Testing
Twonky
***************************
****************** ************ *************************
*****************
***************** ****************** ********************
*****************
***************** ************ ************* ************
******************
The Almighty is all about the singularity of electricity, duality of
Positive and Negative energy. Energy to matter, the Natural
Creation, Genetics, Life, Life immortal, Knowledge of Positive
and Negative, Psychology, Interbreeding, Inbreeding, Mortality,
and Technology....
Twonky
> ****** ********** *************** **************
> *************************** ******** ****** ***
> ****************** ************ ****************
> ******** ********* ********* ********* ***** ***
> ***************** ****************** **********
> ********** ************ **************** ******
> ****** ************ ****** ***** ** *** 88 * **
Twonky
>
> - Show quoted text -
The Almighty is all about...the singularity of electricity.
And the duality of Positive and Negative energy igniting,
spinning energy into matter that ignites into stars, creating
companion planets. "ENOUGH" He said. Ask yourself, "Enough
what?" Enough stars with companions, on which He could create
life....?
Black holes recycle matter back out the center, in such a way,
as to keep Creation perpetual....
See...black holes serve a purpose....
Bob Casanova
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Twonky
<01910i...@gmail.com>:
Failed; you're still getting through. Try again.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
Twonky
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 01:52:20 -0800 (PST), the following
> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Twonky
>
> Failed; you're still getting through. Try again.
Maybe it was meant to be.....
Bob Casanova
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Twonky
>On Jan 13, 4:12�pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 01:52:20 -0800 (PST), the following
>> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Twonky
>> <01910infin...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Failed; you're still getting through. Try again.
>
>Maybe it was meant to be.....
The inmates are in charge of the asylum?
Twonky
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:54:23 -0800 (PST), the following
> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Twonky
>
> >On Jan 13, 4:12 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 01:52:20 -0800 (PST), the following
> >> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Twonky
> >> <01910infin...@gmail.com>:
>
> >> Failed; you're still getting through. Try again.
>
> >Maybe it was meant to be.....
>
> The inmates are in charge of the asylum?
Yeah. Those like you.....
Who ignore 'stem cells' to make man in their
image and likenness. And genes, from him,
to make his wife.....
Stem cells are the stuff of Almighty God. Man
is walking His turf.....and doesn't even know it.
Man thinks he is the only in HaShem's Creation
(Man's Univserse) that has the knowledge....
If it wasn't for Cain. We would still be the Neanderthal.
Not being able to know our HaShem. And not in the
situation as Cain, to having commune with HaShem.
We commune 24/7. You think I come up with this shit
on my own? I have the gift of Wisdom.......
And tongues...praising he and my Father (evidentally
not yourss) Logos HaShem.......
.
> --
>
> Bob C.
>
> "Evidence confirming an observation is
> evidence that the observation is wrong."
> - McNameless
How about the evidence I present, for observing Islam
and Judaism exist on the planet. And they that they have
an origin....
Is that wrong? Would you like I share the evidence and
observation with you.....?
~>
Twonky....
Interbred hybrid of Cain, and inbred hybrid of Seth...
A dumbed down, Modern HOMO Sapien. I am NOT
evolved from Darwinian think. I am of HaShem's ways.....
And He is all about...
The Singularity of Electricity, Duality of Positive and
Negative, Energy to matter, the Natural Creation,
Genenetics, Life, Life immortal, Knowledge of Positive
and Negative, Pshycology, interbreeding, inbreeding,
mortality, and Technology....
Twonky
> On Jan 14, 6:45 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>
>
>
> Bob C.
>
> "Evidence confirming an observation is
> evidence that the observation is wrong."
> - McNameless
How about the evidence that is put in front of you?
Observing and confirming Islam and Judaism exist
on the planet,. as a sound fact....
And that they have an origin....
NOT a fairy tale....fact also.....
Can you see the genetics and psychology involved?
If so. You can see the kingdom.....
Anyone can.....
1500 cubic miles in size. How can you miss it in the
mind and soul of your psyche? Easy. Just not shown
to you....
What would you do, if you saw it, blocking the sun....?
Or hovering above the Earth.....?
Good questions all.....
~>
Twonky....
Interbred hybrid of Cain, and inbred hybrid of Seth...
A dumbed down, interbred/inbred Modern HOMO
Sapien. I am NOT evolved from Darwinian think....
I am of HaShem's ways.....
And He is all about...
The Singularity in the Energy of Electricity, Schizoid
in the Duality of Positive and Negative, Energy to
matter, the Natural Creation, Genetics, Life, Life
immortal, Knowledge of Positive and Negative,
Psychology, interbreeding, mortality, inbreeding,
and Technology....
What would you say, if I told you, "Creation", is a
hyper dimensional computer program....
A hierarchical, hyper dimensional, single player,
game. "Creator Owner" is seen in "Security
Options".. In Windows OS anyway....
I wonder if He plays remotely....
Bob Casanova
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Twonky
>On Jan 15, 12:53 pm, Twonky <01910infin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jan 14, 6:45 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>
><<<SNIP>>>
>>
>>
>> Bob C.
