Happy Thanksgiving everyone from Church Education Resource Ministries!
jo...@cerm.info
to Dr. David Jeremiah at this time on the subject of Thanksgiving. If
any of you want to also hear his sermon then go here.
http://www2.oneplace.com/Ministries/Turning_Point/
As for me there is so much to be thankful for. I can be eternally
thankful for the Great Salvation of God that has been given to me. I
can be thankful that I will spend an eternity with God. I can be
thankful for a family, a web ministry CERM, good health, and so much
more!
As for the unbelievers here, you can be thankful that you still have
time to repent of your ways and turn to the Truth. If any of you is
interested in receiving salvation then please visit this page.
http://www.cerm.info/salvation.htm
What should we thank God for, and how should we praise Him?
God's righteousness and holiness - Psalm 7:17, 30:4, 48:10,
71:16, 24, 99:3
*
All God's marvelous works - Psalm 9:1, 66:3-7, 71:16-17, 72:18,
92:4-6, 105:5, 111:2-4
*
Your body - Psalm 139:14-16
*
God's guidance and instruction to you - Psalm 16:7, 48:14, 71:17
*
The hope God has given you - Psalm 16:9
*
Salvation - Psalm 16:9-11, 71:23, 92:1, 96:2
*
The joy God gives you in His presence - Psalm 16:11
*
God is great and worthy of praise - Psalm 18:3, 48:1, 96:4, 145:3
*
When you were in trouble, God heard your cries for help - Psalm
18:6, 22:24
*
Deliverance - Psalm 18:49, 54:7, 68:20
*
Mercy and kindness - 117:2 , Psalm 18:49, 31:21, 57:10, 86:13,
100:5, 106:1, 108:4, 145:8-9
*
For not staying angry with us and not giving up on us - Psalm
30:5
*
God's blessings and benefits - Psalm 68:19
*
God's laws and commands - Psalm 19:7-8, 48:11, 112:1
*
God's judgments and the warning they have provided to you - Psalm
19:9-11, 119:7, 119:164
*
God's power - Psalm 21:13, 29:3-10
*
Faithfulness - 71:22
*
For preserving our ancestors - Psalm 22:4-5
*
For the strength and confidence God gives you - Psalm 27:1-6,
28:7-8, 29:11, 56:4, 11, 138:3
*
For listening to your prayers - Psalm 28:6, 66:20, 116:1-2
*
God's Word - Psalm 56:4, 56:10
*
For being truthful - Psalm 33:2, 57:10, 117:2
*
For filling the earth with His love and goodness - Psalm 33:5
*
Creation of the stars - Psalm 19:1-4
*
God's thoughts, many and deep - Psalm 139:17-18
Again Happy Thanksigiving!
John
www.cerm.info
Mike Painter
thing and doing another along with your disdain for others and the pride you
show in lacking an education does more for the cause of atheism than an
atheist could ever do.
Bob Blaylock
--
"Today, we celebrate the first glorious anniversary of the Information
Purification Directives. ... Our Unification of Thoughts is more powerful
a weapon than any fleet or army on earth. ... Our enemies shall talk
themselves to death and we will bury them with their own confusion."
Dave
> x-no-archive: yes
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:24:40 -0600, CB <count...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
> >On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:40:17 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mddotp...@sbcglobal.net>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>I am thankful that christians like you exist.
> >
>
> Excellent question!
It's an "excellent question" if one engages in the sort of shallow
thinking that we see in so many of these Usenet "Christians." One may
be thankful without being thankful *to* anyone in particular.
It's also amusing to see that Weatherly still can't "let go and let
God," as he told us he does, with respect to Wolf or any thread
involving Wolf. Feel the love, folks.
John C. Randolph
> As for the unbelievers here, you can be thankful that you still have
> time to repent of your ways and turn to the Truth.
May god smite you for spamming comp.sys.mac.system, you smug little prick.
-jcr
John C. Randolph
> Matthew 6:1-6,16-18 http://scriptures.lds.org/en/matt/6/1-6,16-18#1
Wow.. If Christians followed the teachings in their own scriptures,
they'd be far better neighbors.
-jcr
Jamie Kahn Genet
LMAO. Don't hold your breath, eh? :-D
--
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
Jamie Kahn Genet
I'd settle for a purely random accident. Is a grand piano to the head a
bit passé nowadays?
Regards,
Jamie Kahn Genet
Jamie Kahn Genet
> Matthew 6:1-6,16-18 http://scriptures.lds.org/en/matt/6/1-6,16-18#1
Fucking cunt 69-13
STOP FUCKING SPAMMING MAC GROUPS YOU IDIOT NUTCASES.
Detlef Tietz
Dave napisał(a):
> john w wrote:
> > x-no-archive: yes
> > On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:24:40 -0600, CB <count...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> > article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> > author
> > >On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:40:17 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mddotp...@sbcglobal.net>
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >>I am thankful that christians like you exist.
> > >
> > >To whom are you thankful?
> >
> > Excellent question!
>
> It's an "excellent question" if one engages in the sort of shallow
> thinking that we see in so many of these Usenet "Christians." One may
> be thankful without being thankful *to* anyone in particular.
The root verb, "to thank" is transitive in English and in most
languages. In some language it takes the accusative case, and in some
others the dative case, but there is always an object. An intransitive
version of 'thank' doesn't exist.
If you are "thankful" it means you are full of thanking in the same way
that being "thoughtful" means being full of thinking. But thinking can
be without an object - we think thoughts not individuals, but we thank
individuals and not thoughts.
There was nothing shallow in the question, but to dismiss it with an
argument by assertion that falls to pieces on the most basic linguistic
analysis - this is more shallow.
Dave
The problem is that the argument doesn't fall to pieces on those terms,
and it seems to me that *lots* of people are making assertions and
arguments by assertion.
If one can appeal to basic linguistic terms, one can suggest that
linguistic terms can be considerably more complicated if one bothers to
explore them beyond simplistic assertion-making. The question was to
whom the individual was "thankful," and the question is based on the
shallow notion that one must be "thankful" to an individual. The fact
is that we can be thankful without having an "object" to thank, per se.
Being "thankful" isn't always the same as saying "thank you" to
someone, which isn't the comment to which I was reacting, in any case.
It is, therefore, quite realistic to be "thankful" in an unspecific
sense without having some "individual" to thank. It almost certainly
happens quite frequently. One may "thank" an individual, but one can
be "thankFUL" without having an individual to whom to be "thankful."
That was the basis of my comment.
We can couch responses in all sorts of pretentious linguistic
ledgerdemain and still come up with nothing substantial other than "is
not," when it's examined a bit more closely. My point stands.
Mike Painter
>
I'm thankful to the people like BB and BJ for showing how silly the idea of
christianity is.
I'm thankful for science making it possible to spread their metabolic
residue over a wide area.
I'm thankful for the sad sack who invited me here and showed just how inane
he is.
Jason, in one 15 minute period said that I had asked a question, promised to
answer it and then said I had not asked the question.
The EAC could never invent people like them.
Dave
[Snip]
> >It's an "excellent question" if one engages in the sort of shallow
> >thinking that we see in so many of these Usenet "Christians."
>
> Well.... look around yourself, gnome!
>
> This is a Christian group!
As usual, Weatherly is wrong and remarkably unobservant at the same
time. We are in several groups, all of which are part of the *secular*
Usenet and some of which happen to have "Christian" subjects.
> You sound like the guy who jumped into the pool, then was heard to
> remark, "Gee, this place would be SO nice, if it weren't for all this
> damn WATER!"
Bad analogy. Why don't we get more specific? This place would be SO
nice if it wasn't for all the phony "Christians."
> If you don't like what's being said, perhaps it's time for you to find
> somewhere more to your liking.
I said nothing about liking or disliking. I pointed out that the
question is shallow, which exposes Weatherly as shallow, which is part
of exposing *him*.
And he always takes the bait.
[Snip]
Dave
[Snip]
> >There was nothing shallow in the question, but to dismiss it with an
> >argument by assertion that falls to pieces on the most basic linguistic
> >analysis - this is more shallow.
>
> In such cases, one "considers the source."
