Re: #Coulter - Joe Biden: Hair We Can Believe In
Clay
...
> Kurt Nicklas <knick...@bellsouth.net> wrote innews:MPG.23203efd2...@news.aioe.org:
>
>
> > Joe Biden: Hair We Can Believe In
> > Townhall.com ^ | August 28, 2008 | Ann Coulter
>
> > Posted on Thursday, August 28, 2008 1:32:49 AM by Kaslin
>
> > Vice presidential candidate Joe Biden's speech at the Democratic
> > National Convention was great. As I write, he hasn't given it yet, but
> > these are my favorite parts:
>
> > "General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity
> > for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization:
> > Come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev,
> > tear down this wall!"
>
> > "Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth, upon this
> > continent, a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the
> > proposition that all men are created equal."
>
> > "These Republican leaders have not been content with attacks on me, or
> > my wife, or on my sons. No, not content with that, they now include my
> > little dog, Fala. Well, of course, I don't resent attacks, and my family
> > doesn't resent attacks, but Fala does resent them. You know, Fala is
> > Scotch, and ... his Scotch soul was furious. He has not been the same
> > dog since."
>
> > Everyone acts as though Biden's outrageous plagiarism of British Labor
> > Leader Neil Kinnock's speech during the 1988 presidential campaign was
> > just a mistake, a slip of the tongue. Biden, his defenders say, had
> > credited Kinnock in other speeches, but simply forgot to add the
> > attribution one time.
>
> Coulter complains about plagarism. Oh, the irony.
>
> In "Godless," Coulter writes:
>
> "The massive Dickey-Lincoln Dam, a $227 million hydroelectric
> project proposed on upper St. John River in Maine, was halted
> by the discovery of the Furbish lousewort, a plant previously
> believed to be extinct."
>
> An article that ran in 1999 in Maine’s Portland-Press Herald
> contains the following passage:
>
> "The massive Dickey-Lincoln Dam, a $227 million hydroelectric
> project proposed on upper St. John River, is halted by the
> discovery of the Furbish lousewort, a plant believed to be
> extinct."
>
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13803982/
1) The article in the cite is more than 2 years old. Any resolution?
Any follow-up?
2) The article in the cite did not cite the supposed plagiarized
articles. Hmmm... curious. Any help with that?
3) "MakingSureNeophyteBarack(is)Chosen"... 'nuff said.
-C-
Clay
...
> "Mitchell Holman" <Noem...@comcast.com> wrote in message
>
> news:Xns9B08454E...@216.196.97.131...
>
> > Kurt Nicklas <knick...@bellsouth.net> wrote in
> That's not just irony. That's an irony bunkerbuster.
>
> JESUS!
Liberal Lunacy 101:
1) A plane did not crash into the Pentagon on 9/11/01. It was
probably some kind of missle (more than likely, American).
2) It was a military plane (more than likely, American) that struck
the WTC towers on 9/11/01.
3) The reason why the towers fell on 9/11/01 was b/c the owner of WTC
ordered that pre-installed dynamite charges be detonated.
4) All top officials of the current administration will soon be
arrested, shipped to The Hague and then put on trial for war crimes.
Of course, soon thereafter, they will be convicted and sentenced to
harsh punishment.
5) In 2004, George W. Bush did not win Ohio and thus did not win the
last presidential election. When well-paid lawyers finally prove that
this is the case, President Bush and his whole administration will be
forced to vacate the White House, making room for the true winner,
John F.
Kerry, to take his rightful place.
6) A Democrat dominated Congress will impeach, try, convict and then
remove President George W. Bush from the office of President of The
United States for "crimes"... whatever those crimes are.
7) A vast, secret & insidious young boy/kidnap/pedophile conspiracy
has existed and continues to exist to this day. Although it is mainly
run by unknown right-wing zealots, some liberal sell-outs are also
involved. This ring is so underground that only certain people, who
tune into
a very special frequency (Kenneth) are the only folks on the planet
who know about it.
8) Ann Coulter is a man masquerading as a female best-selling
Conservative author.
I don't think that even *JESUS*... can help the lunatic left.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
Gandalf Grey
"Clay" <clays...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9fe91628-911d-4df1...@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Liberal Lunacy 101:
==============
[snip off topic sniveling to]
8) Ann Coulter is a man masquerading as a female best-selling
Conservative author.
