sex
> therapist." That a lot of folks take him seriously is just a symptom of
the
> shallow depth of many folks on political matters. George III isn't
president
> because the average American is blindingly incisive. ;-)
I've listened in on the Rush-ster off and on for quite a while, just to get
a sampling of his BS (and for that matter, have enjoyed sampling the even
more psychedlic BS of Xtian fundies scattered across the AM dial as well).
Seems to me that up to a year or two ago, Limboob was at least capable of
patching together a logical argument (falacious though it may have been),
and communicating it as per the requirements of his day job. But any more,
when I flip over to get a random sample, literally, more often than not it's
"I...I..I...uhhhhh....." "phhppphh, well, there's just, .... pppppppppp"
"eehhhheEEEHhhh", etc, i.e. markedly increasing percentage of random,
stuttering, stammering, whining vocalizations. Sometimes I even enjoy
flipping between stations and then back to Rush again a few seconds at a
time, just to see how many consecutive "uuu....eeh.. I, I, I"s I can get in
a row. And, they can last for a surprisingly long time! Apparently, his pain
pill uptake has indeed increased exponentially over the past year or so. Or
something! Anyway, watch for falling Limbaugh .....
steve
Neil
> news:vnv0823...@corp.supernews.com...
> : With a name like "Rush," I guess we should have known!
> :
> My basic attitude toward the Great Windbag is that what he does is a
> schtick. It's entertainment. It has nothing to do with political commentary.
> He's a political version of Howard Stern. No one would call Howard a "sex
> therapist." That a lot of folks take him seriously is just a symptom of the
> shallow depth of many folks on political matters. George III isn't president
> because the average American is blindingly incisive. ;-)
>
> SF
Maybe, just maybe, you are right about Rush, but Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham,
Ann Coulter, David Limbaugh (the brother), and others take themselves very
seriously and grimly. (Mike Savage: God only knows what's going on in that
wire-ass's head. If he's taking drugs, it wouldn't be OxyContin, but Datura and
STP mixture at the least.) Some are quite bitter and not at all "entertaining."
Coulter called decorated Vietnam vet John Kerry a "traitor" for not agreeing
with her/Bush (heh heh) about foreign policy. Their talk about liberals is
getting to be like anti-Semitism in the 30's. (Find Richard Cohen's column about
Coulter and _Treason_ if you can.)
As for Bush: My mother, still quite sharp in her 70's, says that G III was
elected precisely because people thought he was "dumb like them, and they liked
that."
Cliff Stabbert
[note: yes, I drop e-prime several times during this post, adopting the
certainty of fools and fanatics, as Bertrand Russel might say. Ah
well.]
Neil:
>Maybe, just maybe, you are right about Rush [doing entertainment schtick],
>but Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Ann Coulter, David Limbaugh (the brother),
>and others take themselves very seriously and grimly. (Mike Savage: God
>only knows what's going on in that wire-ass's head. If he's taking drugs,
>it wouldn't be OxyContin, but Datura and STP mixture at the least.)
In fact, a profound humorlessness marks all such fanatics. They'll
claim to have a sense of humor but appear to have wholly and completely
lost the ability to laugh at themselves.
As for what drugs Mike Savage and for that matter the others may be on,
simple amphetamine psychosis and / or heavy stimulant-induced or enabled
paranoia satisfy me as an explanation (I have difficulty distinguishing
their rantings from those of the clinically paranoid, which those of
coke or speed heads can end up resembling).
Neil:
>Some are quite bitter and not at all "entertaining." Coulter called
>decorated Vietnam vet John Kerry a "traitor" for not agreeing with
>her/Bush (heh heh) about foreign policy.
It's also worth remembering what she wrote in response to the acts of
9/11 and the fact that she along with everyone else was having her bags
thoroughly checked --
Coulter, http://www.nationalreview.com/coulter/coulter091301.shtml:
> This is no time to be precious about locating the exact individuals
> directly involved in this particular terrorist attack. Those
> responsible include anyone anywhere in the world who smiled in
> response to the annihilation of patriots like Barbara Olson.
>
> We don't need long investigations of the forensic evidence to
> determine with scientific accuracy the person or persons who
> ordered this specific attack. We don't need an "international
> coalition." We don't need a study on "terrorism." We certainly
> didn't need a congressional resolution condemning the attack
> this week.
>[...]
> Airports scrupulously apply the same laughably ineffective airport
> harassment to Suzy Chapstick as to Muslim hijackers. It is
> preposterous to assume every passenger is a potential crazed
> homicidal maniac. We know who the homicidal maniacs are. They are
> the ones cheering and dancing right now.
