All are instrumental
how ya feelin' Tokyo
how ya feelin' Copenhagen
It must be painful for the effin' bootleggers right now!
Not unless Prince starts releasing whole shows it won't. Even then they'll
always make money off other shows.
Rudedog
"golem" <golem...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a9b05f32.0301...@posting.google.com...
lol, Premium will have these on their newest release by next week!
I can see it now:
Prince "A New Direction In Music"
1) Xhalation
2) Xcogitate
3) Xemplify
4) Xpectation
5) Xotica
6) Xogenous
7) Xpand
8) Xosphere
9) Xpedition
10) Xenophobia (taken direct from Soundboard) <source the ONA Live set>
BONUS TRACKS Live From Soundboard!!!!
11) Copenhagen Soundcheck
12) Nagoya Soundcheck
13) Osaka Soundcheck
14) Tokyo Soundcheck
isn't really hard since all their releases are nothing but CD-R's
They'll end up using Statik's artwork, and slopping on the extra tracks in a
totally different font.
--
--
Billy
ICQ#: 40523352
Purple Funk
Confidentiality Note: The information contained in this transmission and
document(s)
attached contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended
only for the
use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you
are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication
of this
communication is strictly prohibited. Further, if you are not the intended
recipient,
please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the
original message.
"Kevin McGregor" <mcgregor...@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:avjR9.382$_c1....@news.uswest.net...
: "golem" <golem...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
:
:
Why?...they will be on bootleg, he can't win unless he releases this stuff
officially.
Billy...they'll probably steal this idea from you on the latest Premium 1CDR
coming next week from your favourite French bootlegger.
--
Billy
ICQ#: 40523352
Purple Funk
Confidentiality Note: The information contained in this transmission
and document(s) attached contain privileged and confidential
information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this
communication is strictly prohibited. Further, if you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and
destroy all copies of the original message.
"Richard Dower" <richar...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:av4nf5$812$1...@dorito.esatclear.ie...
:
: "Billy" <funk...@pfunk.com> wrote in message
:
:
:
"Billy" <funk...@pfunk.com> wrote in message
news:av4grc$bmd1q$1...@ID-139244.news.dfncis.de...
> i also edited out the audience noises on the mp3s, muted in
> between the keyboard stabs at the start of xenophobia etc 2 make it sound
> less of a live recording and more of a studio peice 2 fit in with the
other
> trax
What Xenophobia track?, from Indianapolis?.
the i put on the full xpectations, then toyko with the piano bit reversed,
nagoya, osaka, and a composite of copenhagen - the long intro from the old
mp3 spliced with the new mp3 which is at a higher bitrate and sounds
noticeably different. unless ure really paying attention and know where i
made the split its unnoticable really. i edited out the audience applause
on all the live trax so most of them could pass 4 studio trax if u just
stuck the cd on and let it play without really analysing it. also it keeps
the length down 2 a 80.15min disc
so he added empty room, but as its got vocals it dont fit in with the style
of the cd i had already made, so thats cool. originaly b4 the xtra downloads
i put gamillah, instrumental (aka holy river quiet nite mix), we gonna make
it funky, along with full xenophobia and copenhagen
now a download of whole lotta love rock style would b nice, followed by the
accoustic show from the celly...
"Richard Dower" <richar...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:av6md6$tpa$1...@dorito.esatclear.ie...
You reversed it back?...the original file is not supposed to be that way, as
you know.
"Richard Dower" <richar...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:av6o2s$uet$1...@dorito.esatclear.ie...
Thats rain...it's not hiss, that was something added no question, i put all
the music together myself...put them chronological: Tokyo/Osaka/Nagoya. They
are all seemless and flow as if you were listening to a near 20 minute
soundboard soundcheck recording.
>> New downloads are available at the NPGMC
>> Soundcheck Nagoya 8 min
>> Soundcheck Osaka 5.55 min
>> Soundcheck Tokyo 5.09 min
>>
>> All are instrumental
>
>how ya feelin' Tokyo
>how ya feelin' Copenhagen
>
>It must be painful for the effin' bootleggers right now!
Actually, no. This is simply giving them more source material.
--
Bart Van Hemelen
http://pr1nc3.com/BVH/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking for answer? Why not try:
http://www.prince.org/faq/
http://www.prince.org/
http://pr1nc3.com/google.asp
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"History has shown that one of the best deterrents to pirated product is
providing legitimate product at appropriate prices. In the music industry,
we have already seen that people will gladly pay fair prices for
legally-produced product even when it can be easily reproduced and
unlawful copies can be easily acquired."
