Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: virgin birth
0 views
Skip to first unread message
The 2nd Coming
Dec 27, 2010, 2:21:17 PM12/27/10
to
On Dec 13, 9:30 am, "Rajinder Nijjhar" <rajinder.nijj...@ntlworld.com>
wrote:
> BIRTH AND DEATH OF JESUS
>
> Many people know that Jesus was born of a Virgin in the manger of an Inn
> situated in Bethlehem, the birth place of king David, the lion of Judah
> tribe, and He died a very humiliating death on the cross at a place much
> haunted and feared by people. But why it happened so?
>
> 1. Why the Virgin Birth?:- The answer to this question is very simple to the
> twice-born people of "spirit", who are capable of "perceiving" and
> "intuition" based upon logical reasoning. At the same time it is well
> beyond the apprehension of the once-born people of "flesh", who are only
> capable of "seeing", they take the Holy Books by the "letters" and for this
> reason; they are also called the people of Book.
>
> Prophet Jesus, the First anointed Christ/Satguru of God was supposed to
> appear among the people of Judah tribe who at the times of king David were
> highly religious people and had a good knowledge of the Holy Books. They
> used to obey the moral laws of Moses to the very "letters" and for their
> religious devotion; they were called the "angelic people" or DEVTAS. But the
> act of "adultery" by king David was a "sin" that put the people of Judah
> tribe to great "shame".
>
> However, in this Dark Age, things happen "opposite" to the past
> "enlightened" Ages. Thus, the most religious people of Judah tribe become
> the "highly" satanic people and the act of "adultery" by king David was
> turned from a "shameful" sin to an act of great pride to be boasted off
> publicly with such an "arrogance" that if our king David did it, so why
> should not we do it in the "steps" of our great king David.
>
> The nature of these satanic people of Judah tribe was well illustrated in
> Judah Iscariot, the only Labourer of Judah tribe who, like his forefathers,
> was well versed in the "letters" and therefore in accounts also and he
> begged Jesus to take him on for his skills, especially to handle the
> "purse". His love of Mammon and smartness culminated in taking a bribe of
> 30 Shackles to deceive Jesus. Even after Jesus rebuked and turned him out
> of the Room for his smartness before He did baptise the rest of His
> Labourers in the Last Supper rites of sacrifice.
>
> Whilst the Gentile who were considered by the smart Jewish people of BOOK to
> be the "simpletons" or stone-headed, became the great religious people of
> "spirit", the Saints and earned the fame that organisations like the "Good
> Samaritans" openly speak of.
>
> Now, the tribal "identity" of "flesh" establishes one's link or "covenant"
> with our ancestors or Adam and by doing so one becomes a "son of Man", which
> Jesus termed as the "wheat" plants that our heavenly father, the demiurge
> "creator" YAHWEH/Brahma, planted in this field of world - Matt. 13.24-30.
> But if you hide or severe your tribal link with your ancestors, the noble
> men in Adam, as the people at present are doing so by becoming the so-called
> Sikhs, Muslims, Christians, Protestants, Catholics, Jews, etc. of the
> "flesh" and not remaining of their "hearts" or "spirit", then such people
> become the "tares" or the "sons of Satan", the fanatics and then they
> perform "bastardly" deeds that create "hell" as it is being done so in the
> Punjab, Lebanon, Israel, Bosnia, N. Ireland, etc. This distinction between
> the "flesh" and the "spirit" Christ Paul clarified in His Saying, "A Jew is
> one who is inwardly (of the heart or spirit) and not outwardly (of the flesh
> or tribe)". Further, about these "tares" Jesus said, "Every plant (person),
> which (who) my heavenly father, the creator, did not Plant (has lost his
> tribal identity of flesh or has severed his link or covenant with Adam,
> ancestors or Abraham) shall be uprooted (killed) along with the "roots", the
> fanatic supporters".
>
> It was this covenant that St. Stephen, the first Bishop of the Church of God
> was trying to explain and establish before the high priest or the Chief
> Rabbi in the Temple that the Satan asked his mountain of "fanatics" to stone
> him to death.
>
> So, when Jesus was born most of the Jews, especially of the Judah tribe,
> were the Jews of "flesh", the "tares", which, the creator, our heavenly
> father, does not want to know. Such "tares" were not worthy of the
> "baptism" of John in water and He stressed this by branding them a "brood"
> of vipers. These "vipers", the spiritually sick people especially of the
> Judah tribe needed Jesus, the Great Spiritual Doctor, and the most and,
> therefore, Jesus took birth among them not in a normal way but of a
> "Virgin".
