Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Nudist Non-Sexual Videos--Pretty Good quality--View for free..Legal..

1 view
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

R. Steve Walz

unread,
Sep 11, 2007, 7:03:00 PM9/11/07
to
Dexter Sinatra wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:36:30 -0700, Dan MacKay
> <cal1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> >On Sep 7, 9:22 pm, sportbug <MikeNCalifor...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> Everyone together from all ages having great clean fun. No Fear!!
> >>
> >> View first three videos link below scrolling from top to down..Fun at
> >> the beach, Naturist games 01 and 02. These three I am able to connect
> >> immediately via windows media player. All the others I have not been
> >> quite able to figure out to get on.
> >>
> >> http://www.nudistfun.com/videos/index.html
> >
> >I posted about this site on a couple of MySpace forums and it was kind
> >of interesting.
> >
> >I had a person on one group stated that he reported the site to this
> >group http://www.asacp.org/page.php?c..report
> >
> >He said that group told him those were "Officially" Child Porn.
> >
> >I thought it interesting that a Private Group (not Government or Law
> >Enforcement) made that kind of statement and in their "Mission
> >Statement" it reads:
> >
> >
> >Founded in 1996, the Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection
> >(ASACP) is a non-profit organization dedicated to eliminating child
> >pornography from the Internet. ASACP battles child pornography through
> >its CP reporting hotline, and by organizing the efforts of the online
> >adult industry to combat the heinous crime of child sexual abuse.
> >ASACP also works to help parents prevent children from viewing age-
> >inappropriate material online.
>
> More power to their elbow
>
> >You think they might be a little bit biased?
>
> When will you realize that the only people not "biased" against your
> beloved child pornography are pedophiles?
-----------------
So now you're implying that all nudists are pedophiles.
Keep it up and at this rate you're shortly going to be outnumbered!
Most men like nude little girls anyway. And most women like little
boys, they just won't admit it to each other for fear of being labeled a
pedophile (WITCH!), except for the ones who are emotionally adult.


> Nobody except perverts wants to be in the least open minded about
> kiddie fucking or dirty old men, such as yourself,masturbating to
> images of naked pre-teens.
---------------------------
Then everyone is a pervert. They just won't admit it till we get to
the tipping point.


> Normal folk want to vomit at the very thought of your activities.
-------------------------
Nope, they fantasize about it all the time, they only vomit at being
called a pedophile.


> Dr Judith Reisman
------------------
Reisman's the shit who slandered Kinsey, and her "degree" is in art,
to whit, "Communications", the EASY (mailorder) major.
Steve

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Terry J. Wood

unread,
Sep 11, 2007, 7:30:01 PM9/11/07
to
"R. Steve Walz" <rst...@armory.com> wrote in news:46E71EA4.4E46
@armory.com:

> So now you're implying that all nudists are pedophiles.

Dex will now name all the nudist groups that have been infiltrated by
pedophiles. He also will now name all the nudist beaches where the
majority of US child porn is produced. He's made this claim in rec.nude,
so I'm sure he's got data to back this up.

Come on, Dex! Show "R. Steve" that you weren't just blowing smoke up our
collective nudist *sses when you made those claims! You can prove what you
post, can't you?

Give us the names, Dex! Give us the dates! Give us the places where it
all happened! Post it here Dex! We're waiting for you to show "R. Steve"
who's the boss!

You *can* do it, can't you Dex? (This is a "YES" or "NO" question Dex).


Gee, you aren't going to ignore this.... are you Dex?

Message has been deleted

Dan MacKay

unread,
Sep 11, 2007, 9:23:17 PM9/11/07
to
On Sep 11, 3:49 pm, Dexter Sinatra <spamme...@nospamme.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:36:30 -0700, Dan MacKay
>
>
>
>
>
> <cal1f...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >On Sep 7, 9:22 pm, sportbug <MikeNCalifor...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> Everyone together from all ages having great clean fun. No Fear!!
>
> >> View first three videos link below scrolling from top to down..Fun at
> >> the beach, Naturist games 01 and 02. These three I am able to connect
> >> immediately via windows media player. All the others I have not been
> >> quite able to figure out to get on.
>
> >>http://www.nudistfun.com/videos/index.html
>
> >I posted about this site on a couple of MySpace forums and it was kind
> >of interesting.
>
> >I had a person on one group stated that he reported the site to this
> >grouphttp://www.asacp.org/page.php?c..report