>
> We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert
> them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and
> punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German
> cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war.
Neil:
>Their talk about liberals is getting to be like anti-Semitism in the 30's.
>(Find Richard Cohen's column about Coulter and _Treason_ if you can.)
Better yet, find the typical of their political projection style*
interview with Grover Norquist about the estate tax (spun as "the death
tax") and / or the whole concept of progressive taxation "is"
persecution of the monied minority just like persecution of the jewish
minority characterized the Nazis, or apartheid characterized South
Africa.
...I just looked this up. The interview was on NPR's Fresh Air:
http://freshair.npr.org/day_fa.jhtml?display=day&todayDate=10/02/2003
and transcript of the relevant bits is at
http://chujoe.net/archives/000141.html
[other locations:
http://www.thetalentshow.org/archives/000494.html
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2003_09_28_atrios_archive.html#106512342555379252
]
>As for Bush: My mother, still quite sharp in her 70's, says that G III was
>elected precisely because people thought he was "dumb like them, and they
>liked that."
Sure. Part of that seemed pure spin on the media's part; I found
DailyHowler.com's live analysis of the repeated media distortions and
lies (specifically, how everything got slotted into prescripted stories:
Bush the Simplistic but Honest EveryMan, McCain the Straight Shooter,
Gore the Exaggerator / Condescending Smartypants) during election 2000
and find their subsequent summaries of same after invaluable in pinning
them down. [I've also made a related, more paranoid point re: the movie
_Armageddon_.]
* Remember Team Bush's 2000 claim that "they'll do anything to win".
Note also that the repeated implication that liberal criticism of the
president's policies is "treasonous" is not restricted at all to
Coulter. Many right wing columnists have recently repeated Ashcroft's
point outright: that such criticism aids and abets our enemies. It has
been updated to apply to recent criticism of the lack of pre-war
planning for occupation (as urged by the CIA and State Department, but
rejected by the inner neocon circle), of current U.S. policies in Iraq,
of the continued anti-UN policy, etc.
In that regard the following quote again holds a mirror up to certain
players on the Bush side -- in the Bush white house even (i.e. the
Veronica Plame leakers):
"Even though I'm a tranquil guy now at this stage of my life, I have
nothing but contempt and anger for those who betray the trust by
exposing the name of our sources. They are, in my view, the most
insidious of traitors."
The speaker? George H.W. Bush (in his speech at the dedication ceremony
for the George Bush Center for Intelligence -- see
http://www.cia.gov/cia/public_affairs/speeches/1999/bush_speech_042699.html
)
--
Cliff
Steady Eddy
> As for Bush: My mother, still quite sharp in her 70's, says that G III was
> elected precisely because people thought he was "dumb like them, and they liked
> that."
Your mother is dumber than a box of rocks.
Neil
"Steady Eddy" <nonsm...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:68ce28c1.03100...@posting.google.com...
Give us some good reasons, without lying or the intellectual fallacies and fraud
common to dittoheads and their ilk, to believe that George W. Bush has done a
good job manifesting his intelligence. Go ahead, look at the economy, the way
intelligence and the war turned out, the civil rights situation (Patriot acts,
that bother libertarians like Nat Hentoff and true conservatives like Judge
Andrew Napolitano of Fox, not the PC sideshow junk about gays and affirmative
action) , the issue of transparency of government, handling of critics, the
environment, the donor-reward tax scheme. If you can succeed, I'll put the old
girl out to pasture and become a Republican. I don't think you could even if you
weren't dumb like him, it would be hard enough for someone with a high IQ. (The
smarter conservatives like George Will have indeed stopped trying. You probably
don't read much, like your hero in the What?House, so you may never have heard
of him.)
Neil
Nada, John
> My basic attitude toward the Great Windbag is that what he does is a
> schtick.
How insightful.
His 'schtick' happens to be his opinions
presented in a clear captivating manner.
> It's entertainment.
Another blast of deep insight...
Did you have help figuring that one out?
> It has nothing to do with political commentary.
Heavy, dude.
What is it? A 'home fix it show'?
A 'car problem show'. Perhaps a 'poetry reading show'?
What does he 'comment about? Fashion?
> He's a political version of Howard Stern.
They do have similarities.
Huge success. Huge ratings. Huge contracts.
They both make their audiences laugh.
They both work hard as hell to stay #1.
(you wouldn't know anything about that)
> No one would call Howard a "sex therapist."
No shit. Neither would Howard.
