Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Why A Mom Should Be Buried with her Dead Soldier Son

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Otis Willie PIO The American War Library

unread,
Dec 31, 2009, 6:23:05 PM12/31/09
to
Why A Mom Should Be Buried with her Dead Soldier Son
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mona-gable/why-a-mom-should-be-burie_b_407709.html

{EXCERPT} Huffington Post (blog) My stepmother served in the Korean War. Her best friend was one of the Army's first female colonels. And now I have friends whose children might be heading...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mona-gable/why-a-mom-should-be-burie_b_407709.html


\\gol...

U.S. and friendly nation laws prohibit fully
reproducing copyrighted material. In abidance
with our laws this report cannot be provided in
its entirety. However, you can read it in full
today at the supplied URL. The subject/content of
this report is not necessarily the viewpoint of
the distributing Library. This report is provided
for your information and discussion.

-- Otis Willie (Ret.)
Military News and Information Editor (http://www.13105320634.com)
The American War Library, Est. 1988 (http://www.amervets.com)
16907 Brighton Avenue
Gardena CA 90247
1-310-532-0634

Military Personnel Database
http://www.amervets.com/library.htm
Military and Vet Info-Exchange/Discussion Groups
http://www.amervets.com/share.htm
Public Information Office
http://www.13105320634.com

Will

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 7:52:34 AM1/1/10
to
On Dec 31 2009, 6:23�pm, Otis Willie PIO The American War Library
<themilitaryto...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> Why A Mom Should Be Buried with her Dead Soldier Sonhttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/mona-gable/why-a-mom-should-be-burie_b_...
>
> {EXCERPT} Huffington Post (blog) My stepmother served in the Korean War. Her best friend was one of the Army's first female colonels. And now I have friends whose children might be heading...http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mona-gable/why-a-mom-should-be-burie_b_...

>
> \\gol...
>
> � � � � U.S. and friendly nation laws prohibit fully
> � � � � reproducing copyrighted material. In abidance
> � � � � with our laws this report cannot be provided in
> � � � � its entirety. However, you can read it in full
> � � � � today at the supplied URL. The subject/content of
> � � � � this report is not necessarily the viewpoint of
> � � � � the distributing Library. This report is provided
> � � � � for your information and discussion.
>
> -- Otis Willie (Ret.)
> � �Military News and Information Editor (http://www.13105320634.com)
> � �The American War Library, Est. 1988 (http://www.amervets.com)
> � �16907 Brighton Avenue
> � �Gardena CA 90247
> � �1-310-532-0634
>
> Military Personnel Database
> � �http://www.amervets.com/library.htm
> Military and Vet Info-Exchange/Discussion Groups
> � �http://www.amervets.com/share.htm
> Public Information Office
> � �http://www.13105320634.com

She shouldn't. She's doesn't meet the qualifications necessary for
burial there. It would start a ridiculous precedent.

Kris Baker

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 11:12:57 AM1/1/10
to

"Will" <Felixb...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:46844a1c-773c-4084...@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...

>
> She shouldn't. She's doesn't meet the qualifications necessary
> for burial there. It would start a ridiculous precedent.

Aren't our veterans' cemeteries for soldiers and their spouses?
Why can't an unmarried man have his next-of-kin buried there?

I know, space. But why not allow the cremated remains of the
mother to be buried on top of the grave?

A friend of mine her mother's ashes to a small Oklahoma
cemetery, found her grandfather's grave, dug a small hole
and buried her mother....silently and quietly.

Kris

Will

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 9:04:58 AM1/2/10
to
On Jan 1, 11:12�am, "Kris Baker" <parallelcoo...@ggmail.com> wrote:
> "Will" <Felixbird1...@aol.com> wrote in message

Veterans are buried in a V.A. cemetery at no cost for the grave,
opening charges, gravebox or gravestone. Should we also allow the
parent to be buried free? I think not. Besides in most V.A.
cemeteries, body burials are inground while cremations have walls with
niches.

BobF

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 2:30:57 PM1/2/10
to

[Default] On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 06:04:58 -0800 (PST), Will
<Felixb...@aol.com> magnanimously proffered:

>On Jan 1, 11:12?am, "Kris Baker" <parallelcoo...@ggmail.com> wrote:
>> "Will" <Felixbird1...@aol.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:46844a1c-773c-4084...@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > She shouldn't. She's doesn't meet the qualifications necessary
>> > for burial there. It would start a ridiculous precedent.
>>
>> Aren't our veterans' cemeteries for soldiers and their spouses?
>> Why can't an unmarried man have his next-of-kin buried there?
>>

>> I know, space. ? But why not allow the cremated remains of the


>> mother to be buried on top of the grave?
>>
>> A friend of mine her mother's ashes to a small Oklahoma

>> cemetery, ?found her grandfather's grave, dug a small hole


>> and buried her mother....silently and quietly.
>>
>> Kris
>
>Veterans are buried in a V.A. cemetery at no cost for the grave,
>opening charges, gravebox or gravestone. Should we also allow the
>parent to be buried free? I think not. Besides in most V.A.
>cemeteries, body burials are inground while cremations have walls with
>niches.

Veterans *and* their spouses. My mother's cremated remains are
interred in a niche next to those of my step-father (ex-navy WWII) in
a V.A. cemetery in Southern California. It's a drive and a half, but I
visit it whenever I'm in the US.


--

RE: The Berlin Wall

Not really. I'm just being precocious and knowing how
Government usually operates when it puts up physical walls on artificial
(re: political) boundaries.
I can easily forsee the day this Southern Wall will be just as
noxious to the U.S. and the remainder of the world as the Berlin Wall was to
the Germans and to the rest of the world (outside the U.S.S.R.) for over 28
terrible years for Berliners (Aug. 13, 1961 - Nov. 9, 1989).
It wouldn't surprise me one little bit within the next 10 years
to see armed guards (and barbed wire for additional fortifications) *inside
the U.S.* gunning down people trying to flee oppression to what-is-now
Mexico and beyond.

- From "The Sayings of Roy"

Kris Baker

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 3:45:42 PM1/2/10
to

"Will" <Felixb...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:d3e434cd-7293-4b23...@o28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

----------------------------------------------

Not just the veterans themselves. Spouses (even if they remarried
a non-veteran), dependent and unmarried (disabled) adult children
can also be buried in a national cemetery. In fact, *any* surviving
spouse of a veteran, whether he is buried in a national cemetery
or not, who died after Dec 1 2000, can be buried there.
http://www.military.com/benefits/burial-and-memorial/va-national-cemetery-burial-eligibility#sd

The mother is asking that she be allowed to be buried **on top of**
her son's grave (because he's buried quite deep into the ground).
If she wants to pay for it, what's the big deal?

My husband and I, as well as my father and father-in-law, have
foregone burial in a national cemetery. Maybe we could arrange
to trade. A Gold Star mother isn't good enough, but all ex-spouses
of a vet, are now eligible?

Kris
Wife and daughter of veterans

cat

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 10:48:18 AM1/3/10
to
"BobF" <b...@surfwriter.net.not> wrote in message

> Veterans *and* their spouses. My mother's cremated remains are
> interred in a niche next to those of my step-father (ex-navy WWII) in
> a V.A. cemetery in Southern California. It's a drive and a half, but I
> visit it whenever I'm in the US.

My parents' ashes are together in a veterans' cemetery as well. My father
served during the Korean conflict, but never got closer to Korea than
Kansas.

So a woman whose son *died in war* can't join him, even though he would be
entitled to share space with a spouse or a child? Doesn't seem right.

I'm a veteran. She can have my space.


0 new messages