=========================================
Got anything to say on the actual subject, Clay?
I didn't think so?
Oh, by the way: bulk buying of Coulter's screeds by right wing think tanks
don't constitute "best selling"
Clay
...
> "Clay" <clays0nl...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Which one caused your pain, Gandalf? Was it...
1) A plane did not crash into the Pentagon on 9/11/01. It was
probably some kind of missle (more than likely, American).
2) It was a military plane (more than likely, American) that struck
the WTC towers on 9/11/01.
3) The reason why the towers fell on 9/11/01 was b/c the owner of WTC
ordered that pre-installed dynamite charges be detonated.
Or the combination?
> Oh, by the way: bulk buying of Coulter's screeds by right wing think tanks
> don't constitute "best selling"
I'm really reluctant to do this to ya, Gandalf... but what the hell...
Cite.
*snicker*
-C-
Gandalf Grey
==========================
Why run away from the question, Clay? What does your off-topic screed have
to do with the question?
Is it the same reason that you ran away from my other answers to your
questions?
Are you only capable of flaming?
> Oh, by the way: bulk buying of Coulter's screeds by right wing think tanks
> don't constitute "best selling"
I'm really reluctant to do this to ya, Gandalf... but what the hell...
Cite.
http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=57&aid=52208
http://hnn.us/roundup/comments/53627.html
Iarnrod
I'm sorry, but what the heck does the above have to do with liberals?
I don't know any liberals who believe that 9/11 nonsense; the 9/11
"truth" movement is made up mostly of Ron Paul type libertarians and
anti-government kooks.
Clay
Uhhh... why did you, Gandalf? Twice (and counting).
> Is it the same reason that you ran away from my other answers to your
> questions?
GWBush and the case in the courts? Simple, the case is still in
litigation, Gandalf. Point blank and period. Even you should be able
to comprehend that... can't ya?
> Are you only capable of flaming?
HEHEHEHEHE... where is the flame in this thread, Gandalf? Was it from
ME or... was it from YOU? Look closely.
*snicker*
> > Oh, by the way: bulk buying of Coulter's screeds by right wing think tanks
> > don't constitute "best selling"
>
> I'm really reluctant to do this to ya, Gandalf... but what the hell...
>
> Cite.
>
> http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=57&aid=52208
OPINION... opinions are like assholes, everybody has one.
> http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E05EED6153CF936A35753...
Broken link
> http://hnn.us/roundup/comments/53627.html
1) OPINION... very well researched, but OPINION nonetheless.
2) The author's only source for "daggers" is the NYTimes. Not
journalistically professional.
3) Multiple sources have Ann Coulter (among others) as "best-selling
authors". Is the whole world incorrect and only the author correct?
Pretty good "screeds"... but hardly "cites".
IMHO
-C-
Gandalf Grey
=========================================
From you, Clay. So now we've established that you can't actually discuss
anything. Glad to have that settled.
If you want to be nothing but a troll that's up to you.
===================================
*snicker*
======
The mark of a true troll.
Clay
On Aug 28, 12:01 pm, "Gandalf Grey" is very confused... it's early for
him... perhaps not enuf coffee, so he's forgiven:
...
Scroll up, Gandalf... I just discussed EVERYTHING you brought up..
> If you want to be nothing but a troll that's up to you.
Hmmm... questions asked and I answered said questions. What more is
required?
Or is this a "Gandalf Dodge"? Be careful with the answer b/c I've
seen you do it b4.
> ===================================
>
> *snicker*
> ======
>
> The mark of a true troll.
I've read better from you, Gandalf. I know, for a fact, you can do
better.
It's clear you need another (or more) cup(s) of coffee.
I'll wait.
-C-
FDR
Coulter likened the widows of 9/11 victims to terrorists. So that
discredits her as a human being.
Gandalf Grey
"Clay" <Clays...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ebaf9860-a548-40a9...@k7g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
All I see coming out of you is the same old troll crap.
I got no use for you at this point, you can't discuss an issue and all
you're really good at is appending brainless claims of victory to arguments
you not only haven't won, you haven't even engaged in.