Only a tortured mind could make that leap logic.
> That a lot of folks take him seriously is just a symptom of the
> shallow depth of many folks on political matters.
Well, you sure gave us shallow folks
a lesson, professor.
> George III isn't president
> because the average American is blindingly incisive. ;-)
What were the choices, professor?
Two silver spoon, legacy babies...
One graduated Yale AND Harvard as a C- student.
The other flunked out of every institution
he daddy got him into.
The obvious happened.
Nada, John
> As for Bush: My mother, still quite sharp in her 70's, says that G III was
> elected precisely because people thought he was "dumb like them, and they liked
> that."
If your mother thinks Alpha Gore is smarter than Bush
than she's the dumbass. If she's 'still quit sharp',
she must have been a dumbass her whole life.
'Least we know where you get it.
Nada, John
> <mindless drivel snipped>
> If you can succeed, I'll put the old
> girl out to pasture and become a Republican.
Forget it. Your ignorance is genetic. You're fucked.
> I don't think you could even if you
> weren't dumb like him,
> it would be hard enough for someone with a high IQ.
You're a true product of the indoctrination gulags:
a moron with high self-esteem.
> (The
> smarter conservatives like George Will have indeed stopped trying. You probably
> don't read much, like your hero in the What?House, so you may never have heard
> of him.)
Usenet: midnight basketball for socialist morons.
Neil
> J Lee wrote:
>
> > My basic attitude toward the Great Windbag is that what he does is a
> > schtick.
>
> How insightful.
> His 'schtick' happens to be his opinions
> presented in a clear captivating manner.
"Clear and captivating," says a Limbicile. But if RL is so great, why
does he attract the sort of potty-mouthed teen philosophers who come
up with memorable, thoughtful responses like:
"It seems you have neither, kornholer.
If intellect was money,
you'd need a loan to buy
something from The Dollar Store."
BTW - Rush admitted today to being hooked on narcotic pills, and will
be in rehab for a few weeks. You will have to find some other windbag
smear artist to suck up to for awhile.
Nada, John
>
> "Nada, John" <sha...@gotemon.com> wrote in message news:<3F86A0C4...@gotemon.com>...
> > J Lee wrote:
> >
> > > My basic attitude toward the Great Windbag is that what he does is a
> > > schtick.
> >
> > How insightful.
> > His 'schtick' happens to be his opinions
> > presented in a clear captivating manner.
> >...
> "Clear and captivating," says a Limbicile.
Wow you can read!!!
Remedial classes, kornholer?
> But if RL is so great, why
> does he attract the sort of potty-mouthed teen philosophers who come
> up with memorable, thoughtful responses like:
>
> "It seems you have neither, kornholer.
> If intellect was money,
> you'd need a loan to buy
> something from The Dollar Store."
Your comprehension sucks, kornholer.
> BTW - Rush admitted today to being hooked on narcotic pills, and will
> be in rehab for a few weeks. You will have to find some other windbag
> smear artist to suck up to for awhile.
But you'll always have usenet:
Neil
> Neil wrote:
> >
> > "Nada, John" <sha...@gotemon.com> wrote in message
news:<3F86A0C4...@gotemon.com>...
> > > J Lee wrote:
> > >
> > > > My basic attitude toward the Great Windbag is that what he does is a
> > > > schtick.
> > >
> > > How insightful.
> > > His 'schtick' happens to be his opinions
> > > presented in a clear captivating manner.
> > >...
> > "Clear and captivating," says a Limbicile.
>
> Wow you can read!!!
> Remedial classes, kornholer?
>
sarcastic.
> > But if RL is so great, why
> > does he attract the sort of potty-mouthed teen philosophers who come
> > up with memorable, thoughtful responses like:
> >
> > "It seems you have neither, kornholer.
> > If intellect was money,
> > you'd need a loan to buy
> > something from The Dollar Store."
>
> Your comprehension sucks, kornholer.
>
An absolute non sequitur (I doubt you even understand what that means.)
> > BTW - Rush admitted today to being hooked on narcotic pills, and will
> > be in rehab for a few weeks. You will have to find some other windbag
> > smear artist to suck up to for awhile.
>
> But you'll always have usenet:
> midnight basketball for socialist morons.
Are you really a plant from the Hillary campaign, designed to make dittoheads
look absolutely disgusting and absolutely idiotic in order to ruin their image?
