On Mar 17, 12:03 am, "News" <
m...@sb.net> wrote:
> That is true for many activities including hitting a baseball, but
> there is usually a limit for anyone to hit the fastest speeds, depending
> upon a person's natural ability and hard, frequent practice to get better.
>
> 1. You have a round bat.
> 2. You have a round ball.
> 3. You try to hit #2 with #1 *squarely in its center* when thrown anywhere regularly from 85-98+ mph by a pitcher who can throw: curves, sliders, knuckleballs, and of course, fastballs that can rise or sink, and at the
> point of release is usually only 57 feet away from you (coming off the mound
> at 60' 6") and can reach you in less than 0.50 sec., and you have to decide
> to swing or not in less than 0.30 sec. after release.
>
> That should explain the case for hard difficult it is for hitting, succinctly.
> I'm not saying being a goalie in hockey is a piece of cake, because
> it isn't with a hard piece of cold rubber flying regularly at 80+ mph
> potentially knocking you out or breaking a bone!
>
> Because the starting pitcher wears down over the innings and throws
> softer or less effectively, and batters' timing on his pitches get better.
> "Hitting is timing. A pitcher's job is to upset that timing."
> TJ says, "it's just as hard to to strike out a good batter as it is for a good hitter to hit a ball."
> Not necessarily so, depending upon the specific batter-pitcher duel!
Well of course to that last statement. I'm not going to argue.
I know that hitting a 90 mile an hour pitch is difficult. If it was
easy there wouldn't be a game. I'm just saying I have heard the
statement made many times over the years that hitting a baseball is
the hardest thing to do in sports - and I think such absolute
statements are ridiculous, and it's incredible the number of people
who believe everything they hear. Sure, it's hard to hit a 90 mile an
hour fast ball, but it's just as hard to stand up for more than 10
seconds against a dominant boxer in your weight class, or to throw
pitches to a polished and accomplished batter. I just don't like
those blanket statements, they're like the arguments over which
athlete is toughest or deserves more praise, and before you know it
everyone's piping up with their choices - usually running the gamut
from boxer or sprinter or MMA fighter or bicyclist or marathoner all
the way down the list, usually winding up with somebody mentioning a
sport people would be less apt to mention - which makes the mentioner
stand out as someone really unique and cool - mentioning a sport like
horse racing for example, and saying the jockey is the toughest and
most durable athlete of all. I hung out in a poolroom for years where
these debates raged endlessly. I've heard it all, and the truth is,
at it's highest level all competitions are equally demanding. To be a
champion at tiddlywinks or scrabble, and to go through tons of
competitors to take the title, is an accomplishment as great and as
grueling as any anyone can mention. And lastly, I am a natural
athlete who hated school and athletes and also scholars when I was
growing up, which is why I quit school at 15. But I played baseball
and could hit pretty good. I would be terrified to stand at the plate
for a 90 mph fastball. But I still believe that gradual increase of
speed over time would make it easier for natural athletes such as
myself to do well at something I've never done before, like face a 90
mph pitcher.
TJ