And then Weatherly responds, anyway.
> The "source' in this case being an atheist malcontent...
Malcontent, perhaps...but not an atheist, as Weatherly well knows. So
he's lying...again.
> ...who likes to sit in a Christian chat group and wail like a wet baby.
One man's wet baby is another man's phony-exposer. I prefer the
latter. The readership mileage may vary.
Chris McDonald
>Why don't you move to Iraq where you feel more comfortable around your
>neighbors?
or at least get out of comp.sys.mac.system
--
Chris,
Jamie Kahn Genet
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:56:33 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mddotp...@sbcglobal.net>
> I thank you for the entertainment.
> It's nice to know there are real comedians out there.
>
>
>
>
> Acts 26:8 "Why is it considered incredible among you
> people if God does raise the dead?
Learn how to add a sig properly, you stupid delusional sack of shit.
Jamie Kahn Genet
> Why don't you move to Iraq where you feel more comfortable around your
> neighbors?
> >
> >-jcr
Wow! I'm just dumbfounded by the sheer brilliance of your reply. I
mean... just... wow!
> Acts 26:8 "Why is it considered incredible among you
> people if God does raise the dead?
Learn how to add a sig properly you ignorant delusional fool. Oh, and
some proof would be nice...
Regards,
Jamie Kahn Genet
Jamie Kahn Genet
> x-no-archive: yes
> On 24 Nov 2006 02:52:21 -0800, "Detlef Tietz" <tit...@titfort.at>
> wrote:
> Š 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
> >
> >Dave napisa?(a):
> >> john w wrote:
> >> > x-no-archive: yes
> >> > On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:24:40 -0600, CB <count...@hotmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > Š 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> >> > article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> >> > author
> >> > >On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:40:17 GMT, "Mike Painter"
> >> > ><mddotp...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >>I am thankful that christians like you exist.
> >> > >
> >> > >To whom are you thankful?
> >> >
> >> > Excellent question!
> >>
> >> It's an "excellent question" if one engages in the sort of shallow
> >> thinking that we see in so many of these Usenet "Christians." One may
> >> be thankful without being thankful *to* anyone in particular.
> >
> >The root verb, "to thank" is transitive in English and in most
> >languages. In some language it takes the accusative case, and in some
> >others the dative case, but there is always an object. An intransitive
> >version of 'thank' doesn't exist.
> >
> >If you are "thankful" it means you are full of thanking in the same way
> >that being "thoughtful" means being full of thinking. But thinking can
> >be without an object - we think thoughts not individuals, but we thank
> >individuals and not thoughts.
> >
> >There was nothing shallow in the question, but to dismiss it with an
> >argument by assertion that falls to pieces on the most basic linguistic
> >analysis - this is more shallow.
>
> In such cases, one "considers the source." The "source' in this case
> being an atheist malcontent who likes to sit in a Christian chat group
> and wail like a wet baby.
>
> john w
Fuck off you cross-posting dickhead. Take your delusional babble
elsewhere. Only other delusional fools are interested in your ramblings.
Jamie Kahn Genet
> x-no-archive: yes
> On 23 Nov 2006 21:55:56 -0800, "Dave" <hor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Š 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
> >john w wrote:
> >> x-no-archive: yes
> >> On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:24:40 -0600, CB <count...@hotmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> Š 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> >> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> >> author
> >> >On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:40:17 GMT, "Mike Painter"
> >> ><mddotp...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>I am thankful that christians like you exist.
> >> >
> >> >To whom are you thankful?
> >>
> >> Excellent question!
> >
> >It's an "excellent question" if one engages in the sort of shallow
> >thinking that we see in so many of these Usenet "Christians."
>
> Well.... look around yourself, gnome!
>
> This is a Christian group!
>
> You sound like the guy who jumped into the pool, then was heard to
> remark, "Gee, this place would be SO nice, if it weren't for all this
> damn WATER!"
>
> If you don't like what's being said, perhaps it's time for you to find
> somewhere more to your liking.
>
> And don't let the exit door hit you on the ass on your way out.
> It makes a weird sound!
