David Daniel Moore DOB 9/26/70 Birth Mom Judith Ulanowski
Greegor
that
LIT> you were slurring your words when we were on the phone? Why is
it
LIT> then that you would call me, ramble on about something or
another,
LIT> only to call me back a little while later with no recollection
that
LIT> you had already called me? Why is it that you insulted Greg each
and
LIT> everytime we talked yet, you still play him when you are holding
a
LIT> losing hand? "Greg has some serious deviant behavior. I
wouldn't let
LIT> him near a child' At least we agree on one thing, Ken.
KRP > Kim you are having serious hallucinations. Is it the medication
KRP > you are on? Your statements above are completely devoid of
reality.
Moe > Funny you never claimed in the first place
Moe > when LIT said you and LIT talked on the phone a few times.
Maureen, Have you been practicing
brain surgery on yourself again?
Acknowledging that they talked on the
phone several times does not prove
that every LIE she tells about those
calls later is true.
Kim E. Olson deceived Ken for a YEAR
by pretending to be his friend just to
get dirt on him, and she came up with
NOTHING, so it's easy to see her level
of deviousness and motive for making
up stories!
womanGoddess
Admitting that she and Kennie talked on the phone doesn't help your
master, Greg. You just gave some credibility to LIT's story.
If she actually did talk to Kennie on the phone a few times
( something you yourself admit she did) then its her word against his
on the content of the phone conversations. And LIT has more
credibility than Kennie does.
>
> Kim E. Olson deceived Ken for a YEAR
> by pretending to be his friend just to
> get dirt on him, and she came up with
> NOTHING, so it's easy to see her level
> of deviousness and motive for making
> up stories!
It doesn't sound like Kim got " nothing", Greg.
But I'm sure you're following Kennie's orders to you.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
Greegor
G > Kim E. Olson deceived Ken for a YEAR
G > by pretending to be his friend just to
G > get dirt on him, and she came up with
G > NOTHING, so it's easy to see her level
G > of deviousness and motive for making
G > up stories!
Moe > It doesn't sound like Kim got " nothing", Greg.
She has posted her DAMNING discoveries!
http://www.funny-ecards.com/cards/dance-mooning/showgirl-granny.html
krp
"womanGoddess" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6a5bde67-f9b0-4f75...@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
MOE> If she actually did talk to Kennie on the phone a few times
MOE> ( something you yourself admit she did) then its her word against his
MOE> on the content of the phone conversations. And LIT has more
MOE> credibility than Kennie does.
Really, Maureen? When she publicly ADMITS that it was a case of
deliberate deception? She admits to being a LIAR. You seem to think that
somebody who claims to have been "playing" me has some super credibility in
contrast to the person she "played?" I see you are still using that LSD,
Maureen.
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>KRP > Kim you are having serious hallucinations. Is it the medication
>KRP > you are on? Your statements above are completely devoid of
>reality.
>
>Moe > Funny you never claimed in the first place
>Moe > when LIT said you and LIT talked on the phone a few times.
>
>Maureen, Have you been practicing
>brain surgery on yourself again?
>
>Acknowledging that they talked on the
>phone several times does not prove
>that every LIE she tells about those
>calls later is true.
But it does make it possible. This isn't proof, of course, but
it's possible.
>
>Kim E. Olson deceived Ken for a YEAR
>by pretending to be his friend just to
>get dirt on him, and she came up with
>NOTHING,
You and your puppet master can present the lie as often as you
want. The truth will remain the truth.
Ken was, in all probability, too drunk (unless he lied about his
alcoholism) to really recall what all he said.
The problem is, we have only LIT's word. Without more it's a
case of she said, he said and nothing else.
>so it's easy to see her level
>of deviousness and motive for making
>up stories!
DUH! Kevin and I exposed her deceptive nature a long time ago.
Of course, being the mentally retarded person you are (your persona is
NOT an act), you couldn't accept the truth when it was placed before
you.
A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
Wiggly" Hanson (either directly or through the same standards he
DEMANDS be held to others):
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
attacking my first wife (deceased).
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
"Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
abuser
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.