>
> 2. Why in the manger of the Inn?:- Now, "Inn" is symbolic of the "Church
> of God" in that as an "inn" is open to general public for the physical rest,
> so is the "Universal Church of God", open to the people of all nationalities
> and races for the "spiritual" rest or regeneration.
>
> Further, in the Church of God, unlike the Church of England, where the
> king/queen of Mammon is the head, the lowest or the greatest Servant, and
> not a Lord, is the Head of the Church. So Jesus, our Royal High Priest, ONE
> SHEPHERD, being the Head of our universal Church of God, ONE FOLD, could not
> be born anywhere else than the lowest place, the manger, of the inn and that
> too among the stable animals, that "serve" people as the beasts of "burden".
>
> As people are born in the tribal homes of their fathers, so, this humble
> Birth of Jesus in the manger of an Inn is an "implicit" proof that the
> Father of Jesus was not a normal tribal father in flesh but God in Whose
> Universal House, the Church, He took His Birth. Thus, the Parents of Jesus
> are God, the Father and Holy Spirit, the Mother whilst Joseph of the Judah
> tribe in line of king David and Mary were the Chosen Surrogate parents of
> Jesus.
>
> 3. Why the Crown of Thorns?:- Now, the death of Jesus has become a
> controversial issue among the people of BOOK, the so-called Christians. This
> issue is best tackled by knowing that whatsoever applies to "flesh", the
> opposite applies to the matters of "spirit". Thus, in flesh every one of us
> has his own parents whilst in spirit all of us have God as our single
> Parent, both Mother and Father. Kings rest their heads in the comforts of
> their palaces, whereas our Royal King Jesus had no place even to rest His
> head (There is another reason for this in that Jesus was the Second Adam
> and, therefore, He could not established another lines in Adam as our tribal
> father are in Adam). Kings normally die a natural death in the comforts of
> their palaces well attended by their courtiers and nobles whilst our Royal
> King Jesus was to face an un-natural death very humiliating in nature at a
> place much haunted and feared by the general public and that too among the
> company of two criminals; one of "flesh" who asked Jesus to set him free
> through His miraculous Powers whilst the other of "spirit" acknowledged his
> fate but at the same time he proclaimed that Jesus is dying for no wrong
> doing i.e. even the criminals of "spirit" knew Jesus better than the lawyers
> of "letters", the Rabbis. Kings deserve very expensive and comfortable
> crowns made up of the precious stones whilst our Royal King Jesus was put on
> a very uncomfortable crown made up of the natural living thorny bush against
> His Will. In fact, the death by stoning is not as humiliating as
> crucifixion. Further, none of the Apostles met such a humiliating death as
> Jesus did meet.
>
> Here, it is worthwhile to mention the birth of the Second anointed Christ in
> the name of Nanak, Who appeared in India in 1469 among the people of Khatri
> tribe, who, like the people of Judah tribe, were angelic or DEVTA people in
> the past enlightened Age (TRETA) but in this Age, they had become the most
> satanic people. But the birth of the Second anointed Christ, called
> "SATGURU" in Punjabi, was not a Virgin one as the people of the Khatri tribe
> had not severed their covenant with their ancestors by becoming the Hindus
> of flesh or tribe. Thus, the spiritually sick people of Khatri tribe,
> especially those who became Mullahs, became the sworn enemies of the
> Satgurus and the Royal Kings, Sachae Paatshahs. In short, the people of
> Judah tribe, Baby Princes of Darkness, in the Middle East and of the Khatri
> tribe, Kings and Emperors of Darkness, in India are, according to their
> ranks, the great opportunists and "GREEDY" people and, therefore, they
> exploited the religious people to their utmost for their selfish motives.
> Remember that all the people of a certain tribe cannot be good or bad but in
> general a certain trait is dominant among the people of a particular tribe.
>
> Further, in general, people of the West are seeking God more sincerely than
> the people of East but they are blind to the matters of "spirit". This is
> well illustrated in the Parable of the Samaritan woman at the well - John 4,
> who had Five husbands, KAAM, KARODHH, LOB, MOH and the Last one HANKAAR of
> her religious knowledge, which she had overpowered, living with her but no
> more her husbands. But the Book people take the literal sense and address
> her as a prostitute instead of the most knowledgeable and humble woman Jesus
> ever met in His mission. She, Christ Photina, and her village people became
> the Apostles in honour of Christ Jesus and they glorified God.