-- excerpt from a holiday message by Walt Disney CEO, Michael Eisner,
to a vast number of Disney employees, 2000
Full text @ http://www.2600.com/news/display.shtml?id=326
i just found after playing around with the tracks that what i posted earlier
was the better tracklisting in my opinion, but they didnt matter 2 much,
tokyo seemed 2 follow the studio stuff the best, cuz it was mellow and
slower than the 8 min track
"Richard Dower" <richar...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:av6ppv$uto$1...@dorito.esatclear.ie...
Are you drunk (again) ?, i am refering to the NPGMC files and the fact that
some added effect like rain was added as a tag, not that i tagged anything.
And yes...i did not edit that stuff out myself. I pretty much kept the files
intact, save for a few things i did for my own taste and to make my own
disc.
>
> i just found after playing around with the tracks that what i posted
earlier
> was the better tracklisting in my opinion, but they didnt matter 2 much,
> tokyo seemed 2 follow the studio stuff the best, cuz it was mellow and
> slower than the 8 min track
Not it's not...you wanna add live tracks to an album ?, i kept the files
chronological for good reason...the concerts are performed in chronological
order and should be presented as such.
Same as how i will do the Copenhagen files all in sequence.
In response to:
> >It must be painful for the effin' bootleggers right now!
> Actually, no. This is simply giving them more source material.
Irrelevant to bootleggers for sabotage purposes.
Premium-rated material for pirates
but ure still the only person who never saw that joke
>
>
> >
> > i just found after playing around with the tracks that what i posted
> earlier
> > was the better tracklisting in my opinion, but they didnt matter 2 much,
> > tokyo seemed 2 follow the studio stuff the best, cuz it was mellow and
> > slower than the 8 min track
>
> Not it's not...you wanna add live tracks to an album ?, i kept the files
> chronological for good reason...the concerts are performed in
chronological
> order and should be presented as such.
>
> Same as how i will do the Copenhagen files all in sequence.
when an artist records an album they rarely sequence it in the exact order
of the way the trax were recorded. artists can spend literally months
decieding the running order of albums. 1 of the main problems with ure sets
and the work is the running order. y sequence trax in a strict chrono order
as opposed 2 a coherent and enjoyable order? 4 example with the work, keep
trax grouped by period but in a way that sounds good. likewise a little
artistic license in compiling a cd can add 2 the listening experience, maybe
removing a few seconds here and there may make the track less "complete",
but if the cd sounds a lot better 4 it, then who is complaining? music is
recorded 2 b listened 2 and enjoyed, thus anything that adds 2 the enjoyment
is good
>
>
>
> 1 of the main problems with ure sets
> and the work is the running order. y sequence trax in a strict chrono
order
> as opposed 2 a coherent and enjoyable order?
My Lib discs were presented in chronological order for a good reason,
according to recording dates, it made more sense to me to do it this
way...and it had never really been done like that before.
ure discs r done and dusted so thats all over with, but its something 2 bear
in mind 4 future releases. had the work tracklist been arranged with more
care, it couldve made the work a killer set as opposed 2 a big collection of
outtakes thats a drudge to go thru.
"Richard Dower" <richar...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:av87e1$gob$1...@dorito.esatclear.ie...
Again...i had my own mind how to do this, i wanted to assemble them in
chronological order as many other outtake boots were songs from different
periods, everyone has a different idea as to how and sequence a disc.
> ure discs r done and dusted so thats all over with, but its something 2
bear
> in mind 4 future releases. had the work tracklist been arranged with more
> care, it couldve made the work a killer set as opposed 2 a big collection
of
> outtakes thats a drudge to go thru.
Why are you refering to a bootleg that has nothing to do with me?, how many
times do i have to say it?, i am talking about my own Lib discs and nothing
else.
but y? 4 what reason would u wanna do this? is keeping strict chrono order
more important than making a cd that u would wanna listen 2?
>
>
>
> > ure discs r done and dusted so thats all over with, but its something 2
> bear
> > in mind 4 future releases. had the work tracklist been arranged with
more
> > care, it couldve made the work a killer set as opposed 2 a big
collection
> of
> > outtakes thats a drudge to go thru.
>
> Why are you refering to a bootleg that has nothing to do with me?, how
many
> times do i have to say it?, i am talking about my own Lib discs and
nothing
> else.
y? cuz im using these discs as a gr8 example of how a fucked up tracklist
order ruined what couldve been a gr8 set of discs. if they ditched the
related artists stuff and the npgmc stuff, except the older stuff, they
couldve made it a killer set. having stuff like the purple rain trax split
over discs really just spoils the flow. this wasnt some quick and cheap
compilation, so they couldve taken a bit more time and thought in2 making it
an enjoyable set 2 listen 2
and i never said u had anything 2 do with this set. its obvious as it has
been cleaned 2 the point of unlistenable no return in some cases, wheras ure
sets have brazillian rain forests overdubbed on top
>
>
>
>
Two reasons....to do something not really done before on boot or fan CDR,
and second...to have a documentation of studio outtakes following the
sequence they were recorded.
