Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

MJ in UK

0 views
Skip to first unread message

mohammedlal

unread,
Mar 9, 2001, 2:01:32 PM3/9/01
to

There was a new programme in the UK last night which I watched, it included
a interview with Uri Geller.

They showed a very close up on his face, even as a fan I have to say it was
a sorry site. I just wish he had never done all that surgery. He looked
more like a man made human.

I just hoped he kept the look he had during the Victory tour.


kemazz

unread,
Mar 9, 2001, 3:16:23 PM3/9/01
to
I personally think Michael is rather cute, but what the hell does that
matter? If he didn't look like Michael Jackson, who else would he look like?
I just don't see what the problem is.

mohammedlal wrote in message ...

Tim Farrow

unread,
Mar 9, 2001, 5:23:28 PM3/9/01
to
This is the problem:

http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/p/nm/20010305/en/mdf21644.html

MOST MEN DON'T WEAR DEEP RED LADY'S LIPSTICK AND HAVE DIMPLE'S IN THE SIDE
OF THEIR NOSE AND HAVE A HOLE CARVED OUT OF THEIR CHIN AND HAVE A WOMAN'S
HAIRCUT AND HAVE SKIN THAT LOOKS LIKE PASTE. PULL YOUR HEAD OUT. HE'S A
FRIGGIN FREAK.

kemazz <sh...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:mWaq6.8299$642.1...@news2.atl...

Dana

unread,
Mar 9, 2001, 5:23:41 PM3/9/01
to
Excuse me for butting in... :) I would just like to say that I think
Michael looks fine now...though he looks kinda sad...but anyway, he looks
fine now, but he also looked fine before any surgery. Besides, what would
it matter if he WASN'T good-looking?? He's a nice guy.

-Dana-


kemazz <sh...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:mWaq6.8299$642.1...@news2.atl...

ilesh.pancholi

unread,
Mar 9, 2001, 6:16:45 PM3/9/01
to
As the biggest MJ fan I have ever met, it is not a nice site to see michael
nowadays :-(. the media keep slaughtering his looks, but it's his musical
talent that he's famous and succesful for and i just hope when the album
comes out, people can see past that. They did when he released HIStory -
which was a controversial time and the media in the UK pretty much killed
him (in media terms) but he got through it successfully as the album did
well and singles went number 1. Jus hope he can pull it off again.

"Dana" <gwsc...@swbell.net> wrote in message
news:WHcq6.84$Lq2....@nnrp1.sbc.net...

Nat

unread,
Mar 9, 2001, 6:37:37 PM3/9/01
to
You! Out of the gene pool!

Nat

unread,
Mar 9, 2001, 6:39:07 PM3/9/01
to
Tim Farrow wrote on 3/9/01 4:23 PM:

> MOST MEN DON'T WEAR DEEP RED LADY'S LIPSTICK

...and it's not deep red. Learn about your colors please, before you
criticize somebody's cosmetics.


Nat

http://discover-net.net/~nbaker

PERVERT2

unread,
Mar 9, 2001, 8:33:32 PM3/9/01
to
very simply put...
Michael Jackson is NOT most men =0)
There problem solved.

>MOST MEN DON'T WEAR DEEP RED LADY'S LIPSTICK AND HAVE DIMPLE'S IN THE SIDE
>OF THEIR NOSE AND HAVE A HOLE CARVED OUT OF T


"...whatever we say or whatever we do, for now let's make a vow to just, Keep
It In The Closet..."
lovetoall P2

kemazz

unread,
Mar 9, 2001, 8:45:30 PM3/9/01
to
Now when he was wearing all the thick pancake makeup, everyone was talking
about how much makeup he's wearing. Now that he's not wearing the pancake
makeup (no he's no wearing the thick base makeup), everyone talking about
how he looks without it.

I think Michael should tell everyone to kiss his ass and continue to live
his life, because it seems like he's damned if he does and damned it he
doesn't.

ilesh.pancholi wrote in message ...

PERVERT2

unread,
Mar 9, 2001, 11:21:53 PM3/9/01
to
>>very simply put...
>>Michael Jackson is NOT most men =0)
>
>Thank god for that.

I Know Right!!!! =)

Magic-child

unread,
Mar 10, 2001, 1:04:45 AM3/10/01
to
We are no better than tabloids when we start demeaning Michael Jackson's looks.
We know and we see the changes and as fans have accepted the changes. This is
Michael's choice in life, the way he wanted it, for whatever reason, it's
Michael's choice. We have no right to speak against it.

Magic-child

unread,
Mar 10, 2001, 1:07:37 AM3/10/01
to
I agree 100% with what you said. Look inside of his heart, nevermind putting
him under a microscope for examination! He does look rather sad doesn't he, I
thought I was reading into something that wasn't there.

Magic-child

unread,
Mar 10, 2001, 1:12:06 AM3/10/01
to
I don't know why he tortures himself in this way to be scrutinized so much by
those who still hate him. No matter how hard poor Michael tries to do something
good, he's always judged by his looks and of course his past record.

When reporting, the media didn't have to write along with the Oxford Speech,
"Child Molestation." Is it necessary, can't they forget it, he wasn't guilty,
and why continue to bring it up?

Nat

unread,
Mar 10, 2001, 10:07:25 AM3/10/01
to
Magic-child wrote on 3/10/01 12:04 AM:

Very well said, Magic.

Nat

http://discover-net.net/~nbaker

Rachael Hughes - Michael Jackson is SEXY!!

unread,
Mar 10, 2001, 11:56:10 AM3/10/01
to
u know what i think, I reckon if he showed his top teeth when he was smiling
hed look gorgeous, but u know, beauty is not skin deep. What really matters
is the person inside and what the press dont understand is how gorgeous and
beautiful he really is. To tell you the truth, i doubt Michael really gives
a flying fuck what tabloids think anymore because he should know by now
whatever he does it wont make a difference, they will still bad mouth him.
Tabloids either like u or hate u from the start, and in Michaels case, im
afriad to say the obviously hate the poor guy, but what can we do? NOTHING,
because they obviously love putting him down because he is so famous. so as
long as Michael has got his fans and knows we dont care what he looks like
or what he wears he will be fine. I know we cant stop the press so we have
to learn to except that they dont like him, and that their are other people
in the world who will never get it into their thick brainless skulls that
Michael is innocent. So instead wastin his time tryin to change the minds of
people he cant get to like him why not put more time into this bloody album
:-)
I dont care what Michael looks like, but personally, i think he has a
gorgeous face and heart.
remember, beauty is in the eye of the beholder

luv Rach xxx

Magic-child <mde-...@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:3AA9C4A9...@prodigy.net...


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.237 / Virus Database: 115 - Release Date: 07/03/01


tr...@icom.net

unread,
Mar 12, 2001, 12:25:56 AM3/12/01
to
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001 19:01:32 -0000, "mohammedlal"
<moham...@ntlworld.com> wrote:

>
>There was a new programme in the UK last night which I watched, it included
>a interview with Uri Geller.
>
>They showed a very close up on his face, even as a fan I have to say it was
>a sorry site. I just wish he had never done all that surgery. He looked
>more like a man made human.
>

Ye looking at the pictures at the university lecture (read circus)
you would have to say he is wierd.
Its hard to believe people paid money to listen to his crap lecture
or in fact that he was invited in the first place
He looks one third male one third female one third ghost and in that
outfit he looked like a 16th century frump.
The point to note is that HE created the monster that he is :(((

Nat

unread,
Mar 12, 2001, 8:46:58 AM3/12/01
to
tr...@icom.net wrote on 3/11/01 23:25:

> Its hard to believe people paid money to listen to his crap lecture
> or in fact that he was invited in the first place

And what is it about the lecture that you didn't like? Have you even read
it?


Nat

http://discover-net.net/~nbaker

0 new messages