Teaching you all the Dick Strong protocol (website identification)
LIBERATOR
navigate and graphics are never overbearing to the design, they're
always in perfect synergy. Below I have a list of RUSH owned
corporations to compare too. Open numerous tabs to compare side by
side. The RUSH sites are onerous to navigate but Dicks are not.
http://www.nakheel.com/en/corporate
https://www.wellsfargo.com/investing/mutual_funds/
http://www.metavante.com/index.htm
http://www.qwest.com/ - compare to Sprint
http://www.att.com/ - compare to Sprint
http://www.avaya.com/usa/ - Compare to Cisco or Sprint
http://www.ciena.com/ - Compare to Cisco see the amazing difference
here with a huge graphic yet perfectly synergized with the design,
where RUSH on Comcast or Cisco tried this as well on Sprint and
nowhere near is the nice pleasantness.
http://www.amd.com/us/products/Pages/processors.aspx
http://www.northwesternmutual.com/ - Compare to PriceWaterhouseCoopers
or Koh
http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_XA/xa/index.htm
http://thomsonreuters.com/about/
http://www.radware.com/ - one of my favorite Dick Strong owned
corporations, compare it to Juniper or Cisco, you'll see the Dick
Strong excellence in website design
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RUSH owned corporations/websites.
http://www.cisco.com/ -
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/products_ios_cisco_ios_software_category_home.html
Cisco since has changed and tried to replicate Dick Strongs style, but
open the site and compare it to any one of the Dick Strong sites by
nagivating through both simultaneously, you'll see the grace does not
remain as it does with Dicks sites through & through. The second URL
takes you out of the "masquerade" of nicety, they altered the website
due to my posts about Dick Strongs nice websites which remain nice
throughout navigation, as the second URL is 1 click out of the
homepage the nicety is long gone. Compare to Avaya or Ciena.
http://www.intel.com/#/en_US_01
- again it comes accross like it's nice, but the graphics do not
harmonize with the design for pleasant symmetrical feel of navigation.
This site as well as Cisco and IBM try to replicate Dick Strongs style
only by me posting did RUSH catch on and then change these sites to
what they are now, previously they were scatter mess like all their
other sites.
- same as above, note the "total containment of grace" is not
occurring but definitely was attempted. Again these are the nicest
sites RUSH has done by knowingly copying Dick Strong sites only after
I posted about this subject.
http://portal.pohub.com/portal/page?_pageid=761,325809&_dad=pogprtl&_schema=POGPRTL
- Rush owned DP World to get lashing from Dubai Worlds debt problem,
compare this board of director design to another board of director
design on any of Dick Strongs sites.
- Again, this is a changed website, it was not like this 6 months ago
http://www.sprint.com/index.html
- same, its been improved but is the trademark design characteristic
of RUSH - slop that is attempted to be masked as neat, compare it to
any one of Dick Strongs sites above. Dick is able to blend evenly
photos with the webdesign so they're complimentary and create a
synergy, with RUSH it's all lopsided and overbearing.
http://www.ibm.com/us/en/ - the homepage is nice but like Cisco one
click and it's all history, no more it was a masquerade. Compare this
to Dell or Hewlett Packard.
http://www.intel.com/products/processor/index.htm?iid=business+processors
- this might have beat Dick (AMD)
http://www.pwc.com/us/en/index.jhtml - compare to Delloite Touche or
Northwestern Mutual Financial Network
http://www.motorola.com/Business/US-EN/Government/ - Compare to Ciena,
Nokia, Avaya or AT&T, or Radware