9/11 Lessons From Star Trek
Noah's Dove
From the Star Trek episode "Day of the Dove".
It seems that Gene Roddenberry knew something about false flag
operations.
cornholio
9-11 wasn't a false flag retard. It was an instance of islamonazi
terrorism.
dsharavi
> From the Star Trek episode "Day of the Dove".
The only worthwhile ep of the lamentable third season.
> It seems that Gene Roddenberry knew something about false flag
> operations.
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CyjD6Ulf6s
The subtext becomes interesting when you consider that: Michael Ansara
is the son of Syrian (Lebanese) refugees, then married to a Jew.
Shatner and Nimoy are, of course, both Jews. Nimoy has long been
involved with Jewish causes in America and Israel. Shatner is the
recent co-founder of The William and Elizabeth Shatner Therapeutic
Riding Consortium Endowment for Israel, which, funds therapeutic
riding programs in Israel for physically, emotionally, and mentally
handicapped children -- and not just Jewish kids. Shatner said he
wants "all kids - Jews, Bedouins, Israeli-Arabs, Jordanian,
Palestinian, and Egyptian - to benefit from these therapeutic
horseback riding centers."
The EU would know more than Roddenberry about false flag operations.
When Israelis, Palestinians, and their neighbours finally get their
heads out of their assholes and make a true peace, the EU will face
one hell of a serious economic rival. Same holds for Muslim Arab oil
sheikhs.
Deborah
last_per...@yahoo.com
And of course a direct result of American support of ZioNaziism,
and much celebrated--in secret--by the ZioNazis, including
a Kornhole.
Noah's Dove
> On Nov 18, 2:47 pm, cornholio <andxor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 18, 11:10 am, "Noah's Dove" <noahdo...@lightspeed.ca> wrote:
>
> > > Brilliant video by ThoughtCrime7 -
>
1:12:21 - 2 years ago
Produced by Dave vonKleist & William Lewis Hosted by Dave vonKleist |
Directed by William Lewis. What “In Plane Site” accomplishes that no
other video expose’ on September 11th has to date, is it exposes the
viewer to a barrage of news clips from a majority of the mainstream
news outlets. The official story of that day was told on live TV by
reporters, policemen, firefighters, and other on-the-scene
eyewitnesses, however, that footage was shown only once on live
television broadcasts in the first hours of the attacks and then… it
was never repeated. The stories changed, information was enigmatically
omitted, and what can only be described as officially prescribed
propaganda took the place of indisputable reality.
Jaxtraw
The stories changed, information was enigmatically
> omitted,
That's right. In the midst of an enormous breaking story, full of chaos and
confusion and chinese whispers, the stories and information changed
throughout the day. Lawks!
> and what can only be described as officially prescribed
> propaganda took the place of indisputable reality.
If the whole thing was pre-planned propaganda, it wouldn't have changed on
the day, would it? Make your goddamned mind up.
Ian
Jaxtraw
Fat chance. The Middle East is in the same state as Europe several centuries
ago, when the big political arguments were about pettifogging differences in
interpretation of the Trinity or Predestination. For instance, in the mid
17th century, England had a massive Civil War... because the king had
married a Catholic, and preferred a more Arminian rather than Calvinist
state church. Only the subsequent overthrow of Cromwell's roundhead
muhahadeen[1] allowed Britain to become relatively secular and thus
politically stable enough for economic growth.
It's not about the Middle East "making peace". It's a question of whether
they can overthrow their mullahs- and if there is sufficient popular will to
do so- and thus start to drag their minds out of the Dark Ages of theocracy.
In such a situation, there can be no lasting peace by extremists trying to
reach an accomodation. It will always break down. You have to physically
defeat, depose or eject the fundamentalists. England was lucky; it had a
standby king to coronate, it had a significant intellectual caste developing
a theory of liberal individualism, and it had significant gut-level
opposition to the fundamentalists; the English (and thus Anglosphere)
tradition is one of a conflict between (religious) collectivism and
individualism (we're currently on another downswing into religious
collectivism as it goes; it is known this time as "Political Correctness"
but it is a directly descended ideology from that of the 17th century
Puritans).
The problem the Islamic world has is that it has no historic
Cavalier/individualist oppositional tradition, hence its immense difficulty
in dragging itself out of the (ass)hole it is in. It's all Cromwells and no
liberals.
Ian
==
[1] Christians today complain of a War On Christmas. Cromwell BANNED it and
had soldiers going from house to house pulling dinners out of ovens!
dsharavi
> >> Brilliant video by ThoughtCrime7 -
> >> From the Star Trek episode "Day of the Dove".
>
> > The only worthwhile ep of the lamentable third season.
>
> >> It seems that Gene Roddenberry knew something about false flag
> >> operations.
> >>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CyjD6Ulf6s
>
> > The subtext becomes interesting when you consider that: Michael Ansara
> > is the son of Syrian (Lebanese) refugees, then married to a Jew.
