Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: How do I run the Goddamned Linux Executable programs?

1 view
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Peter Köhlmann

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 4:46:00 AM11/22/09
to
EHWollmann wrote:

> You said there is no virus in Linux, of course there won't be because
> you don't let your program run even regular user(not a virus bug) still
> can't run your shitty program.
>
> It always says "open with" no matter what you pick it won't run your
> shitty programs at all.
>
> Help me understand why you kept calling your fucking Robust OS..?

Are you trying to tell us that you are dumber than dirt?
Congrats, you have succeeded
--
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats
you with experience...

Tosspot

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 5:24:55 AM11/22/09
to
EHWollmann wrote:
> You said there is no virus in Linux, of course there won't be because you don't let your program run even regular user(not a virus bug) still can't run your shitty program.
>
> It always says "open with" no matter what you pick it won't run your shitty programs at all.
>
> Help me understand why you kept calling your fucking Robust OS..?

You'll something like WINE to run a windows executable under Linux.

EOS

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 5:40:22 AM11/22/09
to
EHWollmann wrote:

> You said there is no virus in Linux, of course there won't be because you
> don't let your program run even regular user(not a virus bug) still can't
> run your shitty program.
>
> It always says "open with" no matter what you pick it won't run your
> shitty programs at all.
>
> Help me understand why you kept calling your fucking Robust OS..?

"open with" --> you are running gui software?
what desktop are you using (KDE, GNOME, Xfce, ...)

is it a bin, rpm, deb, exe, .....
and this time reply without ** words ;-)
--
EOS
www.photo-memories.be
Running KDE 4.3.3 / openSUSE 11.2

Szymon von Ulezalka

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 12:30:55 PM11/22/09
to
EHWollmann napisał(a):

> You said there is no virus in Linux, of course there won't be because you don't let your program run even regular user(not a virus bug) still can't run your shitty program.
>
> It always says "open with" no matter what you pick it won't run your shitty programs at all.
>
> Help me understand why you kept calling your fucking Robust OS..?

apart from your stupidity, what seems to be a problem?

Rikishi42

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 1:14:21 PM11/22/09
to
On 2009-11-22, houghi <hou...@houghi.org.invalid> wrote:

>
>
> EHWollmann wrote:
>> Help me understand why you kept calling your fucking Robust OS..?
>
> I don't do that. I call mine "Patricia". And as far as the fucking goes
> "fucking Patricia?" Hell yeah.

OK, but the question is: is Patricia robust ?

It seems we need some measurements to establish that.

--
Any time things appear to be going better, you have overlooked
something.

CellShocked

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 1:56:13 PM11/22/09
to
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:14:21 +0100, Rikishi42 <skunk...@rikishi42.net>
wrote:

>On 2009-11-22, houghi <hou...@houghi.org.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>
>> EHWollmann wrote:
>>> Help me understand why you kept calling your fucking Robust OS..?
>>
>> I don't do that. I call mine "Patricia". And as far as the fucking goes
>> "fucking Patricia?" Hell yeah.
>
>OK, but the question is: is Patricia robust ?
>
>It seems we need some measurements to establish that.


Descriptive terminology works as well.

"A balcony you could do Shakespeare from..."

The phrase "A Fine Pair of Torpedoes" works well too.

Rikishi42

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 1:53:11 PM11/22/09
to
On 2009-11-22, EHWollmann <arctur...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> You said there is no virus in Linux, of course there won't be because
> you don't let your program run even regular user(not a virus bug)
> still can't run your shitty program.
>
> It always says "open with" no matter what you pick it won't run
> your shitty programs at all.
>
> Help me understand why you kept calling your fucking Robust OS..?

Hello troll-mann,

1. Maybe you should make them executeable first?

2. Giving some details would help us understand what you're drooling about.

3. Swearing won't get you help. Booting your grey blob might. Think "Google"

And finally: congrats! You're only the 4th peace of proto-ooze, ever to have
earned a permanent slime bucket in my killfile. Enjoy !


May a diseased yak take a liking to your sister.
<PLONK>


--
God must love assholes -- She made so many of them.

Rikishi42

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 2:14:09 PM11/22/09
to
On 2009-11-22, CellShocked wrote:

>>OK, but the question is: is Patricia robust ?
>>
>>It seems we need some measurements to establish that.
>
>
> Descriptive terminology works as well.
>
> "A balcony you could do Shakespeare from..."
>
> The phrase "A Fine Pair of Torpedoes" works well too.

Are those examples, or you do you know Patricia ?

EHWollmann

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 2:19:51 PM11/22/09
to

"Tosspot" <Frank...@esa.int> wrote in message news:7uadnboaSOvljJTW...@giganews.com...
That's not I'm talking about, see there? you dumb jerks prove to the world that your Linux is a piece of shit. Every piece of Windows program runs the first second, and yours won't. I already tried changing access right, and I tried user's bin there is no other shit to help your fucking programs to run. So you expect every body to know your secret? What a fucking program/Os you tried to brag about many years. I told you, there is no business model in your program. Keep bragging... you will never succeed until you correct your common mistake. Heehee......No virus eh? Windows could be doing the same too, in fact they already did some fucking trick like yours (ie. No Java to avoid virus... heehee......most commercial sites require Java to run properly)




Message has been deleted

CellShocked

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 2:54:01 PM11/22/09
to
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:14:09 +0100, Rikishi42 <skunk...@rikishi42.net>
wrote:

>On 2009-11-22, CellShocked wrote:
>
>>>OK, but the question is: is Patricia robust ?
>>>
>>>It seems we need some measurements to establish that.
>>
>>
>> Descriptive terminology works as well.
>>
>> "A balcony you could do Shakespeare from..."
>>
>> The phrase "A Fine Pair of Torpedoes" works well too.
>
>Are those examples, or you do you know Patricia ?