>
> >He said that group told him those were "Officially" Child Porn.
>
> >I thought it interesting that a Private Group (not Government or Law
> >Enforcement) made that kind of statement and in their "Mission
> >Statement" it reads:
>
> >Founded in 1996, the Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection
> >(ASACP) is a non-profit organization dedicated to eliminating child
> >pornography from the Internet. ASACP battles child pornography through
> >its CP reporting hotline, and by organizing the efforts of the online
> >adult industry to combat the heinous crime of child sexual abuse.
> >ASACP also works to help parents prevent children from viewing age-
> >inappropriate material online.
>
> More power to their elbow
>
> >You think they might be a little bit biased?
>
> When will you realize that the only people not "biased" against your
> beloved child pornography are pedophiles?
>
> Nobody except perverts wants to be in the least open minded about
> kiddie fucking or dirty old men, such as yourself,masturbating to
> images of naked pre-teens.
>
> Normal folk want to vomit at the very thought of your activities.
> --
>
> When dealing with children, "consensual" is not
> the legitimizing criterion it is for adults.
> Indeed, almost invariably, sexual predators defend
> their "loving" physical relationships with children
> as being "consensual," when in reality the seduction
> and manipulation of children -- resulting in their
> "consent" -- is both an art form and the stock in trade
> of pedophiles.
>
> Dr Judith Reisman- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I would invite you to come here for a face to face, but it would
probably be a waste of words and I'd waste a day off from work waiting
for you, because you wouldn't have the cajones to show up.

Dan MacKay

unread,
Sep 11, 2007, 9:32:05 PM9/11/07
to
On Sep 11, 4:26 pm, Dexter Sinatra <spamme...@nospamme.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:03:00 -0700, "R. Steve Walz"

>
>
>
>
>
> <rste...@armory.com> wrote:
> >Dexter Sinatra wrote:
>
> >> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:36:30 -0700, Dan MacKay
> >> <cal1f...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> >> >On Sep 7, 9:22 pm, sportbug <MikeNCalifor...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Everyone together from all ages having great clean fun. No Fear!!
>
> >> >> View first three videos link below scrolling from top to down..Fun at
> >> >> the beach, Naturist games 01 and 02. These three I am able to connect
> >> >> immediately via windows media player. All the others I have not been
> >> >> quite able to figure out to get on.
>
> >> >>http://www.nudistfun.com/videos/index.html
>
> >> >I posted about this site on a couple of MySpace forums and it was kind
> >> >of interesting.
>
> >> >I had a person on one group stated that he reported the site to this
> >> >grouphttp://www.asacp.org/page.php?c..report

>
> >> >He said that group told him those were "Officially" Child Porn.
>
> >> >I thought it interesting that a Private Group (not Government or Law
> >> >Enforcement) made that kind of statement and in their "Mission
> >> >Statement" it reads:
>
> >> >Founded in 1996, the Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection
> >> >(ASACP) is a non-profit organization dedicated to eliminating child
> >> >pornography from the Internet. ASACP battles child pornography through
> >> >its CP reporting hotline, and by organizing the efforts of the online
> >> >adult industry to combat the heinous crime of child sexual abuse.
> >> >ASACP also works to help parents prevent children from viewing age-
> >> >inappropriate material online.
>
> >> More power to their elbow
>
> >> >You think they might be a little bit biased?
>
> >> When will you realize that the only people not "biased" against your
> >> beloved child pornography are pedophiles?
> >-----------------
> >So now you're implying that all nudists are pedophiles.
>
> Your implication not mine oh slimy one.
>
> AFAIAC anyone who masturbates to images of naked pre-teens
> *is* a pedophile that no decent person would want within miles of
> their children whether they are nudists or not.

>
> >Keep it up and at this rate you're shortly going to be outnumbered!
> >Most men like nude little girls anyway. And most women like little
> >boys, they just won't admit it to each other for fear of being labeled a
> >pedophile (WITCH!), except for the ones who are emotionally adult.
>
> Reality Check
>
> Not only are most adults NOT lusting after little boys and girls, but
> such is their abhorrence that they would like to see perverts such as
> yourself shot .
>
>

Wrong, Dextromethorphane!!!

"Most Adults" do not want to see pedophiles shot, that is the immature
minded people like yourself and psychotics like Bo08y.
Most adults realize that incarceration and treatment is more civilized
than what you propose and MOST Adults would be satisfied with merely
keeping such people seperate from children.

>
>
> --
> "In my 30 years in law enforcement, (I've) yet to run across a person
> who had these kinds of tapes for anything other than their own sexual
> gratification," Guzy said. "We see this as a progression, a stepping
>
> More Dennis Guzy Clipped
>

>
> More Dennis Guzy Clipped
>


Does Bo08y know you have the Hots for Guzy?

Dan MacKay

unread,
Sep 11, 2007, 9:34:55 PM9/11/07
to
On Sep 11, 5:09 pm, Dexter Sinatra <spamme...@nospamme.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:30:01 -0000, "Terry J. Wood"
>
>
>
>
>
> <TerryJW...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >"R. Steve Walz" <rste...@armory.com> wrote in news:46E71EA4.4E46
> Get on with your love affair with this foul creature you align
> yourself with.
>
> You yourself are a clear link between pedophilia,child pornography
> and "family nudism"
>
> Just remember if you lie down with dogs you get up with fleas.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

HAH!!!!!!!!!