Note that "Nada" appropriately means "nothing" in Spanish - is that a tip off? I
note that you, like SE, never answered my challenge to *honestly* explain why
GWB is doing a great job, but just threw out the most pitiful pubescent insults
as a cowardly diversion. I can't imagine that real persons would be that
ridiculous and derogatory by example to their own professed clique, so it must
be a frame up. Who around here thinks this guy is for real? Wouldn't that be
pathetic? (But I fear for the worst....)
Nada, John
> > > "Clear and captivating," says a Limbicile.
> >
> > Wow you can read!!!
> > Remedial classes, kornholer?
> >
> I had a twelfth-grade reading level in seventh grade, moron.
A clear case of grade inflation.
> I was trying to be sarcastic.
Try using your own words.
> > > But if RL is so great, why
> > > does he attract the sort of potty-mouthed teen philosophers who come
> > > up with memorable, thoughtful responses like:
> > >
> > > "It seems you have neither, kornholer.
> > > If intellect was money,
> > > you'd need a loan to buy
> > > something from The Dollar Store."
> >
> > Your comprehension sucks, kornholer.
> >
> An absolute non sequitur (I doubt you even understand what that means.)
See? Your comprehension needs work.
> > > BTW - Rush admitted today to being hooked on narcotic pills, and will
> > > be in rehab for a few weeks. You will have to find some other windbag
> > > smear artist to suck up to for awhile.
> >
> > But you'll always have usenet:
> > midnight basketball for socialist morons.
>
> Are you really a plant from the Hillary campaign, designed to make dittoheads
> look absolutely disgusting and absolutely idiotic in order to ruin their image?
Dumb asses like you already have your damaged mind made up.
> Note that "Nada" appropriately means "nothing" in Spanish - is that a tip off?
Must be.
>I
> note that you, like SE, never answered my challenge to *honestly* explain why
> GWB is doing a great job,
You never asked that, loony tune.
This thread is about RL not GWB. Pay attention!
I'll type slower for you, if need be.
> but just threw out the most pitiful pubescent insults
> as a cowardly diversion.
Go tell it to your mommy.
> I can't imagine that real persons would be that
> ridiculous and derogatory by example to their own professed clique, so it must
> be a frame up.
Neil and Blow.
Neil
"Nada, John" <sha...@gotmineon.com> supporeted in message
news:3F8B93BC...@gotmineon.com...
<some snipped exudate interspersed with my own comments>
> > I note that you, like SE, never answered my challenge to *honestly* explain
> > why GWB is doing a great job,
>
> You never asked that, loony tune.
> This thread is about RL not GWB. Pay attention!
> I'll type slower for you, if need be.
>
Franken's book: _Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced
Look at the Right_. You should have been in that book, as an example of the most
pitiful among them.) For Chrissake, having a thread about a subject doesn't make
it wrong to bring up a related point! Look at the copy of previous message in
this thread:
"
"Steady Eddy" [another empty-headed, cretinous dittohead moron]
<nonsm...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:68ce28c1.03100...@posting.google.com...
> "Neil" <para...@lykose.com> wrote in message
news:<vo1ebli...@corp.supernews.com>...
> > As for Bush: My mother, still quite sharp in her 70's, says that G III was
> > elected precisely because people thought he was "dumb like them, and they
> > liked that."
>
> Your mother is dumber than a box of rocks.
Give us some good reasons, without lying or the intellectual fallacies and fraud
common to dittoheads and their ilk, to believe that George W. Bush has done a
good job manifesting his intelligence. Go ahead, look at the economy, the way
intelligence and the war turned out, the civil rights situation (Patriot acts,
that bother libertarians like Nat Hentoff and true conservatives like Judge
Andrew Napolitano of Fox, not the PC sideshow junk about gays and affirmative
action) , the issue of transparency of government, handling of critics, the
environment, the donor-reward tax scheme. If you can succeed, I'll put the old
girl out to pasture and become a Republican. I don't think you could even if you
weren't dumb like him, it would be hard enough for someone with a high IQ. (The
smarter conservatives like George Will have indeed stopped trying. You probably
don't read much, like your hero in the What?House, so you may never have heard
of him.)
Neil
"
I've got an idea: be adopted as Rush's son. The two of you would make great
company, and how folks would say: "It's hard to believe he's adopted! How like a
chip off the old block the boy is!" You deserve each other, and that's the worst
insult I can come up with for the both of you.
Nada, John
> > > I note that you, like SE, never answered my challenge to *honestly* explain
> > > why GWB is doing a great job,
> >
> > You never asked that, loony tune.
> > This thread is about RL not GWB. Pay attention!
> > I'll type slower for you, if need be.
> >
> Now I know you really are just an idiot or a liar.
