Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: This Too

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Jason L Greene

unread,
Apr 17, 2008, 1:12:33 PM4/17/08
to
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:53:44 GMT, j...@msn.com wrote:

>of these truths, they have not excluded the other.
>Plurality which is not reduced to unity is confusion; unity which does not
>depend on plurality is tyranny. There is scarcely any other country than
>France in which it is permissible to say that the Council is above the Pope.
>
>872. The Pope is head. Who else is known of all? Who else is recognised by
>all, having power to insinuate himself into all the body, because he holds
>the principal shoot, which insinuates itself everywhere? How easy it was to
>make this degenerate into tyranny! That is why Christ has laid down for them
>this precept: Vos autem non sic.[217]
>
>873. The Pope hates and fears the learned, who do not submit to him at will.
>
>874. We must not judge of what the Pope is by some words of the Fathers--as
>the Greeks said in a council, important rules--but by the acts of the Church
>and the Fathers, and by the canons.
>
>Duo[218] aut tres.219 In unum. Unity and plurality. It is an error to
>exclude one of the two, as the papists do who exclude plurality, or the
>Huguenots who exclude unity.
>
>875. Would the Pope be dishonoured by having h
>

hwo do you know???!

0 new messages