This is a Pagan/Magickal discussion website.
http://www.wiccantogether.com/
The Acceptable User Policy (AUP) of the group True Witches is as
follows;
1) No users will be banned except under extreme circumstances. Extreme
circumstances include but are not limited to harassment,
discrimination, hate campaigns, or violation of local or federal laws.
2) If you post something, it stays. This does not apply to editing
posts for errors such as spelling or grammar. However, we ask that if
you make these changes, you do so in the first fifteen minutes of your
post's existence, when the site engine allows for it. Please, think
before you post.
3) Keep your drama off the site. We understand that some debates get
heated, however, they should never devolve into mudslinging or name-
calling contests. That is beneath us, and is nothing but harmful to
the group at large. There is never a reason to initiate rudeness.
4) Complaints can be submitted to the administrators of the group via
Private Message or Instant Messenger. Administrative decisions can be
put up for review by submitting your appeal to an administrator. All
appeals, complaints, and requests will be processed in the order
received.
Administrators can be contacted by sending them a private message on
this site, or as follows;
Beorc Kano (Brandon Cornwell)
E-mail: Brandon...@gmail.com
MSN: Brandon...@live.com
AIM: BrandonVCornwell
Replies are closed for this discussion.
Replies to This Discussion
Beorc Kano Permalink Reply by Beorc Kano 1 day ago
User Ren will be banned from this group for breaking AUP statutes
1, 2, and 3 as outlined below.
1: Harassing users Angantyr Blaidd Drwg, Alorer the Greek (Wyatt),
and myself, Beorc Kano.
2: Deleting a lengthy thread that had many other posts from the
users of this group.
3: Purposefully starting aggressive drama around the group,
including snide, general comments and causing even uninvilved members
to deliver complaints. They will remain anonymous.
This action was made on December 16th, 2009, 11:22 AM, Central
Standard Time.
Yes, it was a childish troll. But then again, I am childish.
Do you wipe off your hands with an antiseptic wet-wipe after shaking
hands, too?
Typical ren article: The first sentence contains multiple lies.
> This moderator accused me
> of deleting a post. I answered that I did not delete the post. I was
> suspended from the website without even being allowed to state my side
> of the story.
That's what happens when you post thousands of malicious lies on
the Internet.
You probably did delete the post. It's the kind of cowardly and
immoral thing you would do without a second thought.
Newcomers: ren is a pathological liar. The odds are that the above
post is full of lies and distortions. Save yourself some grief and
just assume it's fiction.
Ren is one of the nastiest creeps I've ever encountered and will
say anything about anyone in order to manipulate a situation to
his advantage. He has no conscience at all.
Sid
--
Sidney Lambe
Wiccan Priest and Apprentice Magician
http://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (at) gmail (dot) com
Sometimes I don't wash my hands after urination. Just kidding! Pleased
to meet you!
I am ashamed to identify myself as the same species as you, you filthy
creature.
Wait, does that mean you do not pee on your feet when you shower ?
Peeing on other peoplee is an old shamanic practise while tripping
(many psychadelic substances going in through the skin). It's a good
job most ancient folks knew the plants to use for soap afterwards
too. :-)
The gaps in your deductive reasoning ability are flagrantly evident.
**
The gaps in your deductive reasoning ability are flagrantly evident.
**
It is not reasoning.
It is floating.
Reasoning is flawed because it is dependant on what you can reason about.
I leap for friends.
You consistently do not leap with me.
You can, but refuse.
It is the great unknown that beckons us.
Come leap with me.
> Wait, does that mean you do not pee on your feet when you shower ?
Well, considering I only take a shower after peeing my pants, I
suppose I do not have the ability to do so because my bladder is
empty.
> Wait, does that mean you do not pee on your feet when you shower ?
Well, considering I only take a shower after peeing my pants, I
> Wait, does that mean you do not pee on your feet when you shower ?
Well, considering I only take a shower after peeing my pants, I
I know.
> You consistently do not leap with me.
> You can, but refuse.
Dada isn't all that popular these days. Even less so outside of
Europe.
What a Lye.
�
Wanna Bet.
People want to get ME busted but only give me a Free Attorney, while they like
it or not Get 10 Years, for INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ahlm Sallah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He can't understand.
�
You're so far out of your mind that you don't have a fucking clue what
Bassos and I are talking about. This isn't about you, asshole. It
has nothing to do with you at all.