> > Shatner and Nimoy are, of course, both Jews. Nimoy has long been
> > involved with Jewish causes in America and Israel. Shatner is the
> > recent co-founder of The William and Elizabeth Shatner Therapeutic
> > Riding Consortium Endowment for Israel, which, funds therapeutic
> > riding programs in Israel for physically, emotionally, and mentally
> > handicapped children -- and not just Jewish kids. Shatner said he
> > wants "all kids - Jews, Bedouins, Israeli-Arabs, Jordanian,
> > Palestinian, and Egyptian - to benefit from these therapeutic
> > horseback riding centers."
>
> > The EU would know more than Roddenberry about false flag operations.
> > When Israelis, Palestinians, and their neighbours finally get their
> > heads out of their assholes and make a true peace, the EU will face
> > one hell of a serious economic rival. Same holds for Muslim Arab oil
> > sheikhs.
>
> dsharavi wrote:
> Fat chance. The Middle East is in the same state as Europe several centuries
> ago, when the big political arguments were about pettifogging differences in
> interpretation of the Trinity or Predestination.
>For instance, in the mid
> 17th century, England had a massive Civil War... because the king had
> married a Catholic, and preferred a more Arminian rather than Calvinist
> state church.
The analogy is highly imperfect. The three civil wars of the 17thC
were no more about religion, per se, or Chas 1 marrying a French
Catholic, than the 1st and 2nd fitnas, and ibn al-Zubayr's selling
Jerusalem as Islam's Third Holeyest Site were about religion. The
arguments in the ME today have little relation to various religious
interpretations, no matter what the fanatics say.
>Only the subsequent overthrow of Cromwell's roundhead
> muhahadeen[1] allowed Britain to become relatively secular and thus
> politically stable enough for economic growth.
> It's not about the Middle East "making peace". It's a question of whether
> they can overthrow their mullahs- and if there is sufficient popular will to
> do so- and thus start to drag their minds out of the Dark Ages of theocracy.
They were doing rather well in the sciences while Europe was still
trying to recover from the atrophying of the western Roman empire.
> In such a situation, there can be no lasting peace by extremists trying to
> reach an accomodation. It will always break down. You have to physically
> defeat, depose or eject the fundamentalists. England was lucky; it had a
> standby king to coronate, it had a significant intellectual caste developing
> a theory of liberal individualism, and it had significant gut-level
> opposition to the fundamentalists; the English (and thus Anglosphere)
> tradition is one of a conflict between (religious) collectivism and
> individualism (we're currently on another downswing into religious
> collectivism as it goes; it is known this time as "Political Correctness"
> but it is a directly descended ideology from that of the 17th century
> Puritans).
>
> The problem the Islamic world has is that it has no historic
> Cavalier/individualist oppositional tradition, hence its immense difficulty
> in dragging itself out of the (ass)hole it is in. It's all Cromwells and no
> liberals.
==
Islam had its Cromwells, once upon a time, as well as greater and more
enlightened leaders than Cromwell. What happened? Internal struggles
for power, lack of seperation of "church" and state, and problems
related to global warming, global cooling, the Little Ice Age, and
what was then known as the Great Mortality.
> [1] Christians today complain of a War On Christmas. Cromwell BANNED it and
> had soldiers going from house to house pulling dinners out of ovens!
What a coincidence. Hessian troops were doing things like that during
the Revolutionary War -- which happened to occur during another
struggle over the Divine Right of Stupid Kings -- prompting one
colonial American to bark at them that "An Englishman's home is his
castle." Naturally, the Huns, as the colonials called them, ignored
him, and proceeded to loot his castle, then kill him.
Deborah
Clams Canino
"Noah's Dove" <noah...@lightspeed.ca> wrote in message
news:8a89b2b8-ce98-46d5-
> And of course a direct result of American support of ZioNaziism,
> and much celebrated--in secret--by the ZioNazis, including
> a Kornhole.
I'll bet you believe in "The Protocalls" as well.....
-W
cornholio
Of course, you can't prove any of the above retard. I seem to
remember OBL himself stating that the USA was the Great Satan
and Israel the Little Satan.
dsharavi
> > > 9-11 wasn't a false flag retard. It was an instance of islamonazi
> > > terrorism.
> > And of course a direct result of American support of ZioNaziism,
> > and much celebrated--in secret--by the ZioNazis, including
> > a Kornhole.
On Nov 18, 11:48 pm, cornholio <andxor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Of course, you can't prove any of the above retard. I seem to
> remember OBL himself stating that the USA was the Great Satan
> and Israel the Little Satan.
Big Satan, Little Satan -- that's so cute. Big Satan, Little Satan
sounds like a story for kids about ponies, or dogs, or choo choo
trains.
Deborah
last_per...@yahoo.com
We've only been the Great Satan since 1948. Think it over.
last_per...@yahoo.com
It follows.
cornholio
Um, 7-7, the Madrid train bombings, the Turkish muslime genocide of
2.5 million
Armenian and Assyrian Christians, the muslime pogroms committed in the
Gaza
Shite and Israel before 1948, the ongoing genocide/ethnic cleansing
of non-muslimes in N. Africa ALL say differently.
GFY Ahmed, back in whatever islamopig shitter you crawled out of.