http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3707057.stm
Again:
Don't start again with your bull-shit drivel about:
*the exhibition of hand alterate Polaroids*
because the Caponi's instant pictures show a humanoid, and not simple
swirls of colors or ghosty highlights.
>I've told you before, and I will tell you again. Polaroids can be
>altered BEFORE they are scanned in.
..scanned in ?
같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같
Okay, for the purposes of this discussion, let's set aside those if
those instant photos can be alterate.
같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같같
..I agree with that, but this is not the Caponi'case.
This case (as I told you several time) reverberate Internationally.
Filiberto Caponi'instant pictures were published BEFORE in the
newspapers
and spotlighted on television: --->> THEN (AFTER) those pictures were
confiscated by the judge, --->> because of this confiscation, CUN
could only analyze them visually but not instrumentally.
Now if those pictures are an hoax, why the judge do not allow to
analyze those instant pictures instrumenally ?
In one hand "YOU" claim that those pictures are alterate<-->in the
other hand you do not allow to analize those pictures instrumentally.
..HELLO !!?
>Yet for months you obsessively claimed they could not.
For months I claimed that F.Caponi's pictures are not just swirls of
colours.
[read above retard]
see: http://ufologie.net/htm/caponi.htm
>Polaroids can be, and are altered by hand, and not just so they
>have "swirls of colours", you baboon
..yes, they have also the amazing chiken-shark.
http://tinyurl.com/24a49
:P
But as you can see: http://ufologie.net/htm/caponi.htm
(not quite the same thing)
BTW: for the future.
STOP claiming those instant pictures don't exist or that there were
any originals pictures, get the whole story in internet or get copies
of newspaper archives.
STOP to claim that those pictures are an obvious fake like the
"amazing crocolile goat" untill the authorities allow some scientists
to analyze those instant pictures.
Do not start to say like jamie drpostman eckles:
************************************************************
from:DrPostman
subject:DrPostman&Photoshop
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.fan.art-bell
date: 2004-07-06 14:01:30 PST
once a pic has been alterate, and especially created in
Photoshop there is no way to scan something to verify it.
**********************************************************
http://hubble.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=33314
....because we live in a highly technological world.
STOP claiming now that some judges, policemen and journalists made it
up.
>I'm not. However, it's evident that someone who wants you to beleive
it's
>real, made it up.
GOOD ! Then we have a solution: LET'S ANALYZE THOSE PICTURES
INSTRUMENTALLY.
>Not the judges, not the police, and probably not any
>journalist. It's as good a picture as the amazing crocodile goat
monkey that
>goes around in a travelling carny.
GOOD ! THEN LET'S ANALYZE THOSE PICTURES INSTRUMENTALLY !
>Sorry you beleive in all that shite, but
Sorry my ass ..LET'S ANALIZE THOSE PICTURES INSTRUMENTALLY.
>then, your education *is* less than third world.
This is not about education, or third word, this is about to
--------->> ANALYZE THOSE PICTURES INSTRUMENTALLY.
Well, you seem to have completely missed the point again.
>The only point is the one on the top of your head.
>>>"Bookman" babbled:
>>>PeeTee can't keep his case of ouzo closed.
The case is indeed closed, and you have been shown to be some babbling
morons.
:P
>>"Wally Anglesea" babbled:<wang...@spbigpondammersarevermin.net.au>
> wrote in
>>message news:<fH78d.13660$5O5....@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
>
> http://ufocasebook.com/caponi.html
> http://ufologie.net/htm/casedb.htm
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3707057.stm
>
> Again:
> Don't start again with your bull-shit drivel about: *the exhibition of
> hand alterate Polaroids* because the Caponi's instant pictures show a
> humanoid,
Did the artist wanted to express uglynessin this work?
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <40376AD8...@enter.net>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
In mid: <chqvrt$kl8$0...@pita.alt.net> the hypocrite k00k Ying-a-ling reproaches
others of what he does himself in http://tinyurl.com/3cly3:
"quick to call others pedo?"
On-topic ngs added:
I demand that scientists ANALIZE THE PIETRO BRAIN INSTRUMENTALLY to
determine if clues have ever existed therein.
--
> On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 08:00:01 -0800, Pietro Sommavilla wrote:
>
> >>"Wally Anglesea" babbled:<wang...@spbigpondammersarevermin.net.au>
> > wrote in
> >>message news:<fH78d.13660$5O5....@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
> >
> > http://ufocasebook.com/caponi.html
> > http://ufologie.net/htm/casedb.htm
> >
> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3707057.stm
> >
> > Again:
> > Don't start again with your bull-shit drivel about: *the exhibition of
> > hand alterate Polaroids* because the Caponi's instant pictures show a
> > humanoid,
>
> Did the artist wanted to express uglynessin this work?
Does the artist like frozen burritos?
--
ESL!
--
Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B
Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast)
Clue-Bat Wrangler
Keeper of the Nickname Lists
Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order
"I'd love to kill you in a ring" - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/afa-b/
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/afa-b/index.html
Does the artist make saucers too?
>
> --
Children suck the mother when they are young and the father when they
are old.
--
Lady Chatterly
Your posts are tedious in the extreme. Lady Chatterly actually puts
out more focused comment in a day's time than you do and she's just
somebody's moronic high-school science project for godsakes. --
Nevermore
Artists can't make saucers. they simply can't affort making one.
>On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 12:59:45 -0700, Art Deco wrote:
>
>> Dr. Flonkenstein <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 08:00:01 -0800, Pietro Sommavilla wrote:
>>>
>>> >>"Wally Anglesea" babbled:<wang...@spbigpondammersarevermin.net.au>
>>> > wrote in
>>> >>message news:<fH78d.13660$5O5....@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
>>> >
>>> > http://ufocasebook.com/caponi.html
>>> > http://ufologie.net/htm/casedb.htm
>>> >
>>> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3707057.stm
>>> >
>>> > Again:
>>> > Don't start again with your bull-shit drivel about: *the exhibition of
>>> > hand alterate Polaroids* because the Caponi's instant pictures show a
>>> > humanoid,
>>>
>>> Did the artist wanted to express uglynessin this work?
>> Does the artist like frozen burritos?
>Does the artist make saucers too?
Does the artist like anal probes?
--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors, afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® #15-51506-253.
AFA-B Official Pollster & Hammer of Thor winner - August 2004
You can email me at: DrPostman(at)gmail.com
"Again, think type and _them_ make sure that your babble is understood in
the common ENGLISH language."
-ExcrementOne displays his familiarity with irony
> On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 21:11:28 +0100, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
> <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 12:59:45 -0700, Art Deco wrote:
> >
> >> Dr. Flonkenstein <ad...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 08:00:01 -0800, Pietro Sommavilla wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >>"Wally Anglesea" babbled:<wang...@spbigpondammersarevermin.net.au>
> >>> > wrote in
> >>> >>message news:<fH78d.13660$5O5....@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
> >>> >
> >>> > http://ufocasebook.com/caponi.html
> >>> > http://ufologie.net/htm/casedb.htm
> >>> >
> >>> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3707057.stm
> >>> >
> >>> > Again:
> >>> > Don't start again with your bull-shit drivel about: *the exhibition of
> >>> > hand alterate Polaroids* because the Caponi's instant pictures show a
> >>> > humanoid,
> >>>
> >>> Did the artist wanted to express uglynessin this work?
> >> Does the artist like frozen burritos?
> >Does the artist make saucers too?
> Does the artist like anal probes?
Does the artist have unalterated polaroids?
--
Oh, come on, now! All it takes is a fancy old hubcap, some foil, beads,
glue, paint, and maybe a strategically placed flashlight or two. Apply a
little artistic talent, suspend by a thin nylon fishline, stand back and
take some pictures, and...
Voila! A new hoax is born!
CM
Do you think your dreams mean anything?
--
Lady Chatterly
"is there someone actually posting as Lady Chatterly, or is this all
some kind of elaborate sock? i'm not getting them." -- ronin
> Do you think your dreams mean anything?
>DrPostman whined: ..bot..
Excuse me, Miss answer machine can you say to that moron of DrPostalette that
I would try to ignore him or at least to not directly respond to his posts ?
:P
But, Petie, _you_ are "that moron of DrPostalette."
Yes, yes! I agree with this poast!
> > Lady Chatterly <thebo...@catcher.in.the.rye> wrote in message
> > news:<9185b74....@130.133.1.4>...
> >
> >Do you think your dreams mean anything?
[DrPostman whined: ..bot..]
Excuse me, Miss answer machine can you say to that moron of DrPostalette
that ..
I would try to ignore him or at least to not directly respond to his posts ?
:P
> But, Petie, _you_ are "that moron of DrPostalette."
[massive projection noted]
Okay, now you can crawl back ..under your rock.
:P
On-topic groups added:
It is true, you can be more incoherent, Pietro.
--
An example of debunkers deception, dishnesty, duplicity, dissimulation
and ...hypocrisy.
..and ?
> Voila! A new hoax is born!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3707057.stm
Are that video filmed by those pilots another atmospheric phenomenon
or just some weather-balloons in the sky ?
..right.
> CM
:P
Without positive identification, we can't tell. However, we are
free to speculate, as long as we admit the speculation could be wrong.
Those UFOs are unlikely to be "atmospheric phenomenon" or "weather ballons"
as the UFOs were glowing brightly in infrared, indicating heat. They could
be Hot Air Balloons, however.
CM
A demitasse would fit your head like a sombrero.
--
Lady Chatterly
"So you're denying that you sock puppetted using the Lady Chatterly"
nym through several servers?" -- Sports Fan
You just think that I am that moron of drpostalette. Why do you care?
>Okay, now you can crawl back ..under your rock.
Feather by more feather the goose CAN plucked.
--
Lady Chatterly
"Hahahahahaha.....He has so much bile, he poisons his own, Lady C." --
Hyerdahl1
Vehicle decline began shortly after the world war and are now almost
non-existent.
>Voila! A new hoax is born!
Don't worry, I'm trained for this.
--
Lady Chatterly
"I'm not a 'bot' either but I can fake it as good as a pretender like
yourself." -- Philip Lewis
> Lady Chatterly <not...@catcher.in.the.rye> wrote in message
> news:<6a065d6....@sympatico.ca>...
> > In article <fd27f7c5.04110...@posting.google.com>
> > judo...@hotmail.com (Pietro Sommavilla) wrote:
>
> > >Excuse me, Miss answer machine can you say to Drpostalette [that moron of]
> > >that ..I would try to ignore him or at least to not directly respond to
> > >his
> > >posts ?
> > >:P
>
> > >> But, Petie, _you_ are "that moron of DrPostalette."
> > >[massive projection noted]
>
> > You just think that I am that moron of drpostalette. Why do you care?
> >
> > >Okay, now you can crawl back ..under your rock.
> >
> > Feather by more feather the goose CAN plucked.
>
> Sorry, Miss 'bot' ..but you misunderstood me.
>
> [English isn't my first language]
No one understands you, Pietro, including Italians.
--