> Unfortunately, so-called the Sikhs of beard and turban are familiar with
> these five husbands but they are incapable of explaining to the Christians
> either.
>
> Remember that the word Sikh means a student and in this case of the
> spiritual knowledge best known by his qualities and not the dress or
> costume. So, both in Satguru Jesus and Christ Nanak, it is the quality, best
> judged by what comes out of their mouths, that counts and not the
> dog-collars or the robes of hypocrisy in which case they proclaim to be
> working for God but they get paid for their labour in the currency of
> Mammon.
>
> In Kal Yug, every one has to give his own account to God and those who
> follow the so-called Sants blindly are wasting their invaluable life as such
> false hypocrite Sants cannot give their accounts to God. Therefore, go by
> your own christ/satguru, the ANTAR Guru, or "innerman".
>
> "HOLY SPIRIT SHATTERS THE FETTERS OF THE LETTERS"
>
> Rom.14.12: Live by your own christ, the "inner man". No christ (spirit) in
> your heart, no Gospel and no salvation but Hell.
>
> For further discussion, please contact:-
>
> Chaudhry Rajinder Nijjhar, M.Sc.
>
> Younger Brother of Jesus, the first anointed Christ and of Nanak, the second
> anointed Christ (Satguru), Retired Senior Lecturer in Metallurgy.
>
> A Jat of the Punjab.
wrote:
> BIRTH AND DEATH OF JESUS
>
> Many people know that Jesus was born of a Virgin in the manger of an Inn
> situated in Bethlehem, the birth place of king David, the lion of Judah
> tribe, and He died a very humiliating death on the cross at a place much
> haunted and feared by people. But why it happened so?
>
> 1. Why the Virgin Birth?:- The answer to this question is very simple to the
> twice-born people of "spirit", who are capable of "perceiving" and
> "intuition" based upon logical reasoning. At the same time it is well
> beyond the apprehension of the once-born people of "flesh", who are only
> capable of "seeing", they take the Holy Books by the "letters" and for this
> reason; they are also called the people of Book.
>
> Prophet Jesus, the First anointed Christ/Satguru of God was supposed to
> appear among the people of Judah tribe who at the times of king David were
> highly religious people and had a good knowledge of the Holy Books. They
> used to obey the moral laws of Moses to the very "letters" and for their
> religious devotion; they were called the "angelic people" or DEVTAS. But the
> act of "adultery" by king David was a "sin" that put the people of Judah
> tribe to great "shame".
>
> However, in this Dark Age, things happen "opposite" to the past
> "enlightened" Ages. Thus, the most religious people of Judah tribe become
> the "highly" satanic people and the act of "adultery" by king David was
> turned from a "shameful" sin to an act of great pride to be boasted off
> publicly with such an "arrogance" that if our king David did it, so why
> should not we do it in the "steps" of our great king David.
>
> The nature of these satanic people of Judah tribe was well illustrated in
> Judah Iscariot, the only Labourer of Judah tribe who, like his forefathers,
> was well versed in the "letters" and therefore in accounts also and he
> begged Jesus to take him on for his skills, especially to handle the
> "purse". His love of Mammon and smartness culminated in taking a bribe of
> 30 Shackles to deceive Jesus. Even after Jesus rebuked and turned him out
> of the Room for his smartness before He did baptise the rest of His
> Labourers in the Last Supper rites of sacrifice.
>
> Whilst the Gentile who were considered by the smart Jewish people of BOOK to
> be the "simpletons" or stone-headed, became the great religious people of
> "spirit", the Saints and earned the fame that organisations like the "Good
> Samaritans" openly speak of.
>
> Now, the tribal "identity" of "flesh" establishes one's link or "covenant"
> with our ancestors or Adam and by doing so one becomes a "son of Man", which
> Jesus termed as the "wheat" plants that our heavenly father, the demiurge
> "creator" YAHWEH/Brahma, planted in this field of world - Matt. 13.24-30.