>>
>> "Evidence confirming an observation is
>> evidence that the observation is wrong."
>> - McNameless
>
>How about the evidence that is put in front of you?
Don't feel bad; you're not the first semi-literate to fail
to realize that my sig is intended to show the incompetence
regarding logical thought of people like McCoy. I suppose if
you're surrounded by trees it's hard to see the forest.
<snip>
--
Twonky
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:47:25 -0800 (PST), the following
> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Twonky
>
> >On Jan 15, 12:53 pm, Twonky <01910infin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Jan 14, 6:45 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>
> ><<<SNIP>>>
>
> >> Bob C.
>
> >> "Evidence confirming an observation is
> >> evidence that the observation is wrong."
> >> - McNameless
>
> >How about the evidence that is put in front of you?
>
> Don't feel bad; you're not the first semi-literate to fail
> to realize that my sig is intended to show the incompetence
> regarding logical thought of people like McCoy. I suppose if
> you're surrounded by trees it's hard to see the forest.
You're not talking about me. Sounds like you're talking
about your self centered, self......
>
> <snip>
The truth of we being a species of interbred/inbred
hybrids. Wouldn't you rather be that than evolved
from you don't know, and will never know, what....
> --
>
> Bob C.
>
> "Evidence confirming an observation is
> evidence that the observation is wrong."
> - McNameless
Consider the evidence confirming the observation
that Islam and Judaism exist. And have an origin....
The evidence is...
Genesis 16...
Genesis 17....
Bob Casanova
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Twonky
>On Jan 16, 12:20 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>> On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:47:25 -0800 (PST), the following
>> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Twonky
>> <01910infin...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> >On Jan 15, 12:53 pm, Twonky <01910infin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Jan 14, 6:45 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>
>> ><<<SNIP>>>
>>
>> >> Bob C.
>>
>> >> "Evidence confirming an observation is
>> >> evidence that the observation is wrong."
>> >> - McNameless
>>
>> >How about the evidence that is put in front of you?
>>
>> Don't feel bad; you're not the first semi-literate to fail
>> to realize that my sig is intended to show the incompetence
>> regarding logical thought of people like McCoy. I suppose if
>> you're surrounded by trees it's hard to see the forest.
>
>You're not talking about me.
Based on your question, yes, I am.
Twonky
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:54:44 -0800 (PST), the following
> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Twonky
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Jan 16, 12:20 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:47:25 -0800 (PST), the following
> >> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Twonky
> >> <01910infin...@gmail.com>:
>
> >> >On Jan 15, 12:53 pm, Twonky <01910infin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> On Jan 14, 6:45 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>
> >> ><<<SNIP>>>
>
> >> >> Bob C.
>
> >> >> "Evidence confirming an observation is
> >> >> evidence that the observation is wrong."
> >> >> - McNameless
>
> >> >How about the evidence that is put in front of you?
>
> >> Don't feel bad; you're not the first semi-literate to fail
> >> to realize that my sig is intended to show the incompetence
> >> regarding logical thought of people like McCoy. I suppose if
> >> you're surrounded by trees it's hard to see the forest.
>
> >You're not talking about me.
>
> Based on your question, yes, I am.
What question....?
"Wouldn't you rather be a hybrid, than evolved from you don't know
what?" (That one)....?
And will NEVER know from what you evolved! Ya'll die in that lie.....
Congratulation....
> --
>
> Bob C.
>
> "Evidence confirming an observation is
> evidence that the observation is wrong."
> - McNameless- Hide quoted text -
Bob Casanova
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Twonky
>On Jan 17, 2:15 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>> On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:54:44 -0800 (PST), the following
>> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Twonky
>> <01910infin...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Jan 16, 12:20 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:47:25 -0800 (PST), the following
>> >> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Twonky
>> >> <01910infin...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> >> >On Jan 15, 12:53 pm, Twonky <01910infin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> On Jan 14, 6:45 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>
>> >> ><<<SNIP>>>
>>
>> >> >> Bob C.
>>
>> >> >> "Evidence confirming an observation is
>> >> >> evidence that the observation is wrong."
>> >> >> - McNameless
>>
>> >> >How about the evidence that is put in front of you?
>>
>> >> Don't feel bad; you're not the first semi-literate to fail
>> >> to realize that my sig is intended to show the incompetence
>> >> regarding logical thought of people like McCoy. I suppose if
>> >> you're surrounded by trees it's hard to see the forest.
>>
>> >You're not talking about me.
>>
>> Based on your question, yes, I am.
>
>What question....?
The one just above. The only one you asked above. The one
everyone but you can see above. The one, although you
apparently didn't realize it, you were asking of John McCoy
("McNameless"), since it was his idiocy I was quoting in my
sig. The one you apparently thought was my claim, rather
then an exhibition of the "thought" processes of morons.
