No Olympics in USA
Ned Viking
right thing by choosing a site other than the USA for the Olympics.
The USA got the fewest votes of any country and was eliminated in the
first round of voting.
This is good for Chicago. Last time they held an Olympics in the USA
(Atlanta), there was a terrorist bombing. The security in the USA
were bad in letting the bombing occur, then they arrested an innocent
man and the libelous/slanderous USA media claimed the innocent man was
the bomber. Perhaps the committee remembered the Atlanta SNAFU and
knew to avoid another USA site because of terrorism.
Chicago also has a bad reputation for crime. Do a search on "Chicago
honor student beaten" to see a nasty story about violent mob behavior
in Chicago. Most of Rio is a hideous slum, but conditions there are
still better than many parts of the Chicago area.
Sarah Ehrett
<Lom...@hotmail.com> wrote:
:> Last time they held an Olympics in the USA (Atlanta), there was a terrorist bombing.
<BzzzzzzzzzT!> Wrong answer, you drunken homo. ;)
You never cease to provide me with comic relief, Polio. The month of
Feb. 2002 in Salt Lake City ring a bell for you?
LOL.
Woo
You beat me to it! Well done to Brazil. I'm very tempted to go myself.
Greg.Procter
Nahh, the reason they (the US) was eliminated is because they're all drug
cheats.
(Wait for the "prove it" responses)
Greg.P.
Sarah Ehrett
<pro...@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
Nahh, we already know you can't ever prove for false claims.
:>Greg.P.
Greg.Procter
Flo-joe went and died.
Sarah Ehrett
<pro...@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
So you admit to making frivolous and false claims, fine.
Greg.Procter
Sarah, we all know yanks are cheats, specifically drug and physical
enhancement
cheats. You can yell "prove it" until you're blue or purple or whatever
colour
you druggies turn, but you will only be proving my point to the world at
large.
Sarah Ehrett
<pro...@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
LOL. Such comedic relief groggy. The 'world at large' recognizes
you always make blanket false declarations without any substantiation.
Greg.Procter
Get real Sarah, the World at large doesn't have any idea at all who I am.
OTOH they recognise that people like Flo-Joe, that Tour d'France cyclist
and Phelps are/were all on enhancement drugs.
Sarah Ehrett
<pro...@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
Anyone reading your online persona has a good idea of what you
represent yourself to be.
:>OTOH they recognise that people like Flo-Joe, that Tour d'France cyclist
:>and Phelps are/were all on enhancement drugs.
People recognize nothing of the sort, groggy. See how your lies get
you boxed into a corner.
Greg.Procter
I don't represent myself in any way, in that I am myself.
<sheesh>
>
> :>OTOH they recognise that people like Flo-Joe, that Tour d'France
> cyclist
> :>and Phelps are/were all on enhancement drugs.
>
> People recognize nothing of the sort, groggy. See how your lies get
> you boxed into a corner.
I was refering to _real_ people, Sarah, not those obese imitations that
reside in the USa.
Sarah Ehrett
<pro...@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
Real people like the French? Why have they not stripped " that Tour
d'France cyclist " of his Seven championships if he was a druggy
cheat?
Or perhaps you mean the IOC? Why have *they* not acted and stripped
*Flo-Jo" and *Phelps* of their World and Olympic records and Gold
medals if they were druggy cheats?
The answer is real people recognize a BS'er like you when they see
one, and give them the attention they deserve.
Greg.Procter
Simple, your cheats managed to evade drug discovery in the tests.
>
> The answer is real people recognize a BS'er like you when they see
> one, and give them the attention they deserve.
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Sarah Ehrett
<pro...@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
False premise and a lie, groggy.
How sad you've become. You post fantasies and lies.
:>> The answer is real people recognize a BS'er like you when they see
Greg.Procter
Flo-Joe died of symptoms which match those that can be expected of
performance enhancing drugs.
There's nothing false about the premise.
If there were any lies you could show them to be so, but instead you just
throw
unfounded insults at me - the first action of every bully and blaggard!
Regards,
Greg.P.
BTW any word from Chris and Phuxey?
Sarah Ehrett
<pro...@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
The official cause of death was suffocation as a result of a severe
epileptic seizure.
:>There's nothing false about the premise.
:>If there were any lies you could show them to be so, but instead you just
:>throw
:>unfounded insults at me - the first action of every bully and blaggard!
You started this discussion with a whine about people who demand
cites. The historical fact is not one instance of any drug use has
ever been found in any one of the three athletes you mentioned.
That's the proof in and of itself which shoots down your wild claims
and lies.
:>Regards,
:>Greg.P.
:>
:>BTW any word from Chris and Phuxey?
Nothing from Chris. I suspect Nicky might still be in touch with him.
Nick and Phuxie are posting on az.general [ Seth more so than Nicky]
if you want to *PING* them over there.
Greg.Procter
Right, lots of top level atheletes suffer from epilepsy.
<sarcasm>
That's an excellent indicator of physical enhancement drug abuse.
>
> :>There's nothing false about the premise.
> :>If there were any lies you could show them to be so, but instead you
> just
> :>throw
> :>unfounded insults at me - the first action of every bully and blaggard!
>
> You started this discussion with a whine about people who demand
> cites. The historical fact is not one instance of any drug use has
> ever been found in any one of the three athletes you mentioned.
> That's the proof in and of itself which shoots down your wild claims
> and lies.
>
Did _I_ demand a cite???
>
> :>Regards,
> :>Greg.P.
> :>
> :>BTW any word from Chris and Phuxey?
>
> Nothing from Chris. I suspect Nicky might still be in touch with him.
> Nick and Phuxie are posting on az.general [ Seth more so than Nicky]
> if you want to *PING* them over there.
Life isn't the same without those three - at least we still have Larry the
Frog!