How did I know this was going to be the answer?

How did I know he was going to use one of the standard dodges?

"You're all the proof I need".

Message has been deleted

James

unread,
Sep 11, 2007, 10:20:25 PM9/11/07
to
On Sep 11, 6:32 pm, Dan MacKay <cal1f...@sbcglobal.net
<mailto:cal1f...@sbcglobal.net> > wrote:

> On Sep 11, 4:26 pm, Dexter Sinatra <spamme...@nospamme.com <mailto:spamme...@nospamme.com> > wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:03:00 -0700, "R. Steve Walz"
>
> > <rste...@armory.com <mailto:rste...@armory.com> > wrote:
> > >Dexter Sinatra wrote:
>
> > >> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:36:30 -0700, Dan MacKay
> > >> <cal1f...@sbcglobal.net <mailto:cal1f...@sbcglobal.net> > wrote:
Does Guzy know???????????


Yech!!!!!!

Ck

unread,
Sep 11, 2007, 10:36:20 PM9/11/07
to
On Sep 11, 8:09 pm, Dexter Sinatra <spamme...@nospamme.com> wrote:

>
> Just remember if you [Terry J. Wood ] lie down with dogs you get up with fleas.

Oh No !!! What now on this site ??? Terry ?? You got fleas ??

www.Fairwindlakes.com

Message has been deleted

Dan MacKay

unread,
Sep 12, 2007, 2:22:14 AM9/12/07
to
On Sep 11, 9:12 pm, Dexter Sinatra <spamme...@nospamme.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:32:05 -0700, Dan MacKay
> http://forums.techguy.org/civilized-debate/474213-should-repeat-child...
>
> 60% disagree with you.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

60% of Techno Geeks???

Yes I looked at your forum and that "Poll" is hardly even worth the
time it took to make let alone run.

Try again little man.

Dan MacKay

unread,
Sep 12, 2007, 2:23:15 AM9/12/07
to

Is Terry still a Nudist with his flea collar???

Message has been deleted

Dan MacKay

unread,
Sep 12, 2007, 8:56:31 AM9/12/07
to
On Sep 11, 6:39 pm, Dexter Sinatra <spamme...@nospamme.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:23:17 -0700, Dan MacKay

>
>
>
>
>
> <cal1f...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >On Sep 11, 3:49 pm, Dexter Sinatra <spamme...@nospamme.com> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:36:30 -0700, Dan MacKay
>
> >> <cal1f...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >> >On Sep 7, 9:22 pm, sportbug <MikeNCalifor...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Everyone together from all ages having great clean fun. No Fear!!
>
> >> >> View first three videos link below scrolling from top to down..Fun at
> >> >> the beach, Naturist games 01 and 02. These three I am able to connect
> >> >> immediately via windows media player. All the others I have not been
> >> >> quite able to figure out to get on.
>
> >> >>http://www.nudistfun.com/videos/index.html
>

>


> >> - Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >I would invite you to come here for a face to face, but it would
> >probably be a waste of words and I'd waste a day off from work waiting
> >for you, because you wouldn't have the cajones to show up.
>

> Pathetic.
>
> Quitting drooling over naked pre-teens would be a better idea.
>
> If you were caught drooling I guess you could try explaining that
> pedophiles,child abusers and incest advocates on Usenet told you it
> was perfectly acceptable.- Hide quoted text -


>
> - Show quoted text -

Yup, I thought so, Dex has no Cajones.

R. Steve Walz

unread,
Sep 12, 2007, 12:19:32 PM9/12/07
to
Dexter Sinatra wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:03:00 -0700, "R. Steve Walz"
> Your implication not mine oh slimy one.
-------------------
No, YOU implied it, you shit-fucking lying little asshole!


> AFAIAC anyone who masturbates to images of naked pre-teens
> *is* a pedophile that no decent person would want within miles of
> their children whether they are nudists or not.

------------------------
Nonsense. No one masturbating is any threat to anyone, and once
having done so they are sated for many hours or days. And if you
knew the person as a friend, and your kids did as well and were
sexually informed and desired sexual contact, they might well be
interested in helping the person out with their problem. Sex isn't
any different than any other activity.

The only thing that makes it such a squick for you clowns is your
brainwashing with shame and embarrassment about sexuality. You see
sexuality for kids as something hideous, with no basis whatsoever.
You imagine that surely any kid is going to respond with frightened
horror to sexual advances, and why? Just because after your sick
brainwsshing as a child against sexuality, you know that YOU did!
In other words, you're trying to define normality by YOUR illness!

For your information, LOTS of informed and experienced "children"
are having sex every day, and loving it. And you won't be able to
"keep them down on the farm, after they've seen Paris!" That's why
the more sexual exposure in this society that we can achieve, the
more people will see that people like you are fucking nutcakes!