One never knows...

FatBytestard

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 2:56:09 PM11/22/09
to
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:19:51 -0800, "EHWollmann"
<arctur...@earthlink.net> wrote:

>That's not I'm talking about, see there? you dumb jerks prove...


Said the dope that doesn't even know how long the line length for Usenet
posts is.

snipped remaining, unread, stupid shit.

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Rikishi42

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 3:59:38 PM11/22/09
to
On 2009-11-22, houghi <hou...@houghi.org.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> Rikishi42 wrote:
>> Are those examples, or you do you know Patricia ?
>
> If you would follow this group, you would know the other facination I
> have next to beer.

Musted have missed that one, sorry. :-)

I really should zap less, read more.

ray

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 4:11:56 PM11/22/09
to
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:22:35 -0800, EHWollmann wrote:

> You said there is no virus in Linux, of course there won't be because
> you don't let your program run even regular user(not a virus bug) still
> can't run your shitty program.
>
> It always says "open with" no matter what you pick it won't run your
> shitty programs at all.
>
> Help me understand why you kept calling your fucking Robust OS..?

You come down off your high horse - ask answerable questions and give a
clue as to what you think you want, you might get some help - evidently
you NEED it.

keith

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 6:20:13 PM11/22/09
to
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:11:58 -0800, EHWollmann wrote:


>
> Oh yes you do, all of your Linux nerds seemed to think your shit is
> flying high when you can't even grasp a common sense. >> Make your exe
> programs run now by default and stop bullshiting the world.

Sorry - Linux doesn't have 'exe' programs - but if you use one of the
cross system converters (eg Wine) it is able to run many Windows programs
effectively.

It's a bit like expecting a petrol car to run on diesel - it doesn't
work, although Linux with a converter makes a good stab at doing it!

Keith

Message has been deleted

Kevin Nathan

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 1:58:20 AM11/23/09
to
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:43:56 -0800
"EHWollmann" <arctur...@earthlink.net> wrote:

>I don't care about running Windows exe under Linux, I only care to run
>your own fucking executable Linux programs in your Bin folder. Yours
>never work, it always say "Open it with what?" How a fuck would I
>know? I'm not a psychic!

Yeah, Linux is a piece of shit; best stay with Windows.


--
Kevin Nathan (Arizona, USA)
Linux Potpourri and a.o.l.s. FAQ -- (temporarily offline)

Open standards. Open source. Open minds.
The command line is the front line.
Linux 2.6.25.20-0.5-pae
11:57pm up 32 days 14:11, 37 users, load average: 0.19, 0.30, 0.55

EOS

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 2:28:34 AM11/23/09
to
EHWollmann wrote:

> I don't care about running Windows exe under Linux, I only care to run
> your own fucking executable Linux programs in your Bin folder. Yours
> never work, it always say "Open it with what?" How a fuck would I know?
> I'm not a psychic!


please, get lost

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

stan

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 10:36:12 PM11/23/09
to
EHWollmann wrote:
>
> "houghi" <hou...@houghi.org.invalid> wrote in message news:slrnhgknqg...@penne.houghi...
>> EOS wrote:
>>> please, get lost
>>
>> And please do not feed the trolls. ;-)
>>
>> houghi
>> --
>> For a long time now I have tried simply to write the best I can. Sometimes I
>> have good luck and write better than I can.
>> -- Ernest Hemingway
>
> Yeah right dumbass, you're just a bunch of fucking nuts who think
> you're too smart. What a fuck! you really don't know how to succeed
> in business! Losers for 20+ yrs for trying to bash about Microsoft
> success, calling them evil when you don't know shit about usability.
> You stink!.....heehee.........

Outlook express?? Complete lack of knowledge of usenet
line lengths? You're not even a very bright windows user I can see how
you might be frustrated. You might try a Mac, I hear people have good
luck with such easy to use systems. They're standing by waiting to
hear from you.

bb

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 11:48:36 AM11/24/09
to
On 2009-11-23 07:43, EHWollmann wrote:
> I don't care about running Windows exe under Linux, I only care to run your own fucking executable Linux programs in your Bin folder. Yours never work, it always say "Open it with what?" How a fuck would I know? I'm not a psychic!

Try to take a beginner tutorial about linux before you start.
Linux don't work at windows at all, and before you understand why it's better
you must understand how it works.

The day they have Linux in all schools you and the other Joe figures will have a
lot more knowledge about how to use computers and how they work.

A program in your bin (not Bin) will be in your search path, but some
distributions don't include ~/bin in your path if it don't exist, so if you
create it and add things there, your $PATH will include ~/bin next time you
login. (and the permission must be set to executable)

And if you will run them from your desktop you need to create an action for them.

In KDE, right click on the desktop and create new link to application, or
just press alt F2 and type it's name.

But I guess that is to hard for you to type one word.
(unless it's inside Outlook Express)

Try this script:
#! /bin/sh
(
echo '16i[q]sa[ln0=aln100%Pln100/snlbx]sbA0D212153574F444E49572045535520454\
D20454B414D204F54204847554F4E452059415020544F4E4E4143205345544147204C4C4942\
snlbxq'
) | dc

/bb

Van Chocstraw

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 5:36:54 PM11/25/09
to
EHWollmann wrote:
> You said there is no virus in Linux, of course there won't be because you don't let your program run even regular user(not a virus bug) still can't run your shitty program.
>
> It always says "open with" no matter what you pick it won't run your shitty programs at all.
>
> Help me understand why you kept calling your fucking Robust OS..?

What are you blatting about?

0 new messages