Clint Eastwood, 1930-2012

[AndrewJ]

Eastwood made his first posthumous public appearance at this evening's Republican National Convention.

[Charlene]

On Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:35:29 PM UTC-5, AndrewJ wrote:
> Eastwood made his first posthumous public appearance at this evening's Republican National Convention.

Gee, thanks for scaring those of us who don't give a shit about American politics. Really appreciated.

wd48

[Mcafee]

On 8/30/2012 7:35 PM, AndrewJ wrote:
> Eastwood made his first posthumous public appearance at this evening's Republican National Convention.
>

He got his point across though. Obama is a failed President.

[Mcafee]

You Blacks don't care about anything except a warm place to shit.

[Scott Brady]

On Thursday, August 30, 2012 9:35:29 PM UTC-5, AndrewJ wrote:

> Eastwood made his first posthumous public appearance at this evening's Republican National Convention.

Word has it the Democrats have invited Bin Laden.

[Brian Watson]

"Scott Brady" <sbra...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a8d53aa4-7e1b-4d36...@googlegroups.com...

But that he's already touring for the Republicans?
--
Brian
"Fight like the Devil, die like a gentleman."

[★ The Last 100 Days ▬xA tA xAC xA tA aMAC ! ★]

Yet!

HOOROO

▬§

[Gern Blanston]

> > Eastwood made his first posthumous public appearance at this evening's Republican National Convention.
> >
> He got his point across though. Obama is a failed President

The other point he made was:
"Consider me for your dead pool picks next year."

[MWB]

It won't be long before the people at MSRBN will be calling Clint
Eastwood a racist.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSAyz5c3JmM&feature=related


GO PATRIOTS


Mark

[marcus]

On Aug 30, 10:35 pm, AndrewJ <ajmilner%cavtel....@gtempaccount.com>
wrote:

> Eastwood made his first posthumous public appearance at this evening's Republican National Convention.

That was Eastwood???

I thought it was Rev. Jim from "Taxi".

Either way, he was a national embarassment.

[Sarah Ehrett's Lesbian Love Interest]

At first I thought it was the Crypt Keeper.

[Scott Brady]

On Friday, August 31, 2012 7:30:23 PM UTC-5, marcus wrote:

> Either way, he was a national embarassment.

To what nation?

Speaking of embarrassment, you misspelled it.

[marcus]

On Aug 31, 8:59 pm, Scott Brady <sbrad...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, August 31, 2012 7:30:23 PM UTC-5, marcus wrote:
> > Either way, he was a national embarassment.
>
> To what nation?

The good ole USA.

>
> Speaking of embarrassment, you misspelled it.

And Eastwood was an embarrassment. I am not for having misspelled it.

[MWB]

I'll show you how to shut Marcus up.

He is not capable of answering this question.


Tell me Marcus, who is responsible for the murder of CBP Brian Terry???


GO PATRIOTS


Mark

[marcus]

On Aug 31, 9:40 pm, MWB <bick...@gmail.com> wrote:
.
>
> Tell me Marcus, who is responsible for the murder of CBP Brian Terry???

Alberto Gonzales and Michael Mukasey

[MWB]

On 8/31/2012 9:49 PM, marcus wrote:
> Alberto Gonzales and Michael Mukasey

You are not capable of answering this question correctly, because you
are not capable of telling the truth.

GO PATRIOTS


Mark

[Loki]

On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:16:32 -0700 (PDT), marcus <marc...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

I am a proud Democrat who voted for Obama in '08 and plan to do so
again in '12. That said, Clint Eastwood is a national treasure. His
best years are behind him and last night was not his finest moment,
but I still hold him in great respect and will shed a couple of tears
when he becomes on topic.

Loki

Respond to this post, win a cat

[Tommy Joe]

On Aug 31, 10:43 pm, Loki <cubby77...@aol.com> wrote:

> I am a proud Democrat who voted for Obama in '08 and plan to do so
> again in '12. That said, Clint Eastwood is a national treasure. His
> best years are behind him and last night was not his finest moment,
> but I still hold him in great respect and will shed a couple of tears
> when he becomes on topic.

Perhaps one day death pools will become so prevalent that almost
everyone is playing or paying attention so that when Eastwood or some
other famous person dies it is said in the news that they have finally
become "on topic". instead of saying they died today, they become
'on topic' as in, "Clint Eastwood become On Topic today. Age, 82."
Or however old he is when it finally happens.

TJ

[marcus]

"The Republican Party became On Topic today."

My that has a nice ring to it.

[Scott Brady]

On Friday, August 31, 2012 8:16:32 PM UTC-5, marcus wrote:

> > > Either way, he was a national embarassment.

No, Sean Penn campaigning alongside Chavez raised the bar for national embarrassment, but if Sick Willie so much as alludes to the Republican War On Women he may find himself in contention.

Until I get your read on them, I'm wholly uninterested in anything you may have to say about a patriot.

[MWB]

>
> Respond to this post, win a cat
>

I know you killfiled me.

I worked very hard to get you to killfile me and I accomplished my
mission. It took me a long time to figure out how to do it.

HOWEVAH...

That was a great post and I need a free cat.

The lefties are making fun of an 82 year old man talking from his heart.

I didn't see his speech. I listened to it on my way to work on the radio
and it was PRICELESS.

I did not know there was an empty chair. I didn't know what he had.

My cat CRAZY CAT passed away a few weeks ago and I miss her WICKED BAD

I am anxiously awaiting my free cat.

Please keep me in your killfile


GO KILLFILE


Mark

[tr...@iwvisp.com]

I agree with Loki. It is sad that he decided, or others advised or decided for him, that this format and this material would a) help his candidate or b) not be a personal embarrassment to himself. Hopefully this will fade away, along with the R & R ticket, and not even be an asterisk in what should be a wonderful, untarnished obituary.