> >Keep it up and at this rate you're shortly going to be outnumbered!
> >Most men like nude little girls anyway. And most women like little
> >boys, they just won't admit it to each other for fear of being labeled a
> >pedophile (WITCH!), except for the ones who are emotionally adult.
>

> Reality Check
>
> Not only are most adults NOT lusting after little boys and girls, but
> such is their abhorrence that they would like to see perverts such as
> yourself shot .

---------------------------------
That's what they SAY to each other because of their terror of what
others might think of them, they go over the top trying to prove they
are the "same as everybody else". It is ALL THE STRONGER BECAUSE THEY
KNOW THEY AREN'T, like a closeted gay who affects reactionism!

In reality, almost ALL men will become erect when viewing kiddie porn
that isn't violent. And all women lubricate at the same sight. And
that isn't "their body betraying them", that's them fantasizing in
their minds anc causing their sexual drive to engage!

Show us more shocking stuff, they say, like a bunch of old ladies
at a church social gossiping about who doesn't wear panties and why!
Sex is the biggest drive in humans, and you can't defeat it!


> >> Nobody except perverts wants to be in the least open minded about
> >> kiddie fucking or dirty old men, such as yourself,masturbating to
> >> images of naked pre-teens.
> >---------------------------
> >Then everyone is a pervert. They just won't admit it till we get to
> >the tipping point.
>

> So runs your demented mantra.
----------------------------
So runs the Truth!


> >> Normal folk want to vomit at the very thought of your activities.
> >-------------------------
> >Nope, they fantasize about it all the time, they only vomit at being
> >called a pedophile.
>

> Project much?
-----------------------------
I don't have to, I know what humans feel and think.
You hide from it.


> >> Dr Judith Reisman
> >------------------
> >Reisman's the shit who slandered Kinsey, and her "degree" is in art,
> >to whit, "Communications", the EASY (mailorder) major.
> >Steve
>

> As usual you show your total ignorance
>
> http://www.case.edu/artsci/cosi/
>
> The Department of Communication Sciences prepares undergraduate and
> graduate students to address broad issues of human communication
> processes and disorders through the application of cutting-edge
> technology and rigorous clinical training.
-----------------------------
Ad-man puffery. Diploma mills say the same thing. The thing about
"Communications" is, WHAT ISN'T COMMUNICATIONS?? It's a catch-all
for anything you want to toss-off for a degree, any hack skreed
you want to promote.
Steve

R. Steve Walz

unread,
Sep 12, 2007, 12:29:38 PM9/12/07
to
Dexter Sinatra wrote:
>
> Dennis Guzy
>
> Dennis Guzy has spent over 30 years in Law Enforcement and 20 years
[]

> "In my 30 years in law enforcement, (I've) yet to run across a person
> who had these kinds of tapes for anything other than their own sexual
> gratification," Guzy said.
-----------------------
What a revelation! Let's give that clown a grant to "research" it
so he can tell us the same thing everybody already knows!!


> "We see this as a progression, a stepping

> stone for an individual who ultimately might be interested in hard
> core child pornography or molestation of children."
> Dennis Guzy
---------------------------------
And here's where he digresses into insanity. There is NO such step-wise
"progression" to crime inherent in the enjoyment of porn. NONE of the
reputable research shows any such thing, instead they show that porn
ASSUAGES desires, and does it repeatedly, and WITHOUT any instigation
to harm others or "do it for real".

If anything the reputable research DOES show that porn introduced
into a population REDUCES ALL forms of sex crime!!

Such a notion as "step-wise progression" is antiscientific, like
claiming that because all heroin addicts chew gum, that gum-chewing
causes heroin addiction! Porn causes nothing but sticky sheets.
It is nothing but rank foolish superstition.

If anything causes sexual assaults it has nothing to do with porn,
and everything to do with either NOT using porn, or NOT GETTING to
use porn!
Steve

R. Steve Walz

unread,
Sep 12, 2007, 12:31:14 PM9/12/07
to
Dexter Sinatra wrote:
> http://forums.techguy.org/civilized-debate/474213-should-repeat-child-molesters-face.html
>
> 60% disagree with you.
---------------
No, just 60% of those who respond to calls for people
who think that way.
Steve
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

R. Steve Walz

unread,
Sep 12, 2007, 1:03:56 PM9/12/07
to
Dexter Sinatra wrote:

>
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:19:32 -0700, "R. Steve Walz"
> <rst...@armory.com> wrote:
>
> >> >So now you're implying that all nudists are pedophiles.
> >>
> >> Your implication not mine oh slimy one.
> >-------------------
> >No, YOU implied it, you shit-fucking lying little asshole!
>
> I implied no such thing.
--------------------------
You did indeed.