--a true story
As of Sunday, Nov. 29, 2009:
Financials
Title: STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREG SCOTT
Case: 06571 AGCR015216 (LINN)
Citation Number:
Summary Orig Paid Due
COSTS 9200.00 850.00 8350.00
FINE 500.00 500.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 150.00 150.00 0.00
RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
OTHER 0.00 0.00 0.00
$9850.00 $1500.00 $8350.00
Yes, Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson still owes over
$8000.00 related to his convictions for BEATING his ex-wife.
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
>> Moe > Funny you never claimed in the first place
>> Moe > when LIT said you and LIT talked on the phone a few times.
>>
>> Maureen, Have you been practicing
>> brain surgery on yourself again?
>>
>> Acknowledging that they talked on the
>> phone several times does not prove
>> that every LIE she tells about those
>> calls later is true.
>
> Admitting that she and Kennie talked on the phone doesn't help your
>master, Greg. You just gave some credibility to LIT's story.
>
> If she actually did talk to Kennie on the phone a few times
>( something you yourself admit she did) then its her word against his
>on the content of the phone conversations. And LIT has more
>credibility than Kennie does.
>
Oddly enough, LIT does have more credibility, but only just.
>>
>> Kim E. Olson deceived Ken for a YEAR
>> by pretending to be his friend just to
>> get dirt on him, and she came up with
>> NOTHING, so it's easy to see her level
>> of deviousness and motive for making
>> up stories!
>
> It doesn't sound like Kim got " nothing", Greg.
>
> But I'm sure you're following Kennie's orders to you.
And Pat's, I suspect.
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
>> =A0Admitting that she and Kennie talked on the phone doesn't help your
>> master, =A0Greg. You just gave some credibility to LIT's story.
>>
>> =A0If she actually did talk to Kennie on the phone a few times
>> ( something you yourself admit she did) then its her word against his
>> on the content of the phone conversations. And LIT has more
>> credibility than Kennie does.
>
>G > Kim E. Olson deceived Ken for a YEAR
>G > by pretending to be his friend just to
>G > get dirt on him, and she came up with
>G > NOTHING, so it's easy to see her level
>G > of deviousness and motive for making
>G > up stories!
>
>Moe > =A0It doesn't sound =A0like Kim got " nothing", Greg.
>
>She has posted her DAMNING discoveries!
So you admit the claims she makes against your puppet master,
Kenneth Robert Pangborn, are true?
Wow. I honestly didn't expect that.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>
>"womanGoddess" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:6a5bde67-f9b0-4f75...@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>
>MOE> If she actually did talk to Kennie on the phone a few times
>MOE> ( something you yourself admit she did) then its her word against his
>MOE> on the content of the phone conversations. And LIT has more
>MOE> credibility than Kennie does.
>
> Really, Maureen? When she publicly ADMITS that it was a case of
>deliberate deception? She admits to being a LIAR.
This was proved long ago.
LIT was able to CON you with the E-mails, but only now do you see
the truth?
>You seem to think that
>somebody who claims to have been "playing" me has some super credibility in
>contrast to the person she "played?" I see you are still using that LSD,
>Maureen.
>
I think that may be Greg's illegal drug of choice, though it's
not the only option.
"And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest
fan and GAY lover."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-Team, LYING
and claiming David Moore is his gay lover. Message-ID:
<_MlOj.598$pH4.7@trnddc06>
lostintranslation
Kim E. Olsen? Ok, Mr. Private Eye...who the hell are you talking
about? I do not have an E. in my middle nor last name. Your stalking
skills are failing miserably.
lostintranslation
The only Kim E. Olson I see listed in CT lives quite far from me.
Wrong spelling of last name. Wrong spelling of first name. Wrong
middle initial. Wow, 0/0
Kent Wills
<lostintran...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
>> Kim E. Olson deceived Ken for a YEAR
>> by pretending to be his friend just to
>> get dirt on him, and she came up with
>> NOTHING, so it's easy to see her level
>> of deviousness and motive for making
>> up stories!
>
>Kim E. Olsen? Ok, Mr. Private Eye...who the hell are you talking
>about? I do not have an E. in my middle nor last name. Your stalking
>skills are failing miserably.
He's claimed I live in MANY places. His most recent claim is that
I'm in Pittsburgh, PA.
