Photog Says She Purposely Made Glenn Beck Look Bad On Time Cover
Clay
September 18, 2009
As was noted yesterday when news broke about Time Magazine’s cover
story on Glenn Beck, the image used is from a photo shoot last year by
Jill Greenberg.
It’s an interesting choice. Greenberg is known for her liberal views –
and she’s being very upfront about her use of this opportunity to take
revenge on those who attacked her.
Greenberg brought up the cover on Twitter (she goes by the ironic
handle @JillManipulator).
Here’s her comment:
"...exactly a year after my right wing attack, i am retouching one of
my attackers for a magazine cover. leaving blemishes of course..."
Time may not have known Greenberg’s intent here, but this is a very
blatant admittance on her part that she’s purposely making Beck look
bad. And although Time may not have known that, they had to have known
her background.
She’s the same photographer who took purposely awful pictures of Sen.
John McCain during the campaign, and then photoshopped them on her own
site to make him look even worse. The Atlantic said they wouldn’t pay
her for her work because she “went beyond the parameters of her
contract.”
Now she’s got her photos on a major outlet again. Sweet revenge for
the “manipulator.”
---------------------------
-C-
SFTV_troy
> my attackers for a magazine cover. leaving blemishes of course..."
>
> Time may not have known Greenberg’s intent here, but this is a very
> blatant admittance on her part that she’s purposely making Beck look
> bad. And although Time may not have known that, they had to have known
> her background.
Time knew it. The journalists are just smart enough to keep their
anti-conservative hatred silent, and their mouths shut.
Clay
any smarter... poor thing:
...
> On Sep 20, 8:22 am, Clay <clays0nl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > by Steve Krakauer
> > September 18, 2009
>
> > As was noted yesterday when news broke aboutTimeMagazine’scover
> > story onGlennBeck, the image used is from a photo shoot last year by
> > Jill Greenberg.
>
> > It’s an interesting choice. Greenberg is known for her liberal views –
> > andshe’sbeing very upfront about her use of this opportunity to take
> > revenge on those who attacked her.
>
> > Greenberg brought up thecoveron Twitter (shegoes by the ironic
> > handle @JillManipulator).
>
> > Here’s her comment:
> > "...exactly a year after my right wing attack, i am retouching one of
> > my attackers for a magazinecover. leaving blemishes of course..."
>
> >Timemay not have known Greenberg’s intent here, but this is a very
> > blatant admittance on her part thatshe’spurposelymakingBecklook
> >bad. And althoughTimemay not have known that, they had to have known
> > her background.
>
> >She’sthe same photographer who tookpurposelyawful pictures of Sen.
> > John McCain during the campaign, and then photoshopped them on her own
> > site to make himlookeven worse. The Atlantic said they wouldn’t pay
> > her for her work becauseshe“went beyond the parameters of her
> > contract.”
>
> > Nowshe’sgot her photos on a major outlet again. Sweet revenge for
> > the “manipulator.”
>
> > ---------------------------
>
> > -C-
>
> And the editors who picked the picture to use must have been
> communists, doesn't matter what you take it's what gets bought that's
> important.
Jeez, Homo... your ignorance knows no bounds, does it?
*sigh*
> And typical Coward Claysie, it's always some one else's fault.
Fault? Jeez, Homo... your stupidity knows no bounds, does it?
*sigh*
> His hero's, the right wing, are all remarkably
> handsome or beautiful but we evil socialists
1. I'm sure you meant to type the word "heroes"... but you're too much
of a dunce to have known that, Homo.
2. You're (note the correct usage) a "socialist"???
You're (note the correct usage) too (note the correct usage) much of a
dumbass to even know what that means, Homo.
Your childhood was a waste, Kev. It would've been nice if you had
graduated high school and then gone onto college. You would be a
smarter homosexual... you definitely go against that typecast.
================================================
Dumbass Kev says he attended law school:
<http://tinyurl.com/57692x>
Dumbass Kev now says he graduated from journalism school:
<http://tinyurl.com/659xho>
=================================================
Liar !!!
-C-
Kevin Cunningham
Wow! Coward Claysie can't answer my post so he attacks me. That's
the first time today! I'm sooooooooooooooooo shocked!
Sorry Coward Claysie, I graduated from high school and university and
you didn't get out of high school. I attended laws school and you
didn't get out of high school.
And I should be impressed, why?
Nancy2
> Here’s her comment:
> "...exactly a year after my right wing attack, i am retouching one of
> my attackers for a magazine cover. leaving blemishes of course..."
I don't see any glaring blemishes - Glenn Beck can look nasty all by
his lonesome. I don't give any credit to the photog for that....
N.
Ubiquitous
>As was noted yesterday when news broke about Time Magazine�s cover
>story on Glenn Beck, the image used is from a photo shoot last year by
>Jill Greenberg.
>
>It�s an interesting choice. Greenberg is known for her liberal views �
>and she�s being very upfront about her use of this opportunity to take
>revenge on those who attacked her.
>
>Greenberg brought up the cover on Twitter (she goes by the ironic
>handle @JillManipulator).
>
>Here�s her comment:
>"...exactly a year after my right wing attack, i am retouching one of
>my attackers for a magazine cover. leaving blemishes of course..."
Gee, I assumed as much as when I first saw it.
It's sad to see that woman isn't professional enough to perform her job.
--
It's now time for healing, and for fixing the damage the Democrats did
to America.
Clay
each and every day <LOL>:
...
HEHEHEHEHEHE... stating the truth is NOT attacking your dumbass, Homo.
> Sorry Coward Claysie, I graduated from high school and university and
> you didn't get out of high school.
Yet... you don't know 5th grade grammar.
Why is that, shit-for-brains?
Can't wait for your reply, Homo.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
ArmyOfDorkness
<Whal...@lie.com> wrote in message
news:32igb51gv3vad6f4d...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:20:36 -0400, Ubiquitous
> <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>
>>Gee, I assumed as much as when I first saw it.
>
> We assume you believe everything limpballs, Beck,
> O'really, Hannity and Coulter tell you
>
> But that's why comic relief is so easy to come by from
> the right these days.
He knew it had to be retouched because he couldn't see Becks halo.
Ubiquitous
>Considering the American you know was built by
>democrats, their policy, their aid in elevating the
>middle class to it's stature
Troll O Meter
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
___________________________________________________
| | | | | | | | | | |
---------------------------------------------------
^
|