> The degenerates that congregate on rec.nude and embrace you do not
> represent decent naturists

> You and your wife might, and you may have trained your children to,
> but your family is NOT representative .
--------------------------
Nope, well-researched, EVERYONE does. That can't even BE trained.

> > And
> >that isn't "their body betraying them", that's them fantasizing in
> >their minds anc causing their sexual drive to engage!
> >
> >Show us more shocking stuff, they say, like a bunch of old ladies
> >at a church social gossiping about who doesn't wear panties and why!
> >Sex is the biggest drive in humans, and you can't defeat it!

> >> Project much?
> >-----------------------------
> >I don't have to, I know what humans feel and think.
> >You hide from it.
>

> Your degenerate family may lust after children and watch child
> pornography routinely.
-----------------
No, we don't NEED to.
And if you do it for real it isn't needed.


> Most people go from cradle to grave without ever coming in contact
> with it.
---------------------
You're delusional.
Steve

R. Steve Walz

unread,
Sep 12, 2007, 1:06:35 PM9/12/07
to
Dexter Sinatra wrote:
> It would be good to see you explaining all this in an interrogation
> room.
--------------
You're a cowardly little shit who wastes his time with attempts at
intimidation instead of reason. You will always fail miserably.
Steve

Anna

unread,
Sep 12, 2007, 1:58:24 PM9/12/07
to
On Sep 12, 9:19 am, "R. Steve Walz" <rste...@armory.com> wrote:
> Dexter Sinatra wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:03:00 -0700, "R. Steve Walz"
> > <rste...@armory.com> wrote:
>
> > >Dexter Sinatra wrote:
>
> > >> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:36:30 -0700, Dan MacKay
> > >> <cal1f...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> > >> >On Sep 7, 9:22 pm, sportbug <MikeNCalifor...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >> Everyone together from all ages having great clean fun. No Fear!!
>
> > >> >> View first three videos link below scrolling from top to down..Fun at
> > >> >> the beach, Naturist games 01 and 02. These three I am able to connect
> > >> >> immediately via windows media player. All the others I have not been
> > >> >> quite able to figure out to get on.
>
> > >> >>http://www.nudistfun.com/videos/index.html
>
> > >> >I posted about this site on a couple of MySpace forums and it was kind
> > >> >of interesting.
>
> > >> >I had a person on one group stated that he reported the site to this
> > >> >grouphttp://www.asacp.org/page.php?c..report

You aren't for real are you? I sure hope you aren't. These are the
kinds of people we need to keep out of nudist venues.

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

David

unread,
Sep 12, 2007, 2:45:05 PM9/12/07
to
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 10:58:24 -0700, Anna <annal...@lycos.com> typed
furiously:

You and your fundie-anti-sexual ilk are what needs to be kept out of
society.
--
Regards
David
fundamentalism (n.): fund = give cash to; amentalism = brainlessness

wonderer

unread,
Sep 12, 2007, 4:59:32 PM9/12/07
to

"Dexter Sinatra" <spam...@nospamme.com> wrote in message
news:fj5ge3t3dd1o7b2b5...@4ax.com...

> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:29:38 -0700, "R. Steve Walz"
> <rst...@armory.com> wrote:
>
> It would be good to see you explaining all this in an interrogation
> room.

why, there have been studies done that support that idea.


nudist_emy

unread,
Sep 12, 2007, 10:01:39 PM9/12/07
to
On Sep 12, 12:41 pm, Dexter Sinatra <spamme...@nospamme.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:29:38 -0700, "R. Steve Walz"
>
>
>
> It would be good to see you explaining all this in an interrogation
> room.

always the threats of violence and incarceration.

bobandcarole

unread,
Sep 12, 2007, 10:13:15 PM9/12/07
to

Truth hurts doesn't it, moron?


nudist_emy

unread,
Sep 12, 2007, 10:38:03 PM9/12/07
to
On Sep 9, 11:36 pm, Dexter Sinatra <spamme...@nospamme.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 19:58:39 -0700, James <jmneighb...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Sep 8, 2:47 pm, Dexter Sinatra <spamme...@nospamme.com
> ><mailto:spamme...@nospamme.com> > wrote:
> >> On Sat, 08 Sep 2007 02:32:00 -0700, Jenny6833A <Jenny68...@aol.com <mailto:Jenny68...@aol.com> >
> >> wrote:

>
> >> >On Sep 7, 9:22?pm, sportbug <MikeNCalifor...@hotmail.com <mailto:MikeNCalifor...@hotmail.com> > wrote:
> >> >> Everyone together from all ages having great clean fun. No Fear!!
>
> >> >> View first three videos link below scrolling from top to down..Fun at
> >> >> the beach, Naturist games 01 and 02. These three I am able to connect
> >> >> immediately via windows media player. All the others I have not been
> >> >> quite able to figure out to get on.
>
> >> >>http://www.nudistfun.com/videos/index.html
>

those are nice videos showing well adjusted families having fun. no
doubt seeing such pictures make people like booby, anna, brandon and
dexter want to claw their eyes out. the last thing they want to see
are well adjusted people or fun.

nudist_emy

unread,
Sep 12, 2007, 10:44:48 PM9/12/07
to

booby you have no truth. instead of logic you have violence. instead
of rational thinking you have threats. booby why cant you just admit
your sickness and depravity and seek treatment. i hear shock
treatments are not painful anymore you might actually enjoy it.