> But if you hide or severe your tribal link with your ancestors, the noble
> men in Adam, as the people at present are doing so by becoming the so-called
> Sikhs, Muslims, Christians, Protestants, Catholics, Jews, etc. of the
> "flesh" and not remaining of their "hearts" or "spirit", then such people
> become the "tares" or the "sons of Satan", the fanatics and then they
> perform "bastardly" deeds that create "hell" as it is being done so in the
> Punjab, Lebanon, Israel, Bosnia, N. Ireland, etc. This distinction between
> the "flesh" and the "spirit" Christ Paul clarified in His Saying, "A Jew is
> one who is inwardly (of the heart or spirit) and not outwardly (of the flesh
> or tribe)". Further, about these "tares" Jesus said, "Every plant (person),
> which (who) my heavenly father, the creator, did not Plant (has lost his
> tribal identity of flesh or has severed his link or covenant with Adam,
> ancestors or Abraham) shall be uprooted (killed) along with the "roots", the
> fanatic supporters".
>
> It was this covenant that St. Stephen, the first Bishop of the Church of God
> was trying to explain and establish before the high priest or the Chief
> Rabbi in the Temple that the Satan asked his mountain of "fanatics" to stone
> him to death.
>
> So, when Jesus was born most of the Jews, especially of the Judah tribe,
> were the Jews of "flesh", the "tares", which, the creator, our heavenly
> father, does not want to know. Such "tares" were not worthy of the
> "baptism" of John in water and He stressed this by branding them a "brood"
> of vipers. These "vipers", the spiritually sick people especially of the
> Judah tribe needed Jesus, the Great Spiritual Doctor, and the most and,
> therefore, Jesus took birth among them not in a normal way but of a
> "Virgin".
>
> 2. Why in the manger of the Inn?:- Now, "Inn" is symbolic of the "Church
> of God" in that as an "inn" is open to general public for the physical rest,
> so is the "Universal Church of God", open to the people of all nationalities
> and races for the "spiritual" rest or regeneration.
>
> Further, in the Church of God, unlike the Church of England, where the
> king/queen of Mammon is the head, the lowest or the greatest Servant, and
> not a Lord, is the Head of the Church. So Jesus, our Royal High Priest, ONE
> SHEPHERD, being the Head of our universal Church of God, ONE FOLD, could not
> be born anywhere else than the lowest place, the manger, of the inn and that
> too among the stable animals, that "serve" people as the beasts of "burden".
>
> As people are born in the tribal homes of their fathers, so, this humble
> Birth of Jesus in the manger of an Inn is an "implicit" proof that the
> Father of Jesus was not a normal tribal father in flesh but God in Whose
> Universal House, the Church, He took His Birth. Thus, the Parents of Jesus
> are God, the Father and Holy Spirit, the Mother whilst Joseph of the Judah
> tribe in line of king David and Mary were the Chosen Surrogate parents of
> Jesus.
>
> 3. Why the Crown of Thorns?:- Now, the death of Jesus has become a
> controversial issue among the people of BOOK, the so-called Christians. This
> issue is best tackled by knowing that whatsoever applies to "flesh", the
> opposite applies to the matters of "spirit". Thus, in flesh every one of us
> has his own parents whilst in spirit all of us have God as our single
> Parent, both Mother and Father. Kings rest their heads in the comforts of
> their palaces, whereas our Royal King Jesus had no place even to rest His
> head (There is another reason for this in that Jesus was the Second Adam
> and, therefore, He could not established another lines in Adam as our tribal
> father are in Adam). Kings normally die a natural death in the comforts of
> their palaces well attended by their courtiers and nobles whilst our Royal
> King Jesus was to face an un-natural death very humiliating in nature at a
> place much haunted and feared by the general public and that too among the
> company of two criminals; one of "flesh" who asked Jesus to set him free
> through His miraculous Powers whilst the other of "spirit" acknowledged his
> fate but at the same time he proclaimed that Jesus is dying for no wrong
> doing i.e. even the criminals of "spirit" knew Jesus better than the lawyers
> of "letters", the Rabbis. Kings deserve very expensive and comfortable
> crowns made up of the precious stones whilst our Royal King Jesus was put on
> a very uncomfortable crown made up of the natural living thorny bush against
> His Will. In fact, the death by stoning is not as humiliating as
> crucifixion. Further, none of the Apostles met such a humiliating death as
> Jesus did meet.