Ray Arthur

[MWB]

On 9/1/2012 12:53 AM, tr...@iwvisp.com wrote:
> I agree with Loki. It is sad that he decided, or others advised or decided for him, that this format and this material would a) help his candidate or b) not be a personal embarrassment to himself. Hopefully this will fade away, along with the R & R ticket, and not even be an asterisk in what should be a wonderful, untarnished obituary.
>
> Ray Arthur
>

You're fading out Ray.


GO MITT


Mark

[David Uri]

On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:39:31 -0700 (PDT), silas <silasc...@aol.com>
wrote:

>Oh dear - read the "personal life" section of his Wiki entry. What
>were they thinking??

It's Wikipedia - there is no "they." Anyone who thinks an entry is
wrong can change it.

Regards,
--
David Uri.
Please visit my town - http://allezblancs.miniville.fr
Every visitor increases the population by one.
Email: davidu...@bigfoot.com (remove VEST to reply)
Facebook: http://facebook.com/daviduri

[X ` Man]

On 9/1/12 11:57 AM, News wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "marcus" <marc...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:ebeeaced-625e-4e5c...@h5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

> ---
>
> You meant to write "The Democrat-Republican Party..." because they are
> now merely one bird with the same crooked wing,


That's just more of your loonytarian bullshit.

--

What do the Republican Party of the United States and the Muslim
Brotherhood of the Arab World have in common? They're both faith-based
parties, they both deny science, and they both wage war on women.

[X ` Man]

On 9/1/12 12:07 PM, News wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes

>
> "Scott Brady" <sbra...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

> news:65e2f4dc-9ce3-4d4a...@googlegroups.com...

>> On Friday, August 31, 2012 8:16:32 PM UTC-5, marcus wrote:
>>
>>> > > Either way, he was a national embarassment.
>>
>> No, Sean Penn campaigning alongside Chavez raised the bar for national
>> embarrassment, but if Sick Willie so much as alludes to the Republican
>> War On Women he may find himself in contention.
>

> I fully expect to hear that same line about the Repubs' "War on
> Women"


If your mother had a choice, she would have aborted you retroactively.

[X ` Man]

On 9/1/12 1:23 PM, News wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>

> "X ` Man" <dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote in message
> news:jPadnS5_PPi_pN_N...@earthlink.com...

>> On 9/1/12 12:07 PM, News wrote:
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>
>>> "Scott Brady" <sbra...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:65e2f4dc-9ce3-4d4a...@googlegroups.com...
>>>> On Friday, August 31, 2012 8:16:32 PM UTC-5, marcus wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> > > Either way, he was a national embarassment.
>>>>
>>>> No, Sean Penn campaigning alongside Chavez raised the bar for national
>>>> embarrassment, but if Sick Willie so much as alludes to the Republican
>>>> War On Women he may find himself in contention.
>>>
>>> I fully expect to hear that same line about the Repubs' "War on
>>> Women"
>>
>>
>> If your mother had a choice, she would have aborted you retroactively.
>

> You are even sicker than I gave you credit for.
> Go see someone today to help with your attack-dog mentality and
> abusive personality.
> Not that it will do any good, but at least you can then say you
> tried.
>

See if your galpal Sarah E. will pry open her legs for you, Asperger Roy.

[Tommy Joe]

On Aug 31, 11:03 pm, marcus <marcus...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> "The Republican Party became On Topic today."
>
> My that has a nice ring to it.

I don't vote, never have and never well. What a bore. Same show
every four years with a few minor shows in between. I think the NFL
presentation every Sunday has more value and is more relevant than the
political presentation every four years. Watch it if you wish, have a
ball, it's not for me regardless of party. And if a good looking
third party comes along, that's going to be bullshit too if it becomes
strong enough to actually go anywhere. The policians every night
before they go to bed they get down and thank God for bringing new
children into the world to take the place of the old ones who have
caught on to the tiresome joke.

TJ

[Tommy Joe]

On Sep 1, 11:57 am, "News" <m...@sb.net> wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "marcus" <marcus...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:ebeeaced-625e-4e5c...@h5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

> ---
>
> You meant to write "The Democrat-Republican Party..." because they are now

> merely one bird with the same crooked wing, and have been so for decades.
> The Repubs started going downhill the minute they were formed in 1854 with
> the goal of corporate welfare and subsidies (and high "protectionist"
> tariffs/taxes on imported goods) for the big industrialists, a central bank
> (i.e., inflation), income tax, and wars benefitting the military-industrial
> complex that were in their hip pocket. All started by Rep. Henry Clay (Whig
> Party) morphing into the "party of Lincoln" with Lincoln's political
> connections at everyone else's expense. They have fought for those policies
> ever since 1854, and never have been for the Common Man.
>
> The Democrats also did the same destructive policies since the end of the
> heroic Pres. Grover Cleveland's administration in 1897, and the rise of
> William J. Bryan's left-wing loony urge to inflate the money supply amid
> more government intervention, supposedly to help the farmers. The only good
> thing about Bryan was his anti-war stance in the hysteria over Germany in
> World War 1 when he resigned as Sec. of State to the imperialist, fellow
> socialist President Wilson who also supported the corporate welfarist
> Central Bank (Federal Reserve) inflationary idea. Death to the D/R party!


I saw my name above your response. I certainly hope you didn't
think I wrote the words to which you respond as I have never voted and
never will. I've seen the show before. It's the same every four
years and always has been as long as I can tell.

TJ

[Your Brother]

News <m...@sb.net> wrote:

> I fully expect to hear that same line about the Repubs' "War on Women"

Remember that time Mom got diarrhea and we listened outside the bathroom
door and it gave you a boner? That was pretty funny. Call me.

[piks11]

On Friday, August 31, 2012 8:39:31 PM UTC-5, silas wrote:

> Oh dear - read the "personal life" section of his Wiki entry. What
>
> were they thinking??

I don't know what they were thinking but Eastwood seems to have lead a busy personal life.

After reading about Eastwood I thought I would check on Bill Clinton's "personal life" wiki entry. Guess what? There was no personal life wiki entry for Bill Clinton. I suppose we know what they were thinking.