David

unread,
Sep 13, 2007, 4:23:31 PM9/13/07
to
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 19:13:15 -0700, bobandcarole
<bobandc...@hotmail.com> typed furiously:

Do you really need to admit your failings, Bo0by?

bobandcarole

unread,
Sep 13, 2007, 4:32:51 PM9/13/07
to

You uneducated, bizarre creature...LOL!!!
Did your father tell you that as he banged your ass?


wonderer

unread,
Sep 13, 2007, 5:31:25 PM9/13/07
to

"bobandcarole" <bobandc...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189715571.8...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

boob you sound just like a rapist

>
>


magnolia jackson

unread,
Sep 13, 2007, 7:00:14 PM9/13/07
to
"wonderer" <pir...@bigpond.com> wrote in
news:N_hGi.225$9r...@news-server.bigpond.net.au:

Now, wonderer, I could be misreading you.

But in prior posts you seem to have made it very clear that you believe
children to be far less harmed by sexual interaction with grown-ups than
the main-stream.

Why, then, do you chose being banged in the ass by his father to be the
single most insulting thing you could say to booby?
>
>>
>>
>
>
>

wonderer

unread,
Sep 13, 2007, 7:49:05 PM9/13/07
to

"magnolia jackson" <forgotmypa...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns99AAA67664487a...@66.250.146.159...

the way boob acts, he enjoys analy raping people/children

>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>


Message has been deleted

wonderer

unread,
Sep 13, 2007, 10:08:20 PM9/13/07
to

"lurker" <lur...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:fdkje35adjl7k9skh...@4ax.com...
> The worst insult you can think of is to suggest he is like you?
>
> Sad.

ah! well, can't please them all


magnolia jackson

unread,
Sep 13, 2007, 9:57:38 PM9/13/07
to
"wonderer" <pir...@bigpond.com> wrote in news:R%jGi.269$9r.186@news-
server.bigpond.net.au:

guess i haven't been around long enough to see that. thanks for
responding.
>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>

magnolia jackson

unread,
Sep 13, 2007, 10:00:06 PM9/13/07
to
lurker <lur...@nowhere.com> wrote in
news:fdkje35adjl7k9skh...@4ax.com:

> On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 23:49:05 GMT, "wonderer" <pir...@bigpond.com>
> wrote:
>
>>

> The worst insult you can think of is to suggest he is like you?
>
> Sad.

> .

That's kind of what I was getting at. Clearly, though, I need to be
paying closer attention before I hurry off replies. I tend to jump in
with both feet, as they say........

R. Steve Walz

unread,
Sep 13, 2007, 11:39:58 PM9/13/07
to
--------------
You mean under-educated reactionary degree-mill dildos like her?

If that's who your "moral guaradians" are, you should look for some
new and different ones.

You can't even respond properly, you insert an insult at the end as
your only reaction, and expect it to stand as if it were reasoned and
logical. It ain't.
Steve

R. Steve Walz

unread,
Sep 13, 2007, 11:44:45 PM9/13/07
to
Dexter Sinatra wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 10:58:24 -0700, Anna <annal...@lycos.com>
> I am afraid he is.
---------------------
Betcher ass!


> >> From a twisted sexual deviate such as yourself, who claims all women
> >> wish to fuck little boys and all men want to and should fuck their
> >> children, that doesn't mean very much.
> >----------------
> >Except to the VAST MAJORITY of people who believe it too!
> >
> >The proportion of men who wouldn't lick their 10 or 11 y/o daughter's
> >pussy if she begged for it is MINISCULE!
>
> > And even though women are
> >much more brainwashed against taking such dangerous chances, every
> >thing for women relies upon deniability and secrecy.
>
> > If their son
> >came to them and wanted to fuck them, they'd finally do it after
> >enough flattery, even if they had to play like they were "unconscious"
> >or "seduced".
> >Steve


>
> >These are the
> >kinds of people we need to keep out of nudist venues.
>

> On the contrary, rec.nude seems to be embracing him.
> Hence the comment if you lie down with digs you get up with fleas.
>
> They seem to just think it as amusing.
-------------------------
We'd find you amusing, if we didn't think you were so dangerous
to freedom and the safety of everybody in the world.


> IMO they are as bad as the pornographers and pedophiles they enable
---------------------
Pornographers are excellent people, the kind we need to rescue
the world from antisexual SHIT LIKE YOU!