<snip>
Twonky
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:34:21 -0800 (PST), the following
> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Twonky
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Jan 17, 2:15 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:54:44 -0800 (PST), the following
> >> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Twonky
> >> <01910infin...@gmail.com>:
>
> >> >On Jan 16, 12:20 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >> >> On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:47:25 -0800 (PST), the following
> >> >> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Twonky
> >> >> <01910infin...@gmail.com>:
>
> >> >> >On Jan 15, 12:53 pm, Twonky <01910infin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Jan 14, 6:45 pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>
> >> >> ><<<SNIP>>>
>
> >> >> >> Bob C.
>
> >> >> >> "Evidence confirming an observation is
> >> >> >> evidence that the observation is wrong."
> >> >> >> - McNameless
>
> >> >> >How about the evidence that is put in front of you?
>
> >> >> Don't feel bad; you're not the first semi-literate to fail
> >> >> to realize that my sig is intended to show the incompetence
> >> >> regarding logical thought of people like McCoy. I suppose if
> >> >> you're surrounded by trees it's hard to see the forest.
>
> >> >You're not talking about me.
>
> >> Based on your question, yes, I am.
>
> >What question....?
>
> The one just above.
"How about the evidence that I put put in front of you proving
the origin of Islam and Judaism?" (revised)
> The only one you asked above. The one everyone but you
> can see above. The one, although you apparently didn't
> realize it, you were asking of John McCoy ("McNameless"),
> since it was his idiocy I was quoting in my sig. The one you
> apparently thought was my claim, rather then an exhibition
> of the "thought" processes of morons.
Oh that one. Didn't you like my 'reaction' to it....?
>
> <snip>
> --
>
> Bob C.
>
> "Evidence confirming an observation is
> evidence that the observation is wrong."
> - McNameless-
Not anymore. His name is -McCoy.
Bob Casanova
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Twonky
Why don't you ask McCoy, since it's his statement you're
addressing? And just FYI, your assertions aren't "proof",
nor is the fact that both Islam and Judaism exist; existence
isn't evidence of origin.
>> The only one you asked above. The one everyone but you
>> can see above. The one, although you apparently didn't
>> realize it, you were asking of John McCoy ("McNameless"),
>> since it was his idiocy I was quoting in my sig. The one you
>> apparently thought was my claim, rather then an exhibition
>> of the "thought" processes of morons.
>
>Oh that one. Didn't you like my 'reaction' to it....?
You had a reaction to it?
>> <snip>
>> --
>>
>> Bob C.
>>
>> "Evidence confirming an observation is
>> evidence that the observation is wrong."
>> � � � � � � � � � � � � � - McNameless-
>
>Not anymore. His name is -McCoy.
Yes, and always has been; in fact, I informed you of this
just above. The fact that he once searched the newsgroups
for any mention of his name, in order to contribute his
idiocies to ongoing threads, led many to begin to refer to
him as "McNameless".
HybridArchangel/Messenger of HaShem
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 05:58:10 -0800 (PST), the following
> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Twonky
Don't like my defence....?
> nor is the fact that both Islam and Judaism exist; existence
> isn't evidence of origin.
They BOTH have an ancestral seed. Their origin IS fact....
And entails the Almighty God. That's why the half asses,
that make up one big Ass whole, want nothing to do with
interbreeding with a modern human. Cain...is ignored.
And Darwin remains the ONLY theory that proves correct!
Read it and learn something of (y))our present day reality
originates.........
Genesis 16, Islam...
Genesis 17, Judaism....
Isaiah 14:12...meet the angel in Genesis 16.....
Don't you think Cain producing only male offspring is
deliberate genetic engineering? Maybe to speed up the
processs.....?
A hierarchy is at play upon thje Earth. Has been for
1000's of years. And still playing out....
>
> >> The only one you asked above. The one everyone but you
> >> can see above. The one, although you apparently didn't
> >> realize it, you were asking of John McCoy ("McNameless"),
> >> since it was his idiocy I was quoting in my sig. The one you
> >> apparently thought was my claim, rather then an exhibition
> >> of the "thought" processes of morons.
>
> >Oh that one. Didn't you like my 'reaction' to it....?
>
> You had a reaction to it?
I guess not....
Your psyche is empty of mind and soul. That's probably
why you have no clue of your reality, of how (y)our species
came to be .....
>
> >> <snip>
> >> --
>
> >> Bob C.
>
> >> "Evidence confirming an observation is
> >> evidence that the observation is wrong."
> >> - McNameless-
>
> >Not anymore. His name is -McCoy.
>
> Yes, and always has been; in fact, I informed you of this
> just above. The fact that he once searched the newsgroups
> for any mention of his name, in order to contribute his
> idiocies to ongoing threads, led many to begin to refer to
> him as "McNameless".
You must have a deep hatred of him.....
> --
>
> Bob C.
>
> "Evidence confirming an observation is
> evidence that the observation is wrong."
> - McNameless-
Why don't you use any of my stuff? I guess because
it makes too much sense for you.....
I mean if you were to use.....
"Islam and Judaism exist, and have an origin"....
-Twonky-
I could tell you their origin. But you already know and
can't deal with it....
Don't feel bad. A lot of people are as ignorant and
stupid, as you....