Clinton is an interesting choice for a convention speaker, but I don’t think he’ll be leading the anti-war on women crusade anytime soon. Some people can remember him being fined $90,000.00 by the judge in the Paula Jones abuse case, the loss of his law license, and his nearly $1,000,000.00 settlement with Paula Jones. Following him Wednesday night will be White Woman Who Speaks with Forked Tongue Warren. It promises to be a truly wonderful evening not to be missed.

[Sarah Ehrett]

On Sat, 1 Sep 2012 18:27:56 -0500, "News" <m...@sb.net> wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>
>"X ` Man" <dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote in message

>news:ybWdnVfre7V52d_N...@earthlink.com...

>>
>> See if your galpal Sarah E. will pry open her legs for you, Asperger Roy.
>

> She's married to Ken, you sick, sex-obsessed, crude-creep bastard.
> And you can stop with the Asperger junk also, you amateur psychologist
>and confirmed bully.
> Do you have any compassion or decency for anybody other than your sick
>self?
> Do you have any decency at all, as a so-called human being?
> Apparently, not.
> I pity you more than almost anybody else on this ng, you pathetic
>thing.

Here is the official diagnosis for Harry Krause.
http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html

Profile of the Sociopath

This website summarizes some of the common features of descriptions of the
behavior of sociopaths.

Glibness and Superficial Charm

Manipulative and Conning
They never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving
behaviors as permissible. They appear to be charming, yet are covertly
hostile and domineering, seeing their victim as merely an instrument to be
used. They may dominate and humiliate their victims.

Grandiose Sense of Self
Feels entitled to certain things as "their right."

Pathological Lying
Has no problem lying coolly and easily and it is almost impossible for them
to be truthful on a consistent basis. Can create, and get caught up in, a
complex belief about their own powers and abilities. Extremely convincing
and even able to pass lie detector tests.

Lack of Remorse, Shame or Guilt
A deep seated rage, which is split off and repressed, is at their core.
Does not see others around them as people, but only as targets and
opportunities. Instead of friends, they have victims and accomplices who
end up as victims. The end always justifies the means and they let nothing
stand in their way.

Shallow Emotions
When they show what seems to be warmth, joy, love and compassion it is more
feigned than experienced and serves an ulterior motive. Outraged by
insignificant matters, yet remaining unmoved and cold by what would upset a
normal person. Since they are not genuine, neither are their promises.

Incapacity for Love

Need for Stimulation
Living on the edge. Verbal outbursts and physical punishments are normal.
Promiscuity and gambling are common.

Callousness/Lack of Empathy
Unable to empathize with the pain of their victims, having only contempt
for others' feelings of distress and readily taking advantage of them.

Poor Behavioral Controls/Impulsive Nature
Rage and abuse, alternating with small expressions of love and approval
produce an addictive cycle for abuser and abused, as well as creating
hopelessness in the victim. Believe they are all-powerful, all-knowing,
entitled to every wish, no sense of personal boundaries, no concern for
their impact on others.

Early Behavior Problems/Juvenile Delinquency
Usually has a history of behavioral and academic difficulties, yet "gets
by" by conning others. Problems in making and keeping friends; aberrant
behaviors such as cruelty to people or animals, stealing, etc.

Irresponsibility/Unreliability
Not concerned about wrecking others' lives and dreams. Oblivious or
indifferent to the devastation they cause. Does not accept blame
themselves, but blames others, even for acts they obviously committed.

Promiscuous Sexual Behavior/Infidelity
Promiscuity, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual acting out of all sorts.

Lack of Realistic Life Plan/Parasitic Lifestyle
Tends to move around a lot or makes all encompassing promises for the
future, poor work ethic but exploits others effectively.

Criminal or Entrepreneurial Versatility
Changes their image as needed to avoid prosecution. Changes life story
readily.

[X ` Man]

On 9/1/12 7:27 PM, News wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>

>>

>> See if your galpal Sarah E. will pry open her legs for you, Asperger Roy.
>

> She's married to Ken, you sick, sex-obsessed, crude-creep bastard.
> And you can stop with the Asperger junk also, you amateur
> psychologist and confirmed bully.

1. Since when is reality a concern of yours?

2. Lots of people here refer to you as Roy, Roy, the Asperger Boy, and
with good reason. It's not a phrase to describe you I coined. Why aren't
you objecting to the long-time users of this phrase to describe you?

[marcus]

You do not dictate what I do and don't discuss.

I don't care if you are interested in what I have to say.

[Sarah Ehrett]

On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 11:14:23 -0500, "News" <m...@sb.net> wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>

>"Sarah Ehrett" <nine...@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:jnk548lr7h80qon6j...@4ax.com...

>> On Sat, 1 Sep 2012 18:27:56 -0500, "News" <m...@sb.net> wrote:
>>
>> Here is the official diagnosis for Harry Krause.
>> http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html
>
>> Profile of the Sociopath
>>
>> This website summarizes some of the common features of descriptions of the
>> behavior of sociopaths.
>

> Why isn't Harry, Harry, the sick, sociopath Harry in jail?

Do you think " Harry, Harry, Socio-fairy " has a nice ring to it? :)

[Sarah Ehrett]

On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 11:21:17 -0500, "News" <m...@sb.net> wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>
>"X ` Man" <dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote in message

>news:qJydnbpezMyyqd7N...@earthlink.com...

>> On 9/1/12 7:27 PM, News wrote:
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>
>>
>>>>

>>>> See if your galpal Sarah E. will pry open her legs for you.

>>>
>>> She's married to Ken, you sick, sex-obsessed, crude-creep bastard.
>>> And you can stop with the Asperger junk also, you amateur
>>> psychologist and confirmed bully.
>>
>> 1. Since when is reality a concern of yours?
>

> When do you stop being a sociopath, Harry?

>
>> 2. Lots of people here refer to you as Roy, Roy, the Asperger Boy,
>

> No, only two people: you and your fellow sickie BobF.

Harry's always been desperate to appear "normal". See how quickly he
latches himself onto the loser's bandwagon"? His posts attempting to
tweek you are as sad and pathetic as old man Feigel's break from reality.

And don't forget it is Harry Krause who has dirty baseboards and what
appears to be less than code work done on electrical wiring in his rental
home. Yes indeed....old Harry may be a renter. Apparently his name
doesn't appear on the property records of where he lives. Or so they're
sayin' ...

[X ` Man]

On 9/2/12 1:20 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:

> And don't forget it is Harry Krause who has dirty baseboards and what
> appears to be less than code work done on electrical wiring in his rental
> home.>

Dirty baseboards? You mean, under a drywall wall with supporting studs
that was partially torn out to accommodate an additional breaker box for
a backup generator, with all manner of debris accompanying it, such as
insulation, wood chips, sawdust, pieces of black, red, and white wire,
wire nuts, and various other pieces of flotsam and jetsam? Yeah, it was
a mess there for a day. The next week, the drywall holes were repaired,
some trim was installed around the new electric box, and the area was
repainted. It's probably cleaner than the dishes in your kitchen.

The work was done by a licensed electrician working for a licensed
contractor. The work was done under a permit and the work passed
inspection when it was completed.

And, pray tell, what makes you think the work wasn't completed to code?
Are you, in addition to being a newsgroup asshole, a licensed
electrician or a residential electrical inspector who came by for a
close looksee?

No, I didn't think so. What you are is a bored little obstreperous
newsgroup bitch who gets off *trying* to annoy other posters. How do I
know that? Many reasons, including your cross-posting to other newsgroups.

It's too bad you're such a dried out, nasty old bitch. If you weren't,
you might be able to talk your loverboy NEWS into putting on a
chemo-bio-nuclear warfare suit and going down on you...to the place in
which your alleged husband long ago lost interest.

[Horatio Pugwash]

On Friday, August 31, 2012 4:35:29 AM UTC+2, AndrewJ wrote:
> Eastwood made his first posthumous public appearance at this evening's Republican National Convention.

indeed...US is owned by the Arabs and China....

[Sarah Ehrett]

On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 13:52:22 -0400, X ` Man
<dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote:

>And, pray tell, what makes you think the work wasn't completed to code?
>Are you, in addition to being a newsgroup asshole, a licensed

>electrician ...

I have an electrical engineering degree. And you?

Remember when you challenged me and asked where I'd gone to school? I
answered RPI. YOU can't seem to remember where you went to school.

<smirk>

[Meyer]

Harry does have a way with words, doesn't he?

I hate to put you on the spot but, Do you see any obvious code
violations in the photos he showed us?

[X ` Man]

So you at some point you may have worked with or designed computer
circuits. That doesn't mean you know the NEC. And what specifically
makes you think the work doesn't meet code? There's no minimum height
requirement off the floor, you can't see any of the wiring, and the
movable bookcase was moved. So, what, specifically, is not to code?

And you are still cross-posting.

[Sarah Ehrett]

On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 15:07:35 -0400, X ` Man

<dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote:

>On 9/2/12 2:47 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>> On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 13:52:22 -0400, X ` Man
>> <dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote:
>>
>>> And, pray tell, what makes you think the work wasn't completed to code?
>>> Are you, in addition to being a newsgroup asshole, a licensed
>>> electrician ...
>>
>> I have an electrical engineering degree. And you?
>>
>> Remember when you challenged me and asked where I'd gone to school? I
>> answered RPI. YOU can't seem to remember where you went to school.
>>
>> <smirk>
>>
>So you at some point you may have worked with or designed computer
>circuits.

Is that what you think an Electrical Engineer does?

Harry, your stupidity is limitless.

>That doesn't mean you know the NEC. And what specifically
>makes you think the work doesn't meet code? There's no minimum height
>requirement off the floor, you can't see any of the wiring, and the
>movable bookcase was moved. So, what, specifically, is not to code?

Calm down Harry. I smacking you around for fun. I wouldn't get
professionally involved in this pissing contest for all the limburger
cheese in your underwear drawer.

Btw what school did YOU attend?

>And you are still cross-posting.

Yep. That was an error.

[Sarah Ehrett]

I'll box Harry's ears from one side of usenet to the other but I'd hate to
stake my reputation and comment without actually inspecting it. That said,
it does not look, at least superficially, like any job I would approve,
recommend, or have done in my own home. And of course there's also the
fact I'm not familiar with the local codes in Calvert County, etc...

[X ` Man]

I asked you the same question about any significant "code violations,"
and you couldn't come up with any. How could you without seeing anything
more than the circuit breaker box or the hole in the wall in which it
was placed. There aren't any wires that have anything to do with the
circuit breaker box that are visible.

And what wouldn't you "approve, recommend, or have done" in your house?
The installation of an additional circuit breaker box, done according to
code?

You're exactly the sort of poster who destroyed rec.boats.

Have nice day.

[Meyer]

Testy but without the vulgar name calling and references to religion or
politics. Do we have a new you emerging out of the ashes?

[Sarah Ehrett]

On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 17:19:58 -0400, X ` Man

<dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote:

>On 9/2/12 4:24 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>> On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 14:59:12 -0400, Meyer <fa...@ID.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/2/2012 2:47 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 13:52:22 -0400, X ` Man
>>>> <dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> And, pray tell, what makes you think the work wasn't completed to code?
>>>>> Are you, in addition to being a newsgroup asshole, a licensed
>>>>> electrician ...
>>>>
>>>> I have an electrical engineering degree. And you?
>>>>
>>>> Remember when you challenged me and asked where I'd gone to school? I
>>>> answered RPI. YOU can't seem to remember where you went to school.
>>>>
>>>> <smirk>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Harry does have a way with words, doesn't he?
>>>
>>> I hate to put you on the spot but, Do you see any obvious code
>>> violations in the photos he showed us?
>>
>> I'll box Harry's ears from one side of usenet to the other but I'd hate to
>> stake my reputation and comment without actually inspecting it. That said,
>> it does not look, at least superficially, like any job I would approve,
>> recommend, or have done in my own home. And of course there's also the
>> fact I'm not familiar with the local codes in Calvert County, etc...
>>
>
>I asked you the same question about any significant "code violations,"
>and you couldn't come up with any.