> Dr Judith Reisman
---------------------
The stupid Fundie bitch that slandered Kinsey.
Steve

R. Steve Walz

unread,
Sep 13, 2007, 11:52:18 PM9/13/07
to
Dexter Sinatra wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 10:06:35 -0700, "R. Steve Walz"
> Now why on earth should you find explaining your activities to the
> police intimidating?
-------------------------
Why would you find my pistol in your mouth intimidating.


> According to you everybody ,including the police fuck children. or
> want to.
>
> Surely they would understand?
------------------------------
People have been brainwashed. You're the prime example.


> --


> "In my 30 years in law enforcement, (I've) yet to run across a person
> who had these kinds of tapes for anything other than their own sexual
> gratification," Guzy said.
----------

Duh!


> "We see this as a progression, a stepping
> stone for an individual who ultimately might be interested in hard
> core child pornography or molestation of children."
> Dennis Guzy
---------------

There isn't any "step-wise progression" to "the harder stuff". Porn
assuages lust, not enflames it, all the reputable research indicates.

Kiddie porn does the same for pedos. If it wasn't the kind that was
evidence of a genuine crime of coercion and violence, then it would
be harmless.


> Dennis Guzy has spent over 30 years in Law Enforcement

----------------
Means nothing, like asking your mechanic to design car engines or your
TV repairman to design a new television. Mechanics are like one-trick
ponies, they only know the remedies they were taught, NOT whether the
usage of a device is appropriate or correct!
Steve

R. Steve Walz

unread,
Sep 13, 2007, 11:53:17 PM9/13/07
to
---------------------
You'd know better than us from YOUR aches and pains, you shithead.
Steve

R. Steve Walz

unread,
Sep 14, 2007, 12:15:54 AM9/14/07
to
magnolia jackson wrote:
>
> "wonderer" <pir...@bigpond.com> wrote in
> news:N_hGi.225$9r...@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
>
> >> You uneducated, bizarre creature...LOL!!!
> >> Did your father tell you that as he banged your ass?
> >
> > boob you sound just like a rapist
>
> Now, wonderer, I could be misreading you.
>
> But in prior posts you seem to have made it very clear that you believe
> children to be far less harmed by sexual interaction with grown-ups than
> the main-stream.
------------------------
By CONSENSUAL sexual interaction with SANE people. That is quite
limiting, we know, but some of us actually exist!


> Why, then, do you chose being banged in the ass by his father to be the
> single most insulting thing you could say to booby?

----------------
Because antisexuals are, at heart, beaten abused damaged children,
those who kenw little or no kind and loving interaction with their
parents. In other words, antisexuals are like homophobes, closet
queers who hide who they are with contradictory bluster and over
the top opposition. They can't imagine anyone loving, consensually,
and with great love and kindness, something similar, but actually
altogether different than what they went through as frightening
coercive brutal child-rape! They doubt the actual loving nature of
good sex, and know only sex as it was originally administered to
them, as brutal violence.

This society thinks sex and violence go together ONLY because so many
of its people want to do violence to those who only want to have sex.

They do this because they were taught sex by violence to one degree
or another, from being smacked when they wouldn't keep their clothes
on as a small child, which is so traumatic they can't even rememnber
it, to being beaten for masturbating, which results in fetishistic
behaviors like BDSM and piercing and cutting and anorexia/bulemia
and obesity, to the systematic denial in this society of sex as
early as humans actually need it by as much as a decade, which then
permanently distorts and damages people's self-esteem and sense of
self-worth and personal attractivensess till they are socially
crippled!!

What do I mean?:

Listen: They can't live with others except in a rigid pecking order
called the nuclear family, because they only understand domination
and submission psychology, and are unable to actually cooperate with
others to get their personal needs met sexually and affectionately.

The only way they know how to treat someone, like their wife and
children, is either as a submissive whom they can dominate, or to
submit to them and be dominated.

They have to live in little sound-proof boxes only a few feet apart
because they have never been taught how to get along as equals and
friends. They don't really HAVE any friends, except for workplace
acquaintances whom they feel they must keep out of their personal
lives as far too embarrassing!!

They have even been made so paranoid by this abuse that they can't
organize to obtain health care and guaranteed employment and free
housing and equal wages for everyone, as any bunch of sanely and
properly socialized people would normally do.
Steve

ThePsyko

unread,
Sep 14, 2007, 12:25:44 PM9/14/07
to
On 13 Sep 2007 I stormed the castle called alt.hackers.malicious and
heard wonderer cry out in
news:o2mGi.320$9r....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

But you'll try if they're underage though won't you!

