Message from discussion
Dead tree?
Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newsfeed.news2me.com!newsfeed2.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: "Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" <spamt...@library.lspace.org.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.linux.suse,alt.os.linux.suse
Subject: Dead tree?
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 09:44:19 -0500
Organization: Atid/2
Message-ID: <4389c644$6$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-CompuServe-Customer: Yes
X-Coriate: interspeed.co.nz
X-Ecrate: tanandtanlawyers.com
X-Pose: George Cox
X-Punge: Micro$oft
X-Sanguinate: The MVS Guy
X-Terminate: SPA(GIS)
X-Tinguish: Mark Griffith
X-Treme: C&C,DWS
X-Newsreader: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v2.67/60
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 14
It used to be that SuSE Linux was available in personal and
professional; editions, and that the Pro edition came with additional
dead tree documentation. In SuSE 10 the printed admin documentation
seems to have disappeared. Has Novell stated whether that is a
permanent change in direction?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the
right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to
domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not
reply to spamt...@library.lspace.org