<foot stomping hysterics ignored>

>How could you without seeing anything more than the circuit breaker box or the hole
>in the wall in which it was placed. There aren't any wires that have anything to do with the
>circuit breaker box that are visible.
>
>And what wouldn't you "approve, recommend, or have done" in your house?
>The installation of an additional circuit breaker box, done according to
>code?

I've stated my position clearly. Perhaps if you'd gone to an accredited
school, one you'd not be afraid to name, you'd understand a paragraph sixty
six words in length.

>You're exactly the sort of poster who destroyed rec.boats.

****** Insert Text : ------

>" This is a boating group. "

"I don't give a fuck! " - Harry Krause

****** End -----------------

>Have nice day.

You too Harry.

[X ` Man]

You stated a position like a six year old girl throwing a tantrum states
a position:

"I won't do that."

Why not?

"Because I won't do that. Wah, wah, wah."

As I suspected, there is nothing of value behind your comment on this
matter, just as there is nothing of value behind any of your comments
here. You're a bag of hot air.

[Sarah Ehrett]

On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 17:48:48 -0400, X ` Man

The reason is contained in the first sentence of that sixty six word
paragraph. Go back and read it or not. Your choice.

<snip yet another Harry Krause hissfit>

[X ` Man]

You're assuming I read all your posts or all the words in them. Your
assumption is as "off" as the rest of your posits. If you have a
valuable comment beyond the logical one, that you didn't inspect the
installation and therefore cannot comment on it, I will read it. Let's
see it. I'm not going mining for something you assume is a bòn mót, but
is really just more unintelligible or snarky nonsense on your part.

We live in a mostly rural county with lots of secondary roads and lots
of overhanging trees. When we have significant storms with wind and
lightning, some of the trees flop over onto the utility company's wires,
and we have power outages that range from a few hours to days or
sometimes a week or more at a time. As a result, sales of generators and
generator installs are common here, and the governmental utility
inspectors know what they are doing.

Oh, I'll be up in your area within a month or so. I usually visit my
boyhood and college friends in Connecticut and Rhode Island in early
summer and in October. I was in Providence for nearly a week earlier
this year.

[JustWait]

It was a sloppy job, I thought I saw loose grounds in the wall or
something. Either way, some hack stealing labor from his boss put the
thing in on a weekend...

[X ` Man]

On 9/2/12 7:41 PM, News wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>

> "X ` Man" <dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote in message

> news:3bednRZ0UeSrQt7N...@earthlink.com...

> You live in a dump and you know it.
> You have no boat, an old '92 Chevy van, and a 20-yr.-old bicycle
> that you also can't drive.

>
>> When we have significant storms with wind and lightning, some of the
>> trees flop over onto the utility company's wires, and we have power
>> outages that range from a few hours to days or sometimes a week or
>> more at a time. As a result, sales of generators and generator
>> installs are common here, and the governmental utility inspectors know
>> what they are doing.
>>
>> Oh, I'll be up in your area within a month or so. I usually visit my
>> boyhood and college friends in Connecticut and Rhode Island in early
>> summer and in October. I was in Providence for nearly a week earlier
>> this year.
>

> Stay away from Sarah, you sex-obsessed, sociopathe(t)ic, old, crazy
> loon!
>

Not to worry, Roy Roy Asperger Boy. I know she's wearing your personal
"I'm with stupid" tattoo.

[X ` Man]

"An Unemployed Eight-Year-Old Girl" named
News wrote:

>
> She doesn't have any tatoos, Sociopath Harry.
> But you have 'dope' tattooed on your forehead signifying what's
> inside.

[X ` Man]

"An Unemployed Eight-Year-Old Girl" named News wrote:

>

> Will it short-circuit, catch fire, and blow old Harry to hell sooner
> than he figured?

[Sarah Ehrett]

On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 18:35:33 -0400, X ` Man

Why would I assume YOU'D do anything logical or correctly?

Stop whining Harry. I am as usual, less than impressed with your lies and
excuses.

>We live in a mostly rural county with lots of secondary roads and lots
>of overhanging trees.

I'm very familiar with Calvert county, Anne Arundel as well. Took my
Corvette once to Bayside Chevrolet, across from Calvert Memorial. What a
rip off. Of course that was before the fire and subsequent rebuild and
remodel. I prefer to use Southern Tire in Charlotte Hall. They have
experts there for all makes and models.

>When we have significant storms with wind and lightning, some of the trees flop over onto
> the utility company's wires,

SMECO? They're fantastic. As opposed to that horrible National Grid
we have in RI.

>and we have power outages that range from a few hours to days or
>sometimes a week or more at a time.

Harry, Ken still owns a home in Golden Beach. We rode out last year's
earthquake and Hurricane Irene there. With Irene we lost power at 8pm and
SMECO had it restored by 11:00 the next morning.

>As a result, sales of generators and generator installs are common here, and
>the governmental utility inspectors know what they are doing.
>
>Oh, I'll be up in your area within a month or so.

Excellent. Back to Providence too?

>I usually visit my boyhood and college friends in Connecticut and Rhode Island in early
>summer and in October.

Sounds like you'll have a full schedule. I assume you're doing Homecoming.

>I was in Providence for nearly a week earlier this year.

Don't know if you've had a chance to go to Water Fire while in Providence
but it's beautiful and something to experience if you get a chance.

And for your late night munchies, try Haven Brother diner next to City
Hall.

[JustWait]

On 9/2/2012 8:38 PM, News wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>

> "JustWait" <motod...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:k20r3f$ls3$1...@dont-email.me...