--
ThePsyko
Public Enemy #7

**Pissing off the planet, one person at a time**

nudist_emy

unread,
Sep 14, 2007, 3:41:22 PM9/14/07
to

no actually he didnt say anything while his cock slipped up my ass.
sure felt good tho. so what did your dad say while he did it to you?
or was he too busy whipping you with his belt?

wonderer

unread,
Sep 14, 2007, 5:13:49 PM9/14/07
to

"ThePsyko" <thep...@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in message
news:Xns99AB5FD58F...@nntp.petitmorte.net...

what part of celebate don't you understand

ThePsyko

unread,
Sep 14, 2007, 6:15:09 PM9/14/07
to
On 14 Sep 2007 I stormed the castle called alt.hackers.malicious and

heard wonderer cry out in
news:hQCGi.906$9r....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

you're only celebate because of your medical conditions

wonderer

unread,
Sep 14, 2007, 10:53:19 PM9/14/07
to

"ThePsyko" <thep...@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in message
news:Xns99AB9B38CE...@nntp.petitmorte.net...

ROFL, i don't have any medical condition, i am imune to all colds and flu,
but i believe that you are not.

bobandcarole

unread,
Sep 14, 2007, 10:59:42 PM9/14/07
to
On Sep 14, 10:53?pm, "wonderer" <pir...@bigpond.com> wrote:
> "ThePsyko" <theps...@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in message

>
> news:Xns99AB9B38CE...@nntp.petitmorte.net...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 14 Sep 2007 I stormed the castle called alt.hackers.malicious and
> > heard wonderer cry out in
> >news:hQCGi.906$9r....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> >> "ThePsyko" <theps...@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in message

> >>news:Xns99AB5FD58F...@nntp.petitmorte.net...
> >>> On 13 Sep 2007 I stormed the castle called alt.hackers.malicious and
> >>> heard wonderer cry out in
> >>>news:o2mGi.320$9r....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> >>>> "lurker" <lur...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >>>>news:fdkje35adjl7k9skh...@4ax.com...
> >>>>> On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 23:49:05 GMT, "wonderer" <pir...@bigpond.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>"magnolia jackson" <forgotmypassw0rdag...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> >>>>>>messagenews:Xns99AAA67664487a...@66.250.146.159...

> >>>>>>> "wonderer" <pir...@bigpond.com> wrote in
> >>>>>>>news:N_hGi.225$9r...@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
>
> >>>>>>>> "bobandcarole" <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHA

So disease doesn't affect you, huh pedophile?
Got a force field or what???

wonderer

unread,
Sep 15, 2007, 12:15:19 AM9/15/07
to

"bobandcarole" <bobandc...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189825182....@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

genuine imunity, herts does'nt it


>
>
>


magnolia jackson

unread,
Sep 15, 2007, 2:50:51 PM9/15/07
to
ThePsyko <thep...@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in
news:Xns99AB5FD58F...@nntp.petitmorte.net:

O.K., look, Psyko, I may have taken a dig at you once or twice because
you seem to have a hidden agenda and to have bully capacity. Then
again, you certainly don't bully like some do here, and I suppose we all
have some sort of hidden agenda or another.

BUT, do NOT make assumptions about me.

Though I may have more of a heart for childlovers, etc than you do, that
does not mean I try to "please" "all" underager's, nor that I've ever
even pleased one, not in the the context you mean.

Check yourself, Psyko.

In a bit of a hurry, perhaps?
A bit reflexive?
Maybe a little paranoid?

Look I'm happy to state my agenda if someone wants to know it, but until
you ask me, and I tell you, back the fuck off and don't jump to
conclusions.

Love,
magnolia

ThePsyko

unread,
Sep 20, 2007, 12:30:13 PM9/20/07
to
On 15 Sep 2007 I stormed the castle called alt.support.boy-lovers and
heard magnolia jackson cry out in
news:Xns99AC7C3738AD2a...@66.250.146.159...

Awfully paranoid and defensive about a post directed at somebody other
than yourself, aren't you?

>
> Though I may have more of a heart for childlovers, etc than you do,
> that does not mean I try to "please" "all" underager's, nor that I've
> ever even pleased one, not in the the context you mean.
>
> Check yourself, Psyko.
>
> In a bit of a hurry, perhaps?
> A bit reflexive?
> Maybe a little paranoid?
>
> Look I'm happy to state my agenda if someone wants to know it, but
> until you ask me, and I tell you, back the fuck off and don't jump to
> conclusions.

OMG I bet you're cute when you're angry :)

Unless your nostrils are flaring.. that's a good indication that it's
time to run! lol

bobandcarole®

unread,
Nov 3, 2007, 9:47:04 AM11/3/07
to

"well adjusted" exhibitionists? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!


R. Steve Walz

unread,
Nov 3, 2007, 8:00:08 PM11/3/07
to
--------------
For you to be nude publically you'd have to be an exhibitionist,
that's because you're neurotic.

For many of the rest of us it's just normal.
Steve

0 new messages