Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: (POL) U.S. Government lies (again, ho-hum) about the IRS "independence" - nothing new on another falsehood
12 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Sarah Ehrett
May 18, 2013, 1:53:52 PM5/18/13
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
On Sat, 18 May 2013 12:35:48 -0500, "News" <m...@sb.net> wrote:
>Are you reading this, Sarah? <g>
What are you assuming, Roy?
Do you think because I refuse to respond to your anti-government rants on
the WTC content thread that I am somehow a big government shill?
>Are you reading this, Sarah? <g>
What are you assuming, Roy?
Do you think because I refuse to respond to your anti-government rants on
the WTC content thread that I am somehow a big government shill?
David Carson
May 18, 2013, 2:54:20 PM5/18/13
to
On Sat, 18 May 2013 13:53:52 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <nine...@cox.net>
wrote:
He assumes that anyone who doesn't take his side every time must
fundamentally oppose everything he believes in. You're somewhere in the 50
to 75 percent range, and that's NOT GOOD ENOUGH.
wrote:
fundamentally oppose everything he believes in. You're somewhere in the 50
to 75 percent range, and that's NOT GOOD ENOUGH.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Sarah Ehrett
May 18, 2013, 3:46:10 PM5/18/13
to
On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:07:37 -0500, "News" <m...@sb.net> wrote:
>x-no-archive: yes
>
>"Sarah Ehrett" <nine...@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:guffp89c1fc7hg4o7...@4ax.com...
> No.
> I don't believe that.
> I do believe you believe the government in its biggest lies, that when
>debunked by science you still believe it.
No one has debunked the official findings of the NIST and FEMA reports.
> It is puzzling you will not answer the question on those 14
>distinguished people (police, astrophysicist, three who survived the heat in
>the towers, etc.) who were earwitnesses to the explosion sounds.
I did answer it Roy, via Dr. Jonathan Barnett comments.
"Well, we did talk to eye witnesses. In our opinion the "explosions" were
local events, not demolitions but rather the sound of structural failures."
I agree with that assessment, Roy. There is no evidence to the contrary.
>x-no-archive: yes
>
>"Sarah Ehrett" <nine...@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:guffp89c1fc7hg4o7...@4ax.com...
> I don't believe that.
> I do believe you believe the government in its biggest lies, that when
>debunked by science you still believe it.
No one has debunked the official findings of the NIST and FEMA reports.
> It is puzzling you will not answer the question on those 14
>distinguished people (police, astrophysicist, three who survived the heat in
>the towers, etc.) who were earwitnesses to the explosion sounds.
I did answer it Roy, via Dr. Jonathan Barnett comments.
"Well, we did talk to eye witnesses. In our opinion the "explosions" were
local events, not demolitions but rather the sound of structural failures."
I agree with that assessment, Roy. There is no evidence to the contrary.
Sarah Ehrett
May 18, 2013, 3:49:05 PM5/18/13
to
rights, and other issues that not only Roy but others support.
Sometimes ya just gotta agree to disagree. :)
Message has been deleted
marcus
May 21, 2013, 10:10:33 PM5/21/13
to
Gee, I guess the poor conservatives now know what it"s been like to be
in a left-wing group for the past 65 years.
If only it had just been the IRS for Leftists. Instead, they got
Red Squads
wire taps
surveillance
COINTELPRO
Infiltration
Black Lists
Oh, the poor poor Tea Party, thanks to the Supreme Court they get
unknown amounts from unknown donors, and the IRS targeted
them...imagine!
in a left-wing group for the past 65 years.
If only it had just been the IRS for Leftists. Instead, they got
Red Squads
wire taps
surveillance
COINTELPRO
Infiltration
Black Lists
Oh, the poor poor Tea Party, thanks to the Supreme Court they get
unknown amounts from unknown donors, and the IRS targeted
them...imagine!
Message has been deleted
marcus
May 22, 2013, 9:58:46 AM5/22/13
to
On May 22, 8:29 am, Terry del Fuego <t_del_fu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Though, to be fair. the less hysterical reporting makes me believe
> that this is less of an outrage than it initially appeared. I'd try
> repeating some of the points here, but I'm just not up for any hot
> head-on-brick-wall action this morning.
This is not Watergate(as Peggy Noonan states). not even close.
I just find the whole thing so hypocritical...when did right-wing
groups ever speak out against government injustices to left-wing
groups?
> On Tue, 21 May 2013 19:10:33 -0700 (PDT), marcus <marcus...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Oh, the poor poor Tea Party, thanks to the Supreme Court they get
> >unknown amounts from unknown donors, and the IRS targeted
> >them...imagine!
>
> (wrong * 2) != right
> wrote:
>
> >Oh, the poor poor Tea Party, thanks to the Supreme Court they get
> >unknown amounts from unknown donors, and the IRS targeted
> >them...imagine!
>
>
> Though, to be fair. the less hysterical reporting makes me believe
> that this is less of an outrage than it initially appeared. I'd try
> repeating some of the points here, but I'm just not up for any hot
> head-on-brick-wall action this morning.
This is not Watergate(as Peggy Noonan states). not even close.
I just find the whole thing so hypocritical...when did right-wing
groups ever speak out against government injustices to left-wing
groups?
MWB
May 22, 2013, 11:20:04 AM5/22/13
to
On 5/21/2013 10:10 PM, marcus wrote:
> Gee, I guess the poor conservatives now know what it"s been like to be
> in a left-wing group for the past 65 years.
I didn't know that The United States Asshole Association was a left wing
> Gee, I guess the poor conservatives now know what it"s been like to be
> in a left-wing group for the past 65 years.
group.
GO S&W
Mark
0 new messages