> You're so far out of your mind that you don't have a fucking clue what
> Bassos and I are talking about. This isn't about you, asshole. It
> has nothing to do with you at all.
Even though Lady Azure has defending me countless times in the past, I
am in agreement with Tom. Not that Tom cares or wants my agreement. I
just wish that people would chastise Lady Azure more politely. You can
not treat people with this kind of condition harshly.
Happy Yule.
I do so love reading your posts Sidney. You're always so...on the
ball.
1. Yes, he did delete the post, no one else could have, and the pixies
certainly didn't eat it.
2. The blood ritual in question was not being taught, it was being
referenced. VAGUELY. I have both a screen captured copy of the post
(mine) and the link itself (on the site in question) if you would like
verification of that.
3. The UAP is for a small group within the larger website of
WiccanTogether, not for WiccanTogether as a whole, and was impossible
for Ren not to notice at some point. He often flaunted his lack of
consideration for it, and rules in general. The last instance was
simply the straw that broke the camel's back.
4. He's a psuedo-mystic nitwit and you guys can have him back.
Since you seem to admire him so, is there any way you could take the Sidiot
with you when you go?
If so, please be considerate of the closing of the door. (We don't want to
have to pressure wash it.)
Newsflash Brainiac: Being a troll and creating drama are valid reasons
for your ban. Don't whine since you admit you violated the rules
yourself.
I'd take Sidney if you promised not to let Ren off his leash again.
> On Dec 18, 11:43=A0am, Evergreen <sidneyla...@nospam.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> On alt.religion.wicca, ren <ren1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > This is why I sympathize with Sidney Lambe.
>>
>> Typical ren article: The first sentence contains multiple
>> lies.
>>
>> > This moderator accused me of deleting a post. I answered
>> > that I did not delete the post. I was suspended from the
>> > website without even being allowed to state my side of the
>> > story.
>>
>> That's what happens when you post thousands of malicious lies
>> on the Internet.
>>
>> You probably did delete the post. It's the kind of cowardly
>> and immoral thing you would do without a second thought.
>>
>>
>>
>> > Oh, it's so cold and lonely outside. But I suppose it is
>> > better than being in that place Together with all the 5th
>> > level generation half-vampire half-werewolf children. Many
>> > participants in this group aren't Wiccans. But some really
>> > make me ashamed to identify myself as a =A0Wiccan. Teaching
>> > Replies are closed for this discussion. to This Discussion
>>
>> > Beorc Kano Permalink Reply by Beorc Kano 1 day ago =A0 =A0
>> > User Ren will be banned from this group for breaking AUP
>> > statut=
>
> es
>
>> > 1, 2, and 3 as outlined below.
>>
>> > =A0 =A0 1: Harassing users Angantyr Blaidd Drwg, Alorer the
>> > Greek (Wyat=
>
> t),
>
>> > and myself, Beorc Kano.
>>
>> > =A0 =A0 2: Deleting a lengthy thread that had many other
>> > posts from the users of this group.
>>
>> > =A0 =A0 3: Purposefully starting aggressive drama around the
>> > group, including snide, general comments and causing even
>> > uninvilved members to deliver complaints. They will remain
>> > anonymous.
>>
>> > =A0 =A0 This action was made on December 16th, 2009, 11:22
>> > AM, Central Standard Time.
>>
>> Newcomers: ren is a pathological liar. The odds are that the
>> above post is full of lies and distortions. Save yourself some
>> grief and just assume it's fiction.
>>
>> Ren is one of the nastiest creeps I've ever encountered and
>> will say anything about anyone in order to manipulate a
>> situation to his advantage. He has no conscience at all.
>>
>> Sid
>>
>> -- Sidney Lambe Wiccan Priest and Apprentice
>> Magicianhttp://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb usenet4444 =A0(at) gmail
>> (dot) com
>
> I do so love reading your posts Sidney. You're always so...on
> the ball.
>
> 1. Yes, he did delete the post, no one else could have, and the
> pixies certainly didn't eat it. 2. The blood ritual in question
> was not being taught, it was being referenced. VAGUELY. I have
> both a screen captured copy of the post (mine) and the link
> itself (on the site in question) if you would like verification
> of that. 3. The UAP is for a small group within the larger
> website of WiccanTogether, not for WiccanTogether as a whole,
> and was impossible for Ren not to notice at some point. He
> often flaunted his lack of consideration for it, and rules in
> general. The last instance was simply the straw that broke the
> camel's back. 4. He's a psuedo-mystic nitwit and you guys can
> have him back.