On three occasions he's claimed to have PROVED I live in a certain
place via the phone book. It's important to note that my name has
never appeared in any phonebook since 1997 or 1998. My Usenet nym,
Kent Wills, has never appeared in the phone book in relation to me.
We haven't had a land line in several years, except for two
months when we tried VOIP. The number wasn't active long enough to
get into any phone book, even if it were listed under my name. Because
of this, there is no realistic way Greg could claim to know where I
live via the phone book. Not honestly.
He also has Moe's location wrong.
If Greg is posting information that he claims is about you,
everyone reading can be 100% certain it is about someone else.
Greegor
LIT > lives quite far from me. Wrong spelling
LIT > of last name. Wrong spelling of first
LIT > name. Wrong middle initial. Wow, 0/0
Don't you think you might have overplayed your hand, Kim?
If I had it wrong, WHY would you ever ANNOUNCE that?
Sure, Your last name could be
Oleson, Olesen, Olson, Olsen or Olsson
but Kim is REALLY hard to spell wrong!
Kim or Kimm, both search the same with Kim.
http://genealogy.about.com/library/surnames/o/bl_name-OLSON.htm
Definition: From the Old Norse "Oleifr," meaning "son of Olaf," or
ancestor's relic.
Surname Origin: Scandanavian
lostintranslation
Actually you are having spelling my first name wrong. I thank my
parents for being creative. The correct spelling of my first name is
KYm dorkoboy. I hardly use it but to find me online, that's the
spelling of the shortened version of my first name. My parents were
extremely creative with the correct spelling of the unshortened
version of my first name.
Why would I announce it? Why not? I love to show people reading this
that your stalking skills are getting worse and worse. Drool over
youself some more, Greg. It's funny as hell watching you fall on your
face.
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>LIT > The only Kim E. Olson I see listed in CT
>LIT > lives quite far from me. Wrong spelling
>LIT > of last name. �Wrong spelling of first
>LIT > name. �Wrong middle initial. �Wow, 0/0
>
>Don't you think you might have overplayed your hand, Kim?
>
>If I had it wrong, WHY would you ever ANNOUNCE that?
>
My guess, and it's only a guess, is to further prove how you are
a failure at EVERYTHING you try.
No matter what endeavor you take upon yourself, you ALWAYS fail.
I'd say you fail miserably, but the truth is, you do a fantastic job
of failing.
>Sure, Your last name could be
>Oleson, Olesen, Olson, Olsen or Olsson
>but Kim is REALLY hard to spell wrong!
>Kim or Kimm, both search the same with Kim.
Kym is another spelling, stupid.
Why are you so determined to have me prove you LIED when you
claimed you are erudite? There must be a reason seeing as you work so
hard to offer me opportunities to PROVE that you're mentally retarded.
>
>http://genealogy.about.com/library/surnames/o/bl_name-OLSON.htm
>
>Definition: From the Old Norse "Oleifr," meaning "son of Olaf," or
>ancestor's relic.
>Surname Origin: Scandanavian
Which is relevant how?
Kent Wills
<lostintran...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Dec 12, 11:04�pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> LIT > The only Kim E. Olson I see listed in CT
>> LIT > lives quite far from me. �Wrong spelling
>> LIT > of last name. �Wrong spelling of first
>> LIT > name. �Wrong middle initial. �Wow, 0/0
>>
>> Don't you think you might have overplayed your hand, Kim?
>>
>> If I had it wrong, WHY would you ever ANNOUNCE that?
>>
>> Sure, Your last name could be
>> Oleson, Olesen, Olson, Olsen or Olsson
>> but Kim is REALLY hard to spell wrong!
>> Kim or Kimm, both search the same with Kim.
>>
>> http://genealogy.about.com/library/surnames/o/bl_name-OLSON.htm
>>
>> Definition: From the Old Norse "Oleifr," meaning "son of Olaf," or
>> ancestor's relic.
>> Surname Origin: Scandanavian
>
>Actually you are having spelling my first name wrong. I thank my
>parents for being creative. The correct spelling of my first name is
>KYm dorkoboy.
Greg won't accept that until one of his stoner friends tells him
it's a proper spelling.
--a true story
>I hardly use it but to find me online, that's the