> Will it short-circuit, catch fire, and blow old Harry to hell sooner
> than he figured?
>

One can only hope...

[Sarah Ehrett]

On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 18:35:27 -0500, "News" <m...@sb.net> wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>
>"Sarah Ehrett" <nine...@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:p7k7485qk2sc83uiq...@4ax.com...

> Don't be so nice to the clown prince of *both* a.o. and rec.boats.
> He recs [wrecks] rec.boats into little bits, and still pretends he owns
>one.

It's laughable watching him accuse others of destroying rec.boats.

> Maybe his grandson/an in-law/fourth cousin does, but not him.
> He wouldn't be able to drive one decently anyway, since he is on
>probation from the last time he lost control, almost hit another boater, and
>ran aground. ["The Glass Bottom Boat" a '66 Doris Day film at the end shows
>what Harry did]

Hey I remember "The Glass Bottom Boat". I have to admit I'm a sucker for
Doris Day comedies.

Poor Harry. Can't even pilot a power boat. You can imagine the
cluster-f$#k he'd be on a sailboat. Harry claims to be coming up to RI in
a month or so. Wonder if he ever saw any of the America's Cup races off
Newport? My father had tickets every 4 years for viewing on either a
Coast Guard cutter or a Navy Destroyer. That was always a lot of fun. The
ship provided a light lunch and we got to see the races up close if the
weather behaved and the fog didn't roll in. :) Our hold on the Cup ended
when Liberty lost to Australia II but the better boat won. When Dennis
Connor re-took the Cup in Freemantle 4 years later I watched on TV in the
middle of the night some of the finest 12 meter yacht racing I'd ever seen.

[Sarah Ehrett]

I'll have to take a better look at the pictures. Heck we're all assuming
that's actually Harry's house too.

[Sarah Ehrett]

On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 18:44:30 -0500, "News" <m...@sb.net> wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>

>"X ` Man" <dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote in message

>news:UO-dneLrIsrqM97N...@earthlink.com...

>> On 9/2/12 2:47 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>>> On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 13:52:22 -0400, X ` Man
>>> <dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> And, pray tell, what makes you think the work wasn't completed to code?
>>>> Are you, in addition to being a newsgroup asshole, a licensed
>>>> electrician ...
>>>
>>> I have an electrical engineering degree. And you?
>>>
>>> Remember when you challenged me and asked where I'd gone to school? I
>>> answered RPI. YOU can't seem to remember where you went to school.
>>>
>>> <smirk>
>>>
>> So you at some point you may have worked with or designed computer
>> circuits. That doesn't mean you know the NEC. And what specifically makes
>> you think the work doesn't meet code? There's no minimum height
>> requirement off the floor, you can't see any of the wiring, and the
>> movable bookcase was moved. So, what, specifically, is not to code?
>>
>> And you are still cross-posting.
>

> So what? Big deal!
> You post regularly and exchange messages to your two friends on
>alt.sociopath.old.men.


alt.sociopath.old.men. LOLOL!

[Sarah Ehrett]

On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 19:38:35 -0500, "News" <m...@sb.net> wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>

>"JustWait" <motod...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:k20r3f$ls3$1...@dont-email.me...

> Will it short-circuit, catch fire, and blow old Harry to hell sooner
>than he figured?

That's a sure bet based on the amount of explosive gas Harry expels.

[Sarah Ehrett]

On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 18:41:05 -0500, "News" <m...@sb.net> wrote:

>> Oh, I'll be up in your area within a month or so. I usually visit my
>> boyhood and college friends in Connecticut and Rhode Island in early
>> summer and in October. I was in Providence for nearly a week earlier this
>> year.
>

> Stay away from Sarah, you sex-obsessed, sociopathe(t)ic, old, crazy
>loon!

LOL! Thanks Roy. We both know Harry's too terrified to even darken the
door. He knows I have three grown sons as well as a husband who is more
than capable of breaking his knees should he show up and be less than a
gentleman.

[iBoaterer]

In article <5da748lpih2h88qd8...@4ax.com>,
nine...@cox.net says...

>
> On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 13:52:22 -0400, X ` Man
> <dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote:
>
> >And, pray tell, what makes you think the work wasn't completed to code?
> >Are you, in addition to being a newsgroup asshole, a licensed
> >electrician ...
>
> I have an electrical engineering degree. And you?
>
> Remember when you challenged me and asked where I'd gone to school? I
> answered RPI. YOU can't seem to remember where you went to school.
>
> <smirk>

He's tried to tell people here he went to Yale!!!!! Several have checked
the alumni records, but guess what? Not there!!

[iBoaterer]

In article <6e1848hq56jvk6k4a...@4ax.com>,
nine...@cox.net says...

It's his house, you can tell by the nasty, dirty cat pissed upon
molding.

[X ` Man]

Not to worry, "Sarah." I can't think of a single reason why I'd want to
visit an old bag like you. And, just for the record, I *don't* know or
care about the existence of the family you are claiming. You grossly
overestimate the interest I have in you. You're just one of the snarky
assholes one encounters on usenet.

[X ` Man]

On 9/3/12 7:31 AM, News wrote:

>
> 3. Journalist as he claims he was? He constantly lies, makes
> up fanciful stories about himself, so he fails that definition. I don't
> know how any legitimate news organization as 'The Kansas City Star'
> would have ever hired him as he presently is. Maybe he was an average
> person 45+ years ago, but his degenerative brain cell disease has turned
> him into a tyrant and decrepit old bully. Example: he constantly runs
> down Missouri, and the city (above mention) where he used to work and
> live. Few do that, unless he had a terrible history there and was
> (likely) fired, which meant he was the same miserable character (and a
> bad journalist) then also.
>
> 4. Sensitive, or well-mannered man? Don't make me laugh!
>

It's too bad you can't used your warped imagination for something
useful, Asperger Boy.

I don't run down Missouri as a state. I am, however, disgusted with the
batshit crazy political turn to the right it has taken over the years.
When I lived in Missouri, it was conservative but progressive. No
longer...politically, it has been taken over by right-wing evangelicals.