>
> john w
Do you SEE the newsgroups header? I guess not if you also don't know how
to post properly. Now fuckoff until you get a fucking clue about Usenet
and newsreaders. Shit for brains delusional fool.
> One may
> >be thankful without being thankful *to* anyone in particular.
> >
> >It's also amusing to see that Weatherly still can't "let go and let
> >God," as he told us he does, with respect to Wolf or any thread
> >involving Wolf. Feel the love, folks.
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting aka TOFU (Top-post Over, Full quote Under)
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet?
Concorde
jo...@cerm.info wrote:
I
> can be thankful that I will spend an eternity with God.
Start as soon as you like and take your sixty five aliases with you
including dusty, hornexposer and angelo
Bye Bye
Have eternal fun somewhere
Preferably way beyond Betelgeuse
=+++=================
Dear Lord
John Wolf would apparently like to start his eternal life early
Please do not deny him his wish on our account
He will not be missed
In Jesus name
Wolf without end
Amen
+++++++++++++++++++
Concorde
<johnw<no>@yoo.how> wrote:
> This is a Christian group!
Then what is a pornographer like you doing in it
Jamie Kahn Genet
> x-no-archive: yes
Learn how to properly add a header.
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:13:42 +1300, jam...@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie
> Kahn Genet) wrote:
> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
LMAO at your stupid pointless waste of space copyright notice.
> >john w <johnw<no> wrote:
> >
> >> x-no-archive: yes
> >> On 24 Nov 2006 02:52:21 -0800, "Detlef Tietz" <tit...@titfort.at>
> >> wrote:
> >> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> >> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> >> author
> >> >
> >> >Dave napisa?(a):
> >> >> john w wrote:
> >> >> > x-no-archive: yes
> >> >> > On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:24:40 -0600, CB <count...@hotmail.com>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> > © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> I'm not the one cross-posting, buttface!
> And if all you can do is vomit obscenities, we don't have to dance
> anymore.
>
> john w
>
> snip
You... dance? Wait - let me guess: disco in a white polo-neck and
cardigan?
LMAO.
Regards,
Jamie Kahn Genet
J.J. O'Shea
(in article <HolyGrail-251...@192.168.0.2>):
Setting up to be the new Ted Haggard.
--
email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.
Dave
> x-no-archive: yes
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
> >john w <johnw<no> wrote:
> >
> >> x-no-archive: yes
> >> On 24 Nov 2006 02:52:21 -0800, "Detlef Tietz" <tit...@titfort.at>
> >> wrote:
> >> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> >> author
> >> >
> >> >Dave napisa?(a):
> >> >> john w wrote:
> >> >> > x-no-archive: yes
> >> >> > On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:24:40 -0600, CB <count...@hotmail.com>
> >> >> > wrote:
A quick check of the "to" field in the header of Weatherly's post shows
this to be a lie.
> ...buttface!
Feel the love.
> And if all you can do is vomit obscenities, we don't have to dance
> anymore.
Good thing Jesus didn't seem to have that idea...not that it makes any
difference to Weatherly, who is not a Christian...
Dave
> As for me there is so much to be thankful for. I can be eternally
> thankful for the Great Salvation of God that has been given to me. I
> can be thankful that I will spend an eternity with God.
Spoken like a true Pharisee...
[Snip]
Mike Rosenberg
> Well.... look around yourself, gnome!
>
> This is a Christian group!
Since when is comp.sys.mac.system a Christian group? Or
alt.parenting.solutions?
--
<http://designsbymike.biz/macconsultshop.shtml> Mac-themed T-shirts
<http://designsbymike.biz/musings.shtml> Mostly muckraking T-shirts
<http://designsbymike.biz/prius.shtml> Prius shirts & bumper stickers
<http://cafepress.com/comedancing> Ballroom dance-themed shirts & gift
Pastor Steve Winter
wrote:
>
>Since when is comp.sys.mac.system a Christian group? Or
>alt.parenting.solutions?
I believe it is the devilish deceiver and stalker John Wolf who
chooses your groups to post to and then does not set a followup
so you get all of the replies as well.