> y? cuz im using these discs as a gr8 example of how a fucked up tracklist
> order ruined what couldve been a gr8 set of discs. if they ditched the
> related artists stuff and the npgmc stuff, except the older stuff, they
> couldve made it a killer set.
They made the creative decisions and decided on the sequence, it made sense
to them and that is how they wanted it.
having stuff like the purple rain trax split
> over discs really just spoils the flow. this wasnt some quick and cheap
> compilation, so they couldve taken a bit more time and thought in2 making
it
> an enjoyable set 2 listen 2
They took over a year and the sequencing of discs went through countless
configurations until they settled upon the final sequence they released and
were happy with.
> and i never said u had anything 2 do with this set. its obvious as it has
> been cleaned 2 the point of unlistenable no return in some cases, wheras
ure
> sets have brazillian rain forests overdubbed on top
Again any dodgy filtering on some, and i stress it's just some, tracks were
things sent to them and they decided to use them.
lol...well then, you can't win. Hiss or filtered to death....maybe it's time
you let some of your high quality stuff out?
so u would rather have trax on a cd in strict chrono order, rather than an
enjoyable running order, or even in the order the trax were originally
planned 2 b sequenced? and not only that, u thought that the ppl listening 2
ure sets would appreciate ure choice of strict chrono order, rather than an
enjoyable running order?
>
>
>
> > y? cuz im using these discs as a gr8 example of how a fucked up
tracklist
> > order ruined what couldve been a gr8 set of discs. if they ditched the
> > related artists stuff and the npgmc stuff, except the older stuff, they
> > couldve made it a killer set.
>
> They made the creative decisions and decided on the sequence, it made
sense
> to them and that is how they wanted it.
well if that makes sense 2 them 2 go by what they would want as opposed 2
what the consumers would prefer, then they don't appear 2 have very good
business sense. that collection couldve been an essential set 4 newbies and
collectors alike, but they fucked it up completely with the running order.
it was such a dissapointment.
>
>
> having stuff like the purple rain trax split
> > over discs really just spoils the flow. this wasnt some quick and cheap
> > compilation, so they couldve taken a bit more time and thought in2
making
> it
> > an enjoyable set 2 listen 2
>
> They took over a year and the sequencing of discs went through countless
> configurations until they settled upon the final sequence they released
and
> were happy with.
>
>
> > and i never said u had anything 2 do with this set. its obvious as it
has
> > been cleaned 2 the point of unlistenable no return in some cases, wheras
> ure
> > sets have brazillian rain forests overdubbed on top
>
> Again any dodgy filtering on some, and i stress it's just some, tracks
were
> things sent to them and they decided to use them.
>
> lol...well then, you can't win. Hiss or filtered to death....maybe it's
time
> you let some of your high quality stuff out?
>
by all means reduce the hiss, whoever did the noise reduction went overboard
>
>
Define enjoyable?...to my mind everyone has their own idea how to sequence a
disc, thus no matter what order you present tracks in, someone would say it
is not how they would do it.
What you are talking about here is personal prefrence and taste...there is
no set standard as to how songs should be sequenced to be enjoyable,
enjoyable is whatever that person thinks is nice.
So to avoid getting into debates about how things should be sequenced it
made alot more sense to put tracks in chronogical order.
Thus trying to avoid comments and arguments you have presented.
> well if that makes sense 2 them 2 go by what they would want as opposed 2
> what the consumers would prefer, then they don't appear 2 have very good
> business sense.
It is not for you to say what makes good business sense, they have alot more
experience with making bootlegs and presenting stuff then you have. What
they decided upon is what they wanted and what made business sense to them.
that collection couldve been an essential set 4 newbies and
> collectors alike, but they fucked it up completely with the running order.
> it was such a dissapointment.
In your opinion, and i bet if you sequenced the discs someone else would
chime in and say the tracks are presented in a fucked up order...what you
are talking about here is personal prefrence as to how you or other fans
would do things, this has nothing to do with professional bootleggers would
know about their business and know what they wanted to present to consumers.
> by all means reduce the hiss, whoever did the noise reduction went
overboard
Perhaps...and cycle will continue, the hunt goes on for higher quality
material that will not need to be filtered in anyway.