I had a great time when I lived in the Kansas City area. I lived in
several interesting neighborhoods in KC, near the Country Club Plaza for
a couple of years, and then in a wonderful old house closer to mid-town.
I liked Kansas City, but I haven't been there in decades. I don't recall
posting anything "bad" about Kansas City. The years I worked for The
Star I traveled all over Missouri, Kansas, and Iowa, and was also sent
on a few assignments into Arkansas and Oklahoma. It was a great job.
After four years at The Star, I was recruited by The Associated Press
and accepted its offer.

St. Louis is another matter. I've been there in recent years. It has
noticeably gone downhill.

[iBoaterer]

In article <4oydnbfQ0am4ItnN...@earthlink.com>, m...@sb.net
says...

>
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "Sarah Ehrett" <nine...@cox.net> wrote in message

> news:6e1848hq56jvk6k4a...@4ax.com...

> So, you are saying he might have lied about that also.
> Wouldn't put it past the old fartface, since he lies about everything
> else.
> Maybe he lives in an old, run-down apartment with his older lady who
> won't give him the time of day, not to mention night.

Wow, you know Harry as good as most of the rec.boaters!

[X ` Man]

On 9/3/12 11:22 AM, News wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
>
> "X ` Man" <dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote in message

>>

>> It's too bad you can't used your warped imagination for something
>> useful, Asperger Boy.
>

> That's not my name, Sociopathe(t)ic Harry.


It ought to be. It fits you to a tee.

>
>> When I lived in Missouri, it was conservative but progressive.
>

> Makes no political sense, as is usual with Sociopath, left-wing
> loony Harry.
>

Sure it does. You've just been brainwashed by the current state of
"conservatism." Back then, most conservatives were not batshit crazy.

[X ` Man]

On 9/3/12 11:27 AM, News wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "X ` Man" <dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote in message

> news:UNudnSvkIokJNtnN...@earthlink.com...

>
>
>> And, just for the record, I *don't* know or care about the existence
>> of the family you are claiming. You grossly overestimate the interest
>> I have in you.
>

> But you keep mentioning 'her' is somehow 'Ken' (another Harry
> "winner" line!) and make remarks about visiting near where she lives!
>

I don't give a shit who she or he is, or whether she is Ken or Barbie.
She's just another flaming ass, like you, although she seems a tad
smarter than you are. But, then, so is a turd in my cat's litter box.

I was born in and grew up in New England, and have lots of friends in
Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts. I visit them about twice a
year up there. I suppose since Rhode Island is a small state, if I am in
it, I am "near" where she lives. I wouldn't recognize your girl buddy
Sarah if she were roadkill on the other side of the Connecticut turnpike.

[Meyer]

Know Harry as well

[Sarah Ehrett]

On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 09:20:44 -0400, X ` Man
<dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote:

>On 9/3/12 7:31 AM, News wrote:
>
>>
>> 3. Journalist as he claims he was? He constantly lies, makes
>> up fanciful stories about himself, so he fails that definition. I don't
>> know how any legitimate news organization as 'The Kansas City Star'
>> would have ever hired him as he presently is. Maybe he was an average
>> person 45+ years ago, but his degenerative brain cell disease has turned
>> him into a tyrant and decrepit old bully. Example: he constantly runs
>> down Missouri, and the city (above mention) where he used to work and
>> live. Few do that, unless he had a terrible history there and was
>> (likely) fired, which meant he was the same miserable character (and a
>> bad journalist) then also.
>>
>> 4. Sensitive, or well-mannered man? Don't make me laugh!
>>
>
>It's too bad you can't used your warped imagination for something
>useful, Asperger Boy.

Complains the sociopath who's imagination is filled with sexual comments
and situations about every one else.

PKB Krausie.

[Sarah Ehrett]

On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 09:07:31 -0400, X ` Man
<dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote:

>On 9/2/12 9:26 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>> On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 18:41:05 -0500, "News" <m...@sb.net> wrote:
>>
>>>> Oh, I'll be up in your area within a month or so. I usually visit my
>>>> boyhood and college friends in Connecticut and Rhode Island in early
>>>> summer and in October. I was in Providence for nearly a week earlier this
>>>> year.
>>>
>>> Stay away from Sarah, you sex-obsessed, sociopathe(t)ic, old, crazy
>>> loon!
>>
>> LOL! Thanks Roy. We both know Harry's too terrified to even darken the
>> door. He knows I have three grown sons as well as a husband who is more
>> than capable of breaking his knees should he show up and be less than a
>> gentleman.
>>
>
>
>Not to worry, "Sarah." I can't think of a single reason why I'd want to
>visit an old bag like you. And, just for the record, I *don't* know or
>care about the existence of the family you are claiming. You grossly
>overestimate the interest I have in you.

Sobs the sociopath who queries if I'm going to be knocking on his door
anytime soon.

<smirk>

>You're just one of the snarky assholes one encounters on usenet.

Snarky because I have your number Harry, I've beaten you at your own game,
and I've not stooped to your level of discourse.

[Sarah Ehrett]

On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 10:27:11 -0500, "News" <m...@sb.net> wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>
>"X ` Man" <dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote in message
>news:UNudnSvkIokJNtnN...@earthlink.com...

>> On 9/2/12 9:26 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 18:41:05 -0500, "News" <m...@sb.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Oh, I'll be up in your area within a month or so. I usually visit my
>>>>> boyhood and college friends in Connecticut and Rhode Island in early
>>>>> summer and in October. I was in Providence for nearly a week earlier
>>>>> this
>>>>> year.
>>>>
>>>> Stay away from Sarah, you sex-obsessed, sociopathe(t)ic, old, crazy
>>>> loon!
>>>
>>> LOL! Thanks Roy. We both know Harry's too terrified to even darken
>>> the
>>> door. He knows I have three grown sons as well as a husband who is more
>>> than capable of breaking his knees should he show up and be less than a
>>> gentleman.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Not to worry, "Sarah." I can't think of a single reason why I'd want to
>> visit an old bag like you.
>

> Without looking at either her or your wife for comparison, I'd bet
>your giggly wife was the old bag.

>> And, just for the record, I *don't* know or care about the existence of
>> the family you are claiming. You grossly overestimate the interest I have
>> in you.
>

> But you keep mentioning 'her' is somehow 'Ken' (another Harry "winner"
>line!) and make remarks about visiting near where she lives!

Harry has serious mental problems. His memory went long ago and what's
left of his mind is terminally diseased.

>> You're just one of the snarky assholes one encounters on usenet.
>

> Speaking of snarky assholes on usenet...it's sociopathe(t)ic, old bag
>Harry!

[Sarah Ehrett]

Ahahahaha! Point. :)

[Sarah Ehrett]

On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 09:30:58 -0500, "News" <m...@sb.net> wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>

>"Sarah Ehrett" <nine...@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:6e1848hq56jvk6k4a...@4ax.com...

> So, you are saying he might have lied about that also.

Anything is possible, but iBoaterer says it's his house because of the
filthy cat-pissed-on baseboards. Can you imagine *that* smell?

[Sarah Ehrett]

They must have also been Yale grads then? In my experience alumni data is
not made public.

[ .... ]

Yep, Just checked RPI and one other university and " no joy" on alumni
records ie: search for your classmates stuff, unless you yourself are a
registered alumnus.

Of course YMMV.

[X ` Man]

On 9/3/12 12:07 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 09:07:31 -0400, X ` Man
> <dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote:
>
>> On 9/2/12 9:26 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 18:41:05 -0500, "News" <m...@sb.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Oh, I'll be up in your area within a month or so. I usually visit my
>>>>> boyhood and college friends in Connecticut and Rhode Island in early
>>>>> summer and in October. I was in Providence for nearly a week earlier this
>>>>> year.
>>>>
>>>> Stay away from Sarah, you sex-obsessed, sociopathe(t)ic, old, crazy
>>>> loon!
>>>
>>> LOL! Thanks Roy. We both know Harry's too terrified to even darken the
>>> door. He knows I have three grown sons as well as a husband who is more
>>> than capable of breaking his knees should he show up and be less than a
>>> gentleman.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Not to worry, "Sarah." I can't think of a single reason why I'd want to
>> visit an old bag like you. And, just for the record, I *don't* know or
>> care about the existence of the family you are claiming. You grossly
>> overestimate the interest I have in you.
>
> Sobs the sociopath who queries if I'm going to be knocking on his door
> anytime soon.
>
> <smirk>

Yawn.

>
>
>> You're just one of the snarky assholes one encounters on usenet.
>
> Snarky because I have your number Harry, I've beaten you at your own game,
> and I've not stooped to your level of discourse.
>

Just snarky, not "because." You're snarky to at least half the many many
posters in alt.obits. I'm only snarky to right-wing assholes. Like you.

BTW, I do get quite the kick out of your gun talk. You're probably quite
the shooter at the summer arcades.

[X ` Man]

On 9/3/12 12:11 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:

> Yep, Just checked RPI and one other university and " no joy" on alumni
> records ie: search for your classmates stuff, unless you yourself are a
> registered alumnus.
>
> Of course YMMV.
>

Still crossposting, hey, LiarGirl?

[Sarah Ehrett]

On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:49:25 -0400, X ` Man
<dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote:

>On 9/3/12 11:27 AM, News wrote:
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
>> "X ` Man" <dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote in message
>> news:UNudnSvkIokJNtnN...@earthlink.com...
>>
>>
>>> And, just for the record, I *don't* know or care about the existence
>>> of the family you are claiming. You grossly overestimate the interest
>>> I have in you.
>>
>> But you keep mentioning 'her' is somehow 'Ken' (another Harry
>> "winner" line!) and make remarks about visiting near where she lives!
>>
>
>I don't give a shit who she or he is, or whether she is Ken or Barbie.

And then you go on for a paragraph and a half about me, Harry. You
actions belie your words.

If you don't like it in AO you can take your fat ass outta here.
Remember: YOU came into AO trolling me not vice versa.

[X ` Man]

On 9/3/12 12:24 PM, Sarah Ehrett wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:49:25 -0400, X ` Man
> <dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote:
>
>> On 9/3/12 11:27 AM, News wrote:
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>
>>> "X ` Man" <dump-on-co...@anywhere-you-can.com> wrote in message
>>> news:UNudnSvkIokJNtnN...@earthlink.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>> And, just for the record, I *don't* know or care about the existence
>>>> of the family you are claiming. You grossly overestimate the interest
>>>> I have in you.
>>>
>>> But you keep mentioning 'her' is somehow 'Ken' (another Harry
>>> "winner" line!) and make remarks about visiting near where she lives!
>>>
>>
>> I don't give a shit who she or he is, or whether she is Ken or Barbie.
>
> And then you go on for a paragraph and a half about me, Harry. You
> actions belie your words.
>
> If you don't like it in AO you can take your fat ass outta here.
> Remember: YOU came into AO trolling me not vice versa.
>

Wrong again, turdbreath. I've been reading and occasionally posting in
AO long before your scent reached my nostrils. For a while, not long,
I've noticed you've been one of two batshit crazy attack dogs in here,
the other being your beau NEWS. I'd admit to going after the overtly
batshit crazy righties in rec.boats, but you two bare your fangs
indiscriminately.

[iBoaterer]

In article <5044d436$0$44408$c3e8da3$f017...@news.astraweb.com>,
fa...@ID.com says...

Good catch, Don... Oh, wait...

[iBoaterer]

In article <2kl948thcvmm49k1c...@4ax.com>,
nine...@cox.net says...

Actually there is a very easy way, you can call the school registrar and
ask for information there. They will not divulge detailed information
but they have master lists of students who graduated from their school
and the courses they have finished