Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Vernon Bellecourt fingers Ward Churchill (and David Hill)

6 views
Skip to first unread message

O'Brien

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 2:42:24 PM12/29/09
to

O'Brien

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 2:44:37 PM12/29/09
to

runningwolf

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 8:25:41 PM12/29/09
to
On Dec 29, 12:44 pm, "O'Brien" <sealsor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 29, 12:42 pm, "O'Brien" <sealsor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >http://aimovement.org/mckiernan.htmhttp://aimovement.org/Hill/FBIMpls...
>
> Make thathttp://aimovement.org/mckiernan.html

Noses and ear lobes elongate with age.
One could expect a longer nose on an older version of the same person.
So one would have to computerize the younger picture to see if it
matches the one on the right.
The septum, jaw line and attitude of the head is similar.
The under chin, of course, is fuller, the nasolabial folds more
pronounced, as are the marionette lines.
Which happens, of course, with aging.
What is Churchill now, about 60?

runningwolf

unread,
Dec 29, 2009, 8:44:27 PM12/29/09
to

One can also estimate the height of the man by knowing the length of
the rifle.
If it is an M-16, it is one of the older models or possibly an M-14.
Too bad we can't get a better view of the rifle.
The M-14 is by far a better sniper or marksman rifle than the M-16,
just as the Colt Woodsman is a superior pistol for accuracy.
A casual observer may possibly not be able to tell the difference
twixt the 14 and 16.
.

O'Brien

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 12:27:33 PM12/30/09
to
> .- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

It will be interesting to see if Kevin McKiernan, the photog of this
pic, will be called as a witness in the upcoming Aquash trial(s), and
if any lawyer actually asks him about this and if he has any other
photos of the same person for more detail and information.

0 new messages