You never mentioned GWB to me, Neil And Blow.
> (BTW, I *highly* recommend Al
> Franken's book: _Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced
> Look at the Right_. You should have been in that book, as an example of the most
> pitiful among them.)
I can see why you like that lunatic.
> For Chrissake, having a thread about a subject doesn't make
> it wrong to bring up a related point! Look at the copy of previous message in
> this thread:
None of them was addressed to me, little neil.
Now, go tell your mommy.
John E. Jaku-Hing
John Nada is a commie pedophile who has 485+ troll postings to date.
Nada, John
>
>
> John Nada is a commie pedophile who has 485+ troll postings to date.
486+, kornholer.
John E. Jaku-Hing
> "John E. jerking" wrote:
> >
> >
> > John Nada is a commie pedophile who has 485+ troll postings to date.
>
> 486+, kornholer.
John Nada is a commie pedophile who has 486+ troll postings to date.
J Lee
:
: "J Lee" <puug3c...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
There are people who think "professional" wrestling is real too. The wrestlers
also appear to take themselves quite seriously and pound the mat and throw
opponents into the audience...but it's all a show. Hulk Hogan, George Bush, Rush
Limbo, it's all hot air and hokum. Speed was the old favorite of disc jockeys so
they could rap a mile a minute on their shows. It wouldn't surprise me if the
rightos have fallen into the same habit and their minds have been warped
therefrom, but I still don't think it's serious commentary any more than
throwing the Christians to the lions was serious, except to the Christians of
course. Toward the end the Romans would march real armies into the jaws of the
lions to satisfy the demented rabble's thirst for excitement. Iraq would appear
to be a modern version of the old Roman circus on a grand scale, a kind of huge
football game where the home team crushes the opposition and then the dean of
the school comes out on the field to proclaim the game over. Except the Iraqis
aren't Christians and nobody bothered to tell them what their part in this
little charade was going to be and they just don't seem to have heard little
George's proclamation that the war was over. I am no fan of Islamic militants
and their ilk, but compared to Arial Sharon and George III, they are certainly
not playing in a different league.
SF
MAS
#4s and 1 grain codeine dots, it's hard to believe Rush just went into a
30-day rehab and is now clean. Give me a break. I like Rush, I agree with
SOME of his politics, but be honest Rush. Stop blaming doctors on getting
you hooked. Come on, 30 oxycotin a day??!!! You liked getting high Rush,
pure and simple. If you're now getting methadone from a doctor (Rush, of
course doesn't have to go to a clinic like the rest of us), admit it and get
on with your life. Diabetics take insulin every day, there's nothing wrong
with an opiate addict taking methadone. You can still work and perform
everyday duties like anyone else on methadone as long as you get your daily
dose. Just don't be a hypocrite.
Neil
> After years and years of taking oxycotin, percocet, vicodin, even tylenol
> #4s and 1 grain codeine dots, it's hard to believe Rush just went into a
> 30-day rehab and is now clean. Give me a break. I like Rush, I agree with
> SOME of his politics, but be honest Rush. Stop blaming doctors on getting
> you hooked. Come on, 30 oxycotin a day??!!! You liked getting high Rush,
> pure and simple. If you're now getting methadone from a doctor (Rush, of
> course doesn't have to go to a clinic like the rest of us), admit it and get
> on with your life. Diabetics take insulin every day, there's nothing wrong
> with an opiate addict taking methadone. You can still work and perform
> everyday duties like anyone else on methadone as long as you get your daily
> dose. Just don't be a hypocrite.
> "Neil" <para...@lykose.com> wrote in message
> news:vnv0823...@corp.supernews.com...
> > With a name like "Rush," I guess we should have known!
> >
> > Before I get serious: I put this joke out too late at night (?) on
> > alt.flame.rush-limbaugh etc. for anyone to notice yet, and Google Groups
> now
> > fascistically limits us to five (!) cross-groups, so here goes for the
> > entertainment and enlightenment of others across the fruited plains:
> >
> > When Rush talks about his "favorite dope," does he mean:
> >
> > A. Oxycontin?
> >
> > or
> >
> > B. His biggest fan (whoever that might be....you?)
> >
> > (Actually, it must be "himself!")
> >
Thanks for "keeping dope alive" with your late response, even if it
was a "toppost", MAS. BTW, when will Rush really come out strong
against that immigration business? Most important to the OP'sP, what's
your take on Rush *& big pals* battle of law and wits with the Florida
prosecutors *& their big pals*? I say, let it all hang out, with no
cover for either side.