Anyone knowing John Wolf's current address is asked to contact
the Durham, NC police dept with that information and reference
criminal complaints NC IR05-034406, 05-034406, 05-029465,
06-11685
A malicious individual John Wolf has been harassing and stalking
me for some time now and I have filed numerous criminal
complaints. Including Durham, NC IR05-034406, 05-034406,
05-029465, 06-11685. These include harassing phone calls,
sending unwanted things in the US mail (yes I have filed a
complaint with the Charlotte, NC Postal Inspector), computer
harassment etc. Many of the crimes John Wolf is committing are
Federal crimes across state lines.
Pastor Steve Winter
--
Apostolic Oneness Pentecostal /*/ PreRapture Ministry
http://www.apostolic.biz for Bible studies (text and audio)
Have you obeyed Acts 2:38 as Paul taught in Acts 19:4-6?
http://tinyurl.com/mxu7o for trinity is antichrist sermon
Dave
> x-no-archive: yes
> Kahn Genet) wrote:
> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
> >
> >> x-no-archive: yes
> >
> >Learn how to properly add a header.
>
Feel the love, and note Weatherly, too, is more interested in his ego
than in his "Christian" witness.
> And-- last I looked, moron-- there is no one holding a gun to your
> head, FORCING you to read my posts!
Ah, yes, another of Weatherly's broken-record responses--one that could
certainly be used with equal justification with respect to his
blatherings in the groups.
> So stop whining!
Weatherly would do well to take his own advice, but Weatherly has
always been a hypocrite as well as a liar.
Jamie Kahn Genet
> x-no-archive: yes
Still don't know how to properly add a header, huh? Still scared about
your delusional shit being archived? LMAO. I guess that shows EXACTLY
how much worth even you yourself place on it :-D
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 19:21:31 +1300, jam...@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie
> Kahn Genet) wrote:
> Š 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
*dies laughing at your absurd pseudo-legal-babble copyright notice* You
really have a talent for sharing your ignorance and stupidity with the
world, don't you? :-D
> >john w <johnw<no> wrote:
> >
> >> x-no-archive: yes
> >
> >Learn how to properly add a header.
>
> You post your way, buttface, and I'll post my way.
Yes, you keep stumbling around tripping over your own ignorance while I
get it right. Bravo! Be proud of your ignorance!
> And-- last I looked, moron-- there is no one holding a gun to your
> head, FORCING you to read my posts!
>
> So stop whining!
>
> john w
Last I looked no one is holding a pun to your hollow head forcing you to
keep crossposting to comp.sys.mac.system. Why don't you learn how to
alter which groups you're posting to? Or is it refreshing to wake up
each morning as ignorant as the previous day, month, year...? Knowledge
must absolutely terrify you, eh?
> >> On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:13:42 +1300, jam...@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie
> >> Kahn Genet) wrote:
> >> Š 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> >> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> >> author
> >
> >LMAO at your stupid pointless waste of space copyright notice.
> >
> >> >john w <johnw<no> wrote:
[snip]
> >> I'm not the one cross-posting, buttface!
> >> And if all you can do is vomit obscenities, we don't have to dance
> >> anymore.
> >>
> >> john w
> >>
> >> snip
> >
> >You... dance? Wait - let me guess: disco in a white polo-neck and
> >cardigan?
> >
> >LMAO.
> >
> >Regards,
> > Jamie Kahn Genet
C'mon - share with us? Was it a very nice cardigan? Maybe a photo?
Please?
Regards,
Jamie Kahn Genet
--
Robibnikoff
"john w @yoo.how>" <johnw<no> wrote in message
news:b06fm29iu7aaf50e1...@4ax.com...
> x-no-archive: yes
> On 23 Nov 2006 21:55:56 -0800, "Dave" <hor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Š 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>> Š 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
>>> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
>>> author
>>> ><mddotp...@sbcglobal.net>
>>> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>I am thankful that christians like you exist.
>>> >
>>> >To whom are you thankful?
>>>
>>> Excellent question!
>>
>>It's an "excellent question" if one engages in the sort of shallow
>>thinking that we see in so many of these Usenet "Christians."
>
>
> This is a Christian group!
Which one? Idiot, you're crossposting to several.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557