Message from discussion
DEAD: Catholic Church Protecting Pedophile Priests
Newsgroups: alt.obituaries,alt.censorship,news.admin.censorship,alt.flame.faggots,alt.flame.fucking.faggots
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.airnews.net!cabal11.airnews.net!uunet!ash.uu.net!world!john1
From: jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
Subject: Re: DEAD: Catholic Church Protecting Pedophile Priests
Expires: Wed, 30 Dec 2037 22:58:21 GMT
Organization: Johns & Call Girls United Against Repression
Message-ID: <GvJFyn.IF6x@world.std.com>
References: <B8E39D47.C0B1%walk804@bellsouth.net> <3cbf0a45.951865@news.xprt.net> <a9n3sj$nut$1@reader1.panix.com> <3cbf1835.4520771@news.xprt.net> <a9n8fn$qj1$1@reader1.panix.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 13:54:23 GMT
Lines: 136
In Message-ID: <a9n8fn$qj...@reader1.panix.com>
Newsgroups: alt.obituaries
Subject: Re: DEAD: Catholic Church Protecting Pedophile Priests
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 19:57:44 +0000 (UTC)
bald...@panix.com wrote:
> In the previous article, doc <drbon...@xprt.net> wrote:
> > I will remind you also, Mr. Baldwin, that pedophilia is not confined
> > to ranks of the Roman clergy. There is, at present, a most
> > notorious case in NYC involving a prominent Rabbi. And there have
> > been a number of cases involving Southern Baptists over the past
> > generation, most notably a minister/college administrator in
> > Oklahoma.
>
> Did their respective religious organizations close ranks and conspire
> to cover it all up? Did they quietly transfer the perps to new
> pastoral responsibilities without mentioning the reason to the
> congregations they were putting at risk?
>
> I don't have a problem with the RC Church because some of its priests
> have turned out to be child rapists. I have a problem with the Church
> because it doesn't, collectively, give a shit. *That* is why they are
> going to pay, and pay, and pay.
>
> > My "zero-tolerance" allusion was originally meant as a joke, but
> > your typically self-righteous jingoistic response really chaps me.
> > I think you'd argue with signpost, you most difficult and unpleasant
> > man.
>
> You may wish to consult a dictionary for the definition of the word
> "jingoistic."
> --
> _+_ From the catapult of |If anyone disagrees with any statement I make, I
> _|70|___:)=}- J.D. Baldwin |am quite prepared not only to retract it, but also
> \ / bald...@panix.com|to deny under oath that I ever made it. -T. Lehrer
> ***~~~~--------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Baldwin,
You really know how to sock it to 'em. You did a great job. I agree with
you 1,000%.
Unfortunately i must inform you that YOU are associated with an
organization that favors pedophilia. I am sure that you are unaware of
this fact. It's like this:
I am referring to your ISP, panix.com. I used to be a subscriber to
panix.com until I was kicked off for opposing pedophilia. Here are the
details.
The number one organization in the world which promotes pedophilia is the
North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA). This organization has
a great deal of support from various sources.
Even The New York Times supports NAMBLA. If you go to a library that has
The New York Times on microfilm and look at the issue of The Times for
1/1/83, page 5, you will see a story about NAMBLA headlined: "Group
Promoting Man-Boy Love is the Focus of Police Inquiry". Now, who can
possibly be against love? Isn't love a desirable thing? The New York Times
does that sort of thing all the time. It slants news stories in favor of
the side it favors. The story about NAMBLA, if it had been truthful,
would have called NAMBLA a group promoting man-boy SEX. There is no love
involved when an adult man sexually molests a young boy. That entire story
was so heavily slanted in favor of NAMBLA that for years the NAMBLA
contingent marching in the anual New York City "Gay Pride" parade
incorporated that entire story into its recruiting literature which it
handed out along the line of march.
Roy Radow used to be the head of the "Steering Committee" of NAMBLA, until
he was arrested for engaging in sexual relations with a young boy about
five years ago. He hasn't been heard of since that time.
Radow used to be a subscriber to panix. As a subscriber to panix, Radow
used to post messages to Usenet glorifying and exalting homosexual
child-molesting.
One time, in a discussion in the newsgroup panix.chat, I said that there
wasn't enough room on the same planet for Radow and myself. To which
Alexis Rosen, one of the two owners of panix replied that he prefers Radow
as a subscriber to panix over myself.
Another time Rod Swift, the notorious homonazi NAMBLA supporter from
Australia was posting attacks against me in the newsgroup alt.recovery.
One of Rosen's stooges on panix told me to stop posting rebutals to Swift
in that newsgroup.
Another thing that one of Rosen's stooges told me to do was to stop
posting messages in the homosexual newsgroup soc.motts. The FAQ of
soc.motss used to include a free plug for NAMBLA. By constantly harping on
that fact I believe that I am the cause of the removal of the free plug
for NAMBLA from the FAQ of soc.motss.
In 1996 I challenged the constitutionality of the Communications Decency
Act of 1996. My grounds for my challenge were that Rod Swift was using
indecent language against me. Swift, posting from Australia, was not
subject to that law, while I was. In other words, Swift was not forbidden
from using indecent language angainst me, but I was forbidden to even
quote the incecent language he was using against me.
During the course of litigation, Rosen sent one of his stooges, Clay
Shirky, to court on the side of the government's attempt to censor
the internet, alleging that I had "polluted" the newsgroup alt.christnet.
Eventually I was able to counter this, by pointing out that Rod Swift had
already "polluted" that newsgroup.
Now, before you denounce me, why don't you post something in panix.chat.
Let's see what Rosen has to say about this.
I am the most hated person on Usenet, and that is because I refuse to
knuckle down to NAMBLA. See some of my controversy with NAMBLA and its
many supporters in the newsgroup alt.gossip.royalty.
___________
| |
| POME |
|_________|
I'm entitled to do a little boasting
You've all heard of alt.support.crossposting
It was I who created that wonderful group
I'm the King of crossposters, and that's no poop!
jo...@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
Grand Duke of Yugoslobia
Duke of Vulgaria
Grand Muff-Diver of Jerusalem
& Elector of Homophobia
|