Send him along. We have floors that need to be swept and
toilets that need to be scrubbed.
Sure you can. I just did.
He chews through leashes.
We have a gigavolt shock collar on order.
Except to Kin.
�
> On Dec 18, 8:56 pm, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole."
> <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
> > Tom wrote:
> > > On Dec 18, 8:38 am, "bassos" <zebazz_nope at zonnet.nl> wrote:
> >
> > > > Wait, does that mean you do not pee on your feet when you shower ?
> >
> > > The gaps in your deductive reasoning ability are flagrantly evident.
> >
> > Wanna Bet.
>
> You're so far out of your mind that you don't have a fucking clue
In Your Deluded Megalomaniac Judg"Mental" Bigoted Opinion!!!!!!!!!!
> On alt.religion.wicca, Summer_the_Heathen
> <summe...@live.com.au> wrote:
>
> >
> > 1. Yes, he did delete the post, no one else could have, and the
> > pixies certainly didn't eat it.
They got "Inside" Server Files last Year for April Fools.
The have been working on hacking the Update Files but that is a trick
with the switch from 32 to 64 going on.
> 1. Yes, he did delete the post, no one else could have, and the pixies
> certainly didn't eat it.
That is where you are wrong. Why would I delete my own post and then
cut and past comments that were still on "My Page" to restore
discussion about the post?
The only thing I can think of other than someone else deleting my post
is that I somehow deleted it accidentally. Sometimes the website would
give me an error when I tried to upload comments.
> 2. The blood ritual in question was not being taught, it was being
> referenced. VAGUELY. I have both a screen captured copy of the post
> (mine) and the link itself (on the site in question) if you would like
> verification of that.
Why would you need screen captures for everything? I noticed that the
comment I supposedly deleted was also screen captured.
> 3. The UAP is for a small group within the larger website of
> WiccanTogether, not for WiccanTogether as a whole, and was impossible
> for Ren not to notice at some point. He often flaunted his lack of
> consideration for it, and rules in general. The last instance was
> simply the straw that broke the camel's back.
To that I wholly admit. And if you should ever wish to continue
posting here freely, yes you can say 'FUCK', be our guest.
> 4. He's a psuedo-mystic nitwit and you guys can have him back.
Ah, I noticed you deliberately misspelled 'pseudo'. Now follow that
logic and you'll realize why I went to WiccanTogether.Com to badger
you in the first place.
> Newsflash Brainiac: Being a troll and creating drama are valid reasons
> for your ban. Don't whine since you admit you violated the rules
> yourself.
No they aren't. I did not threaten anybody's life. I did not use
profanity.
I only started to be disagreeable because one person failed to say
that he sterilized the knife in the picture before he cut himself with
it.
> I'd take Sidney if you promised not to let Ren off his leash again.
Fuckin' deal! You've got yourself a deal!
ARF!
You mean 32 bit to 64 bit systems? Pretty technical for me, LA. I'm
only half a geek.
Thank you for demonstrating the accuracy of my statement, ya prancing,
gibbering, clueless loon.
Oh quit wallowing in your rejection. They got rid of you because you
were offensive to them. Quit crying. You were *trying* to be
offensive and you succeeded. Besides, it's not like it's the first
time you've been thrown out of some group because you "started to be
disagreeable".
You got banned from TW after about a week of stirring the compost
heap. WT banned your ass a few days later. I really had nothing to do
with that.
That was all you, buddy. ~_^
You lying reTARD.
Really. Which part? I can back up my statements with links and
testimonials. Can you?
> Really. Which part? I can back up my statements with links and
> testimonials. Can you?
The only testimonial I need is the one sâr`châsm extracted from you.
The testimonial that I was behaving more politely that I wished to
obviously invalidates dated, textual evidence.
That makes so much sense! Why didn't I see it before? Ren, you have
opened my eyes to the truth!
I can see why so many people have bailed from this cesspool of
inferior logic.
> I can see why so many people have bailed from this cesspool of
> inferior logic.
Oh? You've been here before? How would you know who has bailed?