Sorry, but I've got no time for trolls.
Let me introduce you to my killfile.
FDR
Ahh Gandalf. Clay is just some program bot developed by terrorists to
cause discontent. Please kill file or ignore the Clay terrorist bot.
Gandalf Grey
"FDR" <fdr@kjdfgkdfkl> wrote in message
news:caKdnf5TWfpmSCvV...@giganews.com...
Ann gave up on the whole human being thing long ago. She's special. The
scientists at the genetics lab all said so.
I'm Proud of Barak
"FDR" <fdr@kjdfgkdfkl> wrote in message
news:caKdnf5TWfpmSCvV...@giganews.com...
Two days after the September 11, 2001, terror attacks, Coulter wrote about
Muslims: "We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert
them to Christianity." She was fired from the right-wing National Review
Online in late 2001 for this comment. Since then, she has not changed her
position: In her new book, How to Talk to a Liberal, she wrote: "I am often
asked if I still think we should invade their [Muslim] countries, kill their
leaders, and convert them to Christianity. The answer is: Now more than
ever!"
Clay
fast as he can <LOL>:
...
> "Clay" <ClaysRi...@gmail.com> wrote in message
*YAWN*
It's the same cowardice with you, Gandalf... no progress at all. No
maturity whatsoever.
It's pretty damn sad.
You get all frustrated when confronted by someone with brains... and
then you have a hissy-fit and run.
Or is it more like "pranced" away? Who knows?
"Why is this day different than any other day?"
Too motherfucking funny.
-C-
Clay
right in <LOL>:
...
Make sure you brush off your knees when you're finished.
Too fucking funny.
-C-
I'm Proud of Barak
On Aug 28, 7:48 am, Mitchell Holman wrote:
...
with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building."
Clay's kind of guy!
Arbusto Harken
six little straw men...
FDR
Said the terroist Bot
>
> Too fucking funny.
>
> -C-
FDR
Sort of like a demoness of hell.
Gandalf Grey
"FDR" <fdr@kjdfgkdfkl> wrote in message
Ann's a good little disaster capitalist. She's just opening up previously
unexploited territory.
Mitchell Holman
f17e81...@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:
> On Aug 28, 7:48 am, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> ...
>
>> Kurt Nicklas <knick...@bellsouth.net> wrote
innews:MPG.23203efd2a3b172698
> 97...@news.aioe.org:
Coulter got caught plagarazing an article, word for
word, and she has the balls to complain about the plagarism
of others?
> 2) The article in the cite did not cite the supposed plagiarized
> articles. Hmmm... curious. Any help with that?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,202626,00.html
http://www.americanfamilyvoices.org/amfeed/281/am-feed---july-11-after-
rebukes-changes-in-store-in-war-on-terror
Kurt Nicklas
> Clay <clays0nl...@gmail.com> wrote in news:4a0be7bc-d136-4c7d-8a38-
> f17e81c36...@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:
>
> > On Aug 28, 7:48 am, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> > ...
>
> >> Kurt Nicklas <knick...@bellsouth.net> wrote
>
> innews:MPG.23203efd2a3b172698
>
>
>
>
>
Sorry, Flyboy but NOWHERE in the cite is any mention made of Coulter
"getting caught" plagerizing a column word for word. It just didn't
happen and
only someone as desperately stupid would even try it on.
Facts ONE, HOLLOWMAN zero.
---------------------
Mitchel Holloman on gun rights:
"What militia do you belong to and who regulates it?"
--------- 1/17/08
Mitchell Holman
adc1-419...@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:
Copycatty Coulter Pilfers Prose: Pro
New York Post
July 2, 2006 -- Conservative scribe Ann Coulter cribbed liberally
in her latest book, "Godless," according to a plagiarism expert.
John Barrie, the creator of a leading plagiarism-recognition system,
claimed he found at least three instances of what he calls "textbook
plagiarism" in the leggy blond pundit's "Godless: the Church of
Liberalism" after he ran the book's text through the company's digital
iThenticate program.
He also says he discovered verbatim lifts in Coulter's weekly column,
which is syndicated to more than 100 newspapers, including the Fort
Lauderdale (Fla.) Sun-Sentinel and Augusta (Ga.) Chronicle.
Barrie, CEO of iParadigms, told The Post that one 25-word passage from
the "Godless" chapter titled "The Holiest Sacrament: Abortion" appears
to have been lifted nearly word for word from Planned Parenthood literature
published at least 18 months before Coulter's 281-page book was released.
A separate, 24-word string from the chapter "The Creation Myth" appeared
about a year earlier in the San Francisco Chronicle with just one word
change - "stacked" was changed to "piled."
Another 33-word passage that appears five pages into "Godless" allegedly
comes from a 1999 article in the Portland (Maine) Press Herald.
Meanwhile, many of the 344 citations Coulter includes in "Godless" "are
very misleading," said Barrie, who holds a Ph.D. from the University of
California at Berkeley, where he specialized in pattern recognition.
"They're used purely to try and give the book a higher level of credibility
- as if it's an academic work. But her sloppiness in failing to properly
attribute many other passages strips it of nearly all its academic
merits," he told The Post.
Barrie says he also ran Coulter's Universal Press columns from the past
12 months through iThenticate and found similar patterns of cribbing.
Her Aug. 3, 2005, column, "Read My Lips: No New Liberals," about U.S.
Supreme Court Justice David Souter, includes six passages, ranging from
10 to 48 words each, that appeared 15 years earlier in the same order in
an L.A. Times article, headlined "Liberals Leery as New Clues Surface on
Souter's Views."
But nowhere in that column does she mention the L.A. Times or the story's
writer, David G. Savage.
Her June 29, 2005, column, "Thou Shalt Not Commit Religion," incorporates
10 facts on National Endowment for the Arts-funded work that originally
appeared in the same order in a 1991 Heritage Foundation report, "The
National Endowment for the Arts: Misusing Taxpayers' Money." But again,
the Heritage Foundation isn't credited.
"Just as Coulter plays free and loose with her citations in 'Godless,'
she obviously does the same in her columns," Barrie said.
Coulter did not respond to requests for comment.
---------------------------------------------------
http://www.yuricareport.com/Religion/CoulterPlagiarismInGodless.html
Clay
stupidity <LOL>:
...
Clay
not the only one:
...
> Clay <clays0nl...@gmail.com> wrote in news:4a0be7bc-d136-4c7d-8a38-
> f17e81c36...@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:
>
> > On Aug 28, 7:48 am, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> > ...
>
> >> Kurt Nicklas <knick...@bellsouth.net> wrote
>
>
So... the answer to my question is... there wasn't any resolution to
the charge; the charge was never proven without a doubt; there was no
follow-up.
Thanks for that, Mitch.
> > 2) The article in the cite did not cite the supposed plagiarized
> > articles. Hmmm... curious. Any help with that?
>
> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,202626,00.html
Same quoted story... nothing new and no answers to this one either.
Here is the first sentence to your story:
"The syndicator of Ann Coulter's newspaper column is looking into
allegations that the right-wing pundit has lifted material from other
sources."
Question (again)... Coulter's column is STILL syndicated. So I guess
the results of the investigation was that she did not steal
material... right? Or wrong?
> http://www.americanfamilyvoices.org/amfeed/281/am-feed---july-11-after-
> rebukes-changes-in-store-in-war-on-terror
Just another repeat of the charge.
Again... this supposedly happened TWO YEARS AGO. Has no one proven
the charge to be true?
Can't wait.
-C-
trotsky
> 8) Ann Coulter is a man masquerading as a female best-selling
> Conservative author.
How many women have Adam's apples?
trotsky
> Ann gave up on the whole human being thing long ago. She's special. The
> scientists at the genetics lab all said so.
Yes, while other scientists were creating test tube babies these
particular scientists created a test tube asshole.
trotsky
> Make sure you brush off your knees when you're finished.
>
> Too fucking funny.
Voice of experience.
Kurt Nicklas
> Kurt Nicklas <nickl...@bellsouth.net> wrote in news:c400ef36-23fd-481b-
> adc1-4197a06f2...@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:
You made the claim that "Coulter got caught plagarazing(sic) an
article
word for word". The below does not support your silly claim.
Just how stupid are you?
> http://www.yuricareport.com/Religion/CoulterPlagiarismInGodless.html- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -