Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
APM or ACPI?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
narke  
View profile  
 More options May 30 2011, 1:05 am
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux.slackware
From: narke <narkewo...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 00:05:42 -0500
Local: Mon, May 30 2011 1:05 am
Subject: APM or ACPI?
Hi,

I am using my laptop and want to config power manegment system to sleep
down my computer when its battery is running low.

I found there are two packages, APM and ACPI, both can do the job and
both got installed in my slackware. To save my learning time, I want to
get know from your experts, that what package is the standard or
perferable tool to do the job?

Thanks in advance.

--
Life is the only flaw in an otherwise perfect nonexistence
   -- Schopenhauer

narke


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Eef Hartman  
View profile  
 More options May 30 2011, 4:33 am
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux.slackware
From: Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hart...@tudelft.nl>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 10:33:51 +0200
Local: Mon, May 30 2011 4:33 am
Subject: Re: APM or ACPI?

narke <narkewo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> both got installed in my slackware. To save my learning time, I want to
> get know from your experts, that what package is the standard or
> perferable tool to do the job?

It depends on your BIOS, so on your _specific_ laptop.
APM (Automatic Power Manament) is the older tool, quite reliable
but a bit less powerful, ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power
Interface) is more recent and powerful, but doesn't work with BIOS'es
that don't support that interface.
Normally you should try ACPI first, and only if it doesn't work
reliable, you have to disable it in the bootloader (acpi=off and
arguments like that) and startup the APM daemon instead (APM will
NOT work when the kernel already initialized ACPI).
--
******************************************************************
**  Eef Hartman, Delft University of Technology, dept. SSC/ICT  **
**  e-mail: E.J.M.Hart...@tudelft.nl - phone: +31-15-27 82525   **
******************************************************************

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
narke  
View profile  
 More options May 30 2011, 2:23 pm
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux.slackware
From: narke <narkewo...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 13:23:48 -0500
Local: Mon, May 30 2011 2:23 pm
Subject: Re: APM or ACPI?
On 2011-05-30, Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hart...@tudelft.nl> wrote:

> narke <narkewo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> both got installed in my slackware. To save my learning time, I want to
>> get know from your experts, that what package is the standard or
>> perferable tool to do the job?

> It depends on your BIOS, so on your _specific_ laptop.
> APM (Automatic Power Manament) is the older tool, quite reliable
> but a bit less powerful, ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power
> Interface) is more recent and powerful, but doesn't work with BIOS'es
> that don't support that interface.
> Normally you should try ACPI first, and only if it doesn't work
> reliable, you have to disable it in the bootloader (acpi=off and
> arguments like that) and startup the APM daemon instead (APM will
> NOT work when the kernel already initialized ACPI).

Thanks for the tips.  So I think I will try acpi, since my running of
'acpi -B' get good results.

--
Life is the only flaw in an otherwise perfect nonexistence
   -- Schopenhauer

narke


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »