Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Classifying Native Americans

0 views
Skip to first unread message

climber

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 6:54:46 PM12/24/09
to
Has there been a recognized study showing anthropological varities.
This forum on europeans shows how fine the lines can be.

climber

climber

unread,
Dec 24, 2009, 7:02:10 PM12/24/09
to

YouPick

unread,
Dec 25, 2009, 11:13:29 AM12/25/09
to

"climber" <coled...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ed3ff359-6caa-405f...@j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

http://forums.skadi.net/forumdisplay.php?f=238
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Look at the *word..."Classifying"....Nd if you do not find it SUCKS...then I
might perhaps tell you that a closer look at it will revel secrets of untold
wealth to you.

:)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

climber

unread,
Dec 25, 2009, 3:47:51 PM12/25/09
to
On Dec 25, 9:13 am, "YouPick" <gw-geo...@shaw.ca> wrote:
> "climber" <coledenk...@gmail.com> wrote in message

Here is another site to visit:

http://forum.stirpes.net/physical-anthropology/

More on asian types; I believe the first site I noted
have more on halogroups. If not google the term.

climber

tk

unread,
Dec 28, 2009, 9:54:31 AM12/28/09
to
For a long time, the standard, although now outdated and widely discredited,
was Georg K. Neumamnn's "Archaeology and Race in the American Indian" in
_Archaeology of Eastern United States_ edited by James B. Griffin (U Chicago
Press, 1952).

tk


"climber" <coled...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:d21d4f6c-e3c6-4ea1...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...

0 new messages