>
> Here, it is worthwhile to mention the birth of the Second anointed Christ in
> the name of Nanak, Who appeared in India in 1469 among the people of Khatri
> tribe, who, like the people of Judah tribe, were angelic or DEVTA people in
> the past enlightened Age (TRETA) but in this Age, they had become the most
> satanic people. But the birth of the Second anointed Christ, called
> "SATGURU" in Punjabi, was not a Virgin one as the people of the Khatri tribe
> had not severed their covenant with their ancestors by becoming the Hindus
> of flesh or tribe. Thus, the spiritually sick people of Khatri tribe,
> especially those who became Mullahs, became the sworn enemies of the
> Satgurus and the Royal Kings, Sachae Paatshahs. In short, the people of
> Judah tribe, Baby Princes of Darkness, in the Middle East and of the Khatri
> tribe, Kings and Emperors of Darkness, in India are, according to their
> ranks, the great opportunists and "GREEDY" people and, therefore, they
> exploited the religious people to their utmost for their selfish motives.
> Remember that all the people of a certain tribe cannot be good or bad but in
> general a certain trait is dominant among the people of a particular tribe.
>
> Further, in general, people of the West are seeking God more sincerely than
> the people of East but they are blind to the matters of "spirit". This is
> well illustrated in the Parable of the Samaritan woman at the well - John 4,
> who had Five husbands, KAAM, KARODHH, LOB, MOH and the Last one HANKAAR of
> her religious knowledge, which she had overpowered, living with her but no
> more her husbands. But the Book people take the literal sense and address
> her as a prostitute instead of the most knowledgeable and humble woman Jesus
> ever met in His mission. She, Christ Photina, and her village people became
> the Apostles in honour of Christ Jesus and they glorified God.
> Unfortunately, so-called the Sikhs of beard and turban are familiar with
> these five husbands but they are incapable of explaining to the Christians
> either.
>
> Remember that the word Sikh means a student and in this case of the
> spiritual knowledge best known by his qualities and not the dress or
> costume. So, both in Satguru Jesus and Christ Nanak, it is the quality, best
> judged by what comes out of their mouths, that counts and not the
> dog-collars or the robes of hypocrisy in which case they proclaim to be
> working for God but they get paid for their labour in the currency of
> Mammon.
>
> In Kal Yug, every one has to give his own account to God and those who
> follow the so-called Sants blindly are wasting their invaluable life as such
> false hypocrite Sants cannot give their accounts to God. Therefore, go by
> your own christ/satguru, the ANTAR Guru, or "innerman".
>
> "HOLY SPIRIT SHATTERS THE FETTERS OF THE LETTERS"
>
> Rom.14.12: Live by your own christ, the "inner man". No christ (spirit) in
> your heart, no Gospel and no salvation but Hell.
>
> For further discussion, please contact:-
>
> Chaudhry Rajinder Nijjhar, M.Sc.
>
> Younger Brother of Jesus, the first anointed Christ and of Nanak, the second
> anointed Christ (Satguru), Retired Senior Lecturer in Metallurgy.
>
> A Jat of the Punjab.
Jat Muslims or Musalman Jats (Urdu: ) are a Indo-Aryan tribal group
found
throughout the Punjab region of Pakistan and India. The Jat Hindus
starting
converting to Islam from the Middle Ages onward...
>
> URL:-
>
> http://homepage.ntlworld.com/rajinder.nijjhar/sikhism.htm
>
> E-Mail address:
>
> rajinder.nijj...@ntlworld.com
>
> THERE IS NO COPYRIGHT WHATSOEVER. WORD OF GOD IS RECEIVED FREELY AND FREELY
> IT IS GIVEN.
Right....
Genesis 16. Islam...borne by an angel of HaShem...
Isaiah 14:12....meet Lucifer. The angel of HaShem, in Genesis 16....
Being set up to become like the most High, Almighty God, in the most
High, All Mighty God, Allah.....
Genesis 17. Judaism......borne by HaShem....
Omniscient verses Omnipotent....
Will the real Creator please stand up......?
It's a no brainer.....really.....
Those facts prove. There is an Omnipotent entity, beyond the stars,
that is
reponsible, for those historical, events.....
This does too....
"And Cain knew his Neanderthal wife" (G. Freeman)
We are 99.8% Neanderthal genome.....you figure it out.....
AllSeeing-I
Jan 27, 2011, 1:11:42 AM1/27/11
to
On Dec 27 2010, 1:21 pm, The 2nd Coming <01910infin...@gmail.com>
wrote:> We are 99.8% Neanderthal genome.....you figure it out.....-
wrote:
God may be an ET.
Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Devils Advocaat
Jan 27, 2011, 2:27:13 AM1/27/11
to
Presuming you mean by this that what you call god might be an alien
life form, why do you persist in